RESUMEN
CONTEXT: Opportunities to reduce the risk of cancer, including cervical, liver, and skin cancer, start early in life. To encourage adoption of primary prevention activities in childhood to reduce cancer risk later in life, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention conducted a demonstration project with 3 National Comprehensive Cancer Control Program (NCCCP) recipients. PROGRAM: Iowa, Northwest Portland Area Indian Health Board (NPAIHB), and Pennsylvania NCCCP recipients implemented evidence-based primary prevention activities for cervical, liver, and skin cancer among children using health care provider education, patient education, and policy development. IMPLEMENTATION: Iowa implemented an announcement approach to improve provider education on human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination. Pennsylvania focused on patient education for reducing skin cancer risk and both provider and patient education for liver cancer prevention. NPAIHB created a sun safety intervention for tribal organizations, including a policy guide, media materials, and patient education. RESULTS: In Iowa, health care providers taking the announcement approach reported significantly higher mean scores on a posttest compared with a pretest regarding perceptions about HPV vaccination, self-efficacy, and behavioral intentions related to vaccination. Pennsylvania integrated sun safety education and sunscreen dispenser programs as a health and wellness initiative in 8 state parks and the Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Natural Resources incorporated the program in its Pennsylvania Outdoor Recreation Plan. Pennsylvania also implemented health care provider education on the primary prevention of liver cancer through hepatitis B and hepatitis C screening and hepatitis B vaccination. The NPAIHB skin cancer policy guide was created and distributed for use to all 43 federally recognized tribes of Oregon, Washington, and Idaho served by NPAIHB. DISCUSSION: The identification, dissemination, and implementation of these efforts can serve as best practices for future childhood primary prevention programs. NCCCP recipients and public health professionals can use health care provider education, patient education, and policy development to reduce future risk for cervical, liver, and skin cancer among children.
Asunto(s)
Carbonil Cianuro m-Clorofenil Hidrazona/análogos & derivados , Hepatitis B , Neoplasias Hepáticas , Infecciones por Papillomavirus , Vacunas contra Papillomavirus , Neoplasias Cutáneas , Niño , Humanos , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/prevención & control , Neoplasias Cutáneas/prevención & control , Prevención Primaria , Vacunas contra Papillomavirus/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: We report the prevalence and economic cost of skin cancer treatment compared to other cancers overall in the USA from 2012 to 2018. METHODS: Using the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey full-year consolidated data files and associated medical conditions and medical events files, we estimate the prevalence, total costs, and per-person costs of treatment for melanoma and non-melanoma skin cancer among adults aged ≥ 18 years in the USA. To understand the changes in treatment prevalence and treatment costs of skin cancer in the context of overall cancer treatment, we also estimate the prevalence, total costs, and per-person costs of treatment for non-skin cancer among US adults. RESULTS: During 2012-15 and 2016-18, the average annual number of adults treated for any skin cancer was 5.8 (95% CI: 5.2, 6.4) and 6.1 (95% CI: 5.6, 6.6) million, respectively, while the average annual number of adults treated for non-skin cancers rose from 10.8 (95% CI: 10.0, 11.5) to 11.9 (95% CI: 11.2, 12.6) million, respectively. The overall estimated annual costs rose from $8.0 (in 2012-2015) to $8.9 billion (in 2016-18) for skin cancer treatment and $70.2 to $79.4 billion respectively for non-skin cancer treatment. CONCLUSION: The prevalence and economic cost of skin cancer treatment modestly increased in recent years. Given the substantial cost of skin cancer treatment, continued public health attention to implementing evidence-based sun-safety interventions to reduce skin cancer risk may help prevent skin cancer and the associated treatment costs.
Asunto(s)
Melanoma , Neoplasias Cutáneas , Adulto , Humanos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Gastos en Salud , Estrés Financiero , Neoplasias Cutáneas/epidemiología , Neoplasias Cutáneas/terapia , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Melanoma/epidemiología , Melanoma/terapia , Costo de EnfermedadRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Acral lentiginous melanoma (ALM) is a rare type of melanoma associated with delayed diagnosis and poor survival rates. This study examines ALM incidence rates in comparison to all other melanoma types. METHODS: We used data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's National Program of Cancer Registries and the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program, which together cover 99% of the US population. We calculated age-adjusted rates and rate ratios for ALM and all other malignant melanomas by sex, race and ethnicity, stage, and year of diagnosis (2010-2019). RESULTS: ALM incidence rates were significantly lower among non-Hispanic Black persons (1.8 per 1,000,000); non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander (API) persons (1.7 per 1,000,000); and Hispanic Black, American Indian/Alaska Native (AI/AN), and API persons (1.5 per 1,000,000) compared to non-Hispanic White persons (2.3 per 1,000,000). Rates were significantly higher among Hispanic White persons (2.8 per 1,000,000) compared to non-Hispanic White persons. For all other melanoma types, incidence rates were significantly higher among non-Hispanic White persons compared to persons in each of the other racial and ethnic categories. The percentage of melanomas that were ALM ranged from 0.8% among non-Hispanic White persons to 19.1% among Hispanic Black, AI/AN, and API persons. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that awareness of the potential for ALM in patients of all races and ethnicities could be balanced with an understanding of the rarity of the disease and the potential for the development of other melanoma types in racial and ethnic minority groups.
Asunto(s)
Melanoma , Neoplasias Cutáneas , Humanos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Melanoma/epidemiología , Etnicidad , Incidencia , Grupos Minoritarios , Neoplasias Cutáneas/epidemiología , Neoplasias Cutáneas/etiologíaRESUMEN
Clinicians can play a role in skin cancer prevention by counseling their patients on use of sun protection and indoor tanning avoidance. We used data from the 2016 DocStyles, a web-based survey of U.S. primary care providers, to examine skin cancer prevention counseling practices among 1506 providers. In 2018, we conducted logistic regression analyses to examine factors associated with regularly providing counseling. Almost half (48.5%) of all providers reported regularly counseling on sun protection, and 27.4% reported regularly counseling on indoor tanning. Provider characteristics associated with regular counseling included having practiced medicine for at least 16â¯years (sun protection: adjusted prevalence ratio [aPR]â¯=â¯1.27, 95% confidence interval [CI]â¯=â¯1.15, 1.41; indoor tanning: aPRâ¯=â¯1.38, 95% CIâ¯=â¯1.17, 1.63), having treated sunburn in the past year (sun protection: aPRâ¯=â¯1.78, 95% CIâ¯=â¯1.46, 2.17; indoor tanning: aPRâ¯=â¯2.42, 95% CIâ¯=â¯1.73, 3.39), and awareness of U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendations (sun protection: aPRâ¯=â¯1.73, 95% CIâ¯=â¯1.51, 2.00; indoor tanning: aPRâ¯=â¯2.70, 95% CIâ¯=â¯2.09, 3.48). Reporting barriers to counseling was associated with a lower likelihood of regularly counseling on sun protection (1-3 barriers: aPRâ¯=â¯0.82, 95% CIâ¯=â¯0.71, 0.94; 4+ barriers: aPRâ¯=â¯0.80, 95% CIâ¯=â¯0.69, 0.93) and indoor tanning (1-3 barriers: aPRâ¯=â¯0.72, 95% CIâ¯=â¯0.57, 0.91; 4+ barriers: aPRâ¯=â¯0.61, 95% CIâ¯=â¯0.47, 0.78). Barriers to counseling included lack of time (58.1%), more urgent health concerns (49.1%), and patient disinterest (46.3%). Although many providers report regularly counseling patients on skin cancer prevention, most report serious barriers to providing such counseling. Additional research could explore strategies to integrate compelling and informative skin cancer prevention counseling into current provider practices.
Asunto(s)
Consejo/estadística & datos numéricos , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias Cutáneas/prevención & control , Neoplasias Cutáneas/psicología , Baño de Sol , Quemadura Solar/prevención & control , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Personal de Salud , Humanos , Relaciones Médico-Paciente , Protectores Solares/uso terapéutico , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
Indoor tanning exposes users to high levels of ultraviolet radiation, increasing skin cancer risk. The risk is greatest for those who begin indoor tanning at a young age. The objective of this study was to assess changes in indoor tanning prevalence over time among U.S. high school students, by sex, age, and race/ethnicity. We used cross-sectional data from the 2009, 2011, 2013, 2015, and 2017 national Youth Risk Behavior Survey to examine changes in indoor tanning prevalence from 2009 to 2017 and from 2015 to 2017. From 2009 to 2017 indoor tanning declined overall (15.6 to 5.6%; p < 0.001), across all age groups, and among white (37.4 to 10.1%; p < 0.001) and Hispanic (10.5 to 3.0%; p < 0.001) female students, and white (7.0 to 2.8%; p < 0.001) and Hispanic (5.8 to 3.4%; p < 0.001) male students. From 2015 to 2017, indoor tanning declined overall (7.3 to 5.6%; p = 0.04) and among white (15.2 to 10.1%; p = 0.03) and Hispanic (5.8 to 3.0%; p = 0.02) female students, and 16-year-old students (7.2 to 4.7%; p = 0.03). Indoor tanning has continued to decrease, particularly among white and Hispanic female students, dropping well below the Healthy People 2020 target for adolescents. However, continued efforts are needed to further reduce and sustain reductions in adolescent indoor tanning and address remaining research gaps.
Asunto(s)
Baño de Sol/tendencias , Adolescente , Conducta del Adolescente , Población Negra , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Hispánicos o Latinos , Humanos , Masculino , Prevalencia , Asunción de Riesgos , Estudiantes/estadística & datos numéricos , Baño de Sol/estadística & datos numéricos , Rayos Ultravioleta , Estados Unidos , Población BlancaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Nearly 5 million people are treated for skin cancer each year in the United States. Agricultural and construction workers (ACWs) may be at increased risk for skin cancer because of high levels of ultraviolet radiation exposure from the sun. This is the first study that uses nationally representative data to assess sun-protection behaviors among ACWs. METHODS: We analyzed data from the 2015 National Health Interview Survey Cancer Control Supplement to examine the prevalence of sun-protection behaviors among ACWs. We calculated national, weighted, self-reported prevalence estimates. We used χ2 tests to assess differences between ACWs by industry and occupation. RESULTS: Most of the 2,298 agricultural and construction workers studied were male (by industry, 72.4% in agriculture and 89.3% in construction; by occupation, 66.1% in agriculture and 95.6% in construction) and non-Hispanic white. About one-third had at least 1 sunburn in the past year. The prevalence of sunscreen use and shade seeking was low and did not significantly differ among groups, ranging from 15.1% to 21.4% for sunscreen use and 24.5% to 29.1% for shade seeking. The prevalence of wearing protective clothing was significantly higher among agricultural workers than among construction workers by industry (70.9% vs 50.7%) and occupation (70.5% vs 53.0%). CONCLUSION: Our findings could be used to improve occupational health approaches to reducing skin cancer risk among ACWs and to inform education and prevention initiatives addressing skin cancer. Sun-safety initiatives may include modifying work sites to increase shade and adding sun safety to workplace policies and training. Employers can help reduce occupational health inequities and protect workers by creating workplaces that facilitate sun protection.
Asunto(s)
Industria de la Construcción/estadística & datos numéricos , Agricultores/estadística & datos numéricos , Conductas Relacionadas con la Salud , Enfermedades Profesionales/prevención & control , Neoplasias Cutáneas/prevención & control , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Vigilancia de la Población , Ropa de Protección/estadística & datos numéricos , Conducta de Reducción del Riesgo , Quemadura Solar/epidemiología , Quemadura Solar/prevención & control , Luz Solar/efectos adversos , Protectores Solares/uso terapéutico , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Exposure to Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs) is associated with a host of harmful outcomes, including increased risk for cancer. A scoping review was conducted to gain a better understanding of how ACEs have been studied in association with risk factors for cancer. This review includes 155 quantitative, peer-reviewed articles published between 2005 and 2015 that examined associations between ACEs and modifiable cancer risk factors, including alcohol, environmental carcinogens, chronic inflammation, sex hormones, immunosuppression, infectious agents, obesity, radiation, ultraviolet (UV) radiation, and tobacco, among U.S. adults. This review highlights the growing body of research connecting ACEs to cancer risk factors, particularly alcohol, obesity, and tobacco. Fewer studies investigated the links between ACEs and chronic inflammation or infectious agents. No included publications investigated associations between ACEs and environmental carcinogens, hormones, immunosuppression, radiation, or ultraviolet radiation. Mitigating the impact of ACEs may provide innovative ways to effect comprehensive, upstream cancer prevention.
Asunto(s)
Experiencias Adversas de la Infancia/estadística & datos numéricos , Maltrato a los Niños/estadística & datos numéricos , Acontecimientos que Cambian la Vida , Neoplasias/etiología , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Consumo de Bebidas Alcohólicas/efectos adversos , Consumo de Bebidas Alcohólicas/epidemiología , Niño , Exposición a Riesgos Ambientales/efectos adversos , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Neoplasias/epidemiología , Neoplasias/fisiopatología , Obesidad Infantil/complicaciones , Obesidad Infantil/epidemiología , Medición de Riesgo , Factores Sexuales , Fumar/efectos adversos , Fumar/epidemiología , Rayos Ultravioleta/efectos adversos , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
Little work has been done to explore the use of shade for skin cancer prevention in the context of the built environment. In an effort to address this gap and draw attention to the intersection between architectural and public health practice, we reviewed research on shade design, use, and policies published from January 1, 1996, through December 31, 2017. Our findings indicate that various features influence the sun-protective effects of shade, including the materials, size, shape, and position of the shade structure; the characteristics of the surrounding area; and weather conditions. Limited research suggests that shade provision in outdoor spaces may increase shade use. Shade audit and design tools are available to inform shade planning efforts. Shade policies to date have mostly been setting specific, and information on the implementation and effects of such policies is limited. Integrating shade planning into community design, planning, and architecture may have a substantial impact and will require a multidisciplinary approach.
Asunto(s)
Planificación Ambiental , Exposición a Riesgos Ambientales/prevención & control , Neoplasias Cutáneas/prevención & control , Rayos Ultravioleta/efectos adversos , Humanos , Políticas , Salud PúblicaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To examine the association between state indoor tanning laws and indoor tanning behavior using nationally representative samples of US high school students younger than 18 years. METHODS: We combined data from the 2009, 2011, 2013, and 2015 national Youth Risk Behavior Surveys (n = 41 313) to analyze the association between 2 types of state indoor tanning laws (age restriction and parental permission) and the prevalence of indoor tanning during the 12 months before the survey, adjusting for age, race/ethnicity, and survey year, and stratified by gender. RESULTS: Age restriction laws were associated with a 47% (P < .001) lower indoor tanning prevalence among female high school students. Parental permission laws were not found to be associated with indoor tanning prevalence among either female or male high school students. CONCLUSIONS: Age restriction laws could contribute to less indoor tanning, particularly among female high school students. Such reductions may reduce the health and economic burden of skin cancer.
Asunto(s)
Industria de la Belleza/legislación & jurisprudencia , Baño de Sol/legislación & jurisprudencia , Adolescente , Conducta del Adolescente , Factores de Edad , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Prevalencia , Asunción de Riesgos , Factores SocioeconómicosRESUMEN
Major health organizations recommend obtaining most of one's vitamin D through dietary sources rather than from sun exposure, given the link between sun exposure and increased skin cancer risk. The purpose of this study is to examine the association between beliefs about vitamin D and skin cancer risk-related behaviors, a topic on which research is limited. We analyzed cross-sectional online survey data collected in the summer of 2015 from 4127U.S. adults aged 18years and older. Overall, 19.7% of adults believed that sun protection would put them at risk of not getting enough vitamin D. However, less than half (43.1%) thought they could get enough vitamin D from dietary sources. Individuals with this belief were more likely to protect their skin when spending time outdoors (71.3%) compared with those who were neutral or disagreed (56.5%; P<0.001). Only 5.1% of adults believed that indoor tanning is an effective way to get vitamin D. Compared to those who disagreed or were neutral, those who thought it was effective were more likely to be outdoor tanners (45.1% vs. 28.5%; P<0.001) and indoor tanners (13.8% vs 1.9%; P<0.001). Beliefs about vitamin D were associated with skin cancer risk-related behaviors. Including information about vitamin D in skin cancer prevention messages may be beneficial.
Asunto(s)
Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Neoplasias Cutáneas/prevención & control , Quemadura Solar/prevención & control , Vitamina D , Adulto , Estudios Transversales , Dieta , Femenino , Humanos , Internet , Masculino , Asunción de Riesgos , Baño de Sol/estadística & datos numéricos , Luz Solar/efectos adversos , Protectores Solares/uso terapéutico , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Sunscreen is a common form of sun protection, but little is known about patterns of use. OBJECTIVE: We sought to assess patterns of sunscreen use on the face and other exposed skin among US adults. METHODS: Using cross-sectional data from the 2013 Summer ConsumerStyles survey (N = 4033), we calculated descriptive statistics and adjusted risk ratios to identify characteristics associated with regular sunscreen use (always/most of the time when outside on a warm sunny day for ≥1 hour). RESULTS: Few adults regularly used sunscreen on the face (men: 18.1%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 15.8-20.6; women: 42.6%, 95% CI 39.5-46.7), other exposed skin (men: 19.9%, 95% CI 17.5-22.6; women: 34.4%, 95% CI 31.5-37.5), or both the face and other exposed skin (men: 14.3%, 95% CI 12.3-16.6; women: 29.9%, 95% CI 27.2-32.8). Regular use was associated with sun-sensitive skin, an annual household income ≥$60,000, and meeting aerobic activity guidelines (Ps < .05). Nearly 40% of users were unsure if their sunscreen provided broad-spectrum protection. LIMITATIONS: Reliance on self-report and lack of information on sunscreen reapplication or other sun-safety practices are limitations. CONCLUSION: Sunscreen use is low, especially among certain demographic groups. These findings can inform sun-safety interventions and the interpretation of surveillance data on sunscreen use.
Asunto(s)
Cara , Autocuidado , Protectores Solares/administración & dosificación , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estados Unidos , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To examine the association between demographic and behavioral characteristics and sunburn among U.S. adults. METHOD: We used 2010 National Health Interview Survey data (N=24,970) to conduct multivariable logistic regressions examining associations with having 1 or more sunburns in the past year and having 4 or more sunburns in the past year. RESULTS: Overall, 37.1% of adults experienced sunburn in the past year. The adjusted prevalence of sunburn was particularly common among adults aged 18-29years (52.0%), those who repeatedly burn or freckle after 2weeks in the sun (45.9%), whites (44.3%), indoor tanners (44.1%), those with a family history of melanoma (43.9%), and those who are US-born (39.5%). Physical activity, alcohol consumption, and overweight/obesity were positively associated with sunburn (all P<0.001); sun protection behaviors were not significantly associated with sunburn (P=0.35). Among those who were sunburned in the past year, 12.1% experienced 4 or more sunburns. CONCLUSION: Sunburn is common, particularly among younger adults, those with a more sun-sensitive skin type, whites, those with a family history of melanoma, the highly physically active, and indoor tanners. Efforts are needed to facilitate sun-safety during outdoor recreation, improve the consistency of sun protection practices, and prevent sunburn, particularly among these subgroups.
Asunto(s)
Conductas Relacionadas con la Salud , Melanoma/prevención & control , Baño de Sol/estadística & datos numéricos , Quemadura Solar/epidemiología , Quemadura Solar/prevención & control , Protectores Solares/uso terapéutico , Rayos Ultravioleta/efectos adversos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios Transversales , Exposición a Riesgos Ambientales/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prevalencia , Factores Socioeconómicos , Quemadura Solar/etiología , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Adulto JovenAsunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células de Merkel/epidemiología , Neoplasias Cutáneas/epidemiología , Negro o Afroamericano/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Hispánicos o Latinos/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Sistema de Registros , Factores Sexuales , Tasa de Supervivencia , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Población Blanca/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
Importance: Non-Hispanic American Indian/Alaska Native people have the second highest incidence rate of invasive cutaneous melanoma in the US after non-Hispanic White people. Objective: To examine invasive cutaneous melanoma incidence rates and trends over time among non-Hispanic American Indian/Alaska Native people. Design, Setting, and Participants: This descriptive, observational cross-sectional study used population-based cancer registry data (US Cancer Statistics AI/AN Incidence Analytic Database) linked to the Indian Health Service administrative database to examine incidence rates by age, sex, region, histology, tumor site, stage, and other demographic and clinical characteristics. The study examined trends from 1999 to 2019 time period by age, sex, stage at diagnosis, and region. Non-Hispanic American Indian/Alaska Native people 15 years and older who received a diagnosis of invasive cutaneous melanoma from 1999 to 2019 who were members of federally recognized tribes and resided in Indian Health Service purchased/referred care delivery areas were included in this study to reduce racial misclassification and provide more accurate rates. The data were analyzed in 2022. Exposures: Demographic and clinical characteristics, such as age, sex, geographic region, histology, stage, and tumor site. Main Outcomes and Measures: Invasive cutaneous melanoma incidence rates by age group, sex, region, resident county characteristics (poverty level, rurality, education level, and socioeconomic status), stage at diagnosis, tumor site, and histology. Trends over time by age, sex, region, and stage. Results: From 1999 to 2019, 2151 non-Hispanic American Indian/Alaska Native people (1021 female individuals [47.5%]) received a diagnosis of incident cutaneous melanoma (rate, 10.7 per 100â¯000; 95% CI, 10.3-11.2). Rates were higher among male than female individuals (13.0 [95% CI, 12.2-13.8] vs 9.2 [95% CI, 8.6-9.8]) and for people 55 years and older (24.2; 95% CI, 22.8-25.7) compared with those aged 15 to 39 years (3.5; 95% CI, 3.2-3.9). Rates were highest for male individuals 55 years and older (34.5; 95% CI, 31.8-37.3) and people living in the Southern Plains (male individuals: 23.8; 95% CI, 21.5-26.2; female individuals: 15.5; 95% CI, 14.0-17.2) and Pacific Coast region (male individuals: 16.5; 95% CI, 14.5-18.7; female individuals: 12.3; 95% CI, 10.9-13.9). Rates increased among female individuals from 1999 to 2019 (average annual percent change [AAPC], 2.5; P < .001); among regional/distant stage tumors (AAPC, 2.5; P = .01) and people 55 years and older (AAPC, 2.8; P = .001). Conclusions and Relevance: The results of this study suggest that additional studies could potentially identify risk factors among non-Hispanic American Indian/Alaska Native people.
Asunto(s)
Nativos Alasqueños , Melanoma , Neoplasias Cutáneas , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Incidencia , Indio Americano o Nativo de Alaska , Melanoma/epidemiología , Estudios Transversales , Neoplasias Cutáneas/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
Community health workers (CHWs) are increasingly addressing health disparities in primary care settings; however, there is little information about how primary care practitioners (PCPs) interact with CHWs or perceive CHW roles. We examined PCP engagement with CHWs in adult primary care settings. Overall, 55% of 1504 PCPs reported working with CHWs; involvement with CHWs differed by some PCP demographic and practice-related factors. While PCPs perceived CHWs as engaging in most nationally endorsed CHW roles, they identified several barriers to integrating CHWs into care teams. Findings can inform ongoing efforts to advance health equity through integrating CHWs into primary care practices.
Asunto(s)
Agentes Comunitarios de Salud , Atención Primaria de Salud , Rol Profesional , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Actitud del Personal de SaludAsunto(s)
Instituciones Académicas/legislación & jurisprudencia , Estudiantes/legislación & jurisprudencia , Protectores Solares , Prescripciones de Medicamentos , Revisión de la Utilización de Medicamentos , Política de Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Humanos , Quemadura Solar/prevención & control , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
The use of indoor UV tanning devices (also known as "indoor tanning") has declined in recent years. Less is known about use of dihydroxyacetone-containing products used for tanning (also known as "sunless tanning"). We analyzed data from the 2015 National Health Interview Survey. Analysis was limited to non-Hispanic White women ages 18-49 years. We estimated the proportion of women reporting spray tanning, self-applied lotion tanning, and indoor tanning and used weighted multivariable logistic regression models to examine the relationships between socio-demographic characteristics, skin cancer risk factors, and other cancer risk factors with sunless and indoor tanning. Overall, 17.7% of women reported sunless tanning. Lotion tanning was more common (15.3%) than spray tanning (6.8%), while 12.0% of women engaged in indoor tanning. Among sunless tanners, 23.7% also engaged in indoor tanning. Younger age, ever having a skin exam, skin reactions to the sun, binge drinking, and being at a healthy weight were associated with sunless tanning. While sunless tanning may be less harmful for skin cancer risk than indoor tanning, the frequency with which the two behaviors co-occur suggests that efforts to address societal pressures for women to alter their skin color may have important public health benefits.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Cutáneas/prevención & control , Baño de Sol/tendencias , Quemadura Solar/epidemiología , Rayos Ultravioleta/efectos adversos , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Intervalos de Confianza , Técnicas Cosméticas/efectos adversos , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Predicción , Promoción de la Salud/organización & administración , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Asunción de Riesgos , Factores Sexuales , Neoplasias Cutáneas/etiología , Baño de Sol/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
This study examines beliefs about sunscreen use among non-Hispanic white adults aged 50 years or older using online survey data (n=237). Multiple logistic regression analyses were conducted to examine beliefs associated with sunscreen use, adjusted by age, gender, education, geographic location, and skin cancer risk score. Those who believed sunscreen use would prevent them from getting sunburned (odds ratio [OR]=1.84) and those who believed that their romantic partners thought they should use sunscreen (OR=1.72) were more likely to report sunscreen use. Those who believed sunscreen use would "take too much time" were less likely to report sunscreen use (OR=0.65). These findings can inform future research and messaging efforts, including the evaluation of intervention approaches that highlight the immediate benefits of sunscreen use, address concerns about sunscreen use taking too much time, and tap into the potential influence that older adults may have on the sunscreen use of their romantic partners.