Lithium use and bone health in women with bipolar disorder: A cross-sectional study.

INTRODUCTION: Several psychiatric disorders and medications used to treat them appear to be independently associated with skeletal deficits. As there is increasing evidence that lithium possesses skeletal protective properties, we aimed to investigate the association between lithium use and bone health in a group of women with bipolar disorder. METHOD: Women with bipolar disorder (n = 117, 20+ years) were recruited from south-eastern Australia. Bipolar disorder was confirmed using a clinical interview (SCID-I/NP). Bone mineral density (BMD; g/cm2 ) was measured at the spine, hip and total body using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry and low bone mass determined by BMD T-score of <-1.0. Weight and height were measured, socioeconomic status (SES) determined and information on medication use and lifestyle factors self-reported. Linear and logistic regression were used to test associations between lithium and (i) BMD and (ii) low bone mass, respectively. RESULTS: Thirty-five (29.9%) women reported current lithium use. Lithium users and non-users differed in regard to SES and BMD; otherwise, groups were similar. After adjustments, mean BMD among lithium users was 5.1% greater at the spine (1.275 [95% CI 1.229-1.321] vs. 1.214 [1.183-1.244] g/cm2 , p = 0.03), 4.2% greater at the total hip (0.979 [0.942-1.016] vs. 0.938 [0.910-0.966] g/cm2 , p = 0.03) and 2.2% greater at the total body (1.176 [1.148-1.205] vs. 1.150 [1.129-1.171] g/cm2 , p = 0.08) compared to participants not receiving lithium. Lithium users were also less likely to have low bone mass (22.9% vs. 43.9%, p = 0.031). Associations persisted after adjustment for confounders. CONCLUSION: These data suggest lithium is associated with greater BMD and reduced risk of low bone mass in women with bipolar disorder. Research into the underlying mechanisms is warranted.

The neglected association between schizophrenia and bone fragility: a systematic review and meta-analyses.

Schizophrenia is associated with increased risk of medical comorbidity, possibly including osteoporosis, which is a public health concern due to its significant social and health consequences. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we aimed to determine whether schizophrenia is associated with bone fragility. The protocol for this review has been registered with PROSPERO (CRD42020171959). The research question and inclusion/exclusion criteria were developed and presented according to the PECO (Population, Exposure, Comparison, Outcome) framework. Schizophrenia was identified from medical records, DSM-IV/5 or the ICD. The outcomes for this review were bone fragility [i.e., bone mineral density (BMD), fracture, bone turnover markers, bone quality]. A search strategy was developed and implemented for the electronic databases. A narrative synthesis was undertaken for all included studies; the results from eligible studies reporting on BMD and fracture were pooled using a random effects model to complete a meta-analysis. The conduct of the review and reporting of results adhered to PRISMA guidelines. Our search yielded 3103 studies, of which 29 met the predetermined eligibility criteria. Thirty-seven reports from 29 studies constituted 17 studies investigating BMD, eight investigating fracture, three investigating bone quality and nine investigating bone turnover markers. The meta-analyses revealed that people with schizophrenia had lower BMD at the lumbar spine [standardised mean difference (SMD) -0.74, 95% CI -1.27, -0.20; Z = -2.71, p = 0.01] and at the femoral neck (SMD -0.78, 95% CI -1.03, -0.53; Z = -6.18, p ≤ 0.001). Also observed was a higher risk of fracture (OR 1.43, 95% CI 1.27, 1.61; Z = 5.88, p ≤ 0.001). Following adjustment for publication bias, the association between schizophrenia and femoral neck BMD (SMD -0.63, 95% CI -0.97, -0.29) and fracture (OR 1.32, 95% CI 1.28, 1.35) remained. Significantly increased risk of bone fragility was observed in people with schizophrenia. This association was independent of sex, participant number, methodological quality and year of publication.