Reprint of: Assessment of a naloxone distribution plan in a veteran population who experienced an opioid-related overdose event.

BACKGROUND: The Veteran Health Administration prioritizes the distribution of naloxone to veterans diagnosed with opioid use disorder (OUD) to prevent deaths due to opioid-related overdose. The Overdose Education and Naloxone Distribution (OEND) program was created with tools to supplement efforts in identifying veterans at risk of opioid-related adverse events secondary to OUD or other comorbidities and increase access, education, and distribution of naloxone. Utilizing the OEND tool, Veteran Health Indiana (VHI) employed two different distribution initiatives to increase access to naloxone. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to assess naloxone distribution efforts at a United States Department of Veterans Affairs medical center and evaluate outcomes in patients who experienced opioid overdose events before and after the OEND initiatives were implemented. The primary outcome is to assess the distribution of naloxone within the year prior to the documented overdose event before and after the OEND initiatives. Secondary outcomes include assessment of the number of naloxone doses administered during the overdose event, substances involved in the overdose, and distribution of outpatient naloxone prescriptions after the overdose event. METHODS: This study was a retrospective electronic chart review of all patients who experienced an opioid-related overdose event at VHI from March 1, 2019, to March 1, 2022. RESULTS: Of the 59 opioid-overdose events analyzed, the percentage of patients with a naloxone prescription within 12 months prior to an opioid-overdose event was similar between the pre- and post-OEND initiatives. Within 12 months following the overdose event, naloxone was dispensed to nearly 10% more patients in the post-OEND group compared to the pre-OEND group. CONCLUSIONS: The OEND initiatives increased naloxone distribution amongst patients who ultimately experienced an opioid-related overdose. Additional research is needed to assess if these efforts prevented further overdoses.

Assessment of a naloxone distribution plan in a veteran population who experienced an opioid-related overdose event.

BACKGROUND: The Veteran Health Administration prioritizes the distribution of naloxone to veterans diagnosed with opioid use disorder (OUD) to prevent deaths due to opioid-related overdose. The Overdose Education and Naloxone Distribution (OEND) program was created with tools to supplement efforts in identifying veterans at risk of opioid-related adverse events secondary to OUD or other comorbidities and increase access, education, and distribution of naloxone. Utilizing the OEND tool, Veteran Health Indiana (VHI) employed two different distribution initiatives to increase access to naloxone. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to assess naloxone distribution efforts at a VA medical center and evaluate outcomes in patients who experienced opioid overdose events before and after the OEND initiatives were implemented. The primary outcome is to assess the distribution of naloxone within the year prior to the documented overdose event before and after the OEND initiatives. Secondary outcomes include assessment of the number of naloxone doses administered during the overdose event, substances involved in the overdose, and distribution of outpatient naloxone prescriptions after the overdose event. METHODS: This study was a retrospective electronic chart review of all patients who experienced an opioid-related overdose event at VHI from March 1, 2019, to March 1, 2022. RESULTS: Of the 59 opioid-overdose events analyzed, the percentage of patients with a naloxone prescription within 12 months prior to an opioid-overdose event was similar between the pre- and post-OEND initiatives. Within 12 months following the overdose event, naloxone was dispensed to nearly 10% more patients in the post-OEND group compared to the pre-OEND group. CONCLUSIONS: The OEND initiatives increased naloxone distribution amongst patients who ultimately experienced an opioid-related overdose. Additional research is needed to assess if these efforts prevented further overdoses.

Utility of neuromuscular blockade reversal in the evaluation of acute neurosurgical patients: A retrospective case-series.

OBJECTIVE: Sugammadex reversal of neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs) is usually performed postoperatively. A scarcity of literature exists exploring sugammadex use for timely neurological examination of neurosurgical patients. NMBAs, like rocuronium, are used in the Emergency Department during intubation and their unpredictable duration of action often impedes timely and accurate assessment of patient neurological status. We aim to explore the role of sugammadex in evaluating patients in need of acute neurosurgical care. METHODS: Retrospective assessment of patients presenting with traumatic brain injury or intracranial hemorrhage was conducted at our level 1 trauma center. Patients of interest were those for whom sugammadex reversal of rocuronium neuromuscular blockade, from intubating doses, was pursued to ensure timely neurologic assessment. Nine patients were identified for whom GCS pre-/post-sugammadex, rocuronium dosing, elapsed time between rocuronium administration and reversal, and clinical course data were retrieved. RESULTS: Arrival GCS was 5.2 ± 3.2, with intubation accomplished within 10 ± 2.5 min of presentation. Rocuronium dosing was consistent between patients, average single dose of 1.2 ± 0.3 mg/kg. Lingering neuromuscular blockade ranged from 28 to 132 min (87.3 ± 34.3 min). All patients exhibited a GCS of 3 T upon initial neurosurgical evaluation, prior to reversal. Post-reversal GCS rose to 6.0 T ± 2.2. Sugammadex facilitated more accurate clinical decision making in 8 of 9 patients, including prevention of unnecessary invasive procedures. Two of 9 patients were eventually discharged home or to a rehabilitation facility. CONCLUSIONS: Rocuronium neuromuscular blockade can linger beyond pharmacokinetic predictions, thus delaying timely and precise neurologic assessment. Our data suggests sugammadex may be a useful addition to the clinician's armamentarium for acute neurologic assessment in the neurosurgical population. Sugammadex may impact clinical decision-making in certain patients and allow for more informed decision-making by families and physicians alike. Prospective studies are needed to definitively assess the impact of sugammadex on outcomes in acute neurosurgical settings.