Reflecting on Bioanalysis with the Senior Editors.

A previous Senior Editor, and the present Senior Editor of Bioanalysis reflect on their journeys in the field of bioanalysis, and with the journal. They discuss the evolution and progress of journal since its launch 10 years ago, and where they would like to see it heading in the future.

AMS method validation for quantitation in pharmacokinetic studies with concomitant extravascular and intravenous administration.

A technique has emerged in the past few years that has enabled a drug's intravenous pharmacokinetics to be readily obtained in humans without having to conduct extensive toxicology studies by this route of administration or expand protracted effort in formulation. The technique involves the intravenous administration of a low dose of (14)C-labelled drug (termed a tracer dose) concomitantly with a non-labelled extravascular dose given at therapeutically levels. Plasma samples collected over time are analysed to determine the total parent drug concentration by LC-MS (which essentially measures that arising from the oral dose) and by LC followed by accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS) to determine the (14)C-drug concentration (i.e., that arising from the intravenous dose). There are currently no published accounts of how the principles of bioanalytical validation might be applied to intravenous studies using AMS as an analytical technique. The authors describe the primary elements of AMS when used with LC separation and how this off-line technique differs from LC-MS. They then discuss how the principles of bioanalytical validation might be applied to determine selectivity, accuracy, precision and stability of methods involving LC followed by AMS analysis.

An AMS method to determine analyte recovery from pharmacokinetic studies with concomitant extravascular and intravenous administration.

The absolute bioavailability, clearance and volume of distribution of a drug can be investigated by administering a very low dose of the (14)C-drug intravenously along with a therapeutic nonlabeled dose by the extravascular route (typically orally). The total drug concentration is measured by an assay such as LC-MS and the (14)C-drug is measured by accelerator MS (AMS). In another article in this issue, a method validation is proposed where AMS was used as the analytical assay. Part of the validation is to assess the recovery of the analyte being measured as this has a direct impact on its quantification. In this article, a method of internal standardisation is described where the UV response of the nonlabeled analyte, spiked in excess into the matrix being analysed, is used for internal standardization. The method allows for the recovery of analyte to be measured in each individual sample being analysed. It is important to know the recovery of a (14)C-labeled analyte when determining its mass concentration from (14)C:(12)C isotopic ratio data using AMS. A method is reported in this article that utilizes the UV response of the nonlabeled drug for internal standardization, so that the recovery for each individual sample analyzed can be ascertained.

Procedural elements involved in maintaining bioanalytical data integrity for good laboratory practices studies and regulated clinical studies.

This article describes procedural elements involved in ensuring the integrity of bioanalytical data. These elements can be divided into 3 areas. First, there are those ensuring the integrity of the analyte until analysis, through correct sample collection, handling, shipment, and storage procedures. Incorrect procedures can lead to loss of analyte via instability, addition of analyte through contamination or instability of related metabolites, or changes in the matrix composition that may adversely affect the performance of the analytical method. Second, the integrity of the sample identity needs to be maintained to ensure that the final result reported relates to the individual sample that was taken. Possible sources of error include sample mixup or mislabeling, or errors in data handling. Finally, there is the overall integrity of the documentation that supports the analysis, and any prestudy validation of the method. This includes a wide range of information, from paper and electronic raw data, through standard operating procedures and analytical procedures and facility records, to study plans and final reports. These are critical to allow an auditor or regulatory body to reconstruct the study.