RESUMEN
The most widely used method to quantify the wetting properties of surfaces is by measuring contact angles. Even though contact angle goniometry is a powerful technique for characterizing wetting properties, it is not accurate for very hydrophobic surfaces. As the technique relies on image processing, it has inherent errors due to optical limitations, especially near the three-phase contact line. This leads to uncertainties in the positioning of the baseline, which can cause large errors in the measured contact angles. In this paper, we systematically evaluate these errors both theoretically and experimentally, focusing on the importance of image resolution. For â¼9 microliter droplet, displacement of the baseline by a single pixel leads to errors of approximately ±0.5° to ±1° for contact angles up to 150°, and errors increase rapidly in the superhydrophobic regime, up to ±8°. The error in the contact angle can be slightly reduced by increasing the image resolution, but cannot be eliminated entirely.
RESUMEN
Surface wettability is usually evaluated by the contact angle between the perimeter of a water drop and the surface. However, this single measurement is not enough for proper characterization, and the so-called advancing and receding contact angles also need to be measured. Measuring the receding contact angle can be challenging, especially for extremely hydrophobic surfaces. We demonstrate a reliable procedure by using the common needle-in-the-sessile-drop method. Generally, the contact line movement needs to be followed, and true receding movement has to be distinguished from "pseudo-movement" occurring before the receding angle is reached. Depending on the contact angle hysteresis, the initial size of the drop may need to be surprisingly large to achieve a reliable result. Although our motivation for this work was the characterization of superhydrophobic surfaces, we also show that this method works universally ranging from hydrophilic to superhydrophobic surfaces.
RESUMEN
The version of this Protocol originally published contained typographical errors that affected the accuracy/readability of the text. In Fig. 4e, the line "Contact angle remainsstable" should have read "Contact angle remains stable." In Table 1, in the "Advantages" column, the second instance of "Simple" was incorrectly associated with the "Sessile-drop goniometry" method; it should have corresponded to the "Tilting plate" method. In Table 2, in the "Issues" column, the entry "Difficult to place baseline when the RCA is ~90°" was broken incorrectly in a way that might have suggested that "the RCA is ~90°" was a separate issue. These errors have been corrected in the HTML and PDF versions of the paper.
RESUMEN
Wetting, the process of water interacting with a surface, is critical in our everyday lives and in many biological and technological systems. The contact angle is the angle at the interface where water, air and solid meet, and its value is a measure of how likely the surface is to be wetted by the water. Low contact-angle values demonstrate a tendency of the water to spread and adhere to the surface, whereas high contact-angle values show the surface's tendency to repel water. The most common method for surface-wetting characterization is sessile-drop goniometry, due to its simplicity. The method determines the contact angle from the shape of the droplet and can be applied to a wide variety of materials, from biological surfaces to polymers, metals, ceramics, minerals and so on. The apparent simplicity of the method is misleading, however, and obtaining meaningful results requires minimization of random and systematic errors. This article provides a protocol for performing reliable and reproducible measurements of the advancing contact angle (ACA) and the receding contact angle (RCA) by slowly increasing and reducing the volume of a probe drop, respectively. One pair of ACA and RCA measurements takes ~15-20 min to complete, whereas the whole protocol with repeat measurements may take ~1-2 h. This protocol focuses on using water as a probe liquid, and advice is given on how it can be modified for the use of other probe liquids.