Treatment with low-dose prednisone in refractory obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome: A retrospective cohort study and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Glucocorticoids have been suggested as a potential therapy in refractory obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome (oAPS). Our aims were to describe a cohort of patients with oAPS treated with low-dose glucocorticoids and to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the effects of additional glucocorticoids on the pregnancy outcomes in oAPS patients. METHODS: Retrospective study that included 11 women diagnosed with primary antiphospholipid syndrome. The meta-analysis was conducted by fitting random effects models and was checked for heterogeneity. RESULTS: All women had suffered from early pregnancy losses and two also had a history of fetal deaths. We studied 47 pregnancies that resulted in 32 abortions (68.1%) and 3 fetal deaths (6.4%). Twenty-six pregnancies were under treatment, mainly LDA and LMWH. Low-dose glucocorticoids were indicated in 13 pregnancies (always in association with LDA and LMWH). There was a decrease in pregnancy loss in those patients treated with LDA and LMWH. Treatment with glucocorticoids significantly increased the rate of successful pregnancy (38.5% abortions in treated vs 85.3% abortions in non-treated pregnancies; p=0.003). After multivariate GEE analysis, only glucocorticoids remained inversely associated with pregnancy loss (OR=0.157, (CI 0.025-0.968, p=0.046)). The meta-analysis showed that glucocorticoids tended to improve the frequency of successful pregnancy (OR= 0.509 (0.252-1.028), p=0.06). Three cases of gestational diabetes and one of preeclampsia were observed in our cohort. The meta-analysis, which mostly included studies using high-dose steroids, showed that glucocorticoids increased not only the frequency of preeclampsia and gestational diabetes, but also the rate of pre-term birth. CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy of low-dose glucocorticoids in addition to the standard therapy in patients with refractory oAPS should be confirmed in well-designed clinical trials. However, high doses of steroids significantly increase the frequency of maternal and fetal morbidities, making their use strongly inadvisable.

Pregnancy and systemic lupus erythematosus in Spain: Has anything changed in the 21st century?

OBJECTIVE: To analyse a cohort of pregnant patients with systemic lupus erythematosus and compare the outcomes of both the disease and pregnancy with the results of previous studies conducted in the same geographical area. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of 37 women with systemic lupus erythematosus (64 pregnancies) followed in a multidisciplinary unit. Comparative study with similar Spanish studies identified after literature search. RESULTS: Our cohort was characterized by an older age and by the presence of non-Caucasian patients. Although we found no clinical differences, from the serological point of view our cohort presented a higher frequency of antiphospholipid antibodies. Patients included in this study were treated more frequently with antimalarials and low-dose aspirin. Systemic lupus erythematosus flare frequency was very similar between the different studies, and we did not identify clear predictors for them. Although the rate of live births was similar among studies, the obstetric outcome of our series was better with a very low rate of preeclampsia, preterm birth and low birth weight newborn. The only predictor of adverse obstetric event was age. CONCLUSIONS: Although changes in the therapeutic attitude and planning of pregnancy in recent years have not had a direct impact on the rate of systemic lupus erythematosus flares during pregnancy, they have meant an improvement in the obstetric results. The introduction of new variables independent of the disease such as age at conception, socio-cultural origin, or the availability of multidisciplinary units should be considered in the results of future studies.

Pregnancy and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus in Spain: Has Anything Changed in the 21st Century? / Embarazo y lupus eritematoso sistémico en España: ¿ha cambiado algo en el siglo xxi?

OBJECTIVE: To analyse a cohort of pregnant patients with systemic lupus erythematosus and compare the outcomes of both the disease and pregnancy with the results of previous studies conducted in the same geographical area. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of 37 women with systemic lupus erythematosus (64 pregnancies) followed in a multidisciplinary unit. Comparative study with similar Spanish studies identified after literature search. RESULTS: Our cohort was characterized by an older age and by the presence of non-Caucasian patients. Although we found no clinical differences, from the serological point of view our cohort presented a higher frequency of antiphospholipid antibodies. Patients included in this study were treated more frequently with antimalarials and low-dose aspirin. Systemic lupus erythematosus flare frequency was very similar between the different studies, and we did not identify clear predictors for them. Although the rate of live births was similar among studies, the obstetric outcome of our series was better with a very low rate of preeclampsia, preterm birth and low birth weight newborn. The only predictor of adverse obstetric event was age. CONCLUSIONS: Although changes in the therapeutic attitude and planning of pregnancy in recent years have not had a direct impact on the rate of systemic lupus erythematosus flares during pregnancy, they have meant an improvement in the obstetric results. The introduction of new variables independent of the disease such as age at conception, socio-cultural origin, or the availability of multidisciplinary units should be considered in the results of future studies.

Serological evolution in women with positive antiphospholipid antibodies.

OBJECTIVES: To explore the clinical and serological course of fertile women with positive antiphospholipid (aPL), and the factors and therapeutic implications associated with aPL negativization. METHODS: Retrospective study including 105 women with a positive aPL serology between 1995 and 2013 attending the obstetric autoimmune pathology clinic of a tertiary facility. Patients were classified into the following 3 groups: patients with primary antiphospholipid syndrome (pAPS, 49), patients with a positive serology for aPL, not meeting clinical criteria (42), and patients with systemic lupus erythematosus and a positive aPL serology (14). They were also classified according to the serological aPL evolution: persistently negative aPL, transiently positive serology, and persistently positive serology according to established criteria. RESULTS: After a mean follow-up of 114.4 ± 37.2 months, 59% of patients had persistently negative antibodies, while 25.7% of patients presented persistently positive aPL serology. Multivariate analysis confirmed that smoking (OR = 4; 95% CI: 1.45-11.08; p = 0.008) was an independent risk factor for positive persistence. Persistent positivity as well as a higher antibody load was associated with higher risk for further pregnancy morbidity. In 29 patients, with persistently negative serology who were asymptomatic, treatment with low-dose aspirin was discontinued. No clinical events related to APS were reported after treatment withdrawal, during the 40.95 months of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: A significant proportion of fertile women with aPL antibodies became negative during follow-up. Tobacco use and the number of positive antibodies are associated with persistently positive serology. Patients with persistently positive aPL serology suffer more obstetric complications. Treatment withdrawal might be safe in selected patients.

Embarazo y lupus eritematoso sistémico en España: ¿ha cambiado algo en el siglo xxi? / Pregnancy and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus in Spain: Has Anything Changed in the 21st Century?

Objetivo: Analizar una cohorte de pacientes embarazadas con lupus eritematoso sistémico y comparar los desenlaces tanto de la enfermedad como del embarazo con los resultados de estudios previos realizados en la misma área geográfica. Pacientes y métodos: Estudio de cohortes retrospectivo de 37 mujeres con lupus eritematoso sistémico (64 embarazos) seguidas en una consulta multidisciplinar. Estudio comparativo con los estudios españoles similares identificados tras revisión bibliográfica. Resultados: Nuestra cohorte se caracterizó por una edad más elevada y por la presencia de pacientes de origen no caucásico. Aunque no encontramos diferencias clínicas relevantes, serológicamente nuestra cohorte presentó una mayor frecuencia de anticuerpos antifosfolípido. Las pacientes incluidas en este estudio fueron tratadas más frecuentemente con antipalúdicos y aspirina. La frecuencia de brotes fue muy similar entre los distintos estudios, y no identificamos predictores claros para los mismos. Aunque la tasa de nacidos vivos fue similar, el desenlace obstétrico de nuestra serie fue mejor, con una baja tasa de preeclampsia, parto pretérmino y recién nacido de bajo peso. El único predictor de acontecimiento obstétrico adverso fue la edad. Conclusiones: Si bien los cambios en la actitud terapéutica y la planificación del embarazo no han tenido un impacto directo sobre la tasa de reactivación del lupus eritematoso sistémico durante el embarazo, sí que han supuesto una mejoría en los resultados obstétricos. La introducción de nuevas variables independientes de la enfermedad como la edad en la concepción, la procedencia sociocultural, o la disponibilidad de unidades multidisciplinares deberán ser consideradas en los resultados de próximos estudios.(AU)

Objective: To analyse a cohort of pregnant patients with systemic lupus erythematosus and compare the outcomes of both the disease and pregnancy with the results of previous studies conducted in the same geographical area. Patients and methods: Retrospective cohort study of 37 women with systemic lupus erythematosus (64 pregnancies) followed in a multidisciplinary unit. Comparative study with similar Spanish studies identified after literature search. Results: Our cohort was characterized by an older age and by the presence of non-Caucasian patients. Although we found no clinical differences, from the serological point of view our cohort presented a higher frequency of antiphospholipid antibodies. Patients included in this study were treated more frequently with antimalarials and low-dose aspirin. Systemic lupus erythematosus flare frequency was very similar between the different studies, and we did not identify clear predictors for them. Although the rate of live births was similar among studies, the obstetric outcome of our series was better with a very low rate of preeclampsia, preterm birth and low birth weight newborn. The only predictor of adverse obstetric event was age. Conclusions: Although changes in the therapeutic attitude and planning of pregnancy in recent years have not had a direct impact on the rate of systemic lupus erythematosus flares during pregnancy, they have meant an improvement in the obstetric results. The introduction of new variables independent of the disease such as age at conception, socio-cultural origin, or the availability of multidisciplinary units should be considered in the results of future studies.(AU)