Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
1.
ScientificWorldJournal ; 2012: 680643, 2012.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23049476

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The use of extreme lateral interbody fusion (XLIF) and other lateral access surgery is rapidly increasing in popularity. However, limited data is available regarding its use in scoliosis surgery. The objective of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of adults with degenerative lumbar scoliosis treated with XLIF. METHODS: Thirty consecutive patients with adult degenerative scoliosis treated by a single surgeon at a major academic institution were followed for an average of 14.3 months. Interbody fusion was completed using the XLIF technique with supplemental posterior instrumentation. Validated clinical outcome scores were obtained on patients preoperatively and at most recent follow-up. Complications were recorded. RESULTS: The study group demonstrated improvement in multiple clinical outcome scores. Oswestry Disability Index scores improved from 24.8 to 19.0 (P < 0.001). Short Form-12 scores improved, although the change was not significant. Visual analog scores for back pain decreased from 6.8 to 4.6 (P < 0.001) while scores for leg pain decreased from 5.4 to 2.8 (P < 0.001). A total of six minor complications (20%) were recorded, and two patients (6.7%) required additional surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the significant improvement in validated clinical outcome scores, XLIF is effective in the treatment of adult degenerative scoliosis.


Asunto(s)
Vértebras Lumbares/cirugía , Escoliosis/cirugía , Fusión Vertebral/métodos , Anciano , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Laminectomía , Vértebras Lumbares/diagnóstico por imagen , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dimensión del Dolor/métodos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/patología , Radiografía , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Escoliosis/patología , Fusión Vertebral/instrumentación , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
J Manipulative Physiol Ther ; 34(1): 30-6, 2011 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21237405

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Our goal was to create a parsimonious combination of the Modified Somatic Perception Questionnaire (MSPQ) and the Pain Beliefs Screening Instrument (PBSI) through factorial structural analysis and to investigate the associations of the new scale (if unique) to disability, health condition, and quality of life report in patients with neck and low back pain scheduled for spine fusion surgery. METHODS: Factor analysis was used to refine all items within the 2 scales to 4 distinct factors: (1) somatic complaints of the head/neck, (2) somatic complaints of the gastrointestinal symptom, (3) pain beliefs and fear, and (4) self perception of serious problems. Each factor was assessed for concurrent validity with other well-established tools including the Deyo comorbidity index, the Short Form (SF)-36 mental and physical component subscales, and the Oswestry and Neck Disability Indices (ODI/NDI). RESULTS: The PBSI was fairly to moderately correlated with assessment tools of quality of life (SF-36) and disability assessment (ODI/NDI). Some of the items in the factor 1 from the MSPQ were slightly associated with the Deyo comorbidity index but not with the ODI/NDI. CONCLUSIONS: The items from the MSPQ failed to associate with measures of quality of life and disability and thus may provide only marginal value when assessing the multidimensional aspects associated with neck and low back pain. The PBSI has moderate correlation with disability assessments. Neither tool was found to strongly correlate with disability measures or with SF-36 scales (mental and physical component subscales). Additional tools may be needed to further identify the dimensions associated with chronic pain patients.


Asunto(s)
Dolor de la Región Lumbar , Dolor de Cuello , Percepción del Dolor , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados
3.
JAMA Surg ; 156(5): e207259, 2021 05 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33760010

RESUMEN

Importance: Despite the widespread use of systemic antibiotics to prevent infections in surgically treated patients with fracture, high rates of surgical site infection persist. Objective: To examine the effect of intrawound vancomycin powder in reducing deep surgical site infections. Design, Setting, and Participants: This open-label randomized clinical trial enrolled adult patients with an operatively treated tibial plateau or pilon fracture who met the criteria for a high risk of infection from January 1, 2015, through June 30, 2017, with 12 months of follow-up (final follow-up assessments completed in April 2018) at 36 US trauma centers. Interventions: A standard infection prevention protocol with (n = 481) or without (n = 499) 1000 mg of intrawound vancomycin powder. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was a deep surgical site infection within 182 days of definitive fracture fixation. A post hoc comparison assessed the treatment effect on gram-positive and gram-negative-only infections. Other secondary outcomes included superficial surgical site infection, nonunion, and wound dehiscence. Results: The analysis included 980 patients (mean [SD] age, 45.7 [13.7] years; 617 [63.0%] male) with 91% of the expected person-time of follow-up for the primary outcome. Within 182 days, deep surgical site infection was observed in 29 of 481 patients in the treatment group and 46 of 499 patients in the control group. The time-to-event estimated probability of deep infection by 182 days was 6.4% in the treatment group and 9.8% in the control group (risk difference, -3.4%; 95% CI, -6.9% to 0.1%; P = .06). A post hoc analysis of the effect of treatment on gram-positive (risk difference, -3.7%; 95% CI, -6.7% to -0.8%; P = .02) and gram-negative-only (risk difference, 0.3%; 95% CI, -1.6% to 2.1%; P = .78) infections found that the effect of vancomycin powder was a result of its reduction in gram-positive infections. Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients with operatively treated tibial articular fractures at a high risk of infection, intrawound vancomycin powder at the time of definitive fracture fixation reduced the risk of a gram-positive deep surgical site infection, consistent with the activity of vancomycin. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02227446.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/prevención & control , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/prevención & control , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/prevención & control , Fracturas de la Tibia/cirugía , Vancomicina/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/efectos adversos , Fracturas no Consolidadas/etiología , Humanos , Fracturas Intraarticulares/cirugía , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Polvos , Probabilidad , Estudios Prospectivos , Dehiscencia de la Herida Operatoria/etiología , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/etiología , Factores de Tiempo , Vancomicina/administración & dosificación
4.
J Orthop Trauma ; 30(11): 622-626, 2016 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27437613

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: This multicenter study was designed to evaluate whether tibia fracture nonunions treated with exchange nailing proceed to union faster with dynamically- versus statically-locked nails, or with fibular osteotomy versus no fibular osteotomy. DESIGN: Retrospective, chart-review, multicenter study. SETTING: Multicenter review of 6 level 1 trauma centers. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: Patients who had a tibia fracture treated with an intramedullary nail that progressed to nonunion, and were subsequently treated with exchange nailing, were identified. All patients that met inclusion criteria and subsequently progressed to union were included in the study. INTERVENTION: Patients underwent tibial exchange nailing to repair nonunions, with screws in either a dynamically- or statically-locked configuration with or without fibular osteotomy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measure was a comparison of time to healing of tibial nonunion comparing different screw configurations and fibular osteotomy. RESULTS: Fifty-two patients underwent an exchange nail procedure and their outcomes were used for the primary analysis. Patients with dynamically-locked nails proceeded to union 7.9 months after revision surgery compared with 7.3 months for those with statically-locked nails, but this was not statistically significant (P = 0.68). Patients with fibular osteotomy proceeded to union 2.9 months faster than those without fibular osteotomy, and this trended toward significance (P = 0.067). Obese patients healed on average 8.8 months after surgery compared with 6.8 months for nonobese patients (P = 0.27). Closed fractures healed after 6.4 months compared with 7.7 months for open fractures (P = 0.40). CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant difference in time to union between patients who had a dynamic screw configuration compared with a static screw configuration for their exchange nail. Patients who underwent fibular osteotomy proceeded to union faster than those without an osteotomy. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.


Asunto(s)
Tornillos Óseos , Peroné/cirugía , Fijación Intramedular de Fracturas/estadística & datos numéricos , Curación de Fractura , Osteotomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Fracturas de la Tibia/epidemiología , Fracturas de la Tibia/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Fijación Intramedular de Fracturas/instrumentación , Fijación Intramedular de Fracturas/métodos , Fracturas Mal Unidas/diagnóstico , Fracturas Mal Unidas/epidemiología , Fracturas Mal Unidas/cirugía , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Osteotomía/instrumentación , Osteotomía/métodos , Prevalencia , Factores de Riesgo , Fracturas de la Tibia/diagnóstico , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
5.
Physiother Res Int ; 16(3): 170-8, 2011 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21077266

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The study aims to create a diagnostic support tool to indicate the likelihood of the presence of lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) using a cluster of elements from the patient history and observational findings. DESIGN: The study is case based and case controlled. SETTING: The study was performed in the tertiary care of a medical center. SUBJECTS: There were a total of 1,448 patients who presented with a primary complaint of back pain with or without leg pain. METHODS: All patients underwent a standardized clinical examination. The diagnosis of LSS was made by one of two experienced orthopaedic surgeons based on clinical findings and imaging. Data from the patient history and observational findings were then statistically analysed using bivariate analysis and contingency tables. RESULTS: The most diagnostic combination included a cluster of: 1) bilateral symptoms; 2) leg pain more than back pain; 3) pain during walking/standing; 4) pain relief upon sitting; and 5) age>48 years. Failure to meet the condition of any one of five positive examination findings demonstrated a high sensitivity of 0.96 (95% CI=0.94-0.97) and a low negative likelihood ratio (LR-) of 0.19 (95% CI=0.12-0.29). Meeting the condition of four of five examination findings yielded a LR+ of 4.6 (95% CI=2.4-8.9) and a post-test probability of 76%. CONCLUSION: The high sensitivity of the diagnostic support tool provides the potential to reduce the incidence of unnecessary imaging when the diagnosis of LSS is statistically unlikely. In patients where the condition of four of the five findings was present, the post-test probability of 76% suggests that imaging and further workup are indicated. This is an inexpensive but powerful tool, with a potential to increase diagnostic efficiency and reduce cost by narrowing the indications for imaging.


Asunto(s)
Estenosis Espinal/diagnóstico , Anciano , Dolor de Espalda/epidemiología , Análisis por Conglomerados , Femenino , Marcha , Indicadores de Salud , Humanos , Vértebras Lumbares , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Masculino , Anamnesis , Persona de Mediana Edad , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Estenosis Espinal/complicaciones , Estenosis Espinal/epidemiología
6.
J Man Manip Ther ; 18(1): 44-9, 2010 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21655423

RESUMEN

The clinical diagnosis of an osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture (OVCF) is challenging and requires detailed assessment using comprehensive imaging methods. Further complicating matter is that the clinical sequelae associated with OVCF typically involves asymptomatic findings and variable pain patterns. The purpose of this study was to identify clinical characteristics and assessment findings that were associated with a diagnosis of OVCF. The study evaluated routine clinical findings in over 1400 subjects seen at an adult spine surgery clinic for thoracolumbar spine-related conditions within the years 2005-2009. All patients underwent a standardized clinical examination that included a self-report, observational, physical examination and imaging assessment. The diagnosis of OVCF was made after assessment of radiographic findings in sagittal alignment, vertebral body compression, and spinal canal dimensions. Data from the patient history and observational findings were then statistically analyzed and compared between those patients with a diagnosis of OVCF and those with an alternative diagnosis. Based on the results, a diagnostic support tool was created to predict the likelihood of OVCF. The most diagnostic combination included a cluster of: (1) age > 52 years; (2) no presence of leg pain; (3) body mass index ⩽ 22; (4) does not exercise regularly; and (5) female gender. A finding of two of five positive tests or less demonstrated high sensitivity of 0.95 (95% CI  =  0.83-0.99) and low negative likelihood ratio of 0.16 (95% CI  =  0.04-0.51), providing moderate value to rule out OVCF. Four of five yielded a positive likelihood ratio (LR+) of 9.6 (95% CI  =  3.7-14.9) providing moderate value in ruling in the diagnosis of OVCF. Further validation is necessary prospectively to determine the value of these findings on a disparate sample of patients in other unique environments.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA