RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: This retrospective study analyzed tumor tissue profiling data to assess the potential of comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) for patient care across diverse solid tumors. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients with newly diagnosed or recurrent stage IIIB or IV lung adenocarcinoma with a null immunophenotype and esophageal, gastric, pancreatic, or bile duct cancer between January 2020 and July 2023 at two medical centers in Taiwan were included. One cohort was a part of the National Biobank Consortium of Taiwan project, whereas the other consisted of patients undergoing routine clinical practice. Tumor samples were subjected to CGP using FoundationOne®CDx, with therapeutic implications determined using OncoKB classification. RESULTS: FoundationOne®CDx testing of 574 patients was successful in 456 (79.4%) patients. Clinically actionable genomic alterations were detected in 21.1% (96/456) of the patients, including 17.5%, 2.9%, and 0.7% of patients with evidence levels 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Lung adenocarcinoma accounted for the largest proportion of samples with at least one actionable gene alteration (63.2%), followed by bile duct (26.9%), gastric (17.6%), esophageal (4.0%), and pancreatic (3.1%) cancers. Based on CGP results, 43 patients (9.4%) received matched targeted therapy. The median overall survival of patients who received matched therapy or not was 26.1 months (95% confidence interval (CI), 16.7-35.5 months) and 10.6 months (95% CI, 8.1-13.1 months; hazard ratio, 0.28, 95% CI, 0.14-0.55, p < 0.001), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides comprehensive insights into the genomic profiles of diverse cancers in Taiwan, highlighting the crucial role of CGP in identifying actionable genomic alterations and guiding effective therapeutic strategies in real-world practice.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In real-world practice, most patients with lung cancer are diagnosed when they are aged ≥65 years. However, clinical trials tend to lack data for the elderly population. Therefore, we aimed to describe the effectiveness and safety of afatinib, gefitinib, and erlotinib for elderly patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: Treatment-naïve patients with EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC were enrolled at many hospitals in Taiwan. Patient characteristics and the effectiveness and safety of afatinib, gefitinib, and erlotinib were compared. RESULTS: This study enrolled 1,343 treatment-naïve patients with EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC, of whom 554 were aged <65 years, 383 were aged 65-74 years, 323 were aged 75-84 years, and 83 were aged ≥85 years. For elderly patients, afatinib was more effective, with a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 14.7 months and overall survival (OS) of 22.2 months, than gefitinib (9.9 months and 17.7 months, respectively) and erlotinib (10.8 months and 18.5 months, respectively; PFS: p = 0.003; OS: p = 0.026). However, grade ≥3 adverse events, including skin toxicities, paronychia, mucositis, and diarrhea, were more frequently experienced by patients receiving afatinib than those receiving gefitinib or erlotinib. CONCLUSIONS: This large retrospective study provides real-world evidence of the effectiveness and safety of EGFR-TKIs for elderly patients with EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC, a population that is often underrepresented in clinical trials and real-world evidence. Afatinib was more effective as a first-line treatment than gefitinib or erlotinib for elderly patients with EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC.