Clinical efficacy of ultrasound-guided interventional therapy in patients with benign ovarian cysts: a meta-analysis.

This study aimed to explore the clinical efficacy of ultrasound-guided interventional therapy in patients with benign ovarian cysts through meta-analysis. A literature search was performed on PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, CNKI, and WanFang databases to obtain clinical randomized controlled trials on ultrasound-guided interventional therapy for benign ovarian cysts published between 2010 and 2022. A total of 1395 studies were initially retrieved, and finally 12 studies were included for meta-analysis. The results showed that the observation group (ultrasound-guided interventional therapy) had higher treatment effective rate than the control group (conventional laparotomy or laparoscopic cyst resection), but the incidence of adverse reactions was markedly lower. Additionally, the length of hospital stay, intraoperative blood loss, and operation time showed significant lower levels in the observation group. In terms of ovarian function, postoperative luteinizing hormone and follicle-stimulating hormone levels in the observation group were lower than the control group, while oestradiol levels were higher. In conclusion, compared with conventional surgical treatment, ultrasound-guided interventional therapy can significantly improve the clinical effective rate, shorten the hospital stay and reduce intraoperative blood loss. Such therapy can protect ovarian reserve, with high value of clinical promotion.IMPACT STATEMENTWhat is already known on this subject? Main surgical methods for ovarian cysts consist of laparotomy, laparoscopic surgery, and interventional therapy.What the results of this study add? With the advancement of surgical techniques and instruments, many minimally invasive surgeries have been applied to treat ovarian cysts with good clinical results. However, there is no exact evidence to prove its clinical efficacy. Given the lack in this field, we conducted a meta-analysis of all clinical studies of ultrasound-guided interventional therapy for ovarian cysts to evaluate its efficacy and safety.What the implications are of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? Compared with conventional laparotomic or laparoscopic cyst resection, ultrasound-guided interventional therapy for ovarian cysts significantly improves the treatment effectiveness, shortens the hospital stay and reduces intraoperative blood loss. This therapy with good clinical efficacy also has advantages of small wound, rapid recovery and less adverse reactions, and can protect ovarian reserve. This safe and effective surgical method for ovarian cysts is worth promoting clinically.

Fast-growing immature ovarian teratoma during pregnancy: a case report and a review of the literature.

BACKGROUND: Immature ovarian teratoma is one of the three common malignant ovarian germ cell tumors. However, immature ovarian teratoma in pregnancy is very rare. Due to the rare occurrence, there is little evidence regarding its diagnosis, optimal management, and prognosis. Hence, we present a case of immature teratoma diagnosed during pregnancy, and analyze its clinicopathological features, management and prognosis. CASE PRESENTATION: A 28-year-old woman underwent a sonographic examination revealed no abnormality in the bilateral adnexal area before 29 weeks gestational age (WGA). At 29 WGA, ultrasound demonstrated a 9.7 × 8.5 × 6.4 cm complex structure in the left adnexal area. At 30 WGA, repeated ultrasound revealed rapid growth of tumor mass, measuring 25.0 × 15.0 × 13.7 cm. An elective cesarean section combined with exploratory laparotomy was performed at 33 WGA. Intraoperative frozen pathological examination suggested left ovarian immature teratoma. Then, she underwent a complete staging surgery. Subsequently, the patient received 4 cycles of bleomycin-etoposide-cisplatin (BEP) chemotherapy. After 18 months of follow-up, there is no sign of tumor recurrence till now. CONCLUSIONS: This case report suggests that the benefits and risks of timely treatment for patients and fetuses should be fully assessed by a multidisciplinary team. The early diagnosis, the timing of surgery and chemotherapy, the choice of chemotherapy for BEP will determine the prognosis. Surgery and combination chemotherapy with BEP play an important role in the treatment of immature teratomas in pregnancy, and could gain successful and satisfactory outcomes for mother and fetus.

Fertility-sparing surgery in early-stage cervical cancer: laparoscopic versus abdominal radical trachelectomy.

BACKGROUND: Radical trachelectomy is an acceptable alternative to radical hysterectomy for patients with early-stage cervical cancer who wish to preserve reproductive function. This study is designed to compare the laparoscopic versus abdominal radical trachelectomy and provide oncological and obstetric outcome data on patients who have undergone fertility-sparing surgery. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed all early-stage cervical cancer patients who underwent abdominal radical trachelectomy (ART) or laparoscopic radical trachelectomy (LRT) between January 2005 and June 2017 in West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University. Patients' clinical details and follow-up were obtained from hospital records. RESULTS: A total of 33 patients (5 with IA1, 2 with IA2, and 26 with 1B1) were included, including 18 patients treated with ART and 15 patients treated with LRT. The median age at initial diagnosis was 30.00 ± 4.30 years (range 22-39). The mean follow-up time was 74.67 months. Among the 33 patients, 2 patients (6.06%, 1 abdominal/1 laparoscopic) developed recurrence, and there are no evidence of disease for the remaining 31 patients till now. The overall survival rate 96.99% (32/33). The LRT group had a shorter hospital stay (P = 0.01) and less blood loss (P < 0.01) than the ART group. There is no significant difference in the length of operative time (P = 0.48) between the two surgical routes. Overall, 15/33 patients (45.45%) have tried to conceive. 6 (40.00%) patients were pregnant and 6 (40.00%) patients were infertility. The ART group had a higher clinical pregnancy rate (P = 0.03) than the LRT group. CONCLUSIONS: There is no statistically significant difference in oncological outcome between the two surgical approaches. The clinical pregnancy rate in the ART group was significant higher than that in the LRT group. However, LRT resulted in less blood loss and decreased length of hospital stay.

The effect of preserving pregnancy in cervical cancer diagnosed during pregnancy: a retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE: Cervical cancer diagnosed during pregnancy is a rare event, and data regarding efficacy of cancer treatment during pregnancy is limited. This study aimed to assess the safety of continuation of the pregnancy for mother and fetus when concomitantly diagnosed with cervical cancer. METHODS: This study retrospectively analyzed all cervical cancer patients diagnosed while pregnant or immediately postpartum, inclusive from Jan 2010 to June 2019 at our institute. Patient clinical details and follow-up were obtained from hospital records. RESULTS: The study comprised 40 patients with clinical cancer stages of IA1 (1/40, 2.5%); IB1 (15/40, 37.5%); IB2 (10/40, 25%); IIA (12/40, 30%); and IIB (2/40, 5%). There were 38 patients diagnosed during pregnancy, and 2 diagnosed in the postpartum period. Of the 38 patients, 17 were diagnosed in the first trimester, 13 in the second trimester, and 8 in the third trimester. 10 of 38 patients (26.3%) continued their pregnancy after learning of their diagnosis; 7 (70%) in the third trimester and 3 (30%) in the second trimester. The mean time from diagnosis to surgery in the patients who continued their pregnancy was 52.7 days, which was statistically significantly greater than the termination of pregnancy group (52.7 vs. 16.3 days, P < 0.01). Notably, there was no survival difference between the 2 groups (100% vs. 90.91%, P = 0.54), and none of the pregnant women who ultimately died had delayed treatment due to pregnancy. Similarly, the surgical estimated blood loss and operative duration comparison in the 2 groups were not significantly different. CONCLUSIONS: In the present study, the gestational age of pregnancy at the time of initial diagnosis of cervical cancer was an important determinant in the disease management. Continuation of the pregnancy when diagnosed with cervical cancer may not affect the oncologic outcome of the mother nor increase either surgical or obstetric complications. Additionally, the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy did not threaten the health of the fetus. These results may be useful in counseling patients facing the diagnosis of cervical cancer during pregnancy.