Is HIV Post-test Counselling Aligned with Universal Test and Treat Goals? A Qualitative Analysis of Counselling Session Content and Delivery in South Africa.

Early identification of people living with HIV (PLHIV) and subsequent engagement into HIV treatment is a key to reducing HIV-related illness, HIV-related deaths, and HIV transmission through universal test and treat approaches. With the scale-up of antiretroviral therapy (ART) programmes, counselling that is provided immediately after the diagnosis of HIV (post-test counselling) is well placed to facilitate linkage to care and ART initiation. We sought to assess whether the current delivery of post-test counselling in a routine HIV programme was aligned with the goals of universal test and treat as articulated in local and international HIV testing service guidelines. We analysed transcripts of 40 post-test counselling sessions for HIV-positive clients, performed by 34 counsellors in ten public sector health facilities in the Ekurhuleni District of South Africa. We used thematic analysis to identify key aspects of counselling techniques and content provided to the client. We identified five key themes of counselling messages: (1) specific behaviour changes that are required to maintain or improve health when living with HIV, (2) the benefits of ART, (3) behaviour changes required for ART to be effective, (4) the need for clients to disclose their HIV status, and (5) a need for caution with ART due to a wide range of severe side effects. The counselling sessions were highly didactic, which limited the opportunities for clients to express concerns or counsellors to address client's needs during the counselling session. Based on our observations, a substantial re-adjustment is needed to deliver best-practice counselling. This may include a combination of digital media-based counselling, counselling scripts, and truly client-centred counselling for a sub-set of individuals who are at risk of not linking to care, or not initiated ART within a specified period.

Facilitators and barriers to implementing provider-initiated HIV counselling and testing at the clinic-level in Ekurhuleni District, South Africa.

BACKGROUND: HIV testing is the entry point into the HIV care continuum and critical for HIV epidemic control. Facility-based HIV testing services (HTS) reach individuals who are already seeking clinical care and engaging with the medical care system. For this reason, individuals diagnosed with HIV during facility-based HIV testing are more likely to continue into HIV care. To increase the number of PLHIV who are diagnosed and initiated on ART, in 2015, the South African Department of Health instituted Provider-Initiated Counselling and Testing (PICT) policy-encouraging healthcare providers to recommend HIV testing, but this strategy remains under-utilized. We aimed to identify key constraints to the normalization of PICT implementation in 10 Ekurhuleni District healthcare facilities in South Africa. METHODS: In-depth interviews were conducted with 40 healthcare workers (28 clinicians and 12 lay counsellors). Health care workers were purposefully selected to participate in the interviews, stratified by health facility and work category. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and translated for analysis. Thematic analysis was guided by the normalization process theory (NPT). NPT theory explains how practices are routinely embedded within organizational contexts. We used NVivo 10 software for qualitative data management. RESULTS: Both clinicians and lay counsellors exhibited a clear understanding of the PICT policy- acknowledging its purpose and value. The identified barrier to normalization of PICT among clinicians was offering HIV testing based on suspicion of HIV despite understanding that PICT involves offering testing to all clients. Additionally, clinicians perceived PICT as incongruent with their clinical roles and perceived it to be lay counsellors' responsibility. The main facilitator was the participation of all healthcare workers, specifically the presence of lay counsellors, although they also faced barriers such as a lack of workspace and under-appreciation. CONCLUSIONS: Use of NPT helped identify barriers that prevent the normalization of PITC and its integration into routine patient care. These barriers can be modified by low-cost interventions that promote congruence of PICT to the roles of clinicians and integrate the role of lay counsellors within the patient flow in the facility.