Preserved gastric motility in patients with early gastric cancer after endoscopic submucosal dissection.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is now accepted as a minimally invasive treatment for early gastric cancer (EGC). To our knowledge, however, the functional effects of ESD have not been determined in patients with EGC. We therefore investigated whether gastric motility was affected by ESD. METHODS: Using the (13) C-octanoic acid breath test, gastric emptying of solid test meals was examined in 26 EGC patients and 18 healthy controls, with EGC patients assayed before and about 2 months after ESD. Based on (13) CO2 breath-excretion curves, the lag-phase time (T(lag) ), half-emptying time (T(1/2) ), and gastric emptying coefficient (GEC) were calculated as indices of gastric emptying. RESULTS: In healthy controls, the mean T(lag), T(1/2), and GEC were 85.5 ± 4.9 min, 148.5 ± 8.0 min, and 3.01 ± 0.09 h, respectively. Before ESD, the mean T(lag) , T(1/2), and GEC in the EGC patients were 90.1 ± 5.5 min, 174.7 ± 10.4 min, 2.64 ± 0.08 h, respectively. GEC, but not T(lag) or T(1/2), differed significantly in the two groups, with gastric emptying slower in EGC patients than in controls. Relative to before ESD, the mean T(lag), T(1/2), and GEC in EGC patients after ESD were 109.2% ± 7.8%, 107.9% ± 9.6%, 108.4% ± 4.7%, respectively, indicating that ESD did not significantly affect any of these gastric emptying parameters in EGC patients. CONCLUSION: ESD is an effective treatment for EGC both in preserving organs and gastric motility.

Endoscopic submucosal dissection using a grasping-type scissors forceps for early gastric cancers and adenomas.

AIM: To reduce the risk of complications related to endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) using knives, we developed a new grasping-type scissors forceps (GSF) that can grasp and incise the target tissue using electrosurgical current. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ESD using GSF for the removal of early gastric cancers and adenomas. METHODS: ESD using GSF was carried out on 35 consecutive patients with early gastric cancers or adenomas who had preoperative EUS diagnoses of mucosal tumor without lymph node involvement. Therapeutic efficacy and safety were assessed. RESULTS: All lesions were treated easily and safely without unexpected incision. The mean size of epithelial tumors and resected specimens was 15.6mm and 32.7mm, respectively. Curative en-bloc resection rates according to tumor size and location were 96% (26/27) in tumors ≤20mm, 100% (8/8) in tumors >20mm, 100% (18/18) of tumors in the lower portion, 100% (8/8) of tumors in the middle portion, 89% (8/9) of tumors in the upper portion, and 97% (34/35) overall. The mean operating time according to tumor size and location was 93.4min in tumors ≤20mm, 140min in tumors >20mm, 77.6min for tumors in the lower portion, 113.4min for tumors in the middle portion, 148.6min for tumors in the upper portion, and 104.1min overall. No intraoperative complication occurred, and postoperative bleeding was seen in 3% (1/35). CONCLUSIONS: ESD using GSF allows simple and safe en-bloc resection of early gastric cancer or adenoma irrespective of tumor size and location.

Randomized controlled trial: roxatidine vs omeprazole for non-erosive reflux disease.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy is considered as the first choice for treatment of non-erosive reflux disease (NERD). However, NERD is less sensitive to PPIs than erosive gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and the differences between PPIs and H2 receptor antagonists are less evident in NERD than in erosive GERD. Since gastric acid secretion is lower in the Japanese population than in Western populations, we aimed to investigate whether PPI therapy is really necessary for NERD patients in Japan. METHODOLOGY: Thirty-three symptomatic endoscopically diagnosed NERD patients were randomly assigned to receive roxatidine acetate 75 mg twice daily (n = 16) or omeprazole 20 mg once daily (n = 17). Gastrointestinal symptoms were assessed using the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale at baseline and after 4 and 8 weeks of treatment. RESULTS: Both roxatidine and omeprazole significantly improved the heartburn score at 4 and 8 weeks. The clinical response rates did not differ between roxatidine and omeprazole. Both roxatidine and omeprazole significantly relieved not only reflux but also abdominal pain and indigestion. The degrees of improvement did not differ between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Roxatidine relieved the symptoms of NERD patients with similar effectiveness to omeprazole. Therefore, roxatidine may be a good choice for NERD treatment.

Role of EUS and EUS-guided FNA in the diagnosis of rectal implantation cyst at an anastomosis site after a previous low anterior resection for a rectal cancer without evidence of cancer recurrence.

BACKGROUND: Rectal implantation cysts occurring at an anastomosis site after a low anterior resection for rectal cancer need to be distinguished from locally recurrent rectal cancer. OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to evaluate the role of EUS and EUS-FNA in the diagnosis of rectal implantation cyst. DESIGN: Case series. PATIENTS: A review of medical records identified 3 men and 1 woman who were diagnosed with rectal implantation cyst by EUS and EUS-FNA. RESULTS: All 4 cases had undergone a low anterior resection with the double-stapling technique for a rectal cancer from 12 to 67 months (median 33.8 months) earlier. Follow-up colonoscopy revealed a rectal submucosal tumor at an anastomosis site. EUS revealed cystic lesions with heterogeneous wall thickness from the third layer or the fourth layer to the surroundings. EUS-FNA revealed mucin that contained a few inflammatory cells and no malignant cells in any of the patients. From the findings of EUS and EUS-FNA, all patients were diagnosed with rectal implantation cyst, thus avoiding surgery. LIMITATION: Small number of patients. CONCLUSIONS: EUS and EUS-FNA are useful in the diagnosis of rectal implantation cyst and the avoidance of unnecessary radical surgery.

Endoscopic submucosal dissection by using a grasping-type scissors forceps: a preliminary clinical study (with video).

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) with a knife is a technically demanding procedure associated with a high complication rate. The shortcoming of this method is the difficulty of fixing the knife to the target lesion. It can lead to an unexpected incision and result in major complications, such as perforation and bleeding. To reduce the risk of complications related to ESD, we developed a new grasping-type scissors forceps (GSF), which can grasp and incise the targeted tissue by using electrosurgical current. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of ESD by using GSF for the removal of gastric neoplasms in human beings. DESIGN: Prospective, uncontrolled, single center. SETTING: Department of Gastroenterology, Aso Iizuka Hospital, Iizuka, Japan. PATIENTS: Four patients with early gastric neoplastic lesions. INTERVENTIONS: After marking and injection of a solution into the submucosa, the lesion was separated from the surrounding normal mucosa by complete incision around the lesion by using the GSF. A piece of submucosal tissue was grasped and cut with the GSF by using electrosurgical current to achieve submucosal excision. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENT: Technical success and complications. RESULTS: All lesions were treated easily and safely, without any unexpected incisions. No delayed hemorrhage and perforation occurred. An en bloc resection and a negative resection margin was obtained in all cases. LIMITATIONS: The small number of patients and an uncontrolled study. CONCLUSIONS: ESD with GSF appeared to be an easy, safe, and technically efficient method for resecting GI neoplasms.

[Case of Zollinger-Ellison syndrome diagnosed three years after ulcer perforation in the third portion of the duodenum].

A 61-year-old woman was referred to our hospital for a double balloon endoscopy (DBE) examination of small intestine. She had undergone laparotomy for a perforated ulcer of the 3rd portion in the duodenum 3 years prior to this admission. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy at the previous hospital revealed multiple ulcers in the 2nd and 3rd portions in the duodenum. DBE revealed multiple ulcer scars in the proximal jejunum. Zollinger-Ellison syndrome was suspected from the distribution of the ulcers and scars. Serum gastrin was high and a selective arterial calcium injection test showed a step up of gastrin level only in the gastroduodenal artery area. We diagnosed a gastrinoma located on the ventral side of the 2nd portion of the duodenum from imaging studies. The tumor was extirpated and histologically found to be a neuroendocrine tumor in a lymph node. Serum gastrin level decreased to the normal range a day after surgery.

Gastric emptying in diabetic patients by the (13)C-octanoic acid breath test: role of insulin in gastric motility.

BACKGROUND: Impairment of gastric emptying is well recognized in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM), especially long-standing insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM). The aim of this study was to evaluate the cause of delayed gastric emptying in DM patients. METHODS: In 16 controls, 16 non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) patients and 23 IDDM patients, gastric emptying was studied using the (13)C octanoic acid breath test. Breath samples were taken before a test meal labeled with 100 mg of (13)C octanoic acid, and at 15-min intervals over a 300-min period postprandially. RESULTS: In all DM patients, the gastric emptying coefficient was lower than that in the controls (P < 0.05), and lag time and half-emptying time were significantly longer (P < 0.05). Both NIDDM and IDDM patients showed delayed (13)CO(2) excretion compared with the controls, but IDDM patients showed more delayed gastric emptying than NIDDM patients (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in sex, HbA1c level, or the rate of neuropathy between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: IDDM patients showed delayed gastric emptying compared with NIDDM patients, and the (13)C octanoic acid breath test is useful for evaluating DM patients with delayed gastric emptying.

Acute pancreatitis associated with peroral double-balloon enteroscopy: a case report.

A 58-year-old Japanese man had tarry stool and severe anemia. Neither upper nor lower gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy showed any localized lesions. Thus, the source of his GI bleeding was suspected to be in the small intestine, and he underwent peroral double-balloon enteroscopy (DBE) using EN-450T5 (Fujinon-Toshiba ES System Co., Tokyo, Japan). There were no lesions considered to be the source of GI bleeding. After the procedure, the patient began to experience abdominal pain. Laboratory tests revealed hyperamylasemia and abdominal computed tomography revealed an inflammation of the pancreas and the peripancreas. He was thus diagnosed to have acute pancreatitis. Conservative treatments resulted in both clinical and laboratory amelioration. He had no history of alcohol ingestion, gallstone disease or pancreatitis. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography demonstrated no structural alterations and no stones in the pancreatobiliary ductal system. As his abdominal pain started after the procedure, his acute pancreatitis was thus thought to have been related to the peroral DBE. This is the first reported case of acute pancreatitis probably associated with peroral DBE.

Improved techniques for double-balloon-enteroscopy-assisted endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.

AIM: To investigate the clinical outcome of double balloon enteroscopy (DBE)-assisted endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (DB-ERCP) in patients with altered gastrointestinal anatomy. METHODS: Between September 2006 and April 2011, 47 procedures of DB-ERCP were performed in 28 patients with a Roux-en-Y total gastrectomy (n = 11), Billroth II gastrectomy (n = 15), or Roux-en-Y anastomosis with hepaticojejunostomy (n = 2). DB-ERCP was performed using a short-type DBE combined with several technical innovations such as using an endoscope attachment, marking by submucosal tattooing, selectively applying contrast medium, and CO2 insufflations. RESULTS: The papilla of Vater or hepaticojejunostomy site was reached in its entirety with a 96% success rate (45/47 procedures). There were no significant differences in the success rate of reaching the blind end with a DBE among Roux-en-Y total gastrectomy (96%), Billroth II reconstruction (94%), or pancreatoduodenectomy (100%), respectively (P = 0.91). The total successful rate of cannulation and contrast enhancement of the target bile duct in patients whom the blind end was reached with a DBE was 40/45 procedures (89%). Again, there were no significant differences in the success rate of cannulation and contrast enhancement of the target bile duct with a DBE among Roux-en-Y total gastrectomy (88 %), Billroth II reconstruction (89%), or pancreatoduodenectomy (100%), respectively (P = 0.67). Treatment was achieved in all 40 procedures (100%) in patients whom the contrast enhancement of the bile duct was successful. Common endoscopic treatments were endoscopic biliary drainage (24 procedures) and extraction of stones (14 procedures). Biliary drainage was done by placement of plastic stents. Stones extraction was done by lithotomy with the mechanical lithotripter followed by extraction with a basket or by the balloon pull-through method. Endoscopic sphincterotomy was performed in 14 procedures with a needle precutting knife using a guidewire. The mean total duration of the procedure was 93.6 ± 6.8 min and the mean time required to reach the papilla was 30.5 ± 3.7 min. The mean time required to reach the papilla tended to be shorter in Billroth II reconstruction (20.9 ± 5.8 min) than that in Roux-en-Y total gastrectomy (37.1 ± 4.9 min) but there was no significant difference (P = 0.09). A major complication occurred in one patient (3.5%); perforation of the long limb in a patient with Billroth II anastomosis. CONCLUSION: Short-type DBE combined with several technical innovations enabled us to perform ERCP in most patients with altered gastrointestinal anatomy.

Endoscopic submucosal dissection of a rectal carcinoid tumor using grasping type scissors forceps.

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) with a knife is a technically demanding procedure associated with a high complication rate. The shortcomings of this method are the inability to fix the knife to the target lesion, and compression of the lesion. These can lead to major complications such as perforation and bleeding. To reduce the risk of complications related to ESD, we developed a new grasping type scissors forceps (GSF), which can grasp and incise the targeted tissue using electrosurgical current. Colonoscopy on a 55-year-old woman revealed a 10-mm rectal submucosal nodule. The histological diagnosis of the specimen obtained by biopsy was carcinoid tumor. Endoscopic ultrasonography demonstrated a hypoechoic solid tumor limited to the submucosa without lymph node involvement. It was safely and accurately resected without unexpected incision by ESD using a GSF. No delayed hemorrhage or perforation occurred. Histological examination confirmed the carcinoid tumor was completely excised with negative resection margin.

Endoscopic resection with hypertonic saline-solution-epinephrine injection plus band ligation for large pedunculated or semipedunculated gastric polyp.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic resection of pedunculated polyps with heads 1 cm or greater in diameter presents a risk of bleeding. To minimize this complication, we performed endoscopic resection with hypertonic saline-solution-epinephrine injection plus band ligation and evaluated its safety and effectiveness. METHODS: Seventeen patients with 20 pedunculated or semipedunculated polyps with heads 1 cm or greater in diameter were treated with this technique. Conventional upper-GI endoscope, hypertonic saline-solution and epinephrine, sclerotherapy needle, and endoscopic band ligator device are needed for the procedure. OBSERVATIONS: All lesions were easily and safely resected. During this procedure, a band ligation chamber proved to be satisfactory for accurate recognition of a postpolypectomy ulcer under good visual control. No hemorrhage, perforation, or other complication occurred as a result of the use of this technique. The histologic resection margin was affected by nonneoplastic components in 6 of 20 lesions. Follow-up endoscopy 1 week later revealed a small, shallow ulcer without residual polyp in all lesions. CONCLUSIONS: This preliminary study suggests that endoscopic resection with hypertonic saline-solution-epinephrine injection plus band ligation is a simple and effective method for the prevention of polypectomy-associated bleeding. Prospective trials, including randomized controlled studies, are required to evaluate the suitability of this modality for wide clinical use.