Stratification Based on Risk Factors at Diagnosis Could Predict Progression in Patients with Pancreatic Cysts.

BACKGROUND: Predicting the risk of malignant transformation in pancreatic cyst patients is challenging. AIM: We retrospectively investigated the risk factors for malignant transformation in pancreatic cyst patients. METHODS: Patients with pancreatic cysts diagnosed using imaging tests were followed from November 2008 to December 2021. A significant change was defined as the additional development of high-risk stigmata (HRS), worrisome features (WFs), or pancreatic cancer during monitoring. RESULTS: In total, 479 patients were analyzed, with a median observation period of 50 months. Forty-four patients (9.2%) showed significant changes, and eight (1.7%) developed pancreatic cancer. The univariate analysis showed that the cyst diameter at diagnosis (≥ 14 mm), main pancreatic duct (MPD) diameter at diagnosis (≥ 3 mm), presence of multilocular cysts, and an inconsistent MPD caliber were significant predictive factors for a significant change. One point was assigned for each significant factor. We grouped the patients into three groups: the low-risk group (total score 0), medium-risk group (score 1-2), and high-risk group (score 3-4). The high-risk group had a higher risk of a significant change than the medium- and low-risk groups (age-adjusted HRs for the medium-risk and high-risk groups were 3.0 and 5.2 compared with the low-risk group). CONCLUSION: Stratification based on risk factors may help predict the development of significant changes in pancreatic cyst patients.

Classification and clinical features of adverse drug reactions in patients with ulcerative colitis treated with 5-aminosalicylate acid: a single-center, observational study.

BACKGROUND: 5-Aminosalicylate acid (5-ASA) is a crucial drug for ulcerative colitis (UC) patients. 5-ASA has several side effects. However, the types of side effects vary and are sometimes severe. METHODS: A single-center, retrospective cohort study was conducted from September 2001 to June 2020. We surveyed consecutive UC patients who visited our hospital and investigated adverse drug reactions (ADRs) related to 5-ASA formulations. We grouped patients into four subgroups: (1) lupus-like symptoms, (2) blood test abnormalities, (3) mimicking IBD exacerbation and (4) others. Their clinical courses were evaluated. RESULTS: We surveyed 288 consecutive UC patients, 35 of whom developed ADRs of any grade (12.9%), and analyzed 27 patients. The median age and 5-ASA doses were 43 years and 4000 mg, respectively, and 48% were male. The ADR triggers were the first use of 5-ASA (n = 17, 63%), 5-ASA switch (n = 9, 33%) and 5-ASA dose escalation (n = 1, 3.7%). The median time to ADR was 15 days (IQR: 7, 63). Ten patients (37%) had grade 3/4 ADRs. Fever was the most common ADR (n = 6, 23%), followed by hyperamylasemia and headache (n = 4, 15%). Lupus-like symptoms accounted for 56% (n = 15), blood test abnormalities for 26% (n = 7), mimicking IBD exacerbation for 15% (n = 4) and others for 3.7% (n = 1). The time to ADR was shorter in the mimicking IBD exacerbation group (median 11 days) than in the lupus-like symptoms (22 days) and blood test abnormalities (55 days) groups. CONCLUSION: Classification of ADRs related to 5-ASA into four groups might lead to early recognition of ADRs.

How should radiation exposure be handled in fluoroscopy-guided endoscopic procedures in the field of gastroenterology?

Fluoroscopy-guided endoscopic procedures (FGEPs) are rapidly gaining popularity in the field of gastroenterology. Radiation is a well-known health hazard. Gastroenterologists who perform FGEPs are required to protect themselves, patients, as well as nurses and radiologists engaged in examinations from radiation exposure. To achieve this, all gastroenterologists must first understand and adhere to the International Commission on Radiological Protection Publication. In particular, it is necessary to understand the three principles of radiation protection (Justification, Optimization, and Dose Limits), the As Low As Reasonably Achievable principle, and the Diagnostic Reference Levels (DRLs) according to them. This review will mainly explain the three principles of radiation exposure protection, DRLs, and occupational radiological protection in interventional procedures while introducing related findings. Gastroenterologists must gain knowledge of radiation exposure protection and keep it updated.

Comparison of radiation exposure between endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage and transpapillary drainage by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for pancreatobiliary diseases.

OBJECTIVES: The transpapillary drainage by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP-D) cannot be performed without fluoroscopy, and there are many situations in which fluoroscopy is required even in endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage (EUS-D). Previous studies have compared the efficacy, but not the radiation exposure of EUS-D and ERCP-D. While radiation exposure in ERCP-D has been previously evaluated, there is a paucity of information regarding radiation doses in EUS-D. This study aimed to assess radiation exposure in EUS-D compared with that in ERCP-D. METHODS: This retrospective single-center cohort study included consecutive patients who underwent EUS-D and ERCP-D between October 2017 and March 2019. The air kerma (AK, mGy), kerma-area product (KAP, Gycm2 ), fluoroscopy time (FT, min), and procedure time (PT, min) were assessed. The invasive probability weighting method was used to qualify the comparisons. RESULTS: We enrolled 372 and 105 patients who underwent ERCP-D and EUS-D, respectively. The mean AK, KAP, and FT in the EUS-D group were higher by 53%, 28%, and 27%, respectively, than those in the ERCP-D group, whereas PT was shorter by approximately 11% (AK, 135.0 vs. 88.4; KAP, 28.1 vs. 21.9; FT, 20.4 vs. 16.0; PT, 38.7 vs. 43.5). The sub-analysis limited to biliary drainage cases showed the same trend (AK, 128.3 vs. 90.9; KAP, 27.0 vs. 22.2; FT, 16.4 vs. 16.1; PT, 32.5 vs. 44.4). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to assess radiation exposure in EUS-D compared with that in ERCP-D. Radiation exposure was significantly higher in EUS-D than in ERCP-D, despite the shorter procedure time.

Endoscopic placement of covered versus uncovered self-expandable metal stents for palliation of malignant gastric outlet obstruction.

OBJECTIVE: Stenting is an established endoscopic therapy for malignant gastric outlet obstruction (mGOO). The choice of stent (covered vs uncovered) has been examined in prior randomised studies without clear results. DESIGN: In a multicentre randomised prospective study, we compared covered (CSEMS) with uncovered self-expandable metal stents (UCSEMS) in patients with mGOO; main outcomes were stent dysfunction and patient survival, with subgroup analyses of patients with extrinsic and intrinsic tumours. RESULTS: Overall survival was poor with no difference between groups (probability at 3 months 49.7% for covered vs 48.4% for uncovered stents; log-rank for overall survival p=0.26). Within that setting of short survival, the proportion of stent dysfunction was significantly higher for uncovered stents (35.2% vs 23.4%, p=0.01) with significantly shorter time to stent dysfunction. This was mainly relevant for patients with extrinsic tumours (stent dysfunction rates for uncovered stents 35.6% vs 17.5%, p<0.01). Subgrouping was also relevant with respect to tumour ingrowth (lower with covered stents for intrinsic tumours; 1.6% vs 27.7%, p<0.01) and stent migration (higher with covered stents for extrinsic tumours: 15.3% vs 2.5%, p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Due to poor patient survival, minor differences between covered and uncovered stents may be less relevant even if statistically significant; however, subgroup analysis would suggest to use covered stents for intrinsic and uncovered stents for extrinsic malignancies.

Time Trend of the Radiation Exposure Dose in Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Over an 8-Year Period: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.

INTRODUCTION: The global needs for a reduction in radiation exposure (RE) are increasing. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is a significant fluoroscopic procedure in the gastrointestinal field. However, the actual RE in ERCP and its annual trend are still unclear. Therefore, we examined the yearly trend of RE in ERCP. METHODS: This retrospective, single-center cohort study included consecutive cases of ERCP from September 2012 to June 2019. We measured the air kerma (AK, mGy), dose area product (DAP, Gycm2), and fluoroscopy time (FT, min). We also evaluated the annual trend of the RE before and after the fluoroscopy device update. RESULTS: In total, 2,174 patients receiving ERCP were enrolled. Among these, the mean age was 74.3 years, and 913 patients were women (42.0%). The median/third quartile values of AK (mGy), DAP (Gycm2), and FT (min) were 109/234 mGy, 13.3/25.8 Gycm2, and 18.2/27.7 minutes. The annual AK, DAP, and FT from 2012 to 2019 were 138, 207, 173, 177, 106, 71.0, 45.0, and 33.3 mGy; 23, 21.4, 19, 18.3, 11.9, 9.0, 6.8, and 6.4 Gycm2; and 12.5, 12.1, 9.7, 9.8, 8.2, 10.8, 9.4, and 10.3 minutes, respectively. The corresponding values before and after the update in July 2016 were 177 and 52 mGy (P < 0.0001), 19.2 and 7.6 Gycm2 (P < 0.0001), and 10.2, and 9.9 minutes (P = 0.05), respectively. DISCUSSION: The RE from ERCP tended to decrease every year, especially after fluoroscopy device updates.

A Triple-Drug Blister-Packaged Drug with Vonoprazan Improves First-Line Eradication of Helicobacter pylori in Elderly Patients: A Retrospective Propensity Score-Matched Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: A blister-packaged drug might be useful to enhance the eradication of Helicobacter pylori. We investigated the effect of a blister-packaged drug for H. pylori eradication. METHODS: We treated 1,758 patients with H. pylori infections and evaluated the successful eradication rate in patients who underwent first-line eradication between January 2013 and May 2018. Treatments included a conventional proton pump inhibitor (PPI) blister-packaged drug containing lansoprazole or rabeprazole with clarithromycin (CAM) and amoxicillin (AC), vonoprazan (VPZ) with CAM and AC in a separate tablet, or a VPZ blister-packaged drug (VONOSAP) containing VPZ with CAM and AC, with all drugs given twice daily for 7 days. RESULTS: Finally, we evaluated 1,263 patients (conventional PPI: n = 644, VPZ: n = 326, and VONOSAP: n = 293). The overall successful eradication rates were 71.9% in the conventional PPI group, 90.2% in the VPZ group, and 92.2% in the VONOSAP group. There was a significantly lower eradication rate in the PPI group than in the VPZ and VONOSAP (p < 0.00001, p < 0.0001) groups, but there was no significant difference between the VPZ and VONOSAP groups (p = 0.4006). We enrolled a total of 256 age- and gender-matched patients in the VPZ and VONOSAP groups, and both groups had successful eradication rates of approximately 90% (89.8 vs. 90.4%, respectively, p = 0.7641). After analyzing the subgroup of patients older than 75 years, there was a significant treatment benefit of VONOSAP but not of VPZ in elderly patients (EPs). CONCLUSION: Triple-drug blister-packaged drugs including VPZ may improve the first-line eradication of H. pylori in EPs.

Distinct Clinical Factors in Hospitalized Patients with Diverticular Bleeding and Diverticulitis.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: It is unclear why colonic diverticular bleeding and diverticulitis rarely coexist. This study compared the characteristics of these conditions. METHODS: This single-center retrospective study examined 310 consecutive patients hospitalized with an episode of diverticular disease (cases) and outpatients without a diverticular episode (controls) from January 2012 to December 2015. We investigated distinct clinical factors in hospitalized patients with diverticular bleeding and diverticulitis. RESULTS: We identified 183 patients with 263 episodes of diverticular bleeding and 127 patients with 135 episodes of diverticulitis during the study period. Patients with diverticular bleeding were significantly older than those with diverticulitis (median age 76 vs. 56 years) and had more cardiovascular disease, hypertension, diabetes, cerebrovascular disease, chronic kidney disease, lipid disorder, or a poorer performance status. Significantly more diverticular bleeding patients were taking antiplatelet drugs, anticoagulant drugs, proton pump inhibitors, or laxative agents. Multivariate analysis revealed that an age > 65 years (OR 5.42), and antiplatelet agent use (OR 7.29) were more significant risk factors for diverticular bleeding than for diverticulitis. CONCLUSIONS: Elderly people using antiplatelet drugs may be more susceptible to diverticular bleeding than diverticulitis.

[Afferent Loop Syndrome after Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Successfully Treated with Percutaneous Drainage].

We report 2 cases where afferent loop syndrome after hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery was successfully treated with percutaneous drainage. Case 1: A 74-year-old man who had undergone pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer presented with cholangitis, obstructive jaundice, and dilatation of the elevated jejunum. These conditions were attributed to obstruction of the elevated jejunum on the anal side due to peritoneal dissemination. Subsequently, percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage was performed, and the dilated jejunum was drained through the approach route. Case 2: A 71-year-old woman who had undergone left hepatectomy for hilar bile duct cancer presented with peritoneal dissemination. Owing to the dissemination, the elevated jejunum was obstructed, resulting in its dilatation on the oral side. Percutaneous drainage of the dilated jejunum was directly performed. Percutaneous drainage was effective in both the abovementioned cases, and no symptoms related to the obstruction were observed until the death of the patients because of primary cancer. This suggested that percutaneous drainage may be an effective treatment option for afferent loop syndrome after hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery.

Endoscopic submucosal dissection for large superficial colorectal tumors using the "clip-flap method".

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is technically difficult because of poor visualization and instability in the cutting area. Although mucosal flap formation improves visualization of the cutting area, it is difficult to achieve, especially in colorectal ESD. To facilitate mucosal flap formation, we developed the "clip-flap method" by substituting an endoclip for the mucosal flap until it is formed. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The clip-flap method was applied to 114 of 119 large superficial colorectal tumors being treated by ESD. Therapeutic efficacy and safety were assessed. RESULTS: Mean tumor diameter, resected specimen diameter, and procedure time were 32.5 mm, 38.9 mm, and 82.0 minutes, respectively. The en bloc resection rate was 97.5 %. Intraoperative perforation occurred in one patient who was treated conservatively. A single endoclip was used for 92 lesions and improved visualization of the cutting area. A cross pattern of endoclips was used for 22 lesions and further stabilized the visual field, especially near the lateral side. CONCLUSIONS: The clip-flap method is a simple, safe, and effective option for ESD of large superficial colorectal tumors.

Scheduled endoscopic surveillance controls secondary cancer after curative endoscopic resection for early gastric cancer: a multicentre retrospective cohort study by Osaka University ESD study group.

BACKGROUND: After endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) of early gastric cancer (EGC), patients are at high risk for synchronous or metachronous multiple gastric cancers. OBJECTIVE: To elucidate the time at which multiple cancers develop and to determine whether scheduled endoscopic surveillance might control their development. DESIGN: A multicentre retrospective cohort study from 12 hospitals was conducted. Patients with EGC who underwent ESD with en bloc margin-negative curative resection were included. Synchronous cancer was classified as concomitant cancer or missed cancer. The cumulative incidence of metachronous cancers and overall survival rate were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: From April 1999 to December 2010, 1258 patients met the inclusion criteria. Synchronous or metachronous multiple cancers were detected in 175 patients (13.9%) during a mean of 26.8 months. Among the 110 synchronous cancers, 21 were missed at the time of the initial ESD. Many of the missed lesions existed in the upper third of the stomach and the miss rate was associated with the endoscopist's inexperience (<500 oesophagogastroduodenoscopy cases). The cumulative incidence of metachronous cancers increased linearly and the mean annual incidence rate was 3.5%. The incidence rate did not differ between patients with or without Helicobacter pylori eradication. Four lesions (0.32%) were detected as massively invading cancers during the follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Nineteen per cent of synchronous cancers were not detected until the initial ESD. The incidence rate of metachronous cancer after ESD was constant. Scheduled endoscopic surveillance showed that almost all recurrent lesions were treatable by endoscopic resection.

Managing radiation safety and protection in gastroenterology in Japan: insights from the REX-GI study.

Fluoroscopy-guided gastrointestinal procedures, including gastrointestinal stenting, balloon-assisted endoscopy (BAE), endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS), are essential for diagnosis and treatment in gastroenterology. Such procedures involve radiation exposure that necessitates strict safety measures to protect patients, doctors, and medical staff. The April 2020 update to Japan's Ionizing Radiation Injury Prevention Regulations for occupational exposure reduced the lens exposure dose limit to approximately one-seventh of its previous level. This change highlights the need for improved safety protocols. Without adaptation, the sustainability of fluoroscopy-based endoscopic techniques could be at risk due to the potential to exceed these new limits. This review examines the current state of medical radiation exposure in the field of gastroenterology in Japan and discusses the findings of the REX-GI study.

[A case of exfoliative esophagitis caused by endoscopic submucosal dissection during imatinib treatment for gastrointestinal stromal tumor].

A woman in her seventies with multiple early stage (0-IIa) gastric cancers was undergoing imatinib therapy for gastrointestinal stromal tumor. Subsequently, she underwent 2-stage endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for these cancers. Both procedures were successful, but she developed exfoliative esophagitis as a complication after the first ESD. To prevent this complication after the second ESD, we used a longer imatinib withdrawal period before the procedure and used general anesthesia during ESD. Although the patient developed exfoliative esophagitis after the second ESD, but its severity was less than that after the first procedure. Only a few studies have reported endoscopic therapy-induced exfoliative esophagitis. We suggest that this complication may be related to imatinib-induced mucosal damage.

Occupational radiation exposure to the lens of the eyes and its protection during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.

This study aimed to examine occupational radiation exposure to the lens of the eyes during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). In this multicenter, prospective, observational cohort study, we collected data regarding occupational radiation exposure to the lens of the eyes during ERCP. We measured radiation exposure of patients and examined its correlation with occupational exposure. In dosimetrically-measured ERCPs (n = 631), the median air kerma at the patient entrance reference point, air kerma-area product, and fluoroscopy time were 49.6 mGy, 13.5 Gycm2, and 10.9 min, respectively. The median estimated annual radiation dose to the lens of the eyes was 3.7, 2.2, and 2.4 mSv for operators, assistants, and nurses, respectively. Glass badge over lead aprons and eye dosimeter results were similar in operators but differed in assistants and nurses. A strong correlation was shown between eye dosimeter measurements and patients' radiation exposure. The shielding rates of the lead glasses were 44.6%, 66.3%, and 51.7% for operators, assistants, and nurses, respectively. This study revealed the actual occupational exposure dose for the lens of the eyes during ERCP and the efficacy of lead glass. Values of radiation exposure to patients can help estimate exposure to the lens of the eyes of medical staff.