Canadian multicenter randomized trial comparing sequential and alternating administration of two non-cross-resistant chemotherapy combinations in patients with limited small-cell carcinoma of the lung.

In order to assess the effect of scheduling of chemotherapy on the outcome of patients with limited small-cell lung cancer (SCLC), the Clinical Trials Group of the National Cancer Institute of Canada carried out a randomized trial comparing the alternation of cyclophosphamide, Adriamycin (Adria Laboratories, Columbus, OH; doxorubicin) and vincristine (CAV) with etoposide (VP-16) and cisplatin for six cycles to the administration of these two combinations in a sequential fashion (three cycles of CAV followed by three of VP-16/cisplatin). Three hundred eligible patients were enrolled on the trial from September 1981 to October 1984. All responding patients were also treated after completion of chemotherapy with thoracic irradiation in randomly allocated doses of 2,000 and 3,750 cGy. The complete response (CR) rate to chemotherapy was slightly, but not significantly, higher on the alternating arm (52% v 44%, P = .20). However, there was no difference in disease-free or overall survival on the alternating and sequential arms, respectively (47.3 weeks v 45.1 weeks, P = .26; 61.7 weeks v 59.5 weeks, P = .56). Data on the effect of radiotherapy dose on survival are not yet mature, but it does not appear the results of this portion of the trial will alter the interpretation of the chemotherapy comparison. Patient characteristics favorably influencing survival were female sex, good performance status, younger age, and absence of supraclavicular node involvement. Two interpretations of these and other results in SCLC are suggested: (1) the difference between the schedules used is too small for the predictions of the Goldie-Coldman model to be realized in a trial of this size, or (2) VP-16/cisplatin is actually a superior regimen and any schedule that exposes patients to these drugs early in treatment will produce improved results.

Importance of timing for thoracic irradiation in the combined modality treatment of limited-stage small-cell lung cancer. The National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group.

PURPOSE: The importance of the timing of thoracic irradiation (TI) in the combined modality therapy of limited-stage small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) was assessed in a randomized trial. METHODS: All 308 eligible patients received cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and vincristine (CAV) alternating with etoposide and cisplatin (EP) every 3 weeks for three cycles of each chemotherapy regimen. Patients randomized to early TI received 40 Gy in 15 fractions over 3 weeks to the primary site concurrent with the first cycle of EP (week 3), and late TI patients received the same radiation concurrent with the last cycle of EP (week 15). After completion of all chemotherapy and TI, patients without progressive disease received prophylactic cranial irradiation (25 Gy in 10 fractions over 2 weeks). RESULTS: Although complete remission rates were not significantly different between the two arms, progression-free survival (P = .036) and overall survival (P = .008) were superior in the early TI arm. Patients in the late TI arm had a higher risk of brain metastases (P = .006). CONCLUSION: The early administration of TI in the combined modality therapy of limited-stage SCLC is superior to late or consolidative TI.

The use of VP-16 plus cisplatin during induction chemotherapy for small-cell lung cancer.

In an attempt to circumvent innate or acquired tumor-cell resistance to chemotherapy, patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) were treated with induction therapy that incorporated two active and potentially non-cross-resistant chemotherapy regimens on two National Cancer Institute of Canada (NCI-C) trials. Patients with limited disease (LD) SCLC were treated with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin (Adriamycin [Adria Laboratories, Columbus, Ohio]) and vincristine (CAV) and VP-16 plus cisplatin in two different sequences. One arm was randomized to receive CAV alternating with VP-16 plus cisplatin for a total of six treatment cycles, and the other arm received three courses of CAV followed by three courses of VP-16 plus cisplatin. Both treatment strategies produced similar response rates and survival curves, and each treatment group has a projected 2-year survival of 20%. Patients with extensive disease (ED) were treated with either six cycles of CAV (standard regimen) or CAV alternating with VP-16 plus cisplatin for a total of six treatment cycles. In this study, the alternating regimen produced a higher complete response (CR) rate (40% v 27%) and overall response rate (61% v 39%; P less than .01). The progression-free survival was also superior for the alternating arm (P = .001), as was overall survival (P less than .05). The frequency of thrombocytopenia and severe gastrointestinal toxicity was slightly greater in the alternating arm, but the frequency of neutropenia and infection was less. The alternation of CAV and VP-16 plus cisplatin during induction therapy is an effective treatment strategy in the management of SCLC and superior to CAV alone in extensive SCLC.

The effect of dose of thoracic irradiation on recurrence in patients with limited stage small cell lung cancer. Initial results of a Canadian Multicenter Randomized Trial.

Patients with limited stage small cell lung cancer were initially randomized to receive either three courses of Cyclophosphamide, Adriamycin, and Vincristine (CAV) followed by three courses of VP-16 and Cis-platin (VP-PT) or six courses of alternating CAV and VP-PT. Responding patients received prophylactic cranial radiation (PCI) after three courses of chemotherapy (CT) and loco-regional thoracic radiation (LRTR) after six courses. No maintenance chemotherapy was given. Patients receiving LRTR were randomized to receive either 25 Gy in ten fractions over 2 weeks (SD) or 37.5 Gy in 15 fractions over 3 weeks (HD). In both arms the pre-chemotherapy disease was treated with a 2 cm margin around the primary tumor volume. The mediastinum was included in the treatment volume and the supraclavicular nodes were also included if involved originally. The spinal cord was shielded after 32 Gy. Of the 333 patients enrolled by the time the trial closed in October 1984, 168 were eventually randomized to LRTR and are eligible for response assessment. The overall response rate after combined RT and CT was 94% (CR 67%, PR 27%). The CR rate for SD was 65% and for HD 69%. The combined treatment was well tolerated by most patients. Forty-nine percent of HD patients developed dysphagia compared to 26% of those SD (p less than 0.01). At the time of this analysis the median duration of follow-up since randomization to radiotherapy is 30 months. The median local progression-free survival on HD is 49 weeks. On SD it is 38 weeks (p = 0.05, one sided). The actuarial incidence of local progression by 2 years is 69% on HD and 80% on LD. There is as yet no significant difference in overall survival between the two arms. It appears that HD radiotherapy as administered in this study may have an impact on local control, but it is too early to determine if this will translate into a survival benefit.

A randomized trial of radiation therapy compared to split course radiation therapy combined with mitomycin C and 5 fluorouracil as initial treatment for advanced laryngeal and hypopharyngeal squamous carcinoma.

Two hundred and twelve patients with previously untreated advanced squamous carcinoma of the larynx or hypopharynx were randomized to receive initial treatment with radiotherapy, 50 Gy in 20 fractions in 28 days or split course radiotherapy and concurrent chemotherapy, 25 Gy in 10 fractions in 14 days followed by a 4 week rest and a further 25 Gy in 10 fractions in 14 days starting on day 43; Mitomycin C was given on day 1 and day 43 and 5FU continuous infusions on days 1--4 and days 43--46. Surgery was reserved for persistent or recurrent disease. Two hundred and nine of the 212 patients randomized were included in the analyses. Outcome analyses were performed at a median follow-up interval of 4.4 years. No patients were lost to follow-up. No significant difference was found between the two arms for the end points of local relapse-free rate (p = 0.91), regional relapse-free rate (p = 0.17, adjusted) or overall survival (p = 0.86). Eight-eight patients had attempted surgical resection following radiotherapy failure. The contribution of salvage surgery to overall survival was similar for both arms of the study as was the surgical complication rate. Serious late radiation toxicity was minimal (3% in the RT group, 0% in the radiation therapy plus chemotherapy group). The result of the trial shows no advantage in terms of local control or survival for the experimental treatment arm of split course radiotherapy and concurrent chemotherapy with Mitomycin C and 5 Fluorouracil compared to radiotherapy alone.

Retrospective analysis of treatment of unresectable keloids with primary radiation over 25 years.

AIMS: The purpose of the study was to review retrospectively the role of primary radiotherapy for unresectable keloids. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Kilovoltage X-rays and mega-voltage electron beams were used to irradiate large bulky unresectable keloids. A total of 3750 cGy was given in five once-weekly fractions, over a period of 5 weeks. Eighty-six keloids in 64 patients were treated between 1977 and 2002. RESULTS: Ninety-seven per cent of this cohort had significant regression, and 3% had partial regression 18 months after completing radiotherapy. Both acute and long-term reactions were acceptable, and so far none of the patients have been reported as having cancer of any sort. Sixty-three per cent of the patients surveyed were very happy with the outcome of their treatment. CONCLUSION: Unresectable bulky symptomatic keloids can be satisfactorily treated with hypo-fractionated radiotherapy primarily using either kilovoltage X-rays or electron beams without significant short- or long-term side-effects.

Malignant lympho-epithelial lesion--the Manitoba experience.

A retrospective study was carried out utilizing the Records Department of the Health Sciences Centre, St. Boniface General Hospital, and the Manitoba Cancer Treatment and Research Foundation. Seventeen cases of malignant lympho-epithelial lesion were found. The pathology of all cases was reviewed. There were 12 females and five males. Sixteen cases involved the parotid gland and one the submandibular gland. The ages ranged from 17-65 years with the peak incidence in the fourth decade of life. Fifteen of the patients were Eskimos, all residing in the Northwest Territories; two patients were Caucasian. Most patients were treated with a combined modality of surgery with postoperative radiation. The clinical features, pathology, treatment, and final outcome are reviewed.

Influence of cigarette smoking on the efficacy of radiation therapy in head and neck cancer.

BACKGROUND: Smoking is a risk factor for several cancers and may also limit the efficacy of treatment. In this study, we evaluated the influence of cigarette smoking during radiation therapy on the efficacy of treatment in patients with head and neck cancer. METHODS: Using a questionnaire, we obtained information on smoking behavior at base line and weekly during therapy in 115 patients with head and neck cancer who were treated with radiation therapy with or without fluorouracil. The side effects of therapy were evaluated weekly, and response was assessed 13 weeks after treatment was completed. The main outcomes measured were treatment response and survival. RESULTS: The prognostic variables were similar among the patients who smoked and those who did not smoke during treatment. The 53 patients who continued to smoke during radiation therapy had a lower rate of complete response (45 percent vs. 74 percent, P = 0.008) and poorer two-year survival (39 percent vs. 66 percent, P = 0.005) than the 62 patients who did not smoke or who had quit before treatment. Among the nonsmoking patients, mortality was influenced by the length of time between quitting and treatment, with a risk reduction (relative to that for patients who continued to smoke) of 40 percent for patients who had quit less than 12 weeks before diagnosis and of 70 percent for patients who had quit more than 1 year before diagnosis. After adjustment for other variables with proportional-hazards regression analysis, smoking remained an independent prognostic factor (P = 0.002), with a relative risk of 2.5 (95 percent confidence interval, 1.4 to 4.4) favoring the patients who abstained from smoking. The results could not be explained by the type of chemotherapy received, the presence of coexisting morbid conditions, differences in the side effects of radiation, or the number of interruptions of treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with head and neck cancer who continue to smoke during radiation therapy have lower rates of response and survival than patients who do not smoke during radiation therapy.