Impact of botulinum toxin injection into the masticatory muscles on mandibular bone: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Botulinum toxin type A (BoNTA) injection into the masticatory muscles has been widely used to treat a number of painful and nonpainful conditions; however, no systematic reviews have been performed on the long-term effect to the mandibular bone. OBJECTIVE: Our systematic review aimed to evaluate the impact of botulinum toxin injection into the masticatory muscles on mandibular bone based. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, Ovid, CINAHL and Web of Science were searched for human studies assessing mandibular bone after injection of BoNTA using computed tomography (CT) and cone beam CT (CBCT). RESULTS: Seven studies were eligible for review; five reported significant bony changes to one or more areas of the mandible. Most frequently affected were the condylar head, coronoid process and ramus. The most frequent changes were decreased bone volume, cortical thickness and cortical and trabecular density. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first systematic review to examine an association between BoNTA injection into the masticatory muscles and mandibular bone quality. Data were analysed from a limited number of studies with a small sample size, and the quality of the included studies was very low. While the majority of available evidence suggests BoNTA injection results in bony change, further study is required to confirm a dose-dependence effect and the impact of gender and age. High-quality trials should utilise a combination of software analysis and radiologist review, with longer-term follow-up to monitor for persistence of bony effect and clinical significance.

Paroxysmal hemifacial pain: A report of two cases.

Paroxysmal hemifacial pain (PHFP) is the orofacial counterpart to paroxysmal hemicrania headaches. This paper reports the cases of two patients suffering from episodic attacks of severe unilateral facial pain. In both cases, pain attacks were absolutely responsive to therapeutic doses of indomethacin. Both patients were diagnosed with PHFP, as per the International Classification of Orofacial Pain diagnostic guidelines. The diagnosis of PHFP, and a trial of indomethacin, must be considered in cases of severe unilateral facial pains not clearly explained by more common diagnoses.

Multimodal Assessment of Body Pain in Orofacial Pain Patients.

OBJECTIVE: . Patients with complaints of orofacial pain (OFP) often have other body pain, yet many do not report these to their providers. Uncontrolled pain at any location may impact the successful management of an OFP complaint. The objective of this study was to determine the number of pain regions throughout the body, and the underreporting of pain, in patients who presented to a tertiary military OFP clinic. DESIGN: A retrospective chart review was conducted on 423 consecutive new patients. Patients were given three assessment opportunities to report their pain on a whole-body pain map: 1) prior to evaluation (Pt1), 2) following an explanatory statement by their provider on the relationship between pain and prognosis (Pt2), and 3) during directed pain inquiry of specific body regions (Pro). The pain map was divided into nine anatomical regions that were assessed for the presence of pain after Pt1, Pt2, and Pro. RESULTS: Initially, 60.5% of patients did not report all pain locations (Pt1). Following the explanatory statement (Pt2), 30.5% still did not report all pain. Following the completion of all assessment methods, the most commonly reported number of pain regions was five (17.0%), and 91.5% of patients reported multiple pain regions. CONCLUSIONS: Most patients had multiple pain complaints outside the chief complaint, yet the majority did not report these until multiple forms of assessment were utilized. These data encourage the use of a pain map, a verbal pain explanation, and directed pain questioning to more accurately capture pain location and facilitate multidisciplinary care.

Graphical modeling of causal factors associated with the postoperative survival of esophageal cancer subjects.

PURPOSE: To clarify the causal relationship between factors contributing to the postoperative survival of patients with esophageal cancer. METHODS: A cohort of 195 patients who underwent surgery for esophageal cancer between 2008 and 2021 was used in the study. All patients had preoperative chest computed tomography (CT) and positron emission tomography-CT (PET-CT) scans prior to receiving any treatment. From these images, high throughput and quantitative radiomic features, tumor features, and various body composition features were automatically extracted. Causal relationships among these image features, patient demographics, and other clinicopathological variables were analyzed and visualized using a novel score-based directed graph called "Grouped Greedy Equivalence Search" (GGES) while taking prior knowledge into consideration. After supplementing and screening the causal variables, the intervention do-calculus adjustment (IDA) scores were calculated to determine the degree of impact of each variable on survival. Based on this IDA score, a GGES prediction formula was generated. Ten-fold cross-validation was used to assess the performance of the models. The prediction results were evaluated using the R-Squared Score (R2 score). RESULTS: The final causal graphical model was formed by two PET-based image variables, ten body composition variables, four pathological variables, four demographic variables, two tumor variables, and one radiological variable (Percentile 10). Intramuscular fat mass was found to have the most impact on overall survival month. Percentile 10 and overall TNM (T: tumor, N: nodes, M: metastasis) stage were identified as direct causes of overall survival (month). The GGES casual model outperformed GES in regression prediction (R2  = 0.251) (p < 0.05) and was able to avoid unreasonable causality that may contradict common sense. CONCLUSION: The GGES causal model can provide a reliable and straightforward representation of the intricate causal relationships among the variables that impact the postoperative survival of patients with esophageal cancer.

Trigeminal Neuralgia With Extraoral Trigger Zone Successfully Treated With Intraoral Injections of Botulinum Toxin: A Case Report.

Trigeminal neuralgia is a pain condition that is frequently misdiagnosed and challenging to manage. We present the case of a patient with trigeminal neuralgia with multiple misdiagnoses and poorly managed pain. Despite the presence of trigger zones both inside and outside her mouth, complete symptom resolution was ultimately achieved through onabotulinumtoxinA injections, delivered solely intraorally.

Nonodontogenic Odontalgia Referred from the Temporal Tendon: A Case Report.

INTRODUCTION: Temporal tendonitis (TT) is an orofacial pain disorder that can refer pain to the maxillary and mandibular molars, temporomandibular joint, masticatory muscles, eye, or ear. Patients often present to a dentist or physician with complaints reflecting these referral patterns, yet many healthcare providers are unfamiliar with TT because of the scarcity of literature published on this clinical entity. This may lead to diagnostic confusion, iatrogenic harm, and prolonged patient suffering. METHODS AND RESULTS: This case report describes TT that presented as maxillary and mandibular posterior tooth pain, preauricular pain, and decreased mandibular range of motion. Patient history and examination were suggestive of TT. Local anesthetic injection adjacent to the tendon eliminated all pain complaints and improved range of motion. The patient was given education on the condition and self-care instructions. At 1-week follow-up, the patient reported resolution of her pain complaint. CONCLUSIONS: As healthcare providers familiarize themselves with appropriate diagnostic and treatment options for TT, delayed or unnecessary care can be avoided, and proper management strategies can be implemented.