Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
BMC Infect Dis ; 16: 373, 2016 08 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27495917

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Clinicians frequently prescribe antibiotics inappropriately for acute respiratory infections (ARIs). Our objective was to test information technology-enabled behavioral interventions to reduce inappropriate antibiotic prescribing for ARIs in a randomized controlled pilot test trial. METHODS: Primary care clinicians were randomized in a 2 × 2 × 2 factorial experiment with 3 interventions: 1) Accountable Justifications; 2) Suggested Alternatives; and 3) Peer Comparison. Beforehand, participants completed an educational module. Measures included: rates of antibiotic prescribing for: non-antibiotic-appropriate ARI diagnoses, acute sinusitis/pharyngitis, all other diagnoses/symptoms of respiratory infection, and all three ARI categories combined. RESULTS: We examined 3,276 visits in the pre-intervention year and 3,099 in the intervention year. The antibiotic prescribing rate fell for non-antibiotic-appropriate ARIs (24.7 % in the pre-intervention year to 5.2 % in the intervention year); sinusitis/pharyngitis (50.3 to 44.7 %); all other diagnoses/symptoms of respiratory infection (40.2 to 25.3 %); and all categories combined (38.7 to 24.2 %; all p < 0.001). There were no significant relationships between any intervention and antibiotic prescribing for non-antibiotic-appropriate ARI diagnoses or sinusitis/pharyngitis. Suggested Alternatives was associated with reduced antibiotic prescribing for other diagnoses or symptoms of respiratory infection (odds ratio [OR], 0.62; 95 % confidence interval [CI], 0.44-0.89) and for all ARI categories combined (OR, 0.72; 95 % CI, 0.54-0.96). Peer Comparison was associated with reduced prescribing for all ARI categories combined (OR, 0.73; 95 % CI, 0.53-0.995). CONCLUSIONS: We observed large reductions in antibiotic prescribing regardless of whether or not study participants received an intervention, suggesting an overriding Hawthorne effect or possibly clinician-to-clinician contamination. Low baseline inappropriate prescribing may have led to floor effects. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01454960 .


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Conducta , Educación Médica Continua/métodos , Prescripción Inadecuada/prevención & control , Médicos de Atención Primaria , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Enfermedad Aguda , Adulto , Toma de Decisiones , Sistemas de Apoyo a Decisiones Clínicas , Femenino , Humanos , Prescripción Inadecuada/estadística & datos numéricos , Relaciones Interprofesionales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Faringitis/tratamiento farmacológico , Médicos de Atención Primaria/educación , Médicos de Atención Primaria/psicología , Médicos de Atención Primaria/normas , Proyectos Piloto , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/normas , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Prescripciones/normas , Prescripciones/estadística & datos numéricos , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/tratamiento farmacológico , Sinusitis/tratamiento farmacológico
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA