Assessing Pharmacokinetic Correlates of Escitalopram-Related Adverse Drug Reactions.

BACKGROUND: To assess the pharmacokinetic correlates of reported adverse drug reactions (ADRs) under antidepressant treatment with escitalopram (ESC) using a large therapeutic drug monitoring database. METHODS: A large naturalistic sample of inpatients and outpatients prescribed ESC was analyzed. ADRs were classified using the Udvalg for Kliniske Undersogelser side effect rating scale. We compared ESC-treated patients with (n = 35) and without ADRs (n = 273) using ESC plasma concentrations as the primary outcome. We also compared ADR rates in the 2 groups based on 2 cut-off ESC levels reflecting the recommended upper thresholds of the therapeutic reference range of 80 ng/mL, suggested by the consensus therapeutic drug monitoring guidelines, and 40 ng/mL, based on recent meta-analysis data. The effects of age, sex, smoking, daily ESC dose, plasma concentrations, and concentrations corrected for daily dose were included in a binary logistic regression model to predict ADRs. RESULTS: No differences in clinical, demographic, or pharmacokinetic parameters were observed between patients with and without ADRs ( P > 0.05). Patients with ESC-related ADRs were more frequently diagnosed with psychotic disorders than those without (25% vs. 7.1%, P = 0.004). None of the variables was associated with ADR risk. Overall, ADR rates were not significantly different in patients above versus below thresholds of ESC concentrations (ESC concentrations >40 [n = 59] vs. ≤40 ng/mL [n = 249] and >80 [n = 8] vs. ≤80 ng/mL [n = 300]; P = 0.56 and P = 1.0, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: No distinct pharmacokinetic patterns underlying ESC-associated ADRs were observed. Further studies with more specific assessments of ADRs in larger cohorts are required to better identify potential underlying patterns.

Levomethadone Therapeutic Drug Monitoring to Aid Opioid Withdrawal Therapy: A Short Communication.

BACKGROUND: Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is recommended for opioid maintenance therapy with levomethadone. However, TDM has not yet been applied to monitor opioid withdrawal therapy clinically, although tools to improve it are required. METHODS: In this observational cohort study, repeated TDM with levomethadone was performed according to a prospective opioid withdrawal study protocol. Objective and subjective opioid withdrawal symptoms were measured using validated rating scales and correlated to levomethadone plasma concentrations. Plasma levels were measured using high-pressure liquid chromatography with column switching and spectroscopic detection of methadone and its major metabolite. RESULTS: This study included 31 opioid-dependent patients who participated in standardized opioid withdrawal therapy. The serum levels of levomethadone were found to be highly variable and below the recommended therapeutic reference range of 250 ng/mL for maintenance therapy. These serum levels were positively correlated with dosage (r = 0.632; P < 0.001) and inversely correlated with subjective (r = -0.29; P = 0.011) and objective (r = -0.28; P = 0.014) withdrawal symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: The evidence provided sheds light on how to improve levomethadone withdrawal therapy in patients with opioid dependence. It seems likely that higher initial doses at the beginning and lower dose reductions would have been advantageous. TDM can enhance the safety of opioid withdrawal therapies, minimize withdrawal symptoms, and reduce dropout rates.

An International Adult Guideline for Making Clozapine Titration Safer by Using Six Ancestry-Based Personalized Dosing Titrations, CRP, and Clozapine Levels.

This international guideline proposes improving clozapine package inserts worldwide by using ancestry-based dosing and titration. Adverse drug reaction (ADR) databases suggest that clozapine is the third most toxic drug in the United States (US), and it produces four times higher worldwide pneumonia mortality than that by agranulocytosis or myocarditis. For trough steady-state clozapine serum concentrations, the therapeutic reference range is narrow, from 350 to 600 ng/mL with the potential for toxicity and ADRs as concentrations increase. Clozapine is mainly metabolized by CYP1A2 (female non-smokers, the lowest dose; male smokers, the highest dose). Poor metabolizer status through phenotypic conversion is associated with co-prescription of inhibitors (including oral contraceptives and valproate), obesity, or inflammation with C-reactive protein (CRP) elevations. The Asian population (Pakistan to Japan) or the Americas' original inhabitants have lower CYP1A2 activity and require lower clozapine doses to reach concentrations of 350 ng/mL. In the US, daily doses of 300-600 mg/day are recommended. Slow personalized titration may prevent early ADRs (including syncope, myocarditis, and pneumonia). This guideline defines six personalized titration schedules for inpatients: 1) ancestry from Asia or the original people from the Americas with lower metabolism (obesity or valproate) needing minimum therapeutic dosages of 75-150 mg/day, 2) ancestry from Asia or the original people from the Americas with average metabolism needing 175-300 mg/day, 3) European/Western Asian ancestry with lower metabolism (obesity or valproate) needing 100-200 mg/day, 4) European/Western Asian ancestry with average metabolism needing 250-400 mg/day, 5) in the US with ancestries other than from Asia or the original people from the Americas with lower clozapine metabolism (obesity or valproate) needing 150-300 mg/day, and 6) in the US with ancestries other than from Asia or the original people from the Americas with average clozapine metabolism needing 300-600 mg/day. Baseline and weekly CRP monitoring for at least four weeks is required to identify any inflammation, including inflammation secondary to clozapine rapid titration.

Tolerability of High-Dose Venlafaxine After Switch From Escitalopram in Nonresponding Patients With Major Depressive Disorder.

BACKGROUND: Within a single depressive episode, most patients receive different antidepressants because of an inadequate response to the first-line antidepressant. A commonly used strategy is to switch from a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor to a selective serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor. However, little is known about the tolerability of this switch with consideration of dose and drug concentration in blood. METHODS: After 4 weeks of inadequate response to escitalopram (10-20 mg/d), medication was switched to another 4 weeks of venlafaxine (VF, 150-375 mg/d) in 234 depressed patients. Serum concentrations, depression severity, and adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were assessed weekly. RESULTS: The switch of medication led to an increase of ADRs such as reduced salivation (+11%), orthostatic dizziness (+11%), and sweating (+9.8%). The most frequent ADRs during treatment with VF were reduced salivation (28.6%), sweating (24.6%), and orthostatic dizziness (15.8%). In patients receiving high-dose VF, a significant improvement of depressive symptomatology was observed, and most ADRs decreased during the course of treatment, even in patients above the therapeutic reference range. LIMITATIONS: Patients and physicians were aware of medication, and there was no direct comparison with the herein presented switch of medication. IMPLICATIONS: This study provides important information about the tolerability of a commonly used antidepressant treatment strategy. More detailed information about putative ADRs may help clinicians increase compliance through effective patient education. Because ADRs of VF were associated with the plasma concentration, therapeutic drug monitoring is recommended to guide the therapy and manage problems of tolerability.

Current use of anticholinergic medications in a large naturalistic sample of psychiatric patients.

Due to the high number of psychotropic drugs with anticholinergic potential, patients taking psychotropic drugs are at high risk for anticholinergic adverse drug reactions (ADRs). The aim of this study was to analyze the prevalence and type of pharmacodynamic anticholinergic drug-drug interactions in psychiatric patients. The retrospective longitudinal analysis used data from a large pharmacovigilance study conducted in ten German psychiatric hospitals. Anticholinergic burden of drugs was defined as "strong" or "moderate" based on current literature. Number and type of anticholinergic drugs were assessed. In total, 27,396 patient cases (45.6% female) with a mean age of 47.3 ± 18.3 years were included. 17.4% (n = 4760) of patients were ≥ 64 years. 35.4% of the patients received between one and four anticholinergic drugs simultaneously. A combination of drugs with anticholinergic potential was detected in 1738 cases (6.3%). Most prescribed drugs were promethazine (n = 2996), olanzapine (n = 2561), biperiden (n = 1074), and doxepin (n = 963). Patients receiving anticholinergic combinations were younger (45.7 vs. 47.4 years, p < 0.01) and had a longer inpatient stay (median 18 vs. 26.5 days, p < 0.001). The prevalence of anticholinergic drug use in psychiatry is high. Further efforts need to focus on reducing the rate of anticholinergics and inappropriate medication especially in the elderly. Anticholinergic ADRs can be prevented by avoiding high-risk drug combinations. Replacing tricyclic antidepressants and first-generation antihistamines with drugs with lower anticholinergic potential and avoiding biperiden could reduce 59.3% of anticholinergic drug application.

Pharmacodynamic Drug-Drug interactions of QT-prolonging drugs in hospitalized psychiatric patients.

At least 170 approved drugs are linked to QT prolongation, which can lead to serious adverse drug reactions (ADRs), such as Torsade de Pointes (TdP). The aim of this study was to analyze the prevalence and type of pharmacodynamic drug-drug interactions (DDIs) between QT-prolonging drugs in psychiatry. The present retrospective analysis used data from a large pharmacovigilance study, conducted in 10 psychiatric hospitals in Germany. Patients medication lists were screened for QT-prolonging drugs, classified according to the Arizona Center for Education and Research on Therapeutics (AZCERT). In total, 27,396 patient cases (46% female) with a mean (± standard deviation) age of 47 ± 18 years were included in the study. Altogether, 83% of the cases received at least one and up to eight QT-prolonging drugs at the same time. Combination of drugs with a known or possible risk for TdP (according to the AZCERT) was detected in 13,670 cases (50%). Most frequently prescribed psychotropic high-risk drugs (n = 48,995) were the antipsychotics pipamperone (n = 6202), quetiapine (n = 5718), prothipendyl (n = 4298), and risperidone (n = 4265). The replacement of high-risk drugs such as tricyclic antidepressants, levomepromazine, melperone, and promethazine with more tolerable drugs could avoid 11% of QT-prolonging drugs and increase the tolerability of psychopharmacological treatment. More than 80% of psychiatric patients receive at least one QT-prolonging drug during their hospital stay, and almost 50% of these drugs are combined in clinical practice. For the prevention of cardiac ADRs, the physician should evaluate the risk for QT prolongation for each drug and patient-specific risk factors before prescribing these drugs or drug combinations.

Metamizole but not ibuprofen reduces the plasma concentration of sertraline: Implications for the concurrent treatment of pain and depression/anxiety disorders.

AIM: Comorbidity of pain and depression or anxiety is a challenging clinical phenomenon, often requiring the concurrent application of antidepressant and analgesic drugs. Growing evidence suggests that the analgesic metamizole exhibits cytochrome P450 inducing properties. In the present study, we assessed the impact of metamizole and ibuprofen on plasma concentrations of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor sertraline. METHODS: Out of a therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) database, three groups of patients were compared: patients receiving sertraline and metamizole (n = 15), patients receiving sertraline and ibuprofen (n = 19), and a matched control group without one of the analgesics (n = 19). RESULTS: Metamizole was associated with 67% lower median sertraline plasma concentrations compared to the control group (14 vs 42 ng/mL, P < 0.001). In contrast, differences between the ibuprofen group and the control group did not reach statistical significance (31 vs 42 ng/mL, P = 0.128). Moreover, the metamizole group demonstrated lower dose-adjusted drug concentrations than the ibuprofen group (0.10 vs 0.26 (ng/mL)/(mg/day), P = 0.008). Finally, the metamizole group exhibited a higher proportion of patients whose sertraline concentrations were below the therapeutic reference range (40% in the metamizole group, 5% in the ibuprofen group, 0% in the control group, P = 0.005) indicating therapeutically insufficient drug concentrations. CONCLUSION: Our findings support preliminary evidence that metamizole acts as a potent inductor of cytochrome P450 isoenzymes CYP2B6 and CYP3A4. We observed a clinically meaningful pharmacokinetic interaction between metamizole and sertraline, leading to insufficiently low sertraline drug concentrations. Clinicians should therefore consider alternative drug combinations or apply TDM-guided dose adjustment of sertraline.

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Long-Acting Injectable Antipsychotic Drugs.

BACKGROUND: The use of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) to guide treatment with long-acting injectable (LAI) antipsychotics, which are increasingly prescribed, remains a matter of debate. The aim of this review was to provide a practical framework for the integration of TDM when switching from an oral formulation to the LAI counterpart, and in maintenance treatment. METHODS: The authors critically reviewed 3 types of data: (1) positron emission tomography data evaluating dopamine (D2/D3) receptor occupancy related to antipsychotic concentrations in serum or plasma; D2/D3 receptors are embraced as target sites in the brain for antipsychotic efficacy and tolerability, (2) pharmacokinetic studies evaluating the switch from oral to LAI antipsychotics, and (3) pharmacokinetic data for LAI formulations. Based on these data, indications for TDM and therapeutic reference ranges were considered for LAI antipsychotics. RESULTS: Antipsychotic concentrations in blood exhibited interindividual variability not only under oral but also under LAI formulations because these concentrations are affected by demographic characteristics such as age and sex, genetic peculiarities, and clinical variables, including comedications and comorbidities. Reported data combined with positron emission tomography evidence indicated a trend toward lower concentrations under LAI administration than under oral medications. However, the available evidence is insufficient to recommend LAI-specific therapeutic reference ranges. CONCLUSIONS: Although TDM evidence for newer LAI formulations is limited, this review suggests the use of TDM when switching an antipsychotic from oral to its LAI formulation. The application of TDM practice is more accurate for dose selection than the use of dose equivalents as it accounts more precisely for individual characteristics.

Potentially inappropriate medication in older psychiatric patients.

PURPOSE: Many psychotropic drugs are listed as potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) in the older population. Potentially inappropriate means that prescription of those drugs in older adults may cause significant harm. The objective of this study was to analyze the prevalence and sort of PIM prescribing in a naturalistic, real-world psychiatric setting. METHODS: The retrospective analysis gathered data from a large pharmacovigilance study, conducted at 10 psychiatric hospitals. Data from inpatients aged ≥ 65 years were included for the analysis. The number and sort of PIM, as defined by the German PRISCUS list, were controlled by analyzing the patients' medication profile. RESULTS: In total, 4760 patient cases (59.2% female) with a mean (mean ± standard deviation (SD)) age of 77.33 ± 7.77 years were included into the study. Altogether, 1615 cases (33.9%) received at least 1 PRISCUS-PIM per day (regular and as-needed medication included). The most frequently prescribed PRISCUS-PIM (n = 2144) were zopiclone > 3.75 mg/day (n = 310), lorazepam > 2 mg/day (n = 269), haloperidol > 2 mg/day (n = 252), and diazepam (n = 182). Cases with PRISCUS-PIM were younger (75.7 vs. 78.2 years, p < 0.001) and had a longer (26 vs. 22 days, p < 0.001) hospital length of stay. Replacing benzodiazepines and z-substances, haloperidol > 2 mg, tricyclic antidepressants, first generation antihistaminergic drugs, and clonidine by non-PIM could reduce 69.9% of PRISCUS-PIM-prescribing. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of PRISCUS-PIM is high in the hospitalized psychiatric setting. Rational deprescribing of inappropriate anticholinergics, benzodiazepines, and antipsychotics in the older population is a key component to reduce the risk of adverse drug reactions. More tolerable medications should be prescribed.

Buprenorphine-cannabis interaction in patients undergoing opioid maintenance therapy.

Buprenorphine is a partial µ-opioid agonist widely used for opioid maintenance therapy (OMT). It is mainly metabolized to pharmacologically active norbuprenorphine by the cytochrome P450 (CYP) isozyme 3A4. This may give rise to drug-drug interactions under combinations with inhibitors or inducers of CYP3A4. Cannabis is a potential inhibitor of CYP3A4, and there is a large degree of concomitant cannabis use among OMT patients. We performed a retrospective analysis on liver healthy OMT patients substituted with buprenorphine, either with (n = 15) or without (n = 17) concomitant use of cannabis. Patients with additional illicit drugs or medications affecting CYP3A were excluded. Measured blood concentrations of buprenorphine and norbuprenorphine were compared between the two groups. Cannabis users and non-users received similar doses, but users had 2.7-fold higher concentrations of buprenorphine (p < 0.01) and 1.4-fold for norbuprenorphine (1.4-fold, p = 0.07). Moreover, the metabolite-to-parent drug ratio was 0.98 in non-users and 0.38 in users (p = 0.02). Female gender did not produce significant effects. These findings indicate that cannabis use decreases the formation of norbuprenorphine and elevates buprenorphine and norbuprenorphine concentrations in blood most probably by inhibition of CYP3A4. The pharmacokinetic interaction may give rise to enhanced or altered opioid activity and risk of intoxications. Physicians should inform patients about this risk and supervise cannabis users by regular control of buprenorphine blood levels, i.e., by therapeutic drug monitoring.

Clinical response in patients treated with once-monthly paliperidone palmitate: analysis of a therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) database.

To investigate pharmacokinetic correlates of clinical response in patients treated with once-monthly paliperidone palmitate (PP1M) injections at steady state. Plasma concentrations and dose-adjusted-plasma concentrations (C/D) of paliperidone from a naturalistic therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) database were compared between responders and non-responders using the Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement scale (CGI-I) ratings. Analyses were based on the non-parametric Mann-Whitney U test and the Pearson Chi-squared test (χ2) with a significance level of 0.05. Subgroup analyses were performed separately in patients with schizophrenia spectrum, schizoaffective disorders and bipolar disorders. Comparing 93 responders with 80 non-responders, we detected no significant differences in the proportion of females, age, and body mass index (p's ranging 0.18-0.83); there were more smokers in the group of non-responders (p = 0.04), which also included more patients with bipolar disorders (p = 0.014). Despite the lack of differences for prescribed PP1M doses and dose intervals (p = 0.42 and p = 0.11, respectively), non-responders had higher paliperidone plasma concentrations and C/D levels (p = 0.033 and p = 0.021, respectively). Subgroup analyses did not yield differences for paliperidone plasma and C/D levels between non-responders and responders with schizophrenia spectrum (p = 0.099 and p = 0.14, respectively) and bipolar disorders (p = 0.95 and p = 0.75, respectively); dose-adjusted plasma concentrations were higher in non-responders compared to responders with schizoaffective disorders (p = 0.039), while no differences were reported for plasma levels (p = 0. 15). Our results show that paliperidone plasma concentrations over injection doses may be associated with patterns of clinical response suggesting potential utility of TDM as part of PP1M-based maintenance treatment.

Polypharmacy and the risk of drug-drug interactions and potentially inappropriate medications in hospital psychiatry.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to analyze the epidemiology of polypharmacy in hospital psychiatry. Another aim was to investigate predictors of the number of drugs taken and the associated risks of drug-drug interactions and potentially inappropriate medications in the elderly. METHODS: Daily prescription data were obtained from a pharmacovigilance project sponsored by the Innovations Funds of the German Federal Joint Committee. RESULTS: The study included 47 071 inpatient hospital cases from eight different study centers. The mean number of different drugs during the entire stay was 6.1 (psychotropic drugs = 2.7; others = 3.4). The mean number of drugs per day was 3.8 (psychotropic drugs = 1.6; others = 2.2). One third of cases received at least five different drugs per day on average during their hospital stay (polypharmacy). Fifty-one percent of patients received more than one psychotropic drug simultaneously. Hospital cases with polypharmacy were 18 years older (p < 0.001), more likely to be female (52% vs. 40%, p < 0.001) and had more comorbidities (5 vs. 2, p < 0.001) than hospital cases without polypharmacy. The risks of drug-drug interactions (OR = 3.7; 95% CI = 3.5-3.9) and potentially inappropriate medication use in the elderly (OR = 2.2; CI = 1.9-2.5) substantially increased in patients that received polypharmacy. CONCLUSION: Polypharmacy is frequent in clinical care. The number of used drugs is a proven risk factor of adverse drug reactions due to drug-drug interactions and potentially inappropriate medication use in the elderly. The potential interactions and the specific pharmacokinetics and -dynamics of older patients should always be considered when multiple drugs are used.

Lack of Smoking Effects on Pharmacokinetics of Oral Paliperidone-analysis of a Naturalistic Therapeutic Drug Monitoring Sample.

INTRODUCTION: Major smoking effects have been reported for a series of psychotropic agents, mainly including substrates of CYP450 1A2, although smoking may also affect alternative metabolic pathways. To our knowledge, smoking effects on paliperidone pharmacokinetics have not been assessed yet. METHODS: We compared plasma concentrations of paliperidone as well as dose-corrected-plasma concentrations (C/D) from a naturalistic database between smokers and nonsmokers using nonparametrical tests, such as the Mann-Whitney U-test (MWU). Additionally, we compared light and heavy smokers with nonsmokers separately. RESULTS: Comparing 55 smokers with 37 nonsmokers treated with oral paliperidone, no differences in the percentage of females, age, body weight, body mass index, and daily paliperidone dose were reported (p=0.709 for χ2, p=0.26, p=0.38, p=0.67, and p=0.8 for MWU). No differences were detected in plasma concentrations or C/D values (p=0.50 and p=0.96 for MWU). Likewise, differences in daily dose, plasma concentrations, or C/D values were not significant between light smokers (n=17) and nonsmokers (p=0.61, p=0.81, and p=0.33 for MWU) or heavy smokers (n=22) and nonsmokers (p=0.874, p=0.38, and p=0.59; MWU in all cases). DISCUSSION: Paliperidone is not affected by smoking, and paliperidone dose-adjustments in smokers may not be necessary. This may be seen as an essential difference to risperidone, whose cytochrome-mediated metabolism might be affected by smoking.

[Therapeutic drug monitoring to optimize psychopharmacotherapy in children and adolescents - Update and guidelines for practice]. / Therapeutisches Drug Monitoring zur Optimierung der Psychopharmakotherapie von Kindern und Jugendlichen.

Therapeutic drug monitoring to optimize psychopharmacotherapy in children and adolescents - Update and guidelines for practice Abstract. Despite the improved evidence base, many uncertainties remain in child and adolescent psychiatric pharmacotherapy about the efficacy and tolerability of drugs, which are often prescribed off-label or in combination therapy in this age group. Because medium- to long-term use is unavoidable in many cases, clinicians should minimize adverse drug reactions as far as possible and tailor an effective dosage to the individual characteristics of the patient. Not only are children and adolescents particularly vulnerable to certain adverse drug effects, they are also exposed to iatrogenic risks from dosing or application errors, which can lead to under- or overdosing with correspondingly negative effects on the success of the therapy. In addition to determining a strict indication, it is therefore essential to establish precise dosage and systematic monitoring of the safety of the psychopharmacotherapy. This article introduces therapeutic drug monitoring as a useful clinical tool and describes how its correct application in practice can improve the efficacy as well as the safety and tolerability of psychotropic therapy in children and adolescents for the immediate benefit of patients. Keywords: Psychopharmacotherapy, adverse drug reactions, pharmacovigilance, therapeutic drug monitoring, quality assurance.

Safety of psychotropic medications in people with COVID-19: evidence review and practical recommendations.

BACKGROUND: The novel coronavirus pandemic calls for a rapid adaptation of conventional medical practices to meet the evolving needs of such vulnerable patients. People with coronavirus disease (COVID-19) may frequently require treatment with psychotropic medications, but are at the same time at higher risk for safety issues because of the complex underlying medical condition and the potential interaction with medical treatments. METHODS: In order to produce evidence-based practical recommendations on the optimal management of psychotropic medications in people with COVID-19, an international, multi-disciplinary working group was established. The methodology of the WHO Rapid Advice Guidelines in the context of a public health emergency and the principles of the AGREE statement were followed. Available evidence informing on the risk of respiratory, cardiovascular, infective, hemostatic, and consciousness alterations related to the use of psychotropic medications, and drug-drug interactions between psychotropic and medical treatments used in people with COVID-19, was reviewed and discussed by the working group. RESULTS: All classes of psychotropic medications showed potentially relevant safety risks for people with COVID-19. A set of practical recommendations was drawn in order to inform frontline clinicians on the assessment of the anticipated risk of psychotropic-related unfavorable events, and the possible actions to take in order to effectively manage this risk, such as when it is appropriate to avoid, withdraw, switch, or adjust the dose of the medication. CONCLUSIONS: The present evidence-based recommendations will improve the quality of psychiatric care in people with COVID-19, allowing an appropriate management of the medical condition without worsening the psychiatric condition and vice versa.

Correction to: Safety of psychotropic medications in people with COVID-19: evidence review and practical recommendations.

An amendment to this paper has been published and can be accessed via the original article.

Prevalence and sort of pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions in hospitalized psychiatric patients.

Psychiatric patients are high-risk patients for the development of pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions (DDIs), leading to highly variable (victim) drug serum concentrations. Avoiding and targeting high-risk drug combinations could reduce preventable adverse drug reactions (ADRs). Pharmacokinetic cytochrome P450 (CYP)-mediated DDIs are often predictable and, therefore, preventable. The retrospective, longitudinal analysis used informations from a large pharmacovigilance study (Optimization of pharmacological treatment in hospitalized psychiatric patients study, study number 01VSF16009, 01/2017), conducted in 10 psychiatric hospitals in Germany. Medication data were examined for the co-prescription of clinically relevant CYP inhibitors or inducers and substrates of these enzymes (victim drugs). In total, data from 27,396 patient cases (45.6% female) with a mean (mean ± standard deviation (SD)) age of 47.3 ± 18.3 years were available for analysis. CYP inhibitors or inducers were at least once prescribed in 14.4% (n = 3946) of the cases. The most frequently prescribed CYP inhibitors were melperone (n = 2504, 28.1%) and duloxetine (n = 1324, 14.9%). Overall, 51.0% of the cases taking melperone were combined with a victim drug (n = 1288). Carbamazepine was the most frequently prescribed CYP inducer (n = 733, 88.8%). Combinations with victim drugs were detected for 58% (n = 427) of cases on medication with carbamazepine. Finally, a DDI was detected in 43.6% of the cases in which a CYP inhibitor or inducer was prescribed. The frequency of CYP-mediated DDI is considerably high in the psychiatric setting. Physicians should be aware of the CYP inhibitory and inducing potential of psychotropic and internistic drugs (especially, melperone).

Dose-Related Concentrations of Neuroactive/Psychoactive Drugs Expected in Blood of Children and Adolescents.

PURPOSE: Therapeutic drug monitoring is highly recommended for children and adolescents treated with neurotropic/psychotropic drugs. For interpretation of therapeutic drug monitoring results, drug concentrations (C/D) expected in a "normal" population are helpful to identify pharmacokinetic abnormalities or nonadherence. Using dose-related concentration (DRC) factors obtained from pharmacokinetic data, C/D ranges expected under steady state can be easily calculated by multiplication of DRC by the daily dose. DRC factors, however, are defined only for adults so far. Therefore, it was the aim of this study to estimate DRC factors for children and adolescents and compare them with those of adults. METHODS: To obtain pharmacokinetic data (apparent total clearance of drugs from plasma after oral administration, elimination half-life, area under the curve, and minimum serum drug concentration) from children and adolescents treated with psychotropic drugs, a systematic review of published literature was performed, and the pharmaceutical companies that market these drugs were contacted. Available information was used for the calculation of DRC factors. RESULTS: Fourteen of 26 drugs had similar DRC factors to those reported for adults; 8 and 4 had higher and lower factors, respectively. The antidepressants citalopram, clomipramine, fluvoxamine, and imipramine and the antipsychotics haloperidol and olanzapine showed higher DRC factors than those calculated for adults. The DRC factors of amphetamine and methylphenidate were higher in children (6-12 years) but not in adolescents (13-17 years). On the contrary, the antipsychotic quetiapine and the mood-stabilizing antiepileptics lamotrigine, oxcarbazepine, and topiramate showed lower DRC factors than those calculated for adults. CONCLUSIONS: It was concluded that concentrations of neuroactive/psychoactive drugs to be expected in blood for a given dose may differ between adults and children or adolescents, most probably owing to age-dependent differences in the elimination of these drugs.

Methylphenidate challenge test in adults with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD): Clinical effects and their predictors.

OBJECTIVE: Adult and children attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) share similar symptoms and responses to drugs such as methylphenidate (MPH). Yet, in Europe, these drugs remain unlicensed for adults. We aimed to assess the effects of an acute MPH challenge on the four dimensions concentration, impulsivity, tension, and general well-being in ADHD adults, and identify predictors of improvement. METHODS: Therapeutic Drug Monitoring was performed to measure MPH plasma levels. A Visual Analogue Scale was administered to patients before and after the acute MPH challenge to measure self-reported changes in the four dimensions. RESULTS: After the acute MPH challenge, our 71 patients showed significant improvement in concentration and tension. The MPH challenge dose correlated with lower patients' age, greater side effects, increased concentration (p = .008) and decreased tension (p = .001). At multiple linear regression MPH plasma levels and absence of postdose side effects predicted concentration improvement, MPH plasma levels predicted tension improvement. MPH plasma levels were significantly higher in patients who reported an improvement in concentration, tension, and impulsivity compared to nonimprovers (p's from .001 to .004). CONCLUSIONS: These findings point to the efficacy of MPH challenge in improving concentration and tension in adult ADHD, thus emphasizing the need for a broader treatment access for these patients.

The Effects of Co-prescription of Pantoprazole on the Clozapine Metabolism.

BACKGROUND: Polypharmacy including somatic medications such as proton pump inhibitors is a common phenomenon in psychiatric care. The aim of this study was to evaluate the pantoprazole effects on clozapine metabolism. METHODS: A large therapeutic drug-monitoring database containing plasma concentrations of CLZ was analyzed. The results were stratified into four groups: a non-smoking (n=250) and a smoking group (n=326), and two groups co-medicated with pantoprazole: non-smokers (n=26) and smokers (n=29). The analysis was based on the non-parametrical Mann-Whitney U test (M-W-U) with a significance level of 0.05. RESULTS: Differences reached statistical significance for pharmacokinetic parameters between CLZ monotherapy and co-medication with pantoprazole neither in smokers nor in non-smokers (p>0.05 for M-W-U in pairwise comparisons). In patients with clozapine monotherapy, smokers had a higher daily dosage of CLZ compared to non-smokers (mean dosage 363±181 vs. 291±145 mg/day, p<0.001 for M-W-U). CONCLUSIONS: Adding pantoprazole to an ongoing treatment with clozapine does not alter the metabolism of clozapine to a significant extent.