RESUMEN
SOURCE CITATION: Connolly SJ, Sharma M, Cohen AT, et al; ANNEXA-I Investigators. Andexanet for factor Xa inhibitor-associated acute intracerebral hemorrhage. N Engl J Med. 2024;390:1745-1755. 38749032.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Lung ultrasound (LUS) reduces time to diagnosis and treatment of acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) in emergency department (ED) patients with undifferentiated dyspnea. We conducted a systematic review to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy and clinical impact of LUS for ADHF in the prehospital setting. METHODS: We performed a keyword search of multiple databases from inception through June 1, 2023. Included studies were those enrolling prehospital patients with undifferentiated dyspnea or suspected ADHF, and specifically diagnostic studies comparing prehospital LUS to a gold standard and intervention studies with a non-US comparator group. Title and abstract screening, full text review, risk of bias (ROB) assessments, and data extraction were performed by multiple authors. and adjudicated. The primary outcome was pooled sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic likelihood ratios (LR) for prehospital LUS. A test-treatment threshold of 0.7 was applied based on prior ADHF literature in the ED. Intervention outcomes included mortality, mechanical ventilation, and time to HF specific treatment. RESULTS: Eight diagnostic studies (n = 691) and two intervention studies (n = 70) met inclusion criteria. No diagnostic studies were low-ROB. Both intervention studies were critical-ROB, and not pooled. Pooled sensitivity and specificity of prehospital LUS for ADHF were 86.7% (95%CI:70.8%-94.6%) and 87.5% (78.2%-93.2%), respectively, with similar performance by physician vs. paramedic LUS and number of lung zones evaluated. Pooled LR+ and LR- were 7.27 (95% CI: 3.69-13.10) and 0.17 (95% CI: 0.06-0.34), respectively. Area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.922. At the observed 42.4% ADHF prevalence (pre-test probability), positive pre-hospital LUS exceeded the 70% threshold to initiate treatment (post-test probability 84%, 80-88%). CONCLUSIONS: LUS had similar diagnostic test characteristics for ADHF diagnosis in the prehospital setting as in the ED. A positive prehospital LUS may be sufficient to initiate early ADHF treatment based on published test-treatment thresholds. More studies are needed to determine the clinical impact of prehospital LUS.
Asunto(s)
Servicios Médicos de Urgencia , Insuficiencia Cardíaca , Pulmón , Ultrasonografía , Humanos , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/diagnóstico por imagen , Ultrasonografía/métodos , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia/métodos , Pulmón/diagnóstico por imagen , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Enfermedad AgudaRESUMEN
SOURCE CITATION: Edlow JA, Carpenter C, Akhter M, et al. Guidelines for reasonable and appropriate care in the emergency department 3 (GRACE-3): acute dizziness and vertigo in the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med. 2023;30:442-486. 37166022.
Asunto(s)
Mareo , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Humanos , Mareo/complicaciones , Vértigo/diagnóstico , Vértigo/etiología , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Enfermedad Aguda , Accidente Cerebrovascular/complicacionesRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Violence directed at healthcare workers (HCWs) is common and may be more frequent in the emergency department (ED). In addition to physical injury, other consequences of workplace violence in the ED include an increased risk of burnout, post-traumatic stress disorder, reduced job satisfaction, and feelings of avoidance and futility. Understanding behaviors underlying workplace violence is the first step to employing mitigation strategies. The objective of this descriptive study was to assess the prevalence and types of violence against HCWs in a large, urban ED. METHODS: This study took place in the ED of an urban hospital with an annual ED census of approximately 100,000. A previously existing general patient safety incident "dropbox" for HCWs was utilized to capture workplace violence reports. At the completion of the study period, all data was collated into the electronic database and each report was categorized based on the nature and severity of the abuse. Further, all events were also coded as either involving or not involving specifically racist, sexist, or homophobic content. The primary outcomes were the number of reported events over the study period, and the percentage of total events that fell into each category. The secondary outcomes were the overall prevalence and ratio of events that included racist, sexist, or homophobic language or provocation. RESULTS: Over the 5-month survey period, 130 reports of workplace violence were recorded, on average 0.85 per day. Perpetrators were mostly male, and most victims were nurses. Hospital security was involved in 26% of cases. At least 37% of incidents involved patients that were intoxicated and/or had history of psychiatric illness. Type I events (swearing provocatively, shouting, and legal threats) were the most common at 44% of encounters while 22% involved physical violence. Racist, sexist, and homophobic comments were involved in 8 (6%), 18 (14%), and 3 (2%) incidents respectively. CONCLUSION: We found that workplace violence against HCWs was common in this study, and sometimes involved a component of racist, sexist, or homophobic bias. Consistent with previous ED literature, we found that abusive events occurred almost daily and that approximately 20% of events involved physical violence. Future efforts toward policy change to address workplace violence in health care is needed at local, state, and national levels.
Asunto(s)
Violencia Laboral , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Abuso Físico , Lugar de Trabajo/psicología , Hospitales Urbanos , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Sepsis identification and treatment is a priority for emergency department (ED) providers and payors alike. However, aggressive metrics aimed at improving sepsis care could have unintended consequences for patients who do not have sepsis. METHODS: All ED patient visits for a one month period before and after a quality initiative to increase early antibiotic use in septic patients were included. Overall broad spectrum (BS) antibiotic use, admission rates, and mortality were compared in the 2 time periods. A more detailed chart review was performed on those who received BS antibiotics in the before and after cohorts. Patient were excluded for pregnancy, age < 18, COVID-19 infection, hospice patients, left ED against medical advice, and if antibiotics were given for prophylaxis. In BS antibiotic treated patients, we sought to determine mortality, rates of subsequent multidrug resistant (MDR) or Clostridium Difficile (CDiff) infections and rates of non-infected patients receiving BS antibiotics. RESULTS: There were 7967 and 7407 ED visits in the pre- and post-implementation periods, respectively. Of those, BS antibiotics were administered in a total of 3.9% pre-implementation and 6.2% post-implementation (p ≤ 0.00001). Admission was more common in the post-implementation period, but overall mortality was unchanged (0.9% pre-implementation and 0.8% post-implementation, p = 0.41). After exclusions, 654 patients treated with BS antibiotics were included in the secondary analyses. Baseline characteristics were similar between the pre-implementation and post-implementation cohorts. There was no difference in the rate of CDiff infection or the proportion of patients receiving BS antibiotics who were not infected, but there was an increase in the post-implementation period in MDR infections after ED BS antibiotics, 0.72% vs. 0.35% of the entire ED cohorts, p = 0.0009. CONCLUSIONS: We found that a QI sepsis initiative was associated with an increase in the proportion of patients who received BS antibiotics in the ED, and a small absolute increase in associated subsequent MDR infections, with no apparent effect on mortality in all ED patients or the subset treated with BS antibiotics. Further research is needed to assess the impact on all patients affected by aggressive sepsis protocols and initiatives, rather than only those with sepsis.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Infecciones por Clostridium , Sepsis , Humanos , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Infecciones por Clostridium/tratamiento farmacológico , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
SOURCE CITATION: Gray AJ, Roobottom C, Smith JE, et al. Early computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome: randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2021;374:n2106. 34588162.
Asunto(s)
Síndrome Coronario Agudo , Síndrome Coronario Agudo/diagnóstico , Angiografía por Tomografía Computarizada , Angiografía Coronaria , Humanos , Pronóstico , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/métodosRESUMEN
SOURCE CITATION: The DISCHARGE Trial Group. CT or invasive coronary angiography in stable chest pain. N Engl J Med. 2022;386:1591-602. 35240010.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria , Dolor en el Pecho/diagnóstico por imagen , Dolor en el Pecho/etiología , Angiografía Coronaria , Humanos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos XRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Endotracheal intubation is a high-risk procedure. Optimisation of all aspects of the procedure, including patient positioning, is important to facilitate success and minimise complications. The objective of this systematic review was to determine the association between inclined patient positioning and first-pass success and other clinically important outcomes among patients undergoing endotracheal intubation. METHODS: A search of PubMed, CINAHL, SCOPUS, EMBASE and Cochrane, from inception through October 2020 was conducted. Studies were assessed independently by two authors to determine eligibility for inclusion. Included studies were any randomised or observational study that compared supine to inclined patient positioning for endotracheal intubation and assessed one of our predefined outcomes. Simulation studies were excluded. Study results were meta-analysed using a random effects model. The quality of the evidence for outcomes of interest was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations approach. RESULTS: A total of 5113 studies were identified, of which 10 studies representing 18 371 intubations were included for meta-analysis. There was no statistically significant difference in the primary outcome of first-pass success rate (relative risk 1.02, 95% CI 0.98 to 1.05) or secondary outcomes of oesophageal intubation, glottic view, hypotension, hypoxaemia, mortality or peri-intubation arrest. Likewise, there were no statistically significant differences in any of the outcomes in predefined subgroup analyses of randomised controlled trials, intubations in acute settings or intubations performed with >45 degrees of incline. Overall quality of evidence was rated as low or very low for most outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review and meta-analysis found no evidence of benefit or harm with inclined versus supine patient positioning during endotracheal intubation in any setting.
Asunto(s)
Intubación Intratraqueal , Posicionamiento del Paciente , Humanos , Intubación Intratraqueal/efectos adversos , Intubación Intratraqueal/métodos , Posicionamiento del Paciente/métodos , Estudios Observacionales como Asunto , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Medición de RiesgoRESUMEN
SOURCE CITATION: Metra B, Summer R, Brooks SE, et al. Racial disparities in COVID-19 associated pulmonary embolism: a multicenter cohort study. Thromb Res. 2021;205:84-91. 34274560.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Embolia Pulmonar , Negro o Afroamericano , Estudios de Cohortes , Humanos , SARS-CoV-2RESUMEN
SOURCE CITATION: Qaseem A, Etxeandia-Ikobaltzeta I, Mustafa RA, et al. Appropriate use of point-of-care ultrasonography in patients with acute dyspnea in emergency department or inpatient settings: a clinical guideline from the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med. 2021;174:985-93. 33900792.
Asunto(s)
Disnea , Sistemas de Atención de Punto , Disnea/etiología , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Humanos , Ultrasonografía , IncertidumbreRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is associated with respiratory symptoms and renal effects. Data regarding fluid resuscitation and kidney injury in COVID-19 are lacking, and understanding this relationship is critical. OBJECTIVES: To determine if there is an association between fluid volume administered in 24 h and development of renal failure in COVID-19 patients. METHODS: Retrospective chart review; 14 hospitals in Indiana. Included patients were adults admitted between March 11, 2020 and April 13, 2020 with a positive test for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 within 3 days of admission. Patients requiring renal replacement therapy prior to admission were excluded. Volumes and types of resuscitative intravenous fluids in the first 24 h were obtained with demographics, medical history, and other objective data. The primary outcome was initiation of renal replacement therapy. Logistic regression modeling was utilized in creating multivariate models for determining factors associated with the primary outcome. RESULTS: The fluid volume received in the first 24 h after hospital admission was associated with initiation of renal replacement therapy in two different multivariate logistic regression models. An odds ratio of 1.42 (95% confidence interval 1.01-1.99) was observed when adjusting for age, heart failure, obesity, creatinine, bicarbonate, and total fluid volume. An odds ratio of 1.45 (95% confidence interval 1.02-2.05) was observed when variables significant in univariate analysis were adjusted for. CONCLUSIONS: Each liter of intravenous fluid administered to patients with COVID-19 in the first 24 h of presentation was independently associated with an increased risk for initiation of renal replacement therapy, supporting judicious fluid administration in patients with this disease.
Asunto(s)
Lesión Renal Aguda , COVID-19 , Lesión Renal Aguda/etiología , Lesión Renal Aguda/terapia , Adulto , Fluidoterapia/efectos adversos , Humanos , Terapia de Reemplazo Renal , Estudios Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2RESUMEN
The recent approval and distribution of vaccines against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) have been a major development in the fight against the current coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. The first two vaccines approved in the United States, mRNA-1273, and BNT162b2, are both messenger RNA (mRNA) based and highly effective in immunocompetent persons, but efficacy in patients on immunosuppressants has not been established. Additionally, data suggests these patients are less likely than immunocompetent people to develop neutralizing antibodies after COVID-19 infection. Given the high risk of poor outcomes in organ transplant and immunosuppressed patients, effective vaccination is paramount in this group. We present the first reported case of a solid organ transplant patient who failed to achieve seroconversion after two doses of mRNA vaccine. This case has significant implications about how immunosuppressed patients should be counseled about SARS-CoV-2 vaccination and the protection provided. Physicians should remain clinically suspicious for infection with SARS-CoV-2 despite vaccination status in solid organ transplant patients.
Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra la COVID-19/inmunología , Trasplante de Pulmón , SARS-CoV-2/inmunología , Vacuna nCoV-2019 mRNA-1273 , Anticuerpos Neutralizantes/sangre , Anticuerpos Antivirales/inmunología , COVID-19/inmunología , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , ARN Mensajero/inmunología , Receptores de Trasplantes , VacunaciónRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: The rate of bacterial coinfection with SARS-CoV-2 is poorly defined. The decision to administer antibiotics early in the course of SARS-CoV-2 infection depends on the likelihood of bacterial coinfection. METHODS: We performed a retrospective chart review of all patients admitted through the emergency department with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection over a 6-week period in a large healthcare system in the United States. Blood and respiratory culture results were abstracted and adjudicated by multiple authors. The primary outcome was the rate of bacteremia. We secondarily looked to define clinical or laboratory features associated with bacteremia. RESULTS: There were 542 patients admitted with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection, with an average age of 62.8 years. Of these, 395 had blood cultures performed upon admission, with six true positive results (1.1% of the total population). An additional 14 patients had positive respiratory cultures treated as true pathogens in the first 72 h. Low blood pressure and elevated white blood cell count, neutrophil count, blood urea nitrogen, and lactate were statistically significantly associated with bacteremia. Clinical outcomes were not statistically significantly different between patients with and without bacteremia. CONCLUSIONS: We found a low rate of bacteremia in patients admitted with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection. In hemodynamically stable patients, routine antibiotics may not be warranted in this population.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones Bacterianas/epidemiología , COVID-19/epidemiología , Coinfección/epidemiología , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Bacteriemia/diagnóstico , Bacteriemia/epidemiología , Bacteriemia/terapia , Infecciones Bacterianas/diagnóstico , Infecciones Bacterianas/terapia , COVID-19/diagnóstico , COVID-19/terapia , Coinfección/diagnóstico , Coinfección/terapia , Femenino , Hospitalización , Hospitales , Humanos , Indiana/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , SARS-CoV-2/aislamiento & purificación , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
STUDY OBJECTIVE: There is a paucity of evidence to guide the diagnostic evaluation of emergency department (ED) patients presenting after nonfatal strangulation (manual strangulation or near hanging). We seek to define the rate of serious injuries in alert strangled patients and determine which symptoms and examination findings, if any, predict such injuries. METHODS: Using prospectively populated databases and electronic medical record review, we performed a retrospective analysis of alert strangled patients treated in the ED of an academic Level I trauma center. Exclusions were Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score less than 13, younger than 16 years, and interhospital transfers. Trained researchers used structured forms to abstract demographics, symptoms, examination findings, radiology and operative findings, and final diagnoses. Injuries requiring greater than 24 hours' observation or specific treatment (surgery, procedure, specific medication) were considered clinically important. The electronic medical record was searched for 30 days after presentation to identify missed injuries. RESULTS: Advanced imaging (computed tomography or magnetic resonance maging) was obtained in 60%. Injuries were identified in 6 patients (1.7%, 95% CI, 0.7% to 3.6%). Two injuries were clinically important (0.6%, 95% CI, 0.1% to 2.0%). Both were cervical artery dissections with no neurologic deficits, treated with aspirin. No additional injuries were identified within 30 days or at next medical contact. Of 343 uninjured patients, 291 (85%) had documented medical follow up confirming the absence of any new diagnosis of injury or stroke. The small number of injuries precluded analyses of associations. CONCLUSION: Alert, strangled patients had a low rate of injuries. All patients with neck injuries had concerning findings besides neck pain; specifically, GCS score less than 15 or dysphagia. Our findings suggest, but do not prove, that a selective imaging strategy is safe in alert patients after strangulation findings besides neck pain.
Asunto(s)
Asfixia/diagnóstico , Traumatismos del Cuello/diagnóstico , Adulto , Asfixia/etiología , Asfixia/patología , Arterias Carótidas/diagnóstico por imagen , Arterias Carótidas/patología , Traumatismos de las Arterias Carótidas/diagnóstico , Traumatismos de las Arterias Carótidas/diagnóstico por imagen , Traumatismos de las Arterias Carótidas/patología , Angiografía por Tomografía Computarizada , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Cuello/irrigación sanguínea , Cuello/diagnóstico por imagen , Cuello/patología , Traumatismos del Cuello/diagnóstico por imagen , Traumatismos del Cuello/etiología , Traumatismos del Cuello/patología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Intento de Suicidio , Violencia , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 is a novel coronavirus first diagnosed in U.S. hospitals in January 2020. Typical presenting symptoms include fever, dry cough, dyspnea, and hypoxia. However, several other symptoms have been reported, including fatigue, weakness, diarrhea, and abdominal pain. We have identified a series of patients with diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) likely precipitated by coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). CASE SERIES: We describe 5 patients with previously known type 2 diabetes and no history of DKA, who presented to the emergency department with new-onset DKA and COVID-19. WHY SHOULD AN EMERGENCY PHYSICIAN BE AWARE OF THIS?: Diabetes mellitus is a known risk factor for poor outcomes in viral respiratory illnesses, including COVID-19. Infection may precipitate DKA in patients with type 2 diabetes. Aggressive management of these patients is recommended; however, management guidelines have not yet been put forth for this unique subset of patients.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19/complicaciones , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicaciones , Cetoacidosis Diabética/complicaciones , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , COVID-19/diagnóstico , COVID-19/terapia , Soluciones Cristaloides/uso terapéutico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamiento farmacológico , Cetoacidosis Diabética/tratamiento farmacológico , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Femenino , Humanos , Hidroxicloroquina/uso terapéutico , Hipoglucemiantes/uso terapéutico , Insulina/uso terapéutico , Intubación Intratraqueal , Pulmón/diagnóstico por imagen , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Insuficiencia Multiorgánica , Oxígeno/sangre , RadiografíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Studies examining the association between hyperoxia exposure after resuscitation from cardiac arrest and clinical outcomes have reported conflicting results. Our objective was to test the hypothesis that early postresuscitation hyperoxia is associated with poor neurological outcome. METHODS: This was a multicenter prospective cohort study. We included adult patients with cardiac arrest who were mechanically ventilated and received targeted temperature management after return of spontaneous circulation. We excluded patients with cardiac arrest caused by trauma or sepsis. Per protocol, partial pressure of arterial oxygen (Pao2) was measured at 1 and 6 hours after return of spontaneous circulation. Hyperoxia was defined as a Pao2 >300 mm Hg during the initial 6 hours after return of spontaneous circulation. The primary outcome was poor neurological function at hospital discharge, defined as a modified Rankin Scale score >3. Multivariable generalized linear regression with a log link was used to test the association between Pao2 and poor neurological outcome. To assess whether there was an association between other supranormal Pao2 levels and poor neurological outcome, we used other Pao2 cut points to define hyperoxia (ie, 100, 150, 200, 250, 350, 400 mm Hg). RESULTS: Of the 280 patients included, 105 (38%) had exposure to hyperoxia. Poor neurological function at hospital discharge occurred in 70% of patients in the entire cohort and in 77% versus 65% among patients with versus without exposure to hyperoxia respectively (absolute risk difference, 12%; 95% confidence interval, 1-23). Hyperoxia was independently associated with poor neurological function (relative risk, 1.23; 95% confidence interval, 1.11-1.35). On multivariable analysis, a 1-hour-longer duration of hyperoxia exposure was associated with a 3% increase in risk of poor neurological outcome (relative risk, 1.03; 95% confidence interval, 1.02-1.05). We found that the association with poor neurological outcome began at ≥300 mm Hg. CONCLUSIONS: Early hyperoxia exposure after resuscitation from cardiac arrest was independently associated with poor neurological function at hospital discharge.
Asunto(s)
Reanimación Cardiopulmonar , Paro Cardíaco/terapia , Hiperoxia , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso/fisiopatología , Adulto , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Paro Cardíaco/sangre , Paro Cardíaco/mortalidad , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Oxígeno/sangre , Presión Parcial , Alta del Paciente , Estudios Prospectivos , Recuperación de la Función , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Ventiladores MecánicosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Laboratory studies suggest elevated blood pressure after resuscitation from cardiac arrest may be protective; however, clinical data are limited. We sought to test the hypothesis that elevated postresuscitation mean arterial blood pressure is associated with neurologic outcome. DESIGN: Preplanned analysis of a prospective cohort study. SETTING: Six academic hospitals in the United States. PATIENTS: Adult, nontraumatic cardiac arrest patients treated with targeted temperature management after return of spontaneous circulation. INTERVENTIONS: Mean arterial blood pressure was measured noninvasively after return of spontaneous circulation and every hour during the initial 6 hours after return of spontaneous circulation. MEASURES AND MAIN RESULTS: We calculated the mean arterial blood pressure and a priori dichotomized subjects into two groups: mean arterial blood pressure 70-90 and greater than 90 mm Hg. The primary outcome was good neurologic function, defined as a modified Rankin Scale less than or equal to 3. The modified Rankin Scale was prospectively determined at hospital discharge. Of the 269 patients included, 159 (59%) had a mean arterial blood pressure greater than 90 mm Hg. Good neurologic function at hospital discharge occurred in 30% of patients in the entire cohort and was significantly higher in patients with a mean arterial blood pressure greater than 90 mm Hg (42%) as compared with mean arterial blood pressure 70-90 mm Hg (15%) (absolute risk difference, 27%; 95% CI, 17-37%). In a multivariable Poisson regression model adjusting for potential confounders, mean arterial blood pressure greater than 90 mm Hg was associated with good neurologic function (adjusted relative risk, 2.46; 95% CI; 2.09-2.88). Over ascending ranges of mean arterial blood pressure, there was a dose-response increase in probability of good neurologic outcome, with mean arterial blood pressure greater than 110 mm Hg having the strongest association (adjusted relative risk, 2.97; 95% CI, 1.86-4.76). CONCLUSIONS: Elevated blood pressure during the initial 6 hours after resuscitation from cardiac arrest was independently associated with good neurologic function at hospital discharge. Further investigation is warranted to determine if targeting an elevated mean arterial blood pressure would improve neurologic outcome after cardiac arrest.
Asunto(s)
Presión Sanguínea/fisiología , Reanimación Cardiopulmonar , Evaluación de la Discapacidad , Paro Cardíaco/terapia , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Paro Cardíaco/fisiopatología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Alta del Paciente , Pronóstico , Sobrevivientes/estadística & datos numéricos , Privación de Tratamiento/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Syncope is a common presentation in the emergency department (ED). The differential diagnosis is long and includes benign conditions as well as acute life threats, such as dysrhythmias or pulmonary embolism. OBJECTIVE: The specific goals of this review are twofold: 1) to define the diagnostic utility of orthostatic vital signs (OVS) as a test for orthostatic syncope, and 2) to determine whether OVS help diagnose or exclude life-threatening causes of syncope in ED patients. METHODS: Three prospective cohort studies plus 2017 national guidelines for syncope management were identified, reviewed, and critically appraised. RESULTS: This literature review found that orthostatic hypotension is common among ED patients with syncope and is often diagnosed as the cause of syncope. CONCLUSIONS: OVS measurements do not, in isolation, reliably diagnose or exclude orthostatic syncope, nor do they appear to have value in ruling out life-threatening causes of syncope.