Anti-thymocyte globulin induction with delayed introduction of tacrolimus preserves renal function in pediatric liver transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: Tacrolimus (TAC)-mediated renal disease occurs in up to 70% of pediatric liver transplant (LT) recipients. The safety and efficacy of renal-sparing immunosuppression using anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) induction and delayed TAC administration has not been studied in children. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of ATG induction on preserving renal function in children within the first year (Y1) post-LT in a single-center retrospective cohort study. METHODS: Children under age 18 years of who received isolated LT from 2008 to 2020 with a GFR < 70 received renal-sparing (RS) protocol consisting of ATG with methylprednisolone (MP), delayed TAC administration, lower initial TAC trough goals, and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). The RS group was matched 1:2 by age and LT indication with standard immunosuppression (SI) group. Changes in renal function as well as adverse events within Y1 post-LT were compared. RESULTS: Forty-four pediatric patients were included in the analysis, of which 13 received RS. As expected, the RS group had significantly lower mean TAC trough levels at 30 days (10.3 vs. 13.2, p = .001) post-LT. Renal function was significantly preserved at 6 (-0.26 vs. 0.21, p = .004) and 12 months (-0.33 vs. 0.11, p = .003) post-LT in the RS versus SI group as measured by mean change in serum creatinine, with similar trends observed in eGFR and cystatin C. ACR, sepsis, viremia, graft loss and mortality occurred at similar rates in both RS and SI groups. CONCLUSION: Induction immunosuppression with ATG and delayed TAC administration in children with renal impairment is safe and effectively preserves renal function during Y1 post-LT.

Characteristics and Outcomes of Sepsis Presenting in Inpatient Pediatric Settings.

OBJECTIVE: The pediatric sepsis literature lacks studies examining the inpatient setting, yet sepsis remains a leading cause of death in children's hospitals. More information is needed about sepsis arising in patients already hospitalized to improve morbidity and mortality outcomes. This study describes the clinical characteristics, process measures, and outcomes of inpatient sepsis cases compared with emergency department (ED) sepsis cases within the Improving Pediatric Sepsis Outcomes data registry from 46 hospitals that care for children. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included Improving Pediatric Sepsis Outcomes sepsis cases from January 2017 to December 2019 with onset in inpatient or ED. We used descriptive statistics to compare inpatient and ED sepsis metrics and describe inpatient sepsis outcomes. RESULTS: The cohort included 26 855 cases; 8.4% were inpatient and 91.6% were ED. Inpatient cases had higher sepsis-attributable mortality (2.0% vs 1.4%, P = .025), longer length of stay after sepsis recognition (9 vs 5 days, P <.001), more intensive care admissions (57.6% vs 54.1%, P = .002), and greater average vasopressor use (18.0% vs 13.6%, P <.001) compared with ED. In the inpatient cohort, >40% of cases had a time from arrival to recognition within 12 hours. In 21% of cases, this time was >96 hours. Improved adherence to sepsis treatment bundles over time was associated with improved 30-day sepsis-attributable mortality for inpatients with sepsis. CONCLUSIONS: Inpatient sepsis cases had longer lengths of stay, more need for intensive care, and higher vasopressor use. Sepsis-attributable mortality was significantly higher in inpatient cases compared with ED cases and improved with improved sepsis bundle adherence.

Predicting aggression, conciliation, and concurrent rumination in escalating conflict.

Interactions are characterized by opposite motives according to game theory. The purpose of this study was to explore how people judge the probability and advisability of conflict reactions in an unfolding dispute within a married couple using latent growth curve modeling (LGCM). Individuals participated in a study using two videotaped scenarios depicting marital conflict in which a spouse comes home after a long day at work only to criticize his or her partner for violating expectations of a good meal. One situation involved male-initiated conflict and female reactance, whereas another illustrated female-initiated conflict and male reactance. Participants were asked to predict the future reactions based on aggressive tactics (e.g., slapping the partner, insulting the partner) or prosocial and forgiving communication (e.g., apologizing, discussing the issue calmly) as well as the use of online, imagined interaction (II) rumination in which individuals replay arguments in their mind as well as thinking about what to say next during the argument. Results of the LGCM revealed support for various hypotheses in which it was predicted that the husband would be more likely to be conciliatory than the wife, and the wife would be more aggressive than her husband. II rumination was initially expected to increase and be advised before reaching a plateau. Findings are discussed in terms of game theory and II conflict-linkage theory.