Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo de estudio
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Acad Radiol ; 31(2): 417-425, 2024 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38401987

RESUMEN

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Innovation is a crucial skill for physicians and researchers, yet traditional medical education does not provide instruction or experience to cultivate an innovative mindset. This study evaluates the effectiveness of a novel course implemented in an academic radiology department training program over a 5-year period designed to educate future radiologists on the fundamentals of medical innovation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A pre- and post-course survey and examination were administered to residents who participated in the innovation course (MESH Core) from 2018 to 2022. Respondents were first evaluated on their subjective comfort level, understanding, and beliefs on innovation-related topics using a 5-point Likert-scale survey. Respondents were also administered a 21-question multiple-choice exam to test their objective knowledge of innovation-related topics. RESULTS: Thirty-eight residents participated in the survey (response rate 95%). Resident understanding, comfort and belief regarding innovation-related topics improved significantly (P < .0001) on all nine Likert-scale questions after the course. After the course, a significant majority of residents either agreed or strongly agreed that technological innovation should be a core competency for the residency curriculum, and that a workshop to prototype their ideas would be beneficial. Performance on the course exam showed significant improvement (48% vs 86%, P < .0001). The overall course experience was rated 5 out of 5 by all participants. CONCLUSION: MESH Core demonstrates long-term success in educating future radiologists on the basic concepts of medical technological innovation. Years later, residents used the knowledge and experience gained from MESH Core to successfully pursue their own inventions and innovative projects. This innovation model may serve as an approach for other institutions to implement training in this domain.


Asunto(s)
Educación de Postgrado en Medicina , Internado y Residencia , Humanos , Educación de Postgrado en Medicina/métodos , Competencia Clínica , Curriculum , Radiólogos , Hospitales
2.
Anat Sci Educ ; 11(5): 478-487, 2018 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29251834

RESUMEN

The complexity of the material being taught in clinical neuroscience within the medical school curriculum requires creative pedagogies to teach medical students effectively. Many clinical teaching strategies have been developed and are well described to address these challenges. However, only a few have been evaluated to determine their impact on the performance of students studying clinical neuroscience. Interactive, 2-hour, self-directed small-group interactive clinical case-based learning sessions were conducted weekly for 4 weeks to integrate concepts learned in the corresponding didactic lectures. Students in the small groups analyzed cases of patients suffering from neurological disease that were based on eight learning objectives that allowed them to evaluate neuroanatomical data and clinical findings before presenting their case analysis to the larger group. Students' performances on the formative quizzes and summative tests were compared to those of first-year medical students in the previous year for whom the self-directed, small-group interactive clinical sessions were not available. There was a significant improvement in the summative performance of first-year medical students with self-directed clinical case learning in the second year (Y2) of teaching clinical neuroscience (P < 0.05) when compared with first-year students in the first year (Y1) for whom the self-directed learning approach was not available. Student performance in the formative assessments between Y1 and Y2 was not significantly different (P = 0.803). A target of ≥70% student scoring above 80% in the final summative examination was met. The current study revealed evidence for the impact and educational outcomes of a self-directed, clinical teaching strategy in a clinical neuroscience curriculum for first-year medical students. Anat Sci Educ 11: 478-487. © 2017 American Association of Anatomists.


Asunto(s)
Rendimiento Académico/estadística & datos numéricos , Educación de Pregrado en Medicina/métodos , Neuroanatomía/educación , Estudiantes de Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Enseñanza , Adulto , Encéfalo/anatomía & histología , Encéfalo/diagnóstico por imagen , Curriculum , Educación de Pregrado en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Facultades de Medicina/organización & administración , Facultades de Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA