RESUMEN
This paper introduces a forensic psychiatry database established in Japan and discusses its significance and future issues. The purpose of this Database, created under the Medical Treatment and Supervision Act (MTSA) Database Project, is to improve the quality of forensic psychiatry treatment. It can collect monthly data on "basic information," "Orders and hospitalizations under the MTSA," "Treatment process," "Criminal and medical treatment history," and "problematic behavior in the unit." The online system has accumulated data on more than 8,000 items in 24 broad categories. Medical data are exported from the medical care assisting system of 32 designated inpatient facilities in XML format and then saved on USB memory sticks. The files are imported into the Database system client, which sends the data to the Database server via a virtual private network. This system minimizes errors and efficiently imports patient data. However, there is a limitation that it is difficult to set items that need to be analyzed to solve everyday clinical problems into the database system because they tend to change over time. By evaluating the effectiveness of the Database, and collecting appropriate data, it is expected to disseminate a wide range of knowledge that will contribute to the future development of mental health and welfare care.
Asunto(s)
Servicios de Salud Mental , Humanos , Psiquiatría Forense , Hospitalización , Japón , Sistemas en LíneaRESUMEN
Criminal behavior by people with epilepsy (PWE) has often been discussed. However, there are limited studies on criminal victimization of PWE-in particular, how such victimizations occur. We identified criminal cases involving victims with epilepsy using databases containing criminal judgments and found 16 such cases between 1990 and 2019. Seven were homicide cases, including four filicide cases. In the four filicide cases, all the perpetrators had the intention of homicide-suicide; all the victims had intellectual disabilities or cerebral palsy; two of these victims had acted violently toward the family; and two mothers who perpetrated the crime against the victims had depression. It seemed that the comorbidities and problem behaviors of the victims were more strongly related to serious crimes by family caregivers than the epilepsy itself. To prevent victimization caused by family caregivers, reducing their stress levels is important. Defendants sometimes argued against objective evidence of a crime, claiming that epileptic seizure of PWE caused or was related to the death of victims. Legal and medical professionals involved in determining the manner of death need careful evaluation when sudden deaths of PWE occur.
Asunto(s)
Víctimas de Crimen , Criminales , Epilepsia , Homicidio , Humanos , Japón/epidemiología , JuicioRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Japanese forensic mental health services for patients with psychiatric disorders under the Medical Treatment and Supervision Act was initiated in 2005; however, the prognosis of those patients is not well-known, particularly regarding mortality and suicide. This study aimed to evaluate the all-cause mortality and suicide rate in forensic psychiatric outpatients who had been discharged from forensic psychiatric wards in Japan. METHODS: Participants included 966 patients who had been discharged from forensic psychiatric wards. Data were collected from July 15, 2005 to July 15, 2018 at 29 of the 33 forensic psychiatric wards in Japan. Only the patients who provided written informed consent were included. We and collaborators at each forensic psychiatric ward identified demographic data of participants from the medical records for the inpatient treatment period. The reintegration coordinators, who belonged to the Ministry of Justice, investigated the prognosis of the participants during the outpatient treatment order period. We then connected demographic data and participants' prognosis for analysis. The crude rates (CRs) and standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) were calculated to analyze all-cause mortality and suicide rates. Univariate analysis was performed to examine the factors associated with all-cause mortality and suicide rates using the Cox proportional hazards ratio model. RESULTS: The participants included 3.3 times as many men (n=739) compared to women (n=227), and their combined mean age was 47.3 (SD=12.9). The most common primary psychiatric diagnosis was psychotic disorders (81.3%). The mean follow-up period was 790.2 days (SD=369.6). The total observation period was 2091.2 person-years. The CR for all-cause death was 812.9 per 100,000 person-years (95% CI [426.5, 1199.4]), while the SMR for all-cause death was 2.2 (95% CI [1.3, 3.5]). The CR for completed suicide was 478.2 per 100,000 person-years (95% CI [181.8, 774.6]). The suicide SMR was 17.9 (95% CI [8.6, 32.9]) overall, 7.7 (95% CI [2.5, 18.0]) for men, and 79.4 (95% CI [25.8, 185.2]) for women. Univariate analysis showed that women had higher completed suicide risk than men (hazard ratio=3.599, 95% CI [1.041, 12.445]). CONCLUSION: The all-cause mortality and completed suicide rates were higher in participants than observed in the general population consistent with the results of previous international studies.
Asunto(s)
Causas de Muerte , Alta del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicio de Psiquiatría en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Suicidio/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Psiquiatría Forense , Humanos , Japón/epidemiología , Masculino , Trastornos Mentales/psicología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pacientes Ambulatorios/psicología , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Factores SexualesRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Current Japanese forensic mental health legislation (Medical Treatment and Supervision Act [MTSA]) was enacted in 2003. Little is known, however, about the actual outcomes for the offender patients detained within hospitals under this provision. AIM: This study aimed to quantify reoffending and readmission following patients' discharge from forensic psychiatric hospital units across Japan and explore related risk factors. METHODS: We followed up 526 offenders with mental disorder who had been detained under the MTSA and who were subsequently discharged from any of the 28 hospitals nationwide between 2007 and 2015. RESULTS: The total cumulative reoffence rate was found to be 2.5% (1.1-3.9%) after 1 year and 7.5% (4.6-10.4%) after 3 years. The rate of serious reoffending was 0.4% (-0.18% to 0.99%) after 1 year and 2.0% (0.4-3.6%) after 3 years. The cumulative admission rate to local psychiatric hospitals following a discharge was 21.8% after 6 months and 37.6% after 1 year. Patients who had been discharged from their MTSA order but transferred to a general psychiatric hospital before open community residence-because it was necessary to build community supports-were more likely to reoffend than those discharged directly to the community. Patients who had been diagnosed with a substance use disorder (F10-F19) and had one subsequent admission were at higher risk of further readmissions. CONCLUSIONS: The low reoffending rates could be attributed to the intensive treatment and care plans required by the MTSA. The high rate of readmission to psychiatric hospitals may indicate shortcomings in community mental health services in Japan.
Asunto(s)
Criminales , Hospitales Psiquiátricos/estadística & datos numéricos , Alta del Paciente , Readmisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Trastornos Psicóticos/psicología , Adulto , Servicios Comunitarios de Salud Mental , Femenino , Humanos , Japón , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/psicologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The Structured Assessment of PROtective Factors for violence risk (SAPROF) was recently developed as a strength-based addition to the risk assessment of future violent behavior. We examined the interrater reliability and predictive accuracy of the SAPROF for violence in forensic mental health inpatient units in Japan. METHODS: This retrospective record study provides an initial validation of the SAPROF in a Japanese sample of 95 forensic psychiatric inpatients from a complete 2008-2013 cohort. Violent outcomes were assessed 6 and 12 months after hospitalization. RESULTS: We observed moderate-to-good interrater reliability for the SAPROF total score and the internal factors, motivational factors, external factors, and the Final Protection Judgment scores. According to a receiver operating characteristic analysis, the SAPROF total score and all subscale scores predicted violence at both 6 and 12 months after hospitalization with high accuracy. Furthermore, the predictive validity of a combination of the SAPROF with the Historical Clinical Risk Management-20 (HCR-20) outperformed that of the HCR-20 alone. CONCLUSIONS: The results provide evidence of the value of considering protective factors in the assessment of future violence risk among Japanese forensic psychiatric inpatients. The SAPROF might allow for a more balanced assessment of future violence risk in places where the population rates of violent crime are low, such as Japan, but a validation study in a different setting should confirm this. Moreover, future studies should examine the effectiveness of treatment and promoting community re-integration on motivating patients and treatment staff.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The biological underpinnings of serious violent behaviors in patients with schizophrenia remain unclear. The aim of this study was to identify the characteristics of brain morphometry in patients with schizophrenia and a history of serious violent acts, who were being treated under relatively new legislation for offenders with mental illness in Japan where their relevant action should be strongly associated with their mental illness. We also investigated whether morphometric changes would depend on types of serious violent actions or not. METHODS: Thirty-four male patients with schizophrenia who were hospitalized after committing serious violent acts were compared with 23 male outpatients or inpatients with schizophrenia and no history of violent acts. T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with voxel-based morphometry was used to assess gray matter volume. Additionally, patients with violent acts were divided based on whether their relevant actions were premeditated or not. The regional volumes of these two groups were compared to those of the control patient group. RESULTS: Patients with schizophrenia and a history of serious violent acts showed significantly smaller regional volumes of the right inferior temporal area expanded to the middle temporal gyrus and the temporal pole, and the right insular area compared to patients without a history of violence. Patients with premeditated violent acts showed significantly smaller regional volumes of the right inferior temporal area, the right insular area, the left planum polare area including the insula, and the bilateral precuneus area including the posterior cingulate gyrus than those without a history of violence, whereas patients with impulsive violent acts showed significantly smaller volumes of only the right inferior temporal area compared to those without a history of violence. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with schizophrenia and a history of serious violent acts showed structural differences in some brain regions compared to those with schizophrenia and no history of violence. Abnormalities in the right inferior temporal area were relatively common but did not depend on whether the violent actions were premeditated or not, and abnormalities in a wider range may be attributed to not only planning the violent action against others but also to maintaining that plan. TRIAL REGISTRATION: UMIN.ac.jp UMIN000008065 . Registered 2012/05/31.
Asunto(s)
Encéfalo/diagnóstico por imagen , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Esquizofrenia/diagnóstico por imagen , Psicología del Esquizofrénico , Violencia/psicología , Adulto , Mapeo Encefálico/métodos , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Internamiento Obligatorio del Enfermo Mental , Sustancia Gris/diagnóstico por imagen , Humanos , Interpretación de Imagen Asistida por Computador , Japón , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tamaño de los Órganos/fisiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Most structured assessment tools for assessing risk of violence were developed in Western countries, and evidence for their effectiveness is not well established in Asian countries. AIMS: Our aim was to examine the predictive accuracy of the Historical-Clinical-Risk Management-20 (HCR-20) for violence in forensic mental health inpatient units in Japan. METHODS: A retrospective record study was conducted with a complete 2008-2013 cohort of forensic psychiatric inpatients at the National Center Hospital of Neurology and Psychiatry, Tokyo. Forensic psychiatrists were trained in use of the HCR-20 and asked to complete it as part of their admission assessment. The completed forms were then retained by the researchers and not used in clinical practice; for this, clinicians relied solely on national legally required guidelines. Violent outcomes were determined at 3 and 6 months after the assessment. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was used to calculate the predictive accuracy of the HCR-20 for violence. RESULTS: Area under the curve analyses suggested that the HCR-20 total score is a good predictor of violence in this cohort, with the clinical and risk sub-scales showing good predictive accuracy, but the historical sub-scale not doing so. Area under the curve figures were similar at 3 months and at 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: Our results are consistent with studies previously conducted in Western countries. This suggests that the HCR-20 is an effective tool for supporting risk of violence assessment in Japanese forensic psychiatric wards. Its widespread use in clinical practice could enhance safety and would certainly promote transparency in risk-related decision-making. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Asunto(s)
Psiquiatría Forense/métodos , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Violencia/psicología , Adulto , Anciano , Humanos , Japón , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Servicio de Psiquiatría en Hospital , Estudios Retrospectivos , Gestión de Riesgos , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The unified protocol for the transdiagnostic treatment of emotional disorders is a promising treatment approach that could be applicable to a broad range of mental disorders, including depressive, anxiety, trauma-related, and obsessive-compulsive disorders. However, no randomized controlled trial has been conducted to verify the efficacy of the unified protocol on the heterogeneous clinical population with depressive and anxiety disorders. METHODS/DESIGN: The trial was designed as a single-center, assessor-blinded, randomized, 20-week, parallel-group superiority study in order to compare the efficacy of the combination of unified protocol and treatment-as-usual versus waiting-list with treatment-as-usual for patients with depressive and/or anxiety disorders. The primary outcome was depression at 21 weeks, assessed by the 17-item version of the GRID-Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression. Estimated minimum sample size was 27 participants in each group. We will also examine the treatment mechanisms, treatment processes, and neuropsychological correlates. DISCUSSION: The results of this study will clarify the efficacy of the unified protocol for depressive and anxiety disorders, and the treatment mechanism, process, and neurological correlates for the effectiveness of the unified protocol. If its efficacy can be confirmed, the unified protocol may be of high clinical value for Japan, a country in which cognitive behavioral treatment has not yet been widely adopted. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02003261 (registered on December 2, 2013).
Asunto(s)
Trastornos de Ansiedad/terapia , Protocolos Clínicos , Terapia Cognitivo-Conductual , Trastorno Depresivo/terapia , Proyectos de Investigación , Adulto , Anciano , Trastornos de Ansiedad/diagnóstico , Trastornos de Ansiedad/psicología , Trastorno Depresivo/diagnóstico , Trastorno Depresivo/psicología , Femenino , Humanos , Japón , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Psicoterapia de Grupo , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Although a substantial increase in the number of female offenders has drawn interest towards understanding their unique characteristics, few studies have investigated the characteristics of female mentally disordered offenders in Japan and none since the legislation enacted in 2005 in Japan, which provided for special services for them. AIMS: The aim of this study is to identify those characteristics of people detained under this legislation, which distinguish the women from the men and may indicate special needs among the women. METHODS: A retrospective records-based study of all patients admitted to one secure unit in the 8 years since its opening in July 2005 until a census date of 31 October 2013. RESULTS: Thirty-six (15%) of the patients were women. Marriage, mood disorders, past suicide attempts and homicide were more common among the women than the men. Six of the female offender-patients had committed filicides, of which four were infanticides. CONCLUSION: There appears to be a particularly vulnerable sub-group of women with severe mood disorders, a history of serious suicide attempts and young children at risk of harming those children. Our sample was small and from a single unit so, given the potential importance of improving understanding of who is at risk in such circumstances, extending our study nationally seems indicated.
Asunto(s)
Criminales/legislación & jurisprudencia , Homicidio/estadística & datos numéricos , Trastornos Mentales/etnología , Adolescente , Adulto , Niño , Criminales/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Japón/epidemiología , Masculino , Trastornos Mentales/diagnóstico , Trastornos Mentales/psicología , Prevalencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores Sexuales , Factores Socioeconómicos , Intento de Suicidio/psicologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The relationship between violence and neurocognitive function in schizophrenia is unclear. We examined the backgrounds and neurocognitive functions of violent and nonviolent patients with schizophrenia to identify factors associated with serious violence. METHODS: Thirty male patients with schizophrenia who were hospitalized after committing serious violent acts were compared with 24 hospitalized male patients with schizophrenia and no history of violence. We evaluated psychiatric symptoms using the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) and neurocognitive functions using the Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia (BACS)-Japanese version. RESULTS: Repeated-measures analyses of variance on BACS subcomponents z-scores showed that the violent and control groups had different neuropsychological profiles at trend level (p = 0.095). Post hoc analyses of variance indicated that the violent group had significantly better working memory and executive function than the control group. In post hoc ANOVAs also controlling for the effect of the presence of substance abuse on cognitive function, violent or nonviolent group had a significant main effect on executive function but not on working memory. CONCLUSIONS: Patient with violent or non-violent schizophrenia have distinct neuropsychological profiles. These results may help develop improved psychosocial treatments.
RESUMEN
In Japan, new legislation regarding forensic mental health, namely, the Act on Medical Care and Treatment for Persons Who Have Caused Serious Cases under the Condition of Insanity (Medical Treatment and Supervision Act (MTS Act)) was enforced in 2005, although community mental health care remains largely unchanged. We surveyed local clinical psychiatrists by questionnaire to gather information on the influence of the MTS Act on clinical mental health practice. We sent a paper questionnaire to almost all the psychiatrists in the Chiba prefecture, 56% of whom (N = 306) responded. The participants felt that the MTS Act had minimal direct impact on community mental health care. However, some relatively new schemes such as a multiple disciplinary team approach or supervised outpatient care are given more attention than before. These results suggest that this new forensic mental health legislation may assist in the spread of new paradigms into clinical practice.
RESUMEN
Backgrounds: Patients with schizophrenia suffer from cognitive impairment that worsens real-world functional outcomes. We previously reported that multi-session transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) delivered to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) improved daily living skills, while stimulation on the left superior temporal sulcus (STS) enhanced performance on a test of social cognition in these patients. To examine the region-dependent influence of tDCS on daily-living skills, neurocognition, and psychotic symptoms, this study compared effects of anodal stimulation targeting either of these two brain areas in patients with schizophrenia. Methods: Data were collected from open-label, single-arm trials with anodal electrodes placed over the left DLPFC (N = 28) or STS (N = 15). Daily-living skills, neurocognition, and psychotic symptoms were measured with the UCSD performance-based skills assessment-brief (UPSA-B), Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia (BACS), and Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), respectively. After baseline evaluation, tDCS (2 mA × 20 min) were delivered two times per day for 5 consecutive days. One month after the final stimulation, clinical assessments were repeated. Results: Performance on the UPSA-B was significantly improved in patients who received anodal tDCS at the left DLPFC (d = 0.70, p < 0.001), while this effect was absent in patients with anodal electrodes placed on the left STS (d = 0.02, p = 0.939). Significant improvement was also observed for scores on the BACS with anodal tDCS delivered to the DLPFC (d = 0.49, p < 0.001); however, such neurocognitive enhancement was absent when the STS was stimulated (d = 0.05, p = 0.646). Both methods of anodal stimulation showed a significant improvement of General Psychopathology scores on the PANSS (DLPFC, d = 0.50, p = 0.027; STS, d = 0.44, p = 0.001). Conclusion: These results indicate the importance of selecting brain regions as a target for tDCS according to clinical features of individual patients. Anodal stimulation of the left DLPFC may be advantageous in improving higher level functional outcomes in patients with schizophrenia. Trial registration: These studies were registered within the University hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry [(24), UMIN000015953], and the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials [(28), jRCTs032180026].
RESUMEN
Background. Social cognition deficits are a core feature of psychiatric disorders, such as schizophrenia and mood disorder, and deteriorate the functionality of patients. However, no definite strategy has been established to treat social cognition (eg, emotion recognition) impairments in these illnesses. Here, we provide a systematic review of the literature regarding transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for the treatment of social cognition deficits in individuals with psychiatric disorders. Methods. A literature search was conducted on English articles identified by PubMed, PsycINFO, and Web of Science databases, according to the guidelines of the PRISMA statement. We defined the inclusion criteria as follows: (1) randomized controlled trials (RCTs), (2) targeting patients with psychiatric disorders (included in F20-F39 of the 10th revision of the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems [ICD-10]), (3) evaluating the effect of tDCS or rTMS, (4) reporting at least one standardized social cognition test. Results. Five papers (3 articles on tDCS and 2 articles on rTMS) met the inclusion criteria which deal with schizophrenia or depression. The significant effects of tDCS or rTMS targeting the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex on the emotion recognition domain were reported in patients with schizophrenia or depression. In addition, rTMS on the right inferior parietal lobe was shown to ameliorate social perception impairments of schizophrenia. Conclusions. tDCS and rTMS may enhance some domains of social cognition in patients with psychiatric disorders. Further research is warranted to identify optimal parameters to maximize the cognitive benefits of these neuromodulation methods.
Asunto(s)
Esquizofrenia , Estimulación Transcraneal de Corriente Directa , Electroencefalografía , Emociones , Humanos , Esquizofrenia/terapia , Estimulación Transcraneal de Corriente Directa/métodos , Estimulación Magnética Transcraneal/métodosRESUMEN
The global impact of COVID-19 outbreak on psychiatric hospitals and prisons is unfathomable and unprecedented, and information is needed on how best to mitigate widespread infection whilst safeguarding the community's well-being. This study reports on how the staff and patients in a forensic psychiatric ward in Japan worked together during the COVID-19 outbreak as a "therapeutic community." The "Non-Three Cs" Karaoke Project, with infection prevention guidelines designed by inpatients, was safely conducted and its humor released the staff and patients' anxiety and tension. Through these discussions, the patients and staff gained a better understanding of viruses, transmission routes, countermeasures, and coping with stress. The study highlights the importance of disclosing information to inpatients, conducting open discussions, and involving patients in the prevention and management of infectious diseases. This report is the world's first report showing a concrete example of the therapeutic community's significance during the COVID-19 outbreak. It is an experience that offers an opportunity to reconsider the significance of the therapeutic community, in which patients are seen as a presence that brings change, strength, growth, and creativity into the therapeutic setting. We believe that such an approach in a future disaster would lead to an increase in the patients' problem-solving ability, and recovery and autonomy after discharge could be promoted. A shared difficult situation can be an opportunity to build a therapeutic alliance and make a difference.
RESUMEN
Background: Patients with schizophrenia show impairments of social cognition, which cause poor real-world functional outcomes. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) delivered to frontal brain areas has been shown to partially alleviate disturbances of social cognition. In this study, we aimed to determine whether multisession tDCS targeting the superior temporal sulcus (STS), a brain region closely related to social cognition, would improve social cognitive performance in patients with schizophrenia. Methods: This was an open-label, single-arm trial to investigate the benefits and safety of multisession tDCS over the left STS. Fifteen patients received tDCS (2 mA × 20 min) two times per day for 5 consecutive days. Anodal and cathodal electrodes were placed over the left STS and right supraorbital regions, respectively. Assessments with the Social Cognition Screening Questionnaire (SCSQ), the Hinting Task (HT), the Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia (BACS), and the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) were conducted at baseline and 1 month after the final stimulation. Results: Significant improvements were found on theory of mind, as measured using the SCSQ (d = 0.53) and the HT (d = 0.49). These changes on social cognition were not correlated with those of neurocognition, as measured using the BACS or psychotic symptoms, as measured using the PANSS. There were no adverse events of serious/moderate levels attributable to tDCS. Conclusion: These results suggest that administration of multisession tDCS with anode stimulation targeting the left STS provides a novel strategy to improve functional outcomes in patients with schizophrenia. Ethics Statement: The National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry Clinical Research Review Board (CRB3180006) approved this study. Trial Registration: This study was registered within the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCTs032180026).
RESUMEN
Recent literature examining associations between cognitive function, clinical features, and violence in patients with schizophrenia has been growing; however, the results are inconsistent. Reports on social function and personality are limited. These studies are yet to be reflected in risk assessment tools and management plans. The aim of this study is to provide a resource for risk assessment and intervention studies by conducting multifaceted well-established assessments in a large population. Data from 355 patients with schizophrenia (112 patients with a history of violence; 243 patients without a history of violence) and 1265 healthy subjects were extracted from a large database of individuals with mental disorders in a general psychiatric population in Japan. The associations between violence in patients with schizophrenia and intellectual function, cognitive function (memory function, executive function, attentional function, verbal learning, processing speed, social cognition), clinical variables, personality traits, social function, and quality of life (QOL) were analyzed. Compared with healthy subjects, the schizophrenia group had broadly impaired cognitive function and social cognition, and their personality traits showed similar differences as those reported previously. Patients with schizophrenia with a history of violence showed significantly more impaired visual memory function (P = 1.9 × 10-5, Cohen's d = 0.34), longer hospitalization (P = 5.9 × 10-4, Cohen's d = 0.38), more severe excited factor on Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (P = 1.6 × 10-4, Cohen's d = 0.47), higher self-transcendence personality construct on the Temperament and Character Inventory (P = 1.8 × 10-4, Cohen's d = 0.46), and shorter total working hours per week (P = 4.8 × 10-4, Cohen's d = 0.53) than those with schizophrenia without a history of violence. New findings, including impaired visual memory, a high self-transcendence personality trait, and shorter total working hours, could be focused on in future interventional research.
Asunto(s)
Trastornos del Conocimiento , Esquizofrenia , Trastornos del Conocimiento/psicología , Humanos , Pruebas Neuropsicológicas , Personalidad , Calidad de Vida , Esquizofrenia/complicaciones , Psicología del Esquizofrénico , Violencia/psicologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUNDS: Social cognition is defined as the mental operations underlying social behavior. Patients with schizophrenia elicit impairments of social cognition, which is linked to poor real-world functional outcomes. In a previous study, transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) improved emotional recognition, a domain of social cognition, in patients with schizophrenia. However, since social cognition was only minimally improved by tDCS when administered on frontal brain areas, investigations on the effect of tDCS on other cortical sites more directly related to social cognition are needed. Therefore, we present a study protocol to determine whether multi-session tDCS on superior temporal sulcus (STS) would improve social cognition deficits of schizophrenia. METHODS: This is an open-label, single-arm trial, whose objective is to investigate the efficacy and safety of multi-session tDCS over the left STS to improve social cognition in patients with schizophrenia. The primary outcome measure will be the Social Cognition Screening Questionnaire. Neurocognition, functional capacity, and psychotic symptoms will also be evaluated by the Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia, UCSD Performance-Based Skills Assessment-Brief, and Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale, respectively. Data will be collected at baseline, and 4 weeks after the end of intervention. If social cognition is improved in patients with schizophrenia by tDCS based on this protocol, we may plan randomized controlled trial.
RESUMEN
In Japan, the Medical Treatment and Supervision Act (MTSA) has been in effect since 2005 as a new system for treating mentally disordered offenders. This system was anticipated to aim at treating schizophrenia, while preparing no treatment programs for Substance use disorder (SUD). However, unexpectedly 30% of the inpatients, who a court judged to be treated in this system, have co-occurring SUD in addition to mental disorders. This is the reason why we have provided the inpatients under the MTSA with the treatment program for SUD (TPSUD). The purpose of the present study is to evaluate efficacies of the TPSUD provided in the MTS Award of the Center Hospital, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry. Subjects were the 15 inpatients admitting to this ward, who participated in had the TPSUD due to co-occurrence of SUD. A self-reporting questionnaire, which consisted of the Self-Efficacy Scale for Drug Dependence (SESDD), and Stages of Change Readiness and Treatment Eagerness Scale (SOCRATES), and some clinical information, was administered before and after the program. Consequently, the subscale score of the SOCRATES, "recognition," was significantly elevated after the TPSUD in alcohol related problems, while the subscale score of the SESDD, "global change of self-efficacy for drug dependence," was significantly elevated in drug-related problems. Additionally, either rate of the subjects who started to the anti-alcohol drugs or who manifested to participate in self-help groups for SUD was also significantly elevated. Our findings suggest that the TPSUD may be effective to SUD which co-occur in mentally disordered offenders, and that this program may involve some clinical implication in forensic psychiatry practices under the MTSA.
Asunto(s)
Psiquiatría Forense , Servicios de Salud Mental , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/terapia , Adulto , Femenino , Psiquiatría Forense/legislación & jurisprudencia , Humanos , Japón , Masculino , Servicios de Salud Mental/legislación & jurisprudencia , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud , Psicometría/métodos , Esquizofrenia/complicaciones , Grupos de Autoayuda , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/complicaciones , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/psicología , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine predictors associated with readmission of inpatients with borderline personality disorder. METHODS: This observational study evaluated 83 inpatients with borderline personality disorder admitted to the National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry Hospital in Japan from January 2013 to January 2016. Data were retrospectively obtained from electronic medical records. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the daily antipsychotic dose equivalent to chlorpromazine at admission between the readmitted and nonreadmitted groups, which indicated that there was no between-group difference in the psychiatric disease severity at admission. Multivariate logistic regression analyses revealed that the use of antipsychotics equivalent to >400 mg of chlorpromazine at discharge was associated with readmission within 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, high-dose antipsychotic drug use at discharge may be a risk factor for readmission. The present findings may have important clinical implications since they alert physicians to a possible predictor for readmissions of patients with borderline personality disorder.