Effects of metacognitive training (MCT) on social cognition for schizophrenia spectrum and related psychotic disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Individuals with schizophrenia spectrum and related psychotic disorders (SSD) experience significant impairments in social cognition that impede functioning. Social cognition is a multidimensional construct consisting of four domains: 1. theory of mind, 2. emotion processing, 3. attributional style and 4. social perception. Metacognitive training (MCT) is an intervention designed to target cognitive biases in psychosis containing two modules addressing social cognition. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to investigate the effects of MCT on social cognition and two of its domains: theory of mind and emotion processing. Ten electronic databases were scoured from 2007 to 1 February 2022 for MCT studies reporting social cognition outcomes for people with SSD (1050 identified, 282 assessed). Effect sizes were calculated using Cohen's d in R. RESULTS: Nine studies were included in the meta-analysis (nMCT = 212, ncontrol = 194). MCT had a small but positive effect on global social cognition (d = 0.28 [95% CI 0.07-0.49]) and theory of mind (d = 0.27 [95% CI 0.01-0.52]). MCT showed no evidence of an effect on emotion processing (d = 0.03 [95% CI -0.26 to 0.32]). CONCLUSION: MCT has a small but significant effect on social cognition for people with SSD. Our results add to other recent meta-analyses showing significant effects of MCT on clinically relevant outcomes such as positive symptoms, cognitive biases and cognitive insight. We recommend that future studies on MCT report outcomes on all four domains of social cognition. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO (in the process of registration) available at https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/#recordDetails.

An intersectional perspective on the sociodemographic and clinical factors influencing the status of not in Education, Employment, or training (NEET) in patients with first-episode psychosis (FEP).

PURPOSE: High rates of Not in Education, Employment or Training (NEET) are seen in people with first episode of psychosis (FEP). Sociodemographic and clinical factors were reported to be associated with NEET status in FEP patients. This study follows Intersectionality to examine the independent and additive effects, and most importantly the intersections of sociodemographic and clinical variables concerning NEET status in FEP patients. It was hypothesized that NEET status in FEP patients would be described by the intersection between at least two predictor variables. METHODS: Secondary analyses with chi-square tests, multiple logistic regression and Chi-squared Automatic Interaction Detection (CHAID) analyses were performed on 440 participants with FEP. RESULTS: Chi-square tests indicated that patient socioeconomic status and negative symptom severity were significantly and independently associated with their NEET status. Multiple logistic regression suggested additive effects of age (odds ratio = 1.61), patient socioeconomic status (odds ratio = 1.55) and negative symptom severity (odds ratio = 1.75) in predicting patients' NEET status. CHAID detected an intersection between patients' negative symptom severity and socioeconomic status in shaping their NEET status. CONCLUSION: This study explored how the NEET status of patients with FEP was explained not only by the separate effects of negative symptom severity and socioeconomic status but also by the unique intersections of their clinical and social identities. Findings indicated that functional outcomes of patients appear co-constructed by the intersections of multiple identities. Crucial clinical implications of complementing care for negative symptom severity with vocational resources to improve functional outcomes of patients are discussed.

Transdiagnostic cognitive biases in psychiatric disorders: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Psychiatric disorders are characterized by cognitive deficits, which have been proposed as a transdiagnostic feature of psychopathology ("C" factor). Similarly, cognitive biases (e.g., in attention, memory, and interpretation) represent common tendencies in information processing that are often associated with psychiatric symptoms. However, the question remains whether cognitive biases are also transdiagnostic or are specific to certain psychiatric disorders/symptoms. The current systematic review sought to address whether the proposed "C" factor of transdiagnostic cognitive dysfunction in psychopathology can be extended to cognitive biases. Overall, 31 studies comprising 4401 participants (2536 patients, 1865 non-clinical controls) met inclusion criteria, assessing 19 cognitive biases across 20 diagnostic categories, with most studies focusing on interpretation (k = 22) and attention (k = 11) biases and only 2 assessing memory biases. Traditional meta-analyses found a moderate effect size (g = 0.32) for more severe cognitive biases in all patients relative to non-clinical controls, as well as small but significant associations between interpretation biases and transdiagnostic symptom categories (general psychopathology: r = 0.20, emotion dysfunction: r = 0.17, psychotic symptoms: r = 0.25). Network meta-analyses revealed significant patient versus non-clinical control differences on attention and interpretation biases across diagnoses, as well as significant differences between diagnoses, with highest severity in panic disorder for attention biases and obsessive-compulsive disorder for interpretation biases. The current findings extend the big "C" interpretation of transdiagnostic cognitive dysfunction in psychiatric disorders to cognitive biases and transdiagnostic symptom dimensions. Results also suggest that while the presence of cognitive biases is transdiagnostic, bias severity differs across diagnoses, as in traditional neurocognitive deficits.