RESUMEN
Over the past two decades, cases of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) due to syphilis, gonorrhea, and chlamydia have been rising in the United States, disproportionately among gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (MSM), as well as racial and ethnic minorities of all genders. In this review, we address updates about the evidence on doxycycline post-exposure prophylaxis (doxy-PEP) for prevention of bacterial STIs, including efficacy, safety, antimicrobial resistance (AMR), acceptability, modeling population impact, and evolving guidelines for use. Equitable implementation of doxy-PEP will require evaluation of who is offered and initiates it, understanding patterns of use and longer-term STI incidence and AMR, provider training, and tailored community education.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The incidence of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) has been increasing in the United States, and this trend has continued alongside expanding/changing human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) prevention strategies, moving from reliance solely on behavioral interventions like condoms to biomedical methods like oral and injectable antiretroviral preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP). In 2019, the Ending the HIV Epidemic (EHE) initiative was released to prioritize resource allocation to the 50 jurisdictions in the United States with the highest HIV incidence, providing an opportunity to monitor STI incidence in a national group of discrete, geographic units and identify trends and differences across jurisdictions. OBJECTIVES AND DESIGN: Using existing data from the US CDC and Census Bureau, a retrospective analysis was conducted to examine the incidence of STIs in 49 of the 50 EHE priority counties between 2005 and 2019. This timeframe was divided into 2 periods representing a before and after entry into the biomedical era of HIV prevention: P1 (2005-2011) and P2 (2012-2019). KEY RESULTS: A total of 49 EHE counties were included in this analysis, representing 27.4% of the total US population. Entry into the biomedical HIV prevention era was associated with an increase in STI incidence in 28 EHE counties and a decrease in 14 EHE counties. The greatest percent increase in total STI incidence was in the District of Columbia (+12.1%; incidence rate ratio = 1.121 [1.115, 1.127]; P < 0.001) and the greatest percent decrease was identified in Orleans Parish, LA (-8.7%; incidence rate ratio = 0.913 [0.908, 0.919]; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Rising STI rates in the biomedical era of HIV prevention represent missed opportunities for comprehensive sexual and preventive healthcare. County-level data provide actionable insight for reducing STI incidence. The EHE counties that have experienced decreases in STI incidence while being in the biomedical era may provide models of best practice, which may be scaled in other jurisdictions.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones por VIH , Profilaxis Pre-Exposición , Enfermedades de Transmisión Sexual , Humanos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Infecciones por VIH/epidemiología , Infecciones por VIH/prevención & control , Incidencia , VIH , Estudios Retrospectivos , Enfermedades de Transmisión Sexual/epidemiología , Enfermedades de Transmisión Sexual/prevención & control , Profilaxis Pre-Exposición/métodos , District of ColumbiaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Current guidelines recommend concurrent screening for HIV and syphilis with gonorrhea and chlamydia testing. Despite this, many patients are still not screened. This study describes trends in demographics and encounter locations associated with missed opportunities for HIV and syphilis screening among patients tested for gonorrhea or chlamydia. METHODS: This is a retrospective review of all encounters with gonorrhea or chlamydia testing in a large, urban hospital from November 1, 2018, to July 31, 2021. Demographic information and encounter location were extracted from the medical record. Encounters were categorized as including both HIV and syphilis (complete) screening, HIV screening only, or neither. Logistic regression was used to examine associations between demographics and encounter location and likelihood of complete screening. RESULTS: There were 42,791 patient encounters, of which 40.2% had complete screening, 6.2% had concurrent HIV screening only, and 53.6% had no concurrent screening. Increasing age, female sex (aOR 0.58, 95% CI 0.55-0.61, p < 0.01), non-Hispanic Black race (aOR 0.52, 95% CI 0.49-0.55, p < 0.01), and public insurance (aOR 0.72, 95% CI 0.69-0.75, p < 0.01) were associated with lower odds of complete screening. Emergency department (ED) encounters were most likely to include complete screening (aOR 3.11, 95% CI 2.96-3.26, p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: This study found a large proportion of patients tested for gonorrhea and chlamydia had missed opportunities for HIV and syphilis screening. Significant demographic disparities were found. The ED was most likely to screen for both HIV and syphilis. Decreasing disparities in screening could have profound effects on the HIV and syphilis epidemics.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic and subsequent multi-national mpox outbreak significantly disrupted sexual health care delivery, particularly impacting men who have sex with men (MSM). This study investigated these public health emergencies in relation to perceptions, attitudes, and sexual practices among MSM affiliated with a collective sex venue (CSV). METHODS: Electronic surveys were sent to clientele of a high-volume CSV between June 2021 and November 2022 across three time periods defined as pre-Omicron, post-Omicron, and mpox. Data collection encompassed sociodemographics, healthcare access, STI/HIV status, COVID-19 testing, and sexual behaviors. Multivariable regression analyses identified factors associated with self-reported COVID-19 testing and positivity, and mpox exposure. RESULTS: Among 1,135 responses, demographics were largely cisgender MSM and predominantly White. Increased self-reported COVID-19 positivity was associated with having more sex partners and frequenting bathhouses for meeting sex partners. Confidence in COVID-19 mitigation strategies decreased post-Omicron. Factors linked to mpox exposure included younger age, increased sex partners, STI positivity, and lower confidence in mitigation strategies. DISCUSSION: These findings underscore the intersectionality between sexual behaviors and public health responses to COVID-19 and mpox among MSM communities affiliated with a CSV. Decreased confidence in mitigation strategies and changes in sexual behaviors during public health emergencies underscore the need for targeted interventions and messaging. Collaboration between health departments and CSVs can facilitate responses to current and future public health threats and interventions.
RESUMEN
Objectives. To determine the percentage of US outpatient substance use treatment facilities that offer HIV preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP). Methods. We used a retrospective cross-sectional design with data from the National Substance Use and Mental Health Services Survey, which was administered to directors of US outpatient substance use treatment facilities in 2021. We evaluated the percentage of outpatient substance use treatment facilities offering PrEP and factors associated with the likelihood of offering PrEP. Results. We included 12 182 outpatient substance use treatment facilities. Of these, 637 (5.2%) offered PrEP. Offering HIV treatment (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 45.3; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 36.0, 56.9) and offering programs for LGBTQ (lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer or questioning) people (AOR = 1.3; 95% CI = 1.0, 1.6) were associated with higher likelihoods of offering PrEP. Conclusions. PrEP is highly effective and recommended for patients at risk for HIV from injection drug use. Nearly 95% of US outpatient substance use treatment facilities did not offer PrEP-a missed opportunity for harm reduction through primary HIV prevention. Public Health Implications. Diversification of the array of available HIV PrEP options and the ongoing HIV and opioid use epidemics require outpatient substance use treatment facilities to expand PrEP availability. (Am J Public Health. 2024;114(8):833-837. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2024.307699).
Asunto(s)
Infecciones por VIH , Profilaxis Pre-Exposición , Humanos , Infecciones por VIH/prevención & control , Infecciones por VIH/epidemiología , Profilaxis Pre-Exposición/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados Unidos , Estudios Transversales , Estudios Retrospectivos , Masculino , Centros de Tratamiento de Abuso de Sustancias/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Minorías Sexuales y de Género/estadística & datos numéricos , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/prevención & control , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/epidemiología , Instituciones de Atención AmbulatoriaRESUMEN
Gynecologists play a critical role in the office evaluation of transgender and gender diverse individuals. This includes the provision of essential healthcare services including the treatment and prevention of human immunodeficiency virus and sexually-transmitted infections and screening for human papillomavirus infection-related diseases and cancers. Caring for patients who identify as transgender or gender diverse (TGD) and who have undergone gender-affirming surgical treatments is challenging due in part to clinical gaps in knowledge resulting from insufficient training and educational resources. A patient-centered approach to the care of TGD individuals requires knowledge of the general principles of affirming, holistic care with attention to the risk factors, and anatomic considerations unique to this population. This review aims to provide basic knowledge needed for the successful gynecologic evaluation of a gender diverse patient.
Asunto(s)
Salud Sexual , Enfermedades de Transmisión Sexual , Personas Transgénero , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Enfermedades de Transmisión Sexual/prevención & control , Enfermedades de Transmisión Sexual/diagnóstico , Tamizaje Masivo/métodos , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/prevención & control , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/diagnóstico , Infecciones por VIH/prevención & control , Infecciones por VIH/diagnósticoRESUMEN
Background: With recent increases in syphilis, there is growing interest in expanding screening; however, treatment rates have historically been low. Objectives: This study examines demographic and clinical factors that may contribute to non-completion of syphilis treatment. Design: This is a retrospective comparative cohort study of all patients with syphilis from January through November 2018 at an urban, tertiary care hospital. Methods: Demographics and clinical information were extracted from the electronic medical record. Descriptive statistics and odds ratios (ORs) were calculated. Results: Of 171 patients with syphilis, 89 (52.0%) completed treatment. Patients ages 40-49 were least likely to complete treatment (OR 0.14; 95% CI 0.03-0.72, p = 0.02) compared to those ages 18-24. Non-heterosexual patients were significantly more likely to complete treatment (OR 3.60; 95% CI 1.13-11.49, p = 0.03) compared to heterosexual patients. Patients diagnosed in the emergency department completed treatment at the lowest rate. Conclusion: A major gap in syphilis treatment still exists, which must be addressed to achieve optimal impact from syphilis screening programs.
Demographic and clinical factors associated with risk for not completing treatment among patients with syphilis Rates of syphilis, a common sexually transmitted infection, have been steadily increasing in the United States, now at their highest in decades. Left untreated, syphilis can lead to major health complications, and in pregnant women can cause abnormalities in newborn babies or stillbirth. To address this epidemic, screening programs are being developed to diagnose syphilis in vulnerable populations. However, screening without treatment is not an effective strategy, and historically syphilis treatment rates have been low. This is most likely because the treatment can require a lengthy antibiotic course and often several office visits. In this study, we looked back at the patients diagnosed with syphilis at our hospital for 11 months in 2018 to understand factors that might be associated with a risk of not completing treatment. In this sample, only slightly more than half of patients with syphilis completed treatment. We found that younger patients, patients who didn't identify as heterosexual, and patients with private insurance were all more likely to complete syphilis treatment. We also found that patients diagnosed in the emergency department completed treatment at the lowest rates. These findings suggest some areas where new strategies can be developed to help support patients with syphilis to get treated. Only with sufficient treatment of patients with syphilis can we make progress on the growing syphilis epidemic.
RESUMEN
[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2023.102496.].
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: People living with mental illness (PLMI) experience disproportionately high incidence of and vulnerability to HIV. Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is an effective and safe HIV prevention method, but data regarding prescription to PLMI are lacking. Psychiatrists may serve as important points of access for PrEP prescription for PLMI. METHODS: We conducted a vignette-based study of residents in psychiatry and family medicine (FM) to assess likelihood of prescribing PrEP and assumptions about the fictional patient. Participants were randomized to one of five vignettes in which the patients' psychiatric diagnosis was varied (schizophrenia on long-acting injectable or oral antipsychotic, bipolar disorder, major depression) or a control vignette without a psychiatric diagnosis. RESULTS: A total of 439 residents participated. We found that high percentages of psychiatry (96.8%) and FM (97.4%) residents were aware of PrEP. High percentages of psychiatry (92.0%-98.1%) and FM (80.8%-100%) residents reported that PrEP was indicated for all patient conditions. Family medicine residents were more likely to prescribe PrEP to all experimental conditions than psychiatry residents. There was no difference in likelihood of prescribing to the control condition without a psychiatric diagnosis. The belief that PrEP prescription was out of scope of practice was greater among psychiatry residents. CONCLUSIONS: A majority of psychiatry residents responded that PrEP was indicated for an array of patients with psychiatric diagnoses. However, psychiatry residents were broadly less likely to prescribe PrEP to patients with these diagnoses. The high percentage of psychiatry residents who reported that PrEP was indicated for all patients suggests that additional training is needed to facilitate PrEP prescription by psychiatrists.
Asunto(s)
Medicina Familiar y Comunitaria , Infecciones por VIH , Internado y Residencia , Trastornos Mentales , Profilaxis Pre-Exposición , Psiquiatría , Humanos , Infecciones por VIH/prevención & control , Infecciones por VIH/tratamiento farmacológico , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Fármacos Anti-VIH/uso terapéutico , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
Background: Squamous cell carcinoma of the anus (SCCA) annual incidence among sexual minority men with and without HIV is 85/100,000 and 19/100,000 persons, respectively, which is significantly higher than the overall incidence (2/100,000). Incidence may also be higher in transgender women. Since SCCA tumours average ≥30 mm at diagnosis, we assessed the accuracy of individuals to self-detect smaller anal abnormalities. Methods: Using convenience sampling, the study enrolled sexual minority men and transgender women, aged 25-81 years, in Chicago, Illinois and Houston, Texas, USA, during 2020-2022. Individuals were taught the anal self-examination and anal companion examination (ASE/ACE). Then, a clinician performed a digital anal rectal examination (DARE) before participants conducted the ASE or ACE. The sensitivity, specificity and concordance of the ASE/ACE to detect an abnormality were measured along with factors associated with ASE/ACE and DARE concordance. Findings: Among 714 enrolled individuals, the median age was 40 years (interquartile range, 32-54), 36.8% (259/703) were living with HIV, and 47.0% (334/710), 23.4% (166/710), and 23.0% (163/710) were non-Hispanic white, non-Hispanic Black, and Hispanic, respectively. A total of 94.1% (671/713) identified as cisgendered men, and 5.9% (42/713) as gender minorities. A total of 658 participants completed an ASE and 28 couples (56 partners) completed an ACE. Clinicians detected abnormalities in 34.3% (245/714) of individuals. The abnormalities were a median of 3 mm in diameter. Sensitivity and specificity of the ASE/ACE was 59.6% (95% CI 53.5-65.7%) and 80.2% (95% CI 76.6-83.8%), respectively. Overall concordance was 0.73 (95% CI 0.70-0.76) between ASE/ACE and DARE and increased with increasing anal canal lesion size (p = 0.02). Concordance was lower when participants were older and received ASE/ACE training from a lay person rather than a clinician. Interpretation: Sexual minority men/transgender women may self-detect SCCA when malignant lesions are much smaller than the current mean dimension at presentation of ≥30 mm. Funding: National Cancer Institute.
RESUMEN
Objective and Design: Forced anal examinations are used to prosecute sexual and gender minorities (SGM) in at least seven countries under the presumption that decreased sphincter tone, estimated by a finger inserted into the anal canal, can detect persons practicing receptive anal intercourse. In a cross-sectional analysis of the baseline data from a longitudinal study, we aimed to determine factors associated with sphincter tone and the accuracy of sphincter tonality to detect persons engaging in receptive anal intercourse. Setting: Clinicians in Chicago, Houston, and Milwaukee, USA conducted digital anal rectal examinations (DARE) on 838 participants, 94.0% of whom were cisgendered males. Clinicians used the Digital Rectal Examination Scoring System to score sphincter resting tone (RT) and squeeze tone (ST). On a separate survey, individuals reported their preferred position for anal intercourse: i.e., either always/mostly insertive anal intercourse, always/mostly receptive anal intercourse, or both receptive and insertive anal intercourse. Multivariable regression assessed factors associated with decreased sphincter tone while area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic curves (AUC) estimated the accuracy of sphincter tonality to detect receptive anal intercourse. Results: 11.3% had decreased RT (95/838) and 6.3% had decreased ST (53/838). The accuracy of DARE to detect any receptive anal intercourse was little better than random guessing (AUC 0.53, 95% CI 0.51 to 0.55, and AUC 0.51, 95% CI 0.49 to 0.53, respectively. RT and ST decreased with age regardless of sexual behavior (p trend <0.01 for both). Compared to individuals having always/mostly insertive anal intercourse, individuals having always/mostly receptive anal intercourse was associated with decreased RT, but not ST, while those equally preferring both insertive and receptive anal intercourse were not associated with decreased RT or ST. Conclusions: Decreased sphincter tone is uncommon among SGM who prefer receptive anal intercourse. Given virtually no accuracy, a finger inserted into the anus has no utility to detect individuals practicing receptive anal intercourse and thus should not be used as such. Trial registration: NCT04090060. Summary Box: What is already known on this topic: To gather evidence for prosecution of sexual and gender minorities, forced anal exams are used in multiple countries. The examination includes inserting the index finger into the anal canal to detect decreased sphincter tone which is considered evidence of receptive anal intercourse. We found only two small studies (n= 58 and n=24) assessing factors associated with decreased sphincter tone and none assessing the accuracy of sphincter tone to detect sexual and gender minorities having receptive anal intercourse.What this study adds: Our study suggests that a finger inserted into the anal canal is not useful to detect a history of receptive anal intercourse. As such, the sexual practices of individuals cannot be known using a forced anal examination.
RESUMEN
This survey study assesses full-body skin examination rates among sexual and gender minority patients and investigates their comfort with and reasons for discomfort during these examinations.