Omitting axillary dissection: could we offer a more tailored management to elderly patients with breast cancer?

We retrospectively reviewed the data from patients ≥ 70 years old treated between January 2012 and January 2017. Axillary staging was scarcely used in the therapeutic algorithm but arm lymphedema was significantly associated to axillar dissection (p=0.04) and regional nodal irradiation (p = 0.02). Aggressive management of axilla did not provide relevant information for deciding chemotherapy but added morbidity.

Poor performance status and brain metastases treatment: who may benefit from the stereotactic radiotherapy?

BACKGROUND: Poor Performance Status (PS) of cancer patients, defined as PS score 2-3, is an impediment for many drug- and irradiation-based treatments, supported by the trials that exclude subjects with PS < 1. Reports on the benefits of stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) for brain metastases (BMs) in poor PS patients are scarce. We sought to review the characteristics and survival outcomes of this cohort, to assess who may benefit most from SRT. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 73 patients with PS 2 or 3 (63 and 10 cases) treated with SRT for 150 BMs from 2012 to 2018. Patients' characteristics and post-SRT survival, stratified by concomitant systemic treatment (CST) were assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method (p-value < 0.05). RESULTS: Non-small cell lung cancer was the most frequent primary tumor. Extracranial metastases were present in 86.3% of patients. The median overall survival (mOS) after SRT was estimated as 6.0 months (range 0.2-37.7), with 6- and 12-month survival rates of 51.0% and 21.0%, respectively. CST was administrated to 59.7% of patients (immunotherapy, target therapy or chemotherapy). Patients treated with CST presented larger mOS (6.7 vs. 4.4 months for patients treated with SRT alone, p = 0.3), and better 6- and 12-month survival rates (59% and 24% vs. 37% and 18% in patients not treated with CST). CONCLUSIONS: Survival rate after SRT for BMs in poor performance patients, especially with PS 2, can justify SRT, in particular if an effective systemic treatment is available. Both SRT and CST should be more accessible for these patients in clinical practice.

New pre-treatment eosinophil-related ratios as prognostic biomarkers for survival outcomes in endometrial cancer.

BACKGROUND: Systemic inflammation has long been related with adverse survival outcomes in cancer patients, and its biomarkers, such as the Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR), are recognized as poor prognostic indicators. However, the role of eosinophils in this field has been largely overlooked. Here, we describe two new pre-treatment biomarkers, expressed as Eosinophil-to-Lymphocytes Ratio (ELR) and Eosinophil*Neutrophil-to-Lymphocytes ratio (ENLR), and we analyse their impact on prognosis of endometrial cancer (EC) patients. METHODS: A total of 163 consecutive patients diagnosed with EC and treated with postoperative radiotherapy +/- chemotherapy in our institution from January 2011 to December 2015 were evaluated. The cohort was divided in two groups applying the cut-off value of 0.1 and 0.5 according to ROC curve for pre-treatment ELR and ENLR, respectively. After patients' stratification according to the ESMO-ESGO-ESTRO modified risk assessment, subgroup analyses were conducted. RESULTS: Higher values of ELR and ENLR were associated with worse OS (p = 0.004 and p = 0.010, respectively). On univariate analysis, the factors associated with shorter OS were ELR ≥ 0.1 (HR = 2.9, p = 0.017), ENLR ≥ 0.5 (HR = 3.0, p = 0.015), advanced FIGO stage (HR = 3.4, p = 0.007), endometrioid histology (HR = 0.26, p = 0.003) and ESMO-ESGO-ESTRO high-risk (HR = 10.2, p = 0.023). On multivariate Cox regression, higher ELR and ENLR were independently associated with a worse outcome adjusted for the standardly applied prognostic factors. CONCLUSIONS: Increased values of ELR and ENLR portend worse OS in EC, especially in patients classified by the ESMO-ESGO-ESTRO guidelines as a high-risk group. To our best knowledge, this is the first report describing eosinophils-related ratios as prognostic biomarkers in malignant tumours.

Systemic inflammation in older patients with breast cancer: the missing point in geriatric evaluations to sharpen survival prediction.

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer (BC) prevalence steadily increases in older patients but their treatment is based on the geriatric evaluations of comorbidities and potential benefits proved in clinical trials with younger patients. The lack of better decision-making tools urges to promote the search for new prognostic markers. The association between inflammation, aging and cancer may be crucial for better treatment selection. We sought to analyze its impact on the survival of older BC patients, evaluating the interaction with age and comorbidities. METHODS: We evaluated the relationship between inflammatory biomarkers at BC diagnosis (circulating blood cell counts and inflammatory indexes) and BC-related and not related mortality rate, evaluating the influence of comorbidities and age through the competitive risks assessment. RESULTS: We analyzed 148 consecutive BC patients aged ≥ 70 years old, diagnosed with BC and regional lymph node metastases. After the median follow-up of 51.5 months, 59 patients died (28 due to breast cancer progression and 31 because of other causes). Increased levels of circulating monocytes, neutrophils and neutrophil-to-lymphocytes ratio and decreased level of eosinophils and eosinophil multiple by neutrophils-to-lymphocytes ratio were associated with higher probability of BC-related death but not with death related to other causes. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest a role of inflammatory parameters as a possible prognostic tool in therapeutic decision-making process in older patients with BC, as increased level of inflammation was associated with cancer-specific mortality. Prospective studies may give the possibility of refining the geriatric evaluation for BC treatment in elderly.

Analysis of Systemic Inflammatory Factors and Survival Outcomes in Endometrial Cancer Patients Staged I-III FIGO and Treated with Postoperative External Radiotherapy.

BACKGROUND: The causal link between elevated systemic inflammation biomarkers and poor survival has been demonstrated in cancer patients. However, the evidence for this correlation in endometrial cancer (EC) is too weak to influence current criteria of risk assessment. Here, we examined the role of inflammatory indicators as a tool to identify EC patients at higher risk of death in a retrospective observational study. METHODS: A total of 155 patients surgically diagnosed with EC stage I-III FIGO 2009 and treated with postoperative External Beam Radiotherapy (EBRT) ± brachytherapy and chemotherapy according to ESMO-ESTRO-ESGO recommendation for patients at high risk of recurrence at the Gustave Roussy Institut, France, and Hospital Clínic, Spain, between 2008 and 2017 were evaluated. The impact of pre-treatment Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR ≥ 2.2), Monocyte-to-Lymphocyte Ratio (MLR ≥ 0.18), Systemic Immune-Inflammatory Index (SII ≥ 1100) and lymphopenia (<1.0×109/L) on overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival and progression-free survival was evaluated. Subsequently, a cohort of 142 patients within high-advanced risk groups according to ESMO-ESGO-ESTRO classification was evaluated. RESULTS: On univariate analysis, NLR (HR = 2.2, IC 95% 1.1-4.7), SII (HR = 2.2, IC 95% 1.1-4.6), MLR (HR = 5.0, IC 95% 1.1-20.8) and lymphopenia (HR = 3.8, IC 95% 1.6-9.0) were associated with decreased OS. On multivariate analysis, NLR, MLR, SII and lymphopenia proved to be independent unfavorable prognostic factors. CONCLUSIONS: lymphopenia and lymphocytes-related ratio are associated with poorer outcome in surgically staged I-III FIGO EC patients classified as high risk and treated with adjuvant EBRT and could be considered at cancer diagnosis. External validation in an independent cohort is required before implementation for patients' stratification.

Concurrent palliative external radiotherapy with sorafenib or doxorubicin for bulky differentiated thyroid carcinoma: A case report.

Administration of external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) for a bulky recurrence or primary bulky tumor of differentiated thyroid carcinoma (DTC) is rare. No previous experience is available on the feasibility of administering EBRT simultaneously with systemic treatment with doxorubicin or sorafenib, or both. The present case study reported the results from two different institutions on 5 consecutive patients. Side effects and tolerance to radiotherapy plus systemic treatment with doxorubicin (20 mg/m2 intravenously weekly for 6/8 consecutive weeks) or sorafenib (400 mg/12 h orally for 8 weeks) or both, were analyzed in patients with DTC. The local response to radiotherapy and patient outcome was also analyzed. A total of 4 males and 1 female, aged 37-62 years with cervical bulky mass DTC were included. The pathological tumor types were papillary (2 patients), follicular (2 patients) and medullar thyroid carcinoma (1 patient). The radiated cervical mass was local recurrence in 3 cases and primary tumor in the other two. The total dose of radiotherapy ranged between 50 and 64.8 Gy. Three patients received sorafenib, 1 patient received doxorubicin and 1 patient received both treatments. The total planned dose of radiotherapy was administered to all patients. Grade 2 anemia and erythrodysesthesia was the most frequent toxicity. Only the patient who received doxorubicin plus sorafenib had grade 3 toxicity consisting of lymphopenia, folliculitis and mucositis. All but 1 patient had a good local response to radiotherapy. The administration of EBRT concurrently with sorafenib and doxorubicin to patients with DTC with a bulky cervical mass is feasible.

Systemic inflammation in older patients with breast cancer: the missing point in geriatric evaluations to sharpen survival prediction

BackgroundBreast cancer (BC) prevalence steadily increases in older patients but their treatment is based on the geriatric evaluations of comorbidities and potential benefits proved in clinical trials with younger patients. The lack of better decision-making tools urges to promote the search for new prognostic markers. The association between inflammation, aging and cancer may be crucial for better treatment selection. We sought to analyze its impact on the survival of older BC patients, evaluating the interaction with age and comorbidities.MethodsWe evaluated the relationship between inflammatory biomarkers at BC diagnosis (circulating blood cell counts and inflammatory indexes) and BC-related and not related mortality rate, evaluating the influence of comorbidities and age through the competitive risks assessment.ResultsWe analyzed 148 consecutive BC patients aged ≥ 70 years old, diagnosed with BC and regional lymph node metastases. After the median follow-up of 51.5 months, 59 patients died (28 due to breast cancer progression and 31 because of other causes). Increased levels of circulating monocytes, neutrophils and neutrophil-to-lymphocytes ratio and decreased level of eosinophils and eosinophil multiple by neutrophils-to-lymphocytes ratio were associated with higher probability of BC-related death but not with death related to other causes.ConclusionOur data suggest a role of inflammatory parameters as a possible prognostic tool in therapeutic decision-making process in older patients with BC, as increased level of inflammation was associated with cancer-specific mortality. Prospective studies may give the possibility of refining the geriatric evaluation for BC treatment in elderly. (AU)

A new short daily brachytherapy schedule in postoperative endometrial carcinoma. Preliminary results.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the preliminary results of vaginal-cuff relapses (VCR) and complications of a short brachytherapy (BT) schedule in postoperative endometrial carcinoma. METHODS AND MATERIALS: From September 2011 to December 2014, 102 patients were treated with postoperative BT for endometrial carcinoma. Seventy-four patients received a single 7 Gy dose after external beam irradiation (Group 1), and 28 intermediate-risk patients received three daily fractions of 6 Gy (Group 2). The dose was prescribed at 5 mm from the applicator surface. Toxicity was prospectively evaluated after the objective late effects of normal tissues-subjective, objective, management, analytic scores for vagina and RTOG scores for rectum and bladder. STATISTICS: χ2 and Student's t tests. RESULTS: The mean followup was 28.85 months (9.6-58.5) in Group 1 and 31.19 months (7.7-62.3) in Group 2. No VCR was found during followup. Late toxicity: vagina toxicity was developed in 24.32% of the patients in Group 1 (G1-G2) and in 21.4% in Group 2 (G1-G2 but 1 G3). Rectal toxicity appeared in only 2.7% of patients in Group 1 (G1). Neither Group 1 nor Group 2 presented late bladder toxicity. No differences were found in late toxicity between Groups 1 and 2. CONCLUSIONS: The present short BT schedule was safe in relation to VCR and late toxicity for the followup period studied. These results are similar to those of two larger previous schedules performed in our center in relation to the same point of followup.

Can we shorten the overall treatment time in postoperative brachytherapy of endometrial carcinoma? Comparison of two brachytherapy schedules.

PURPOSE: To analyze vaginal-cuff relapses (VCR) and toxicity of two brachytherapy (BT) schedules in postoperative endometrial carcinoma and to correlate vaginal toxicity with vaginal-surface-EQD2Gy3 dose (VS-EQD2Gy3). METHODS/MATERIALS: 319 patients (p) I-IIIC-Figo-stage were treated with 2 BT schedules. One schedule included 166p (Group-1) to whom 3 fractions (Fr) of 4-6Gy per week (w) of BT were administered after external beam radiotherapy (EBI) (125p) and 6Fr/2w of 4-6Gy in exclusive-BT (41p). The second schedule included 153p (Group-2) with BT administered daily with 2Fr/w of 5-6Gy after EBI (94p) and 5-6Gy/4Fr/w in exclusive-BT (59p). Doses were prescribed at 5mm from the vaginal surface. Toxicity was evaluated using RTOG scores for the rectum and bladder and objective LENT-SOMA scores for the vagina. STATISTICS: Chi-square, Fisher and Student's-t tests. RESULTS: Mean follow-up (months): Group-1: 66.55 (7.73-115.40), Group-2: 41.49 (3.13-87.90). VCR: Group-1: 3p (1.88%); Group-2: 2p (1.3%). No differences were found between the two schedules comparing rectal (p=0.170), bladder (p=0.125) and vagina (p=0.680) late toxicities and comparing vagina EBI+BTp vs. exclusive-BTp (p=0.667). Significant differences in VS-EQD23Gy were observed considering EBI+BT (Groups 1+2) vs. exclusive-BT (Groups 1+2) (p<0.0001); nevertheless, no association was found between VS-EQD23Gy and vaginal complications. CONCLUSIONS: No differences were found between the two schedules. No association was found between vaginal toxicity and VS-EQD23Gy. Consequently, treatment with the least number of fractions is preferable.