RESUMEN
Normal tissue and tumour grafts expressing the same alloantigens often elicit distinct immune responses whereby only normal tissue is rejected. To investigate the mechanisms that underlie these distinct outcomes, we compared the responses of adoptively transferred HY-specific conventional (CD8 and CD4) or regulatory T (Treg) cells in mice bearing HY-expressing tumour, syngeneic male skin graft or both. For local T cell priming, T cell re-circulation, graft localization and retention, skin grafts were more efficient than tumours. Skin grafts were also capable of differentiating CD4 T cells into functional Th1 cells. Donor T cell responses were inversely correlated with tumour progression. When skin graft and tumour transplants were performed sequentially, contemporary graft and tumour burden enhanced CD8 but reduced CD4 T cell responses causing accelerated skin-graft rejection without influencing tumour growth. Although both skin grafts and tumours were able to expand HY-specific Treg cells in draining lymph node (dLN), the proportion of tumour-infiltrating Treg cells was significantly higher than that within skin grafts, correlating with accelerated tumour growth. Moreover, there was a higher level of HY antigen presentation by host APC in tumour-dLN than in graft-dLN. Finally, tumour tissues expressed a significant higher level of IDO, TGFß, IL10 and Arginase I than skin grafts, indicating that malignant but not normal tissue represents a stronger immunosuppressive environment. These comparisons provide important insight into the in vivo mechanisms that conspire to compromise tumour-specific adaptive immunity and identify new targets for cancer immunotherapy.