Sequential appetite suppression by oral and visceral feedback to the brainstem.

The termination of a meal is controlled by dedicated neural circuits in the caudal brainstem. A key challenge is to understand how these circuits transform the sensory signals generated during feeding into dynamic control of behaviour. The caudal nucleus of the solitary tract (cNTS) is the first site in the brain where many meal-related signals are sensed and integrated1-4, but how the cNTS processes ingestive feedback during behaviour is unknown. Here we describe how prolactin-releasing hormone (PRLH) and GCG neurons, two principal cNTS cell types that promote non-aversive satiety, are regulated during ingestion. PRLH neurons showed sustained activation by visceral feedback when nutrients were infused into the stomach, but these sustained responses were substantially reduced during oral consumption. Instead, PRLH neurons shifted to a phasic activity pattern that was time-locked to ingestion and linked to the taste of food. Optogenetic manipulations revealed that PRLH neurons control the duration of seconds-timescale feeding bursts, revealing a mechanism by which orosensory signals feed back to restrain the pace of ingestion. By contrast, GCG neurons were activated by mechanical feedback from the gut, tracked the amount of food consumed and promoted satiety that lasted for tens of minutes. These findings reveal that sequential negative feedback signals from the mouth and gut engage distinct circuits in the caudal brainstem, which in turn control elements of feeding behaviour operating on short and long timescales.

Comparison of Donor Corneal Endothelial Cell Density Determined by Eye Banks and by a Central Image Analysis Reading Center Using the Same Image Analysis Method.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate agreement between eye banks (EBs) and an image analysis reading center on endothelial cell density (ECD) determinations using the same image analysis method. METHODS: The Cornea Image Analysis Reading Center (CIARC) determined ECD with a single experienced analyst on EB-obtained central endothelial images from donors intended for keratoplasty from 2 eye banks, Eversight and Lions VisionGift, using the Konan center analysis method. The EBs performed ECD determination on their respective sets of images using the same analysis method with experienced eye bank technicians. RESULTS: The mean age of the 200 donors was 54 years (range 30-75 years). Seventy (35%) of the 200 patients were women, and 57 (29%) were diabetic. The mean ECD was 10 cells/mm2 greater by the EBs than by CIARC (P = 0.39), with 95% limits of agreement of [-304 to 323 cells/mm2]. The mean difference was not substantially changed when the difference between EBs and CIARC ECD was adjusted for sex, donor age, donor diabetes, CV, HEX, number of cells analyzed, and EBs as a random effect (estimated mean difference of 20 cells/mm2 after adjustment in a linear mixed model; P = 0.73). The EB-determined preoperative ECD was within 10% of the CIARC-determined ECD for 178 (89%) image sets, with 15 (8%) higher by >10% and 7 (3%) lower by >10%. CONCLUSIONS: Well-trained eye bank technicians achieve comparable results for ECD determination with an experienced image analyst from an image analysis reading center when the same image analysis method is used.

Vitreomacular Traction Surgery from the DISCOVER Study: Intraoperative OCT Utility, Ellipsoid Zone Dynamics, and Outcomes.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: To characterize the clinical and ellipsoid zone (EZ) integrity outcomes in surgical intervention for symptomatic vitreomacular traction (VMT), and to evaluate the utility of intraoperative optical coherence tomography (OCT) during VMT surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a post-hoc analysis of eyes in the DISCOVER study undergoing pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with intraoperative OCT for VMT-related macular disease. Data were collected prospectively on feasibility and utility of intraoperative OCT, with follow-up lasting 12 months. RESULTS: Forty-three eyes of 41 patients were included and mean visual acuity improved from 20/96 to 20/45 (P < .001). Intraoperative OCT provided information that impacted surgical decision-making in eight patients (18.6%). EZ integrity metrics significantly improved from baseline to 12 months and directly correlated with functional outcomes (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Retinal function and morphology improved significantly following PPV for VMT. Intraoperative OCT provided surgeon-perceived valuable information in select cases. Further research is needed to determine whether this information impacts overall surgical outcomes. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2021;52:544-550.].