Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Int Arch Allergy Immunol ; 157(3): 269-74, 2012.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22042247

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: This study was carried out to determine whether humoral and cellular immune responses would be provoked by cutaneous administration of keyhole limpet hemocyanin (KLH) and in particular by scarification of the skin (SS). METHODS: This was an unblinded, single-center, 8-week pilot study in healthy young adults. Twenty-four subjects assigned to 4 groups completed the study. Each group was immunized twice, with a 3-week interval, either by SS or intradermally (ID), with an SS dose of 50 or 250 µg and an ID dose of 100 or 250 µg. Serum was collected for antibody assays at baseline and 3 weeks after both the first and second immunizations. Delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH) testing was performed before the first immunization and 3 weeks after the second. RESULTS: In the 250-µg SS group, there was a significant increase from day 0 to day 47 in anti-KLH IgG (p = 0.02; day 0: 3.46 ± 5.49 mg/dl, day 47: 7.54 ± 8.87 mg/dl) and anti-KLH IgA (p = 0.04; day 0: 4.78 ± 9.15 mg/dl, day 47: 11.42 ± 13.62 mg/dl). One subject in each treatment group showed a positive DTH test result representing 20% (50-µg SS), 10% (250-µg SS), 25% (100-µg ID) and 20% (250-µg ID) of the subjects. CONCLUSIONS: It was possible to induce both humoral and cellular immune responses by SS administration despite the limited antigenic potency of the low-molecular-weight KLH preparation. This approach may be useful for studying the mechanisms of immune response in allergic skin diseases such as atopic dermatitis.


Asunto(s)
Hemocianinas/inmunología , Hipersensibilidad Tardía/inmunología , Inmunidad Celular , Inmunidad Humoral , Inmunoterapia Activa/métodos , Adyuvantes Inmunológicos/administración & dosificación , Administración Cutánea , Adolescente , Adulto , Femenino , Hemocianinas/administración & dosificación , Humanos , Hipersensibilidad Tardía/diagnóstico , Inmunoglobulina A/sangre , Inmunoglobulina G/sangre , Inmunoglobulina M/sangre , Inyecciones Intradérmicas , Masculino , Proyectos Piloto , Adulto Joven
2.
Arch Suicide Res ; 24(sup1): 190-203, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30040541

RESUMEN

The objective of this study was to explore, using first-hand accounts, adolescents' understandings of why they self-harmed, what their responses to self-harm were, and how they resisted or ceased self-harm. Secondary analysis was conducted of video-recorded family therapy sessions from the Self-harm Intervention: Family Therapy (SHIFT Trial). Recordings of 22 participants, approximately 170 hours of footage, formed the dataset. The study developed 5 core themes: (1) Distress can be difficult to convey; (2) Self-harm and suicidal ideation: a complex relationship; (3) Self-harm as a form of communication; (4) Self-harm to manage emotions; and (5) Moving forward. Self-harm was a means of communicating distress as well as managing emotions. Accounts highlighted the complex interplay between self-harm and suicidal intent. Encouragingly, many participants described being able to resist self-harm.


Asunto(s)
Comunicación , Relaciones Familiares/psicología , Motivación , Conducta Autodestructiva/psicología , Adaptación Psicológica , Adolescente , Niño , Emociones , Terapia Familiar , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Investigación Cualitativa , Ideación Suicida
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA