[The KomMent study: a pilot project on structured interprofessional communication in uro-oncology]. / Die KomMent-Studie: ein Pilotprojekt zur strukturierten interprofessionellen Kommunikation in der Uroonkologie.

BACKGROUND: Communication and interprofessional collaboration with patients diagnosed with cancer is challenging. Structured communication training has not yet been integrated into postgraduate medical education. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of an 80-teaching unit interprofessional communication training (ICT), as recommended in the National Cancer Plan, at a clinic with a uro-oncological focus. METHODS: A needs assessment was conducted using focus groups and individual interviews. Learning objectives were aligned with (inter)national learning objective catalogs. The ICT was developed using the six-step approach according to Kern and design-based research. Utilization and acceptance were evaluated. The ICT comprised six face-to-face workshops (50 teaching units) and team supervision sessions (10 teaching units). Six defined settings were identified for the individual workplace-based training (20 teaching units): Ward rounds, handover, reporting of medical findings, admission and discharge interviews, and a freely choosable setting. RESULTS: Physician participation rates in the workshops were 83.0% and nursing participation rates were 58.3%. Utilization of the workplace-based training was 97%. The physicians evaluated the ICT very positively. All participants felt better prepared for discussions with patients and relatives. For continuity, physicians were trained as mentors. CONCLUSION: The implementation of an ICT with 80 teaching units is successfully feasible in a urological clinic and leads to a sustainable improvement of the communication culture, among other things through mentor training.

Implementing and optimizing a communication curriculum in medical teaching: Stakeholders' perspectives.

OBJECTIVE: The relevance of communication in medical education is continuously increasing. At the Medical Faculty of Hamburg, the communication curriculum was further developed and optimized during this project. This article aims to describe the stakeholders' perceived challenges and supporting factors in the implementation and optimization processes. METHODS: The initial communication curriculum and its development after a one-year optimization process were assessed with a curricular mapping. A SWOT analysis and group discussions were carried out to provide information on the need for optimization and on challenges the different stakeholders faced. RESULTS: The curricular mapping showed that the communication curriculum is comprehensive, coherent, integrated and longitudinal. In both the implementation and the project-related optimization processes, support from the dean, cooperation among all stakeholders and structural prerequisites were deemed the most critical factors for successfully integrating communication content into the curriculum. CONCLUSION: The initiative and support of all stakeholders, including the dean, teachers and students, were crucial for the project's success. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Although the implementation of a communication curriculum is recommended for all medical faculties, their actual implementation processes may differ. In a "top-down" and "bottom-up" approach, all stakeholders should be continuously involved in the process to ensure successful integration.

Pilot implementation of the national longitudinal communication curriculum: experiences from four German faculties.

Background: The German national longitudinal communication curriculum provides medical faculties with orientation for the content of their communication teaching. But its implementation also requires changes in the organization of teaching. However, due to a lack of reports and studies on experiences with the development and implementation of communication curricula, recommendations on the procedure and the use of suitable instruments cannot be provided. Consequently, as part of this exploratory study the implementation process of the communication curricula was observed at four faculties. Methods: A comparative case study was conducted against the background of a change management concept. The four participating faculties were selected in such a way that they differed significantly in their initial conditions, particularly the development stage of the communication curriculum. Group interviews were conducted with the project teams at each faculty concerning the conditions and experiences with the implementation process. The evaluation took the form of a qualitative content analysis with a focus on identifying supporting and inhibiting factors and useful activities. Results: Different faculty approaches, support structures, core skills, the scope of study and examination regulations, teaching organization and available resources can have a major impact on the implementation processes. It became clear that, depending on the status of the implementation process, other barriers and supporting conditions gain in importance. Strategically, it proved to be a particular success factor to implement the communication curriculum together with other innovations in the course of the conversion to a model study program. This enabled a particularly quick and efficient implementation. The implementation into an existing curriculum proved to be much more protracted. In addition, a change management concept was used to illustrate which measures were found to be effective for which task areas. This includes, for example, curricular mapping, the development of skills in communication teaching or the integration of communication into exams. Conclusions: Thus a concept with strategies and measures for the implementation of the National Longitudinal Communication Curriculum is available. It already contains numerous suggestions for planning one's own approach in line with the conditions and resources of other locations. However, it needs to be supplemented and further validated.

Development, testing and generalizability of a standardized evaluation form for the assessment of patient-directed reports in the new final medical licensing examination in Germany.

Background: As doctors often fail to explain diagnoses and therapies to patients in an understandable and appropriate way, the improvement of doctor-patient communication is essential. The current medical training and examinations are focused on verbal rather than on written communication. Following the premise of "assessment drives learning", the final medical licensing examination in Germany has been further developed by the German National Institute for state examinations in Medicine, Pharmacy and Psychotherapy (IMPP). As part of the discharge management the candidates have to prepare a report for the patient that is understandable and provides them with all important information about their stay in hospital. Aim: A standardized evaluation form for formative and summative feedback has been developed and tested with regard to applicability and the assurance of test quality criteria, especially the reliability to assess the written communication skills of the students. Methodology: In an expert consensus procedure, a draft for a standardized evaluation form was developed. This form was revised after an initial trial run on patient-directed reports written by students in their last year of medical studies. Afterwards twenty-one patient-directed reports were evaluated by fourteen different examiners. The reliability was tested by calculating the generalizability-coefficient and by analysing the inter-rater reliability. Results: The first test on the evaluation of the patient-directed reports indicated the practicability of the application and the usefulness of the evaluation form as an instrument for assessing the written communication skills of students. The analyses of the inter-rater reliability showed that the degree of agreement in the evaluations was partly different between two groups of examiners. The calculated G-coefficient indicates a high reliability. The content validity of the evaluation form was given through the comprehensive medical expertise in the development process. Conclusion: Assessing written patient-directed communication is a benefit of the newly developed last part of the medical licensing examination in Germany. Continuous formative assessment and feedback based on the evaluation form is intended to improve the written communication skills of future doctors. Furthermore, a better understanding of their diagnosis and treatment as well as a trusting relationship with their doctor may empower patients in the medical decision process and lead to fewer dismissal errors in the future. For consistent use of the evaluation form a standardized training of examiners should be implemented.

Patient handover - the poor relation of medical training?

Objective: The handover of patients to medical colleagues and to members of other professional groups is a central task in the medical care process for patient safety. Nevertheless, little is known about teaching and testing on the subject of handing over. The present article therefore examines the extent to which handover is the subject of teaching and examinations at medical faculties in Germany. Methodology: In 31 medical faculties the teachers were asked about the implementation of the NKLM learning objectives in the area of communication. The survey was conducted within the framework of group interviews with lecturers, in which it was determined whether each learning objective of the NKLM (National Competency-based Catalogue of Learning Objectives in Medicine) on the subject of communication, is explicitly taught in lectures and examinations at the respective faculty. Results: The learning objective "transfer to medical colleagues" is covered by 19 faculties, while the learning objective of interprofessional transfer is covered by 14 faculties. There are examinations for transfer to medical colleagues and interprofessional transfer at two faculties. There is a highly significant relationship between the total number of communicative learning objectives that are put into practice in a faculty and the coverage of the learning objectives for handover. Conclusions: In the field of communications, the subject of handover is less frequently taught at the faculties and, more importantly, it is less frequently examined than other NKLM contents. This is particularly evident in the interprofessional area. The subject is more likely to be taught as a handover between physicians, while the interprofessional interfaces attract less attention. In terms of patient safety, it would be desirable to give a higher priority to the subject of handover. An inter-faculty exchange and the inclusion of the subject of intra- and interprofessional transfer in state examinations could give the implementation process at the faculties a decisive impetus.