Influence of nevirapine administration on the pharmacokinetics of dolutegravir in patients infected with HIV-1.

OBJECTIVES: The metabolic pathways of dolutegravir and nevirapine suggest a potential pharmacokinetic interaction between these drugs. The objective of this study was to investigate the influence of nevirapine administration on the pharmacokinetics of dolutegravir in patients infected with HIV-1. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study was an investigator-initiated trial registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under identifier NCT02067767. Dolutegravir (50 mg once daily) was added to the antiretroviral regimen (400 mg of nevirapine once daily + 600/300 mg of abacavir/lamivudine once daily) in 10 adult patients for 5 days. After discontinuation of nevirapine, the combination of dolutegravir + abacavir/lamivudine was continued. Full pharmacokinetic profiles were assessed on the day of nevirapine discontinuation and 2 weeks after discontinuation of nevirapine. The pharmacokinetic parameters of dolutegravir were calculated by non-compartmental analysis. The log-transformed values of these parameters were compared between periods with and without nevirapine co-administration. RESULTS: The co-administration of nevirapine led to a significant decrease (P < 0.05) in the area under the plasma concentration-time curve for dolutegravir from the time the dose was administered until the end of the dosing interval (-19%, P = 0.011), as well as decreases in trough plasma concentration (-34%, P = 0.018) and terminal half-life (-15%, P = 0.039), and a significant increase (P < 0.05) in apparent oral clearance for dolutegravir (+23%, P = 0.011). CONCLUSIONS: The decrease in dolutegravir exposure in combination with nevirapine suggests that the metabolism of dolutegravir is induced by nevirapine. According to therapeutic drug monitoring for dolutegravir, some patients may need a higher dose than 50 mg of dolutegravir once daily to maintain the therapeutic plasma concentration throughout the dosing interval.

Evaluation of a Methotrexate Chemiluminescent Microparticle Immunoassay: Comparison to Fluorescence Polarization Immunoassay and Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry.

OBJECTIVES: For most laboratories, methotrexate (MTX) concentrations are routinely monitored by fluorescence polarization immunoassay (FPIA). In anticipation of an announced withdrawal of the FPIA reagent on the Abbott TDxFLx (Abbott Diagnostics, Abbott Park, IL), we have evaluated a new reagent kit developed by Abbott on the Architect i1000, based on chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay (CMIA). METHODS: Precision, inaccuracy, and selectivity were assessed. Interassay variability was established using 75 plasma patient samples treated with MTX and analyzed by two methods: FPIA and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). RESULTS FOR MTX,: the intraday inaccuracy was between -6.37% and +3.52%, while interday performance was between -3.70% and 7.90%. Intraday and interday imprecision was less than 2.65% and less than 2.22%, respectively. The correlation coefficient between CMIA and FPIA or LC-MS/MS was 0.9969 and 0.9985, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: These results comparing CMIA vs FPIA and LC-MS/MS indicate that CMIA is a suitable alternative to the FPIA method.