Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 88
Filtrar
Más filtros

País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Curr Opin Infect Dis ; 37(4): 296-303, 2024 Aug 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38899948

RESUMEN

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Timely postexposure prophylaxis is important after an occupational exposure. Here we review select organisms, exposure opportunities in the healthcare setting, and postexposure prophylaxis regimens. RECENT FINDINGS: Needlestick injuries pose a risk of exposure to bloodborne pathogens, such as HIV, Hepatitis B, and Hepatitis C. Risk mitigation strategies should be reexamined in light of newer vaccines and therapeutics. Increased vaccine hesitancy and vaccine denialisms may foster the re-emergence of some infections that have become extremely uncommon because of effective vaccines. With increasing occurrences of zoonotic infections and the ease of global spread as evidenced by COVID-19 and mpox, healthcare exposures must also consider risks related to emerging and re-emerging infectious diseases. SUMMARY: Early recognition and reporting of occupational exposures to pathogens with available postexposure prophylaxis is key to mitigating the risk of transmission. Providers should be able to evaluate the exposure and associated risks to provide prompt and appropriate postexposure prophylaxis.


Asunto(s)
Personal de Salud , Exposición Profesional , Profilaxis Posexposición , Humanos , Profilaxis Posexposición/métodos , Exposición Profesional/prevención & control , Lesiones por Pinchazo de Aguja/prevención & control , Transmisión de Enfermedad Infecciosa de Paciente a Profesional/prevención & control , COVID-19/prevención & control , COVID-19/transmisión
2.
N Engl J Med ; 379(26): 2529-2539, 2018 12 27.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30586509

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Plumbing systems are an infrequent but known reservoir for opportunistic microbial pathogens that can infect hospitalized patients. In 2016, a cluster of clinical sphingomonas infections prompted an investigation. METHODS: We performed whole-genome DNA sequencing on clinical isolates of multidrug-resistant Sphingomonas koreensis identified from 2006 through 2016 at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Clinical Center. We cultured S. koreensis from the sinks in patient rooms and performed both whole-genome and shotgun metagenomic sequencing to identify a reservoir within the infrastructure of the hospital. These isolates were compared with clinical and environmental S. koreensis isolates obtained from other institutions. RESULTS: The investigation showed that two isolates of S. koreensis obtained from the six patients identified in the 2016 cluster were unrelated, but four isolates shared more than 99.92% genetic similarity and were resistant to multiple antibiotic agents. Retrospective analysis of banked clinical isolates of sphingomonas from the NIH Clinical Center revealed the intermittent recovery of a clonal strain over the past decade. Unique single-nucleotide variants identified in strains of S. koreensis elucidated the existence of a reservoir in the hospital plumbing. Clinical S. koreensis isolates from other facilities were genetically distinct from the NIH isolates. Hospital remediation strategies were guided by results of microbiologic culturing and fine-scale genomic analyses. CONCLUSIONS: This genomic and epidemiologic investigation suggests that S. koreensis is an opportunistic human pathogen that both persisted in the NIH Clinical Center infrastructure across time and space and caused health care-associated infections. (Funded by the NIH Intramural Research Programs.).


Asunto(s)
Infección Hospitalaria/microbiología , Reservorios de Enfermedades/microbiología , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/microbiología , Ingeniería Sanitaria , Sphingomonas/genética , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Hospitales Federales , Humanos , Metagenómica , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , National Institutes of Health (U.S.) , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sphingomonas/efectos de los fármacos , Sphingomonas/aislamiento & purificación , Estados Unidos , Abastecimiento de Agua , Secuenciación Completa del Genoma
3.
J Clin Microbiol ; 59(3)2021 02 18.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33262219

RESUMEN

We evaluated saliva (SAL) specimens for SARS-CoV-2 reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR) testing by comparison of 459 prospectively paired nasopharyngeal (NP) or midturbinate (MT) swabs from 449 individuals with the aim of using saliva for asymptomatic screening. Samples were collected in a drive-through car line for symptomatic individuals (n = 380) and in the emergency department (ED) (n = 69). The percentages of positive and negative agreement of saliva compared to nasopharyngeal swab were 81.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 65.8% to 90.5%) and 99.8% (95% CI, 98.7% to 100%), respectively. The percent positive agreement increased to 90.0% (95% CI, 74.4% to 96.5%) when considering only samples with moderate to high viral load (cycle threshold [CT ] for the NP, ≤34). Pools of five saliva specimens were also evaluated on three platforms, bioMérieux NucliSENS easyMAG with ABI 7500Fast (CDC assay), Hologic Panther Fusion, and Roche Cobas 6800. The average loss of signal upon pooling was 2 to 3 CT values across the platforms. The sensitivities of detecting a positive specimen in a pool compared with testing individually were 94%, 90%, and 94% for the CDC 2019-nCoV real-time RT-PCR, Panther Fusion SARS-CoV-2 assay, and Cobas SARS-CoV-2 test, respectively, with decreased sample detection trending with lower viral load. We conclude that although pooled saliva testing, as collected in this study, is not quite as sensitive as NP/MT testing, saliva testing is adequate to detect individuals with higher viral loads in an asymptomatic screening program, does not require swabs or viral transport medium for collection, and may help to improve voluntary screening compliance for those individuals averse to various forms of nasal collections.


Asunto(s)
Prueba de Ácido Nucleico para COVID-19/métodos , COVID-19/diagnóstico , Tamizaje Masivo/métodos , SARS-CoV-2/aislamiento & purificación , Saliva/virología , Humanos , Nasofaringe , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa de Transcriptasa Inversa , Manejo de Especímenes/métodos
4.
MMWR Recomm Rep ; 69(6): 1-8, 2020 07 24.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32701942

RESUMEN

Exposure to hepatitis viruses is a recognized occupational risk for health care personnel (HCP). This report establishes new CDC guidance that includes recommendations for a testing algorithm and clinical management for HCP with potential occupational exposure to hepatitis C virus (HCV). Baseline testing of the source patient and HCP should be performed as soon as possible (preferably within 48 hours) after the exposure. A source patient refers to any person receiving health care services whose blood or other potentially infectious material is the source of the HCP's exposure. Two options are recommended for testing the source patient. The first option is to test the source patient with a nucleic acid test (NAT) for HCV RNA. This option is preferred, particularly if the source patient is known or suspected to have recent behaviors that increase risk for HCV acquisition (e.g., injection drug use within the previous 4 months) or if risk cannot be reliably assessed. The second option is to test the source patient for antibodies to hepatitis C virus (anti-HCV), then if positive, test for HCV RNA. For HCP, baseline testing for anti-HCV with reflex to a NAT for HCV RNA if positive should be conducted as soon as possible (preferably within 48 hours) after the exposure and may be simultaneous with source-patient testing. If follow-up testing is recommended based on the source patient's status (e.g., HCV RNA positive or anti-HCV positive with unavailable HCV RNA or if the HCV infection status is unknown), HCP should be tested with a NAT for HCV RNA at 3-6 weeks postexposure. If HCV RNA is negative at 3-6 weeks postexposure, a final test for anti-HCV at 4-6 months postexposure is recommended. A source patient or HCP found to be positive for HCV RNA should be referred to care. Postexposure prophylaxis of hepatitis C is not recommended for HCP who have occupational exposure to blood and other body fluids. This guidance was developed based on expert opinion (CDC. Updated U.S. Public Health Service guidelines for the management of occupational exposures to HBV, HCV, and HIV and recommendations for postexposure prophylaxis. MMWR Recommend Rep 2001;50[No. RR-11]; Supplementary Figure, https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/90288) and reflects updated guidance from professional organizations that recommend treatment for acute HCV infection. Health care providers can use this guidance to update their procedures for postexposure testing and clinical management of HCP potentially exposed to hepatitis C virus.


Asunto(s)
Personal de Salud , Hepatitis C/prevención & control , Transmisión de Enfermedad Infecciosa de Paciente a Profesional/prevención & control , Exposición Profesional , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. , Hepacivirus/genética , Hepacivirus/aislamiento & purificación , Hepatitis C/transmisión , Humanos , Profilaxis Posexposición , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , ARN Viral/análisis , Estados Unidos , United States Public Health Service
5.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil ; 101(12): 2233-2242, 2020 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32966809

RESUMEN

Recognizing a need for more guidance on the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, members of the Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Editorial Board invited several clinicians with early experience managing the disease to collaborate on a document to help guide rehabilitation clinicians in the community. This consensus document is written in a "question and answer" format and contains information on the following items: common manifestations of the disease; rehabilitation recommendations in the acute hospital setting, recommendations for inpatient rehabilitation and special considerations. These suggestions are intended for use by rehabilitation clinicians in the inpatient setting caring for patients with confirmed or suspected COVID-19. The text represents the authors' best judgment at the time it was written. However, our knowledge of COVID-19 is growing rapidly. The reader should take advantage of the most up-to-date information when making clinical decisions.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/rehabilitación , Medicina Física y Rehabilitación/organización & administración , COVID-19/fisiopatología , Comunicación , Conducta Cooperativa , Humanos , Control de Infecciones/normas , Pacientes Internos , Grupo de Atención al Paciente/organización & administración , Medicina Física y Rehabilitación/normas , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , SARS-CoV-2 , Triaje/normas
9.
J Clin Microbiol ; 54(4): 1167-70, 2016 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26888898

RESUMEN

Perirectal surveillance cultures and a stool culture grew Aeromonas species from three patients over a 6-week period and were without epidemiological links. Detection of the blaKPC-2 gene in one isolate prompted inclusion of non-Enterobacteriaceae in our surveillance culture workup. Whole-genome sequencing confirmed that the isolates were unrelated and provided data for Aeromonas reference genomes.


Asunto(s)
Aeromonas hydrophila/enzimología , Aeromonas hydrophila/genética , Canal Anal/microbiología , Proteínas Bacterianas/genética , Genoma Bacteriano , Análisis de Secuencia de ADN , beta-Lactamasas/genética , Adulto , Aeromonas hydrophila/clasificación , Aeromonas hydrophila/aislamiento & purificación , Monitoreo Epidemiológico , Heces/microbiología , Variación Genética , Genotipo , Humanos , Epidemiología Molecular
10.
Curr Opin Infect Dis ; 29(4): 373-80, 2016 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27306563

RESUMEN

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Healthcare personnel are at risk for occupational exposures to bloodborne pathogens. Primary prevention remains the first line of defense, but secondary prevention measures known to be effective should be implemented when percutaneous exposures occur. Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is a major infectious cause of liver-related morbidity and mortality. Chronic HCV treatment has changed dramatically, with many all-oral directly acting anti-HCV antiviral (DAA) regimens now available. Evidence for the use of DAAs as postexposure prophylaxis (PEP) after occupational exposures to HCV is summarized here. RECENT FINDINGS: Little new evidence supports the use of antivirals in acute HCV infection. Several preliminary studies have examined the use of DAAs or host target agents in chronic HCV treatment. Effective HCV PEP requirements likely include pan-genotypic activity and a high barrier to resistance. One investigational DAA has shown promising results as an efficacious option for all genotypes in chronic HCV treatment and may ultimately represent a potential HCV PEP agent. SUMMARY: Insufficient supporting data exist to endorse the use of DAAs for PEP after HCV occupational exposures; additional studies examining efficacy, duration, and cost-effectiveness are needed. Development of more oral drugs possessing a high barrier of resistance and equal activity against all HCV genotypes is anticipated.


Asunto(s)
Antivirales/uso terapéutico , Hepatitis C/prevención & control , Exposición Profesional/efectos adversos , Profilaxis Posexposición , Prevención Secundaria , Hepacivirus , Hepatitis C/transmisión , Humanos , Interferones
11.
Inorg Chem ; 55(12): 6247-60, 2016 Jun 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27256829

RESUMEN

Extraction and binding studies of [PtCl6](2-) are reported for 24 mono-, bi-, and tripodal extractants containing tris(2-aminoethyl)amine (TREN) or tris(3-aminopropyl)amine (TRPN) scaffolds. These reagents are designed to recognize the outer coordination sphere of [PtCl6](2-) and to show selectivity over chloride anion under acidic conditions. Extraction from 0.6 M HCl involves protonation of the N-center in tertiary amines containing one, two, or three urea, amide, or sulfonamide hydrogen-bond donors to set up the following equilibrium: 2L(org) + 2H(+) + [PtCl6](2-) ⇌ [(LH)2PtCl6](org). All reagents show higher Pt loading than trioctylamine, which was used as a positive control to represent commercial trialkylamine reagents. The loading of [PtCl6](2-) depends on the number of pendant amides in the extractant and follows the order tripodal > bipodal > monopodal, with urea-containing extractants outperforming amide and sulfonamide analogues. A different series of reagents in which one, two, or three of the alkyl groups in tris-2-ethylhexylamine are replaced by 3-N'-hexylpropanamide groups all show a comparably high affinity for [PtCl6](2-) and high selectivity over chloride anion in extractions from aqueous acidic solutions. (1)H NMR titration of three extractants [LH·Cl] with [(Oct4N)2PtCl6] in CDCl3 provides evidence for high selectivity for [PtCl6](2-) over chloride for tri- and bipodal extractants, which show higher binding constants than a monopodal analogue.

12.
Clin Infect Dis ; 57(11): 1593-9, 2013 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23934166

RESUMEN

In 2011, the National Institutes of Health Clinical Center experienced a cluster of infection and colonization caused by carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae among profoundly immunocompromised inpatients. This manuscript describes the approach and interventions that were implemented in an attempt to curtail the cluster. Interventions employed included engagement of all stakeholders involved in care of at-risk patients; detailed and frequent communication with hospital staff about issues relating to the outbreak; aggressive microbial surveillance; use of techniques that facilitate rapid identification of resistant organisms; rapid characterization of resistance mechanisms; whole-genome sequencing of outbreak isolates to characterize the spread and to investigate mechanisms of healthcare-associated spread; implementation of enhanced contact precautions for all infected or colonized patients; geographic and personnel cohorting; daily chlorhexidine gluconate baths; dedicating equipment to be used solely for cohorted patients and aggressive decontamination of equipment that had to be reused on uncohorted patients; monitoring adherence to infection control precautions, including unwavering attention to adherence to appropriate hand hygiene procedures; and attention to the details of environmental decontamination. In addition, the manuscript discusses some of the challenges associated with managing such an event, as well as a few of the unanticipated consequences associated with the aftermath of the case cluster.


Asunto(s)
Carbapenémicos/farmacología , Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Transmisión de Enfermedad Infecciosa/prevención & control , Infecciones por Enterobacteriaceae/prevención & control , Enterobacteriaceae/efectos de los fármacos , Resistencia betalactámica , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Infección Hospitalaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Infección Hospitalaria/microbiología , Infección Hospitalaria/transmisión , Brotes de Enfermedades , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana Múltiple , Enterobacteriaceae/genética , Enterobacteriaceae/aislamiento & purificación , Infecciones por Enterobacteriaceae/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Enterobacteriaceae/microbiología , Infecciones por Enterobacteriaceae/transmisión , Genoma Bacteriano , Humanos , Control de Infecciones
13.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 44(9): 1373-1374, 2023 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36762631

RESUMEN

Despite recent guidance from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) allowing institutions to relax in-facility masking strategies and due to our evolving understanding of respiratory pathogen transmission during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, we propose an updated standard for universal precautions in healthcare settings: permanently including universal masking in routine patient-care interactions. Such a practice prioritizes safety for patients, healthcare providers (HCPs), and visitors.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Precauciones Universales , Humanos , Control de Infecciones , COVID-19/prevención & control
14.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 44(1): 62-67, 2023 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35177161

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To analyze the frequency and rates of community respiratory virus infections detected in patients at the National Institutes of Health Clinical Center (NIHCC) between January 2015 and March 2021, comparing the trends before and during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study comparing frequency and rates of community respiratory viruses detected in NIHCC patients between January 2015 and March 2021. Test results from nasopharyngeal swabs and washes, bronchoalveolar lavages, and bronchial washes were included in this study. Results from viral-challenge studies and repeated positives were excluded. A quantitative data analysis was completed using cross tabulations. Comparisons were performed using mixed models, applying the Dunnett correction for multiplicity. RESULTS: Frequency of all respiratory pathogens declined from an annual range of 0.88%-1.97% between January 2015 and March 2020 to 0.29% between April 2020 and March 2021. Individual viral pathogens declined sharply in frequency during the same period, with no cases of influenza A/B orparainfluenza and 1 case of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV). Rhino/enterovirusdetection continued, but with a substantially lower frequency of 4.27% between April 2020 and March 2021, compared with an annual range of 8.65%-18.28% between January 2015 and March 2020. CONCLUSIONS: The decrease in viral respiratory infections detected in NIHCC patients during the pandemic was likely due to the layered COVID-19 prevention and mitigation measures implemented in the community and the hospital. Hospitals should consider continuing the use of nonpharmaceutical interventions in the future to prevent nosocomial transmission of respiratory viruses during times of high community viral load.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Gripe Humana , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio , Virus , Humanos , COVID-19/diagnóstico , COVID-19/epidemiología , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/diagnóstico , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/epidemiología , Pandemias , Estudios Retrospectivos , Gripe Humana/epidemiología
15.
Campbell Syst Rev ; 19(3): e1330, 2023 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37554998

RESUMEN

Background: Montessori education is the oldest and most widely implemented alternative education in the world, yet its effectiveness has not been clearly established. Objectives: The primary objective of this review was to examine the effectiveness of Montessori education in improving academic and nonacademic outcomes compared to traditional education. The secondary objectives were to determine the degree to which grade level, Montessori setting (public Montessori vs. private Montessori), random assignment, treatment duration, and length of follow-up measurements moderate the magnitude of Montessori effects. Search Methods: We searched for relevant studies in 19 academic databases, in a variety of sources known to publish gray literature, in Montessori-related journals, and in the references of studies retrieved through these searches. Our search included studies published during or before February 2020. The initial search was performed in March 2014 with a follow-up search in February 2020. Selection Criteria: We included articles that compared Montessori education to traditional education, contributed at least one effect size to an academic or nonacademic outcome, provided sufficient data to compute an effect size and its variance, and showed sufficient evidence of baseline equivalency-through random assignment or statistical adjustment-of Montessori and traditional education groups. Data Collection and Analysis: To synthesize the data, we used a cluster-robust variance estimation procedure, which takes into account statistical dependencies in the data. Otherwise, we used standard methodological procedures as specified in the Campbell Collaboration reporting and conduct standards. Main Results: Initial searches yielded 2012 articles, of which 173 were considered in detail to determine whether they met inclusion/exclusion criteria. Of these, 141 were excluded and 32 were included. These 32 studies yielded 204 effect sizes (113 academic and 91 nonacademic) across 132,249 data points. In the 32 studies that met minimum standards for inclusion, including evidence of baseline equivalence, there was evidence that Montessori education outperformed traditional education on a wide variety of academic and nonacademic outcomes. For academic outcomes, Hedges' g effect sizes, where positive values favor Montessori, ranged from 0.26 for general academic ability (with high quality evidence) to 0.06 for social studies. The quality of evidence for language (g = 0.17) and mathematics (g = 0.22) was also high. The effect size for a composite of all academic outcomes was 0.24. Science was the only academic outcome that was deemed to have low quality of evidence according to the GRADE approach. Effect sizes for nonacademic outcomes ranged from 0.41 for students' inner experience of school to 0.23 for social skills. Both of these outcomes were deemed as having low quality of evidence. Executive function (g = 0.36) and creativity (g = 0.26) had moderate quality of evidence. The effect size for a composite of all nonacademic outcomes was 0.33. Moderator analyses of the composite academic and nonacademic outcomes showed that Montessori education resulted in larger effect sizes for randomized studies compared to nonrandomized studies, for preschool and elementary settings compared to middle school or high school settings, and for private Montessori compared to public Montessori. Moderator analyses for treatment duration and duration from intervention to follow-up data collection were inconclusive. There was some evidence for a lack of small sample-size studies in favor of traditional education, which could be an indicator of publication bias. However, a sensitivity analysis indicated that the findings in favor of Montessori education were nonetheless robust. Authors' Conclusions: Montessori education has a meaningful and positive impact on child outcomes, both academic and nonacademic, relative to outcomes seen when using traditional educational methods.

17.
Chemistry ; 18(25): 7715-28, 2012 Jun 18.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22619168

RESUMEN

Four new sterically hindered pyridines, L(1)-L(4)-containing amido substituents at the 2-position act as efficient solvent extractants for [CoCl(4)](2-) or [ZnCl(4)](2-) from acidic chloride solutions through protonation of the pyridino N-centre to form the neutral outer-sphere complexes [(LH)(2)MCl(4)]. These ionophores show very high selectivity for chlorometallate anions over chloride ion and are readily stripped to liberate the free-metal chlorides without the formation of inner-sphere complexes [ML(2)Cl(2)]. Single-crystal X-ray structure determinations of [(L(2)H)(2)CoCl(4)] and [(L(2)H)(2)ZnCl(4)] (L(2) = 2-(4,6-di-tert-butylpyridin-2-yl)-N,N'-dihexylmalonamide) coupled with (1)H NMR spectroscopy and DFT calculations on L(2)H(+) and other complexes of [ZnCl(4)](2-) confirm that the pyridinium NH group does not address the outer co-ordination sphere of the metallanion, but rather forms a hydrogen bond to the pendant amide groups and thus pre-organizes the ligand to present both C-H and amido N-H hydrogen-bond donors to the [MCl(4)](2-) ions. The selectivity for chlorometallates over chloride ions shown by this class of extractants arises from their ability to present several polarized C-H units towards the charge-diffuse ions [MCl(4)](2-), whereas the smaller, "harder" chloride anion prefers to be associated with the amido N-H hydrogen-bond donors.

18.
JAMA ; 307(1): 75-84, 2012 Jan 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22146902

RESUMEN

Since its identification in 1985, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) has challenged several aspects of health care delivery. Because HIV is a blood-borne infectious disease, from the early days of the epidemic, concern was raised about risks of occupational exposures and infections among health care workers. Despite the development of highly active antiretroviral therapy, which has effectively modulated HIV into a chronic disease in many settings, risks of occupational infection with 3 blood-borne pathogens remain in the health care workplace. Using the case of a house officer who has a needlestick during a resuscitation attempt, prevention of needlesticks including universal precautions and postexposure management of occupational HIV, hepatitis B, and hepatitis C exposures is discussed.


Asunto(s)
Fármacos Anti-VIH/uso terapéutico , Infecciones por VIH/prevención & control , Lesiones por Pinchazo de Aguja/terapia , Exposición Profesional , Médicos , Patógenos Transmitidos por la Sangre , Combinación de Medicamentos , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Infecciones por VIH/transmisión , Seropositividad para VIH , Personal de Salud , Humanos , Internado y Residencia , Lamivudine/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Lesiones por Pinchazo de Aguja/epidemiología , Lesiones por Pinchazo de Aguja/prevención & control , Profilaxis Posexposición , Riesgo , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Zidovudina/uso terapéutico
19.
Infect Dis Clin North Am ; 36(4): 825-837, 2022 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36328638

RESUMEN

Infection of the lower respiratory tract is a potentially severe or life-threatening illness. Taking the right steps to recognize, identify, and treat pneumonia is critical to improving patient outcomes. An awareness of the diversity of potential infectious causes, the local endemic flora and resistance patterns, as well as testing strategies to differentiate causes of pneumonia is essential to providing the best patient outcomes. Understanding surveillance definitions allow intensivists to become partners in reducing hospital-associated infections and improving quality of care.


Asunto(s)
Infección Hospitalaria , Neumonía , Humanos , Neumonía/diagnóstico , Neumonía/terapia , Neumonía/epidemiología , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología
20.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 43(11): 1661-1663, 2022 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34724999

RESUMEN

Voluntary asymptomatic severe acute respiratory coronavirus virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) testing was provided by the NIH Clinical Center over 1 year. Among 105,927 tests, 0.2% were positive. Among eligible staff, 79% participated with variable frequency and 61% of positive individuals had symptoms at the time of testing. Saliva specimen collection was chosen as an option less frequently than midturbinate collection.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Estados Unidos , Humanos , Prueba de COVID-19 , Técnicas de Laboratorio Clínico , COVID-19/diagnóstico , National Institutes of Health (U.S.)
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA