Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo de estudio
Tipo del documento
Asunto de la revista
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Pathol ; 231(1): 63-76, 2013 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23836465

RESUMEN

The recognition that colorectal cancer (CRC) is a heterogeneous disease in terms of clinical behaviour and response to therapy translates into an urgent need for robust molecular disease subclassifiers that can explain this heterogeneity beyond current parameters (MSI, KRAS, BRAF). Attempts to fill this gap are emerging. The Cancer Genome Atlas (TGCA) reported two main CRC groups, based on the incidence and spectrum of mutated genes, and another paper reported an EMT expression signature defined subgroup. We performed a prior free analysis of CRC heterogeneity on 1113 CRC gene expression profiles and confronted our findings to established molecular determinants and clinical, histopathological and survival data. Unsupervised clustering based on gene modules allowed us to distinguish at least five different gene expression CRC subtypes, which we call surface crypt-like, lower crypt-like, CIMP-H-like, mesenchymal and mixed. A gene set enrichment analysis combined with literature search of gene module members identified distinct biological motifs in different subtypes. The subtypes, which were not derived based on outcome, nonetheless showed differences in prognosis. Known gene copy number variations and mutations in key cancer-associated genes differed between subtypes, but the subtypes provided molecular information beyond that contained in these variables. Morphological features significantly differed between subtypes. The objective existence of the subtypes and their clinical and molecular characteristics were validated in an independent set of 720 CRC expression profiles. Our subtypes provide a novel perspective on the heterogeneity of CRC. The proposed subtypes should be further explored retrospectively on existing clinical trial datasets and, when sufficiently robust, be prospectively assessed for clinical relevance in terms of prognosis and treatment response predictive capacity. Original microarray data were uploaded to the ArrayExpress database (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/arrayexpress/) under Accession Nos E-MTAB-990 and E-MTAB-1026.


Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/genética , Neoplasias Colorrectales/genética , Perfilación de la Expresión Génica/métodos , Regulación Neoplásica de la Expresión Génica/fisiología , Heterogeneidad Genética , Adenocarcinoma/mortalidad , Adenocarcinoma/patología , Neoplasias Colorrectales/mortalidad , Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Femenino , Dosificación de Gen , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Pérdida de Heterocigocidad , Masculino , Mutación , Proteínas de Neoplasias/genética , Análisis de Secuencia por Matrices de Oligonucleótidos , Pronóstico
2.
Clin Cancer Res ; 28(7): 1268-1276, 2022 04 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35091442

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to evaluate ponatinib for advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST). PATIENTS AND METHODS: This single-arm phase II trial enrolled patients with metastatic and/or unresectable GIST with failure of prior tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment into two cohorts based on presence or absence of KIT exon 11 (ex11) primary mutations. Patients initially received ponatinib 45 mg once daily. Following a temporary clinical hold in October 2013, dose reductions were implemented to reduce risk of arterial occlusive events (AOE). Primary endpoint was 16-week clinical benefit rate (CBR) in KIT ex11-positive cohort. KIT mutations in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) were assessed. RESULTS: Forty-five patients enrolled (30 KIT ex11-positive and 15 KIT ex11-negative); median follow-up was 14.7 and 13.6 months, respectively, as of August 1, 2016. Sixteen-week CBR was 36% (KIT ex11-positive; primary endpoint) and 20% (KIT ex11-negative). ctDNA analyses (n = 37) demonstrated strong concordance of primary KIT mutations between plasma and tumor. At least two secondary mutations were detected in 35% of patients overall and 54% of KIT ex11-positive patients. Changes from baseline in mutated ctDNA levels were consistent with clinical activity. Ponatinib was ineffective in patients with KIT exon 9 primary mutations. Resistance was associated with emergence of V654A. AOEs and venous thromboembolic events occurred in three and two patients, respectively. Six patients died; two deaths (pneumonia and pulmonary embolism) were considered possibly ponatinib-related. CONCLUSIONS: Ponatinib demonstrated activity in advanced GIST, particularly in KIT ex11-positive disease. ctDNA analysis confirmed heterogeneous resistance mutations in TKI-pretreated advanced GIST. Safety was consistent with previous studies.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos , ADN Tumoral Circulante , Tumores del Estroma Gastrointestinal , Piridazinas , Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Biomarcadores , ADN Tumoral Circulante/genética , Tumores del Estroma Gastrointestinal/tratamiento farmacológico , Tumores del Estroma Gastrointestinal/genética , Tumores del Estroma Gastrointestinal/patología , Humanos , Imidazoles , Biopsia Líquida , Mutación , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/efectos adversos , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas c-kit/genética , Piridazinas/efectos adversos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA