RESUMEN
Background: Esophagogastric and pancreaticobiliary cancers are associated with chronic blood loss, poor nutrition, and surgical interventions that interfere with iron absorption. Patients with these cancers often have a higher incidence of chemotherapy-induced anemia (CIA) than patients with other malignancies. Objectives: To investigate the efficacy of intravenous iron or erythropoietin-stimulating agents (ESA) for CIA treatment in patients with esophagogastric or pancreaticobiliary cancer. Design: Retrospective, comparative chart review of patients with esophagogastric or pancreaticobiliary cancer who received ferric carboxymaltose (FCM), or darbepoetin alfa (DA), and myelosuppressive chemotherapy at Chungbuk National University Hospital between June 2018 and December 2022. Methods: To assess the efficacy of FCM or DA over time, data on hemoglobin (Hb) levels were collected from the time of administration of FCM or DA (baseline) until 6 months post-baseline, when available. Results: In total, 214 patients (124 in the FCM and 90 in the DA group) were included in the analysis. The FCM group had a higher maximum Hb level and Hb changes for 3 months (mean ± standard deviation) following FCM or DA administration from baseline than the DA group (11.3 ± 1.5 versus 10.9 ± 1.2 g/dL, p = 0.02 and 2.0 ± 1.4 versus 1.5 ± 1.1 g/dL, p = 0.004, respectively). The FCM group had a higher proportion of Hb responders than the DA group (83.9% versus 68.9%, p = 0.013). Based on multivariable analysis, only the CIA treatment group was a significant factor for Hb response (odds ratio = 2.06, 95% confidence interval = 1.05-4.06, p = 0.036). Conclusion: Both FCM and DA are effective, and FCM showed a higher Hb response than DA for CIA treatment in patients with esophagogastric or pancreaticobiliary cancer. Therefore, further randomized controlled trials should determine the optimal treatment for CIA in patients with these cancers undergoing myelosuppressive chemotherapy.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: This analysis of the first-line cohort of LASER201 study evaluated the efficacy and safety of lazertinib 240 mg as a frontline therapy for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: A total of 43 patients, with EGFR mutation-positive (Exon19Del, n = 24; L858R, n = 18; G719X, n = 1) locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC who had not previously received EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR TKI) therapy, received once-daily lazertinib 240 mg. EGFR mutation status was confirmed by local or central testing. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) assessed by blinded independent central review. Secondary efficacy endpoints included duration of response (DoR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), tumor shrinkage, and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: At the primary data cut-off (DCO; January 8, 2021), the ORR was 70 % (95 % confidence interval [CI]: 56.0-83.5), DCR was 86 % (95 % CI: 75.7-96.4) and the median DoR was 23.5 (95 % CI: 12.5-not reached) months. The median PFS was 24.6 (95 % CI: 12.2-30.2) months. At the final DCO (March 30, 2023), the median OS was not estimable and the median follow-up duration for OS was 55.2 [95 % CI: 22.8-55.7] months. OS rates at 36 months and 54 months were 66 % (95 % CI: 47.5-79.3 %) and 55 % (95 % CI: 36.6-70.7 %), respectively. The most commonly reported TEAEs were rash (54 %), diarrhea (47 %), pruritus (35 %), and paresthesia (35 %). No drug-related rash or pruritus TEAEs of grade 3 or higher were reported. Diarrhea and paresthesia of grade 3 or higher were reported in 3 (7 %) and 1 (2 %) patients, respectively. CONCLUSION: This analysis demonstrated long-term clinical benefit with lazertinib 240 mg in patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC who had not previously received EGFR TKIs. The safety profile for lazertinib was tolerable and consistent with that previously reported.