Phase I trial of ATM inhibitor M3541 in combination with palliative radiotherapy in patients with solid tumors.

BACKGROUND: Ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) kinase orchestrates DNA double strand break (DSB) repair; ATM inhibitors may therefore enhance the therapeutic effect of DSB-inducing treatments such as radiotherapy (RT). M3541 is an orally administered selective inhibitor of ATM. METHODS: This phase I dose-escalation study evaluated the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), recommended phase II dose(s) (RP2D), safety, pharmacokinetics (PK) and antitumor activity of M3541 in combination with fractionated palliative RT in patients with solid tumors. Fifteen patients received palliative RT (30 Gy in 10 fractions) and escalating doses of M3541 (50-300 mg administered on RT fraction days) guided by a Bayesian 2-parameter logistic regression model with overdose control. RESULTS: Doses of M3541 up to 300 mg/fraction day were well tolerated. One patient (200 mg group) experienced two dose-limiting toxicities (urinary tract infection, febrile neutropenia) that resolved with antibiotics. All patients reported ≥ 1 treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) but none led to treatment discontinuation. No grade ≥ 4 TEAEs were reported and there was no indication of a dose effect for any TEAE. Three patients (20.0%; 95% confidence interval 4.3-48.1) had confirmed complete or partial response. M3541 total plasma levels did not increase with dose following single or repeated dosing. No relationship was observed between dose and changes in the ratio of phosphorylated to total ATM or in immune cell counts. CONCLUSIONS: The MTD and RP2D could not be established as the study closed early due to the absence of a dose-response relationship and non-optimal PK profile. No further clinical development of M3541 was pursued. (Trial registration number ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03225105. Registration date July 21, 2017).

AKT inhibition in the central nervous system induces signaling defects resulting in psychiatric symptomatology.

BACKGROUND: Changes in the expression and activity of the AKT oncogene play an important role in psychiatric disease. We present translational data assessing the role of AKT in psychiatric symptoms. METHODS: (1) We assessed the protein activity of an AKT3 mutant harboring a PH domain mutation (Q60H) detected in a patient with schizophrenia, the corresponding AKT1 mutant (Q61H), and wild-type AKT1 and AKT3 transduced in AKT-null mouse fibroblasts and modeled the Q61H mutation onto the crystal structure of the Akt1 PH domain. (2) We analyzed the results of earlier genome-wide association studies to determine the distribution of schizophrenia-associated single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the AKT3 gene. (3) We analyzed the psychiatric adverse events (AEs) of patients treated with M2698 (p70S6K/AKT1/AKT3 inhibitor) and with other PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway inhibitors. RESULTS: (1) Proteins encoded by AKT3 (AKT3Q60H) and AKT1 (AKT1Q61H) mutants had lower kinase activity than those encoded by wild-type AKT3 and AKT1, respectively. Molecular modeling of the AKT1-Q61H mutant suggested conformational changes that may reduce the binding of D3-phosphorylated phosphoinositides to the PH domain. (2) We identified multiple SNPs in the AKT3 gene that were strongly associated with schizophrenia (p < 0.5 × 10-8). (3) Psychiatric AEs, mostly insomnia, anxiety, and depression, were noted in 29% of patients treated with M2698. In randomized studies, their incidence was higher in PI3K/AKT/mTOR inhibitor arms compared with placebo arms. All psychiatric AEs were reversible. CONCLUSIONS: Our data elucidate the incidence and mechanisms of psychiatric AEs in patients treated with PI3K/AKT/mTOR inhibitors and emphasize the need for careful monitoring.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of rosiglitazone in relation to CYP2C8 genotype.

OBJECTIVES: Rosiglitazone is metabolically inactivated predominantly via the cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzyme CYP2C8. The functional impact of the CYP2C8*3 allele coding for the Arg139Lys and Lys399Arg amino acid substitutions is controversial. The purpose of this was to clarify the role of this polymorphism with regard to the pharmacokinetics and clinical effects of rosiglitazone. METHODS: From a large sample of healthy volunteers, 14 carriers of the CYP2C8*1/*1 allele, 13 carriers of the *1/*3 allele, and 4 carriers the *3/*3 allele were selected for a clinical study. Rosiglitazone (8 mg) single-dose and multiple-dose pharmacokinetics and its effects on glucose level and body weight were monitored. Plasma and urine concentrations of rosiglitazone and desmethylrosiglitazone were measured, and kinetics was analyzed by noncompartmental and population-kinetic compartmental methods. RESULTS: Mean total clearance values were 0.033 L x h(-1) x kg(-1) (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.030-0.037 L x h(-1) x kg(-1)), 0.038 L x h(-1) x kg(-1) (95% CI, 0.033-0.044 L x h(-1) x kg(-1)), and 0.046 L x h(-1) x kg(-1) (95% CI, 0.033-0.058 L x h(-1) x kg(-1)) in carriers of CYP2C8 genotypes *1/*1, *1/*3, and *3/*3, respectively, on day 1 (P = .02, ANOVA [F test]). Rosiglitazone kinetics could be adequately described by a 1-compartmental model with first-order absorption. Besides CYP2C8 genotype, body weight was a significant covariate (P < .001, log-likelihood ratio test). Elimination half-lives were 4.3, 3.5, and 2.9 hours in CYP2C8*1/*1, *1/*3, and *3/*3 carriers, respectively. Clearance of desmethylrosiglitazone was also higher in CYP2C8*3 allele carriers, with mean values of 1.96 L/h (95% CI, 1.42-2.69 L/h), 2.22 L/h (95% CI, 1.61-3.04 L/h), and 2.47 L/h (95% CI, 1.80-3.39 L/h), respectively (P = .03). The plasma glucose area under the concentration curve was significantly lower after 14 days of taking rosiglitazone compared with day 1 (P = .01, paired t test), but no relationship of the glucose-lowering effect of rosiglitazone with CYP2C8 genotype was observed. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that the CYP2C8*3 allele confers higher in vivo metabolic capacity than the wild-type CYP2C8*1 allele but the pharmacokinetic differences resulting from CYP2C8*3 were quantitatively moderate.

Effects of grapefruit juice on the pharmacokinetics of sildenafil.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Because of extensive first-pass metabolism, oral bioavailability of sildenafil reaches only 40%. Formation of the primary metabolite, N -desmethylsildenafil, is mainly mediated by the cytochrome P450 enzyme CYP3A4. In this study we investigated the influence of grapefruit juice, containing inhibitors of intestinal CYP3A4, on the pharmacokinetics of sildenafil and N -desmethylsildenafil. METHODS: In a randomized crossover study, 24 healthy white male volunteers received single 50-mg doses of sildenafil. Two doses each of 250 ml grapefruit juice or water, respectively, were administered 1 hour before and together with the drug. Plasma concentrations of sildenafil and N -desmethylsildenafil were determined up to 24 hours post dose by use of liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (limit of quantification, 1 ng/ml). RESULTS: Grapefruit juice changed the area under the sildenafil plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity [AUC(0-infinity) from 620 [1.53] ng/ml x h to 761 [1.58] ng/ml x h (geometric mean with geometric standard deviation), corresponding to a 23% increase (90% confidence interval, 13%-33%). N-Desmethyl sildenafil AUC(0-infinity) increased by 24% (90% confidence interval, 17%-32%). Maximum plasma concentrations (C(max)) of sildenafil and N -desmethylsildenafil were essentially unchanged. There was a trend toward a prolonged time to reach C(max) during the grapefruit juice period (from a median of 0.75 hour to a median of 1.13 hours), corresponding to an increase by 0.25 hour (90% confidence interval, 0-0.63 hour). Interindividual variability was pronounced in both periods. CONCLUSIONS: Grapefruit juice increases sildenafil bioavailability and tends to delay sildenafil absorption. Sildenafil pharmacokinetics may become less predictable with grapefruit juice. Although patients usually will not be endangered by concomitant use of grapefruit juice, it seems advisable to avoid this combination.

Impact of impaired renal function on the pharmacokinetics of the antiepileptic drug lacosamide.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The antiepileptic drug lacosamide is eliminated predominantly via the kidneys. Therefore, an evaluation of the impact of renal impairment on its pharmacokinetic profile is an important component of its safety assessment. The objective of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetic profile of lacosamide among individuals with renal impairment (mild, moderate, or severe) and among patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD), including those on hemodialysis. METHODS: This was an open-label, Phase I trial. The pharmacokinetics of a single oral 100-mg lacosamide dose were evaluated in five groups of participants: healthy controls, patients with mild, moderate, or severe renal impairment, and patients with ESRD (with and without hemodialysis). RESULTS: Forty participants completed the trial, eight in each group. In healthy volunteers, renal clearance accounted for approximately 30 % of total body clearance [geometric mean 0.5897 l/h (coefficient of variation 37.9 %) vs 2.13 l/h (20.8 %)]. With severe renal impairment, renal clearance was approximately 11 % of total body clearance [0.1428 l/h (31.8 %) vs 1.34 l/h (26.9 %)]. Terminal half-life and systemic exposure were increased with renal impairment, while total body clearance, renal clearance, and urinary excretion were decreased. Strong positive correlations between creatinine clearance, renal clearance, and urinary excretion were observed. Among patients with ESRD, approximately 50 % of lacosamide was cleared from systemic circulation by 4-h hemodialysis. In patients with essentially no renal clearance, nonrenal clearance was still present (1.1 l/h). Lacosamide was well tolerated by healthy volunteers and patients. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with mild-to-moderate renal impairment, lacosamide dose adjustment is not necessary, because total body clearance decreased by only approximately 20 %. Dose adjustment, however, is required for patients with severe renal impairment. Hemodialysis removes approximately 50 % of lacosamide from plasma; therefore, dose supplementation following hemodialysis should be considered.

Cytochrome P450 2C9 phenotyping using low-dose tolbutamide.

OBJECTIVES: The hypoglycaemic drug tolbutamide is used for assessment of CYP2C9 activity in vivo. However, therapeutically active doses of 500 mg bear the risk of hypoglycaemia, and a tolbutamide-derived parameter based on a single plasma or urine concentration reflecting CYP2C9 activity accurately is lacking. METHODS: We examined tolbutamide and its metabolites 4'-hydroxy-tolbutamide and carboxytolbutamide in plasma and urine of 26 healthy, male volunteers up to 24 h after intake of 125 mg tolbutamide using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. CYP2C9 genotypes were determined by sequencing of exons 3 and 7. Raw plasma and urine data were compared with pharmacokinetic parameters, CYP2C9 genotypes, and data from a study in 23 volunteers with all six CYP2C9*1-*3 combinations who received 500 mg tolbutamide. RESULTS: Plasma clearance and tolbutamide plasma concentrations 24 h after drug intake reflected the genotypes: 0.85 l/h and 1.70 microg/ml (95% confidence interval, CI, 0.80-0.89 l/h and 1.50-1.90 microg/ml) for CYP2C9*1 homozygotes (n=15), 0.77 l/h and 2.14 microg/ml (95%CI, 0.67-0.88 l/h and 1.64-2.63 microg/ml) for *1/*2 genotypes (n=7), 0.60 l/h and 3.13 microg/ml (95%CI, 0.58-0.62 l/h and 2.68-3.58 microg/ml) for *1/*3 genotypes (n=3), and 0.57 l/h and 3.27 microg/ml in the single *2/*2 carrier. Natural logarithms of tolbutamide plasma concentrations 24 h after intake correlated to plasma clearance (r(2)=0.84, P<0.0000001). This correlation was confirmed in the comparison data set (r(2)=0.97, P<0.0000001). CONCLUSIONS: A low dose of 125 mg tolbutamide can safely and accurately be used for CYP2C9 phenotyping. As a simple metric for CYP2C9 activity, we propose to determine tolbutamide in plasma 24 h after drug intake.