Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
Asunto de la revista
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Psychiatr Q ; 94(4): 569-604, 2023 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37796378

RESUMEN

Since the 1940s, the Clubhouse model of psychosocial rehabilitation has evolved towards a comprehensive practice of social theory and intervention. Despite the model's cost effectiveness and observational evidence of its efficacy, empirical research remains lacking. The current narrative review examines studies from recent years (2015-2021), not to assess study rigor, but to identify trends in research aims, findings, and methodology, as well as specify future research directions. A narrative review was conducted using PRISMA guidelines. Using the search term "Clubhouse," 194 articles were identified in online databases. 38 met criteria for inclusion. Most studies were qualitative (60.5%) and few utilized experimental or quasi-experimental designs (7.9%). Narrative synthesis revealed research aims and outcome variables falling into six key areas: social integration and connectedness, quality of life (QOL), recovery outcomes, relational dynamics, policy, and virtual adaptations of the model. Findings indicate that recent Clubhouse-related research trends have primarily involved studies of social connectedness, QOL, recovery, relationships, and policy, as well as studies examining the value of the virtual Clubhouse in maintaining well-being. However, heterogeneity of methodologies and measures present a critical limitation to assessing results across studies. Options for increasing experimental methodologies in this area are reviewed. Recommended future directions involve moving towards a biopsychosocial approach to clarifying the mechanisms through which the model promotes recovery-aims that may yield implications beyond the realm of serious mental illness.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos Mentales , Rehabilitación Psiquiátrica , Humanos , Rehabilitación Psiquiátrica/métodos , Trastornos Mentales/psicología , Calidad de Vida
2.
Psychol Trauma ; 2024 Jun 27.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38934942

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: War and forced migration expose refugees to trauma and ongoing stress, often contributing to long-term psychological consequences. Typically, trauma exposure is assessed cumulatively; yet, trauma type may better predict psychological outcomes. This study examined the differential impact of cumulative trauma and trauma subtypes (victimization, death threat, accidental/injury) on postmigration trajectories of posttraumatic stress and anxiety in refugees. METHOD: Seventy-seven Syrian (88.3%) and Iraqi (9.1%) adult refugees self-reported prior trauma exposure and psychological symptoms at time of arrival in the United States and 2 years post. Linear mixed-effects modeling was performed to assess for associations between trauma variables and symptom trajectories. Models using cumulative trauma as a predictor were compared to models including the three trauma subtype variables as predictors, using pseudo-R² values to compare variance explained between the two methods of trauma measurement. RESULTS: Linear mixed-effects modeling indicated that prior exposure to victimization predicted progressively worsening posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms over time postmigration (b = .97, SE = .45, t = 2.14, p = .036). Cumulative trauma also predicted increasing PTSD symptoms (b = .124, SE = .06, t = 2.09, p = .041), but explained less variance than victimization (9% vs. 18.1%). Direct effects of cumulative trauma (p = .009) and victimization (p = .002) on anxiety severity emerged; however, anxiety symptoms did not change over time depending on prior trauma exposure. Accidents/injuries and death threats did not predict PTSD or anxiety. CONCLUSIONS: These findings can be leveraged toward focused identification of those at highest risk for progressive illness postmigration, thus providing empirical guidance for allocation of interventions and resources for refugees. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

3.
Int J Soc Psychiatry ; : 207640241242030, 2024 Apr 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38605592

RESUMEN

IMPORTANCE: The ongoing Russian invasion of Ukraine marks a critical juncture in a series of events posing severe threat to the health of Ukrainian citizens. While recent reports reveal higher rates of PTSD in Ukrainian refugees following Russia's invasion - data for Ukrainians remaining at the warfront is inherently difficult to access. A primarily elderly demographic, Ukrainians in previously Russian-occupied areas near the front (UPROANF) are at particular risk. DESIGN: Data was sourced from screening questionnaires administered between March 2022 and July 2023 by mobile health clinics providing services to UPROANF. SETTING: Previously occupied villages in Eastern and Southern Ukraine. PARTICIPANTS: UPROANF attending clinics completed voluntary self-report surveys reporting demographics, prior health diagnoses, and PTSD symptom severity (n = 450; Meanage = 53.66; 72.0% female). EXPOSURE: Participants were exposed to Russian occupation of Ukrainian villages. MAIN OUTCOME AND MEASURES: The PTSD Checklist for the DSM-V (PCL-5) with recommended diagnostic threshold (i.e. 31) was utilized to assess PTSD prevalence and symptom severity. ANCOVA was used to examine hypothesized positive associations between (1) HTN and (2) loneliness and PTSD symptoms (cumulative and by symptom cluster). RESULTS: Between 47.8% and 51.33% screened positive for PTSD. Though cumulative PTSD symptoms did not differ based on HTN diagnostic status, those with HTN reported significantly higher PTSD re-experiencing symptoms (b = 1.25, SE = 0.60, p = .046). Loneliness was significantly associated with more severe cumulative PTSD symptoms (b = 1.29, SE = 0.31, p < .001), re-experiencing (b = 0.47, SE = 0.12, p < .001), avoidance (b = .18, SE = 0.08, p = .038), and hypervigilance (b = 0.29, SE = 0.13, p = .036). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: PTSD prevalence was higher than other war-exposed populations. Findings highlight the urgent mental health burden among UPROANF, emphasizing the need for integrated care models addressing both trauma and physical health. Given the significance of loneliness as a risk factor, findings suggest the potential for group-based, mind-body interventions to holistically address the physical, mental, and social needs of this highly traumatized, underserved population.

4.
Psychiatr Rehabil J ; 2024 Jul 18.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39023952

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The theory of social practice describes a therapeutic community process for people living with serious mental illness, while the methods involve engaging people to become collaborators and contributors to a social environment. Confusion in the mental health field surrounding the applied methods of social practice-as occurring within the clubhouse model-has not been sufficiently addressed. This article aims to outline the methodology of social practice, as well as provide guidance on its practical application. METHODS: Specific constructs of social practice are defined, and empirical support is provided to emphasize how practices to support recovery are applied in the clubhouse. RESULTS: Five key elements of social practice-that is, transformational social design, engagement, relationship development, natural feedback and intervention, and transitional environments-are described. Practical examples of therapeutic techniques associated with each element are also provided. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Social practice addresses the social determinants of health by focusing on five key elements that support individual and community recovery. Here, we detail social practice techniques utilized in the clubhouse as a way of unifying theory, providing practical guidance to mental health professionals and improving the measurement of community as therapy for serious mental illness. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

5.
Compr Psychoneuroendocrinol ; 16: 100217, 2023 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38108032

RESUMEN

Refugees and internally displaced people comprise one percent of the world population. Forced migration involves a multitude of ongoing stressful and traumatic experiences, often resulting in lasting psychological symptoms for people resettling as refugees. Despite these risks, the underrepresentation of refugee populations in research-particularly in biological sciences-has impeded the allocation of effective resources and the development of novel interventions for these groups. This paper identifies and addresses key methodological challenges to successfully and appropriately conducting research with refugee and internally displaced communities, many of which have served as barriers to improving research representation for these populations. Methodological challenges discussed include language and literacy barriers; political fears; differing cultural dynamics between participants and researchers; and others. We provide practical recommendations for overcoming each challenge, often sourced from our experience conducting multi-year studies and interventions in refugee mental health. Several key strategies include the recruitment of researchers and research assistants from similar cultural and linguistic backgrounds as participants; providing detailed, ongoing communication about informed consent; avoiding assumptions regarding participants' understanding of concepts that may vary based on culture or experience (e.g., "voluntary" research; confidentiality); and adopting flexible data collection procedures compatible with participants' needs and restrictions. Finally, we discuss the role of the researcher in regard to cultural competencies and partnering with the refugee community. Given the increasing global population of refugees, the strategies discussed in this paper are suggested in order to encourage future research in this underrepresented population and empower investigators to logistically carry out studies with refugees.

6.
Psychol Trauma ; 2023 Nov 30.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38032625

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Trauma exposure-a contributor to psychological risk for refugee youth-is typically assessed using cumulative indices; however, recent findings indicate that trauma type may better predict psychological outcomes. This study investigated the utility of two methods of classifying trauma exposure-cumulative trauma and exposure to specific types of trauma (i.e., trauma subtypes)-in predicting the severity of symptoms related to posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and anxiety for refugee youth. METHOD: 96 Syrian and Iraqi youth resettled as refugees in the United States self-reported trauma exposure and psychological symptoms. Multiple regression was used to assess the variance in symptom severity explained by specific trauma subtypes (i.e., victimization, death threat, and accidental/injury) as compared to cumulative trauma scores. RESULTS: Multiple regression models predicting PTSD revealed cumulative trauma (b = 0.07; p = .004) and death threat trauma (b = 0.16; p = .001) as significant predictors of PTSD symptom severity; notably, death threat trauma was the only subtype associated with PTSD and explained more variance than cumulative trauma scores (10.3% and 8.4%, respectively). Cumulative trauma, but no specific trauma subtype, was associated with anxiety (b = .03; p = .043); however, this relation did not survive correction for multiple comparisons. CONCLUSION: Focused trauma assessment-particularly consideration of death threat trauma and cumulative trauma exposures-may be useful in evaluating the risk of PTSD symptoms in refugee youth, whereas symptoms related to anxiety may be driven by other factors. These findings can be leveraged toward focused identification of youth at highest risk for PTSD symptoms, to improve prevention and early intervention efforts. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

7.
Psychiatr Rehabil J ; 2023 Dec 14.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38095980

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Though the efficacy of the Clubhouse model's interventions and practices in supporting recovery from serious mental illness (SMI) have been demonstrated by prior research, the causal mechanisms and theory driving these outcomes have yet to be comprehensively defined. This theory article aims to synthesize existing knowledge of these methods to define a unified theory of social practice, outline its role in SMI recovery, and discuss future implications. METHOD: Historical, theoretical, and practical foundations of social practice were synthesized to define a current theory of social practice and expand the term to apply to the methods and interventions that define the Clubhouse model. RESULTS: Based on prior theory and findings, we define social practice as "the informed application of a specialized form of environmental therapy that utilizes an intentional community to assist people in their recovery." Key facets of social practice in the Clubhouse model of SMI recovery are discussed, including the efficacy of the practice in addressing SMI outcomes such as isolation and low self-efficacy, as well as its impact on both internal and external motivational forces. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The theory of social practice describes a process of engaging people to become collaborators and contributors to a social environment. This article describes the philosophy and practices of Clubhouses and introduces the theory of social practice as an empirical means of unifying and communicating the methods, practices, and outcomes of both the Clubhouse model and the broader implications of intentional community as therapy. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA