Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 23
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Oncologist ; 25(8): 661-668, 2020 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32202020

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR) and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels are circulating biomarkers that provide information about tumor-related inflammation and immune suppression. This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic role of MLR and LDH in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). MATERIAL AND METHODS: This multicentric study analyzed a consecutive cohort of 528 patients with mCRC treated in 2009-2017. The whole population was randomly divided in training and validation cohort. The first was used to identify a threshold for MLR and to create the prognostic model with MLR and MLR-LDH combined (group 1: MLR-LDH low; group 2: MLR or LDH high; group 3: MLR-LDH high). The second cohort was used to validate the model. RESULTS: At the median follow-up of 55 months, median overall survival (OS) was 22 months. By multivariate analysis, high MLR >0.49 (hazard ratio [HR], 2.37; 95% confidence interval [C.I.], 1.39-4.04), high LDH (HR, 1.73; 95% C.I., 1.03-2.90) in the first model, group 2 (HR, 2.74; 95% C.I.; 1.62-4.66), and group 3 (HR, 3.73; 95% C.I., 1.94-7.18) in the combined model, had a worse prognosis in terms of OS. These data were confirmed both in the validation set and then in the whole cohort. CONCLUSION: MLR and LDH are circulating cost-effective biomarkers, readily available in clinical practice, that can be useful for predicting the prognosis of patients with mCRC. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: High monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR) and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels could be a sign of a tumor's recruitment of suppressive and inflammatory cells worsening prognosis of different types of cancer, including colorectal cancer (CRC). Currently, no data are available for metastatic CRC regarding a cutoff definition for MLR or the prognostic impact of MLR and MLR-LDH combined. The present study showed in the training cohort and confirmed in the validation and whole cohort that MLR is a reliable and independent laboratory biomarker, which is easy to use, to predict clinical outcomes in patients with mCRC. Moreover, MLR and composite MLR-LDH could potentially result in an incremental improvement in the prognostic value of these biomarkers, being used as stratification tools for patients with mCRC.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias del Colon , Neoplasias Colorrectales , Neoplasias Colorrectales/diagnóstico , Humanos , Lactato Deshidrogenasas , Linfocitos , Monocitos , Neutrófilos , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos
2.
Br J Cancer ; 120(5): 522-526, 2019 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30745584

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: HER2 is the only validated predictive biomarker in gastro-oesophageal carcinoma (GOC). However, several factors, such as heterogeneity in protein expression, shortage of evaluable tumour tissue and need for quick target assessment, underline the usefulness of a pre-screening tool in order to anticipate HER2 status. METHODS: Data from 723 consecutive GOC analysed for HER2 at four Italian Institutions were collected. HER2 positivity was defined as 3+ by immunohistochemistry (IHC) or 2+ with gene amplification by in situ hybridisation (ISH). A multivariate logistic regression model was built using data from 413 cases, whereas 310 patients served as validation cohort. C-index, visual inspection of the calibration plot, Brier score and Spiegelhalter z-test were used to assess the performance of the nomogram. RESULTS: HER2 positive rate was 17.4%. Four variables were retained after adjustment in the final model: grading, Lauren's histotype, pathologic material analysed (surgical specimen/biopsy) and site of tissue collection (primary tumour/metastases). Visual inspection of the calibration plot revealed a very good overlap between predicted and observed probabilities, with a Brier score of 0.101 and a non-significant Spiegelhalter z-test (P = 0.319). C-index resulted in 0.827 (95%CI 0.741-0.913). CONCLUSION: A simple nomogram based on always-available pathologic information accurately predicts the probability of HER2 positivity in GOC.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma/metabolismo , Unión Esofagogástrica/metabolismo , Receptor ErbB-2/metabolismo , Neoplasias Gástricas/metabolismo , Antineoplásicos Inmunológicos/uso terapéutico , Carcinoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Femenino , Amplificación de Genes , Humanos , Inmunohistoquímica , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Análisis Multivariante , Nomogramas , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Neoplasias Gástricas/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastuzumab/uso terapéutico
3.
Br J Cancer ; 114(1): 30-6, 2016 Jan 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26575603

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), BRAFV600E mutation has been variously associated to specific clinico-pathological features. METHODS: Two large retrospective series of mCRC patients from two Italian Institutions were used as training-set (TS) and validation-set (VS) for developing a nomogram predictive of BRAFV600E status. The model was internally and externally validated. RESULTS: In the TS, data from 596 mCRC patients were gathered (RAS wild-type (wt) 281 (47.1%); BRAFV600E mutated 54 (9.1%)); RAS and BRAFV600E mutations were mutually exclusive. In the RAS-wt population, right-sided primary (odds ratio (OR): 7.80, 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.05-19.92), female gender (OR: 2.90, 95% CI 1.14-7.37) and mucinous histology (OR: 4.95, 95% CI 1.90-12.90) were independent predictors of BRAFV600E mutation, with high replication at internal validation (100%, 93% and 98%, respectively). A predictive nomogram was calculated: patients with the highest score (right-sided primary, female and mucinous) had a 81% chance to bear a BRAFV600E-mutant tumour; accuracy measures: AUC=0.812, SE:0.034, sensitivity:81.2%; specificity:72.1%. In the VS (508 pts, RAS wt: 262 (51.6%), BRAFV600E mutated: 49 (9.6%)), right-sided primary, female gender and mucinous histology were confirmed as independent predictors of BRAFV600E mutation with high accuracy. CONCLUSIONS: Three simple and easy-to-collect characteristics define a useful nomogram for predicting BRAF status in mCRC with high specificity and sensitivity.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Mutación , Nomogramas , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas B-raf/genética , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Neoplasias Colorrectales/genética , Neoplasias Colorrectales/mortalidad , Femenino , Genes ras , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Metástasis de la Neoplasia , Estudios Retrospectivos
4.
Oncologist ; 20(7): 719-24, 2015 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26018662

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Despite the availability of several therapeutic options for metastatic breast cancer (MBC), no robust predictive factors are available to help clinical decision making. Nevertheless, a decreasing benefit from first line to subsequent lines of treatment is commonly observed. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of benefit from first-line therapy on outcome with subsequent lines. METHODS: We analyzed a consecutive series of 472 MBC patients treated with chemotherapy (CT) and/or endocrine therapy (ET) between 2004 and 2012. We evaluated progression-free survival (PFS) at first (PFS1), second, third, and fourth therapeutic lines, according to treatment (ET and/or CT) and tumor subtypes. RESULTS: In the whole cohort, median overall survival was 34 months, and median PFS1 was 9 months. A 6-month benefit was shown by 289 patients (63.5%) at first line, 128 (40.5%) at second line, 76 (33.8%) at third line, and 34 (23.3%) at fourth line. Not having a 6-month benefit at PFS1 was associated with less chance of benefit at second line (odds ratio [OR]: 0.48; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.29-0.77, p = .0026) and at any line beyond first (OR: 0.39; 95% CI: 0.24-0.62, p < .0001). In the total series, after stratification for tumor subtypes, a strong predictive effect was observed among HER2-positive tumors (OR: 0.2; 95% CI: 0.05-0.73, p = .0152). CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that the absence of at least a 6-month benefit in terms of PFS with first-line therapy predicts a reduced probability of benefit from subsequent therapeutic lines, especially in HER2-positive disease. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: This study supports evidence showing that the absence of a 6-month benefit in terms of progression-free survival with first-line therapy predicts a lack of benefit from subsequent therapeutic lines in metastatic breast cancer. The random distribution of benefit experienced by a subset of the cohort further spurs an interest in identifying predictive factors capable of identifying the most appropriate therapeutic strategy.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Mama/mortalidad , Anciano , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias de la Mama/metabolismo , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias de la Mama Triple Negativas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Mama Triple Negativas/metabolismo , Neoplasias de la Mama Triple Negativas/mortalidad , Neoplasias de la Mama Triple Negativas/patología
5.
Melanoma Res ; 33(5): 398-405, 2023 10 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37402350

RESUMEN

Patients with melanoma brain metastases (MBM) have poor prognosis, albeit advances in locoregional and systemic treatments. The melanoma-specific Graded Prognostic Assessment (GPA) effectively stratifies survival for patients with MBM. Nevertheless, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), a well known prognostic factor for patients with melanoma, is not represented in the GPA scores and might add prognostic information for patients with MBM. In this study, 150 consecutive patients with MBM were retrospectively analyzed with the aim of evaluating independent prognostic factors for MBM patients, including LDH. Furthermore, we implemented a disease-specific prognostic score and estimated survival according to treatment modalities. On the basis of multivariable Cox regression analyses, six prognostic factors (age, BRAF status, number of MBM, number of extracranial metastatic sites, performance status, and LDH level) resulted statistically significant in terms of survival and were combined in a prognostic score to stratify patients in distinct prognostic groups ( P  < 0.0001). Among treatment modalities, a multimodal approach with stereotactic radiosurgery or neurosurgery associated with systemic therapy showed the best outcome (median overall survival: 12.32 months, 95% confidence interval, 7.92-25.30). This is the first study to demonstrate that LDH has independent prognostic value for patients with MBM and might be used to improve prognostic stratification, albeit external validation is mandatory. Survival of patients with MBM is affected by both disease-specific risk factors and treatment modalities, with locoregional treatments associated with better outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Encefálicas , Melanoma , Radiocirugia , Neoplasias Cutáneas , Humanos , Pronóstico , Melanoma/patología , Estudios Retrospectivos , L-Lactato Deshidrogenasa , Neoplasias Cutáneas/cirugía , Neoplasias Encefálicas/secundario
6.
Crit Rev Oncol Hematol ; 186: 104013, 2023 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37116817

RESUMEN

Surgery is the only curative treatment for non-metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma, but less than 20 % of patients present a resectable disease at diagnosis. Treatment strategies and disease definition for borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC) and locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) vary in the different cancer centres. Preoperative chemotherapy (CT) is the standard of care for both BRPC and LAPC patients, however literature data are still controversial concerning the type, dose and duration of the different CT regimens, as well as regarding the integration of radiotherapy (RT) or chemoradiation (CRT) in the therapeutic algorithm. In this unsettled debate, we aimed at focusing on the therapeutic regimens currently in use and relative literature data, to report international trials comparing the available therapeutic options or explore the introduction of new pharmacological agents, and to analyse possible new scenarios in microenvironment evaluation before and after neoadjuvant therapies or in patients' selection at a molecular level.


Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma , Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Humanos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Adenocarcinoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Terapia Neoadyuvante , Terapia Combinada , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Microambiente Tumoral , Neoplasias Pancreáticas
7.
J Gastrointest Cancer ; 53(3): 528-536, 2022 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34033000

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND AIM: The need to estimate prognosis of advanced BTC (aBTC) patients treated with first-line chemotherapy is compelling. The aim of the study is to evaluate the ECSIPOT (psECogSIiPnigOT) index, influenced by PECS (PsECogSii) index, prognostic nutritional index (PNI), and GOT. METHODS: This international study was conducted on a training cohort of 126 patients and in three validation cohorts, both European and Korean. ECSIPOT index formula: (PECS:0 = 1 point; PECS:1 = 1.4 points; PECS:2 = 3.2 points) + (PNI > 36.7 = 1 point; PNI < 36.7 = 2 points) + (GOT < 100 = 1 point; GOT > 100 = 2 points). Event-time distributions were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and survival curves were compared using the log-rank test. RESULTS: In the training cohort, mOS was 12.9, 6.3, and 2.8 months for patients with ECSIPOT-0, ECSIPOT-1, and ECSIPOT-2, respectively (ECSIPOT-0: HR 1; ECSIPOT-1: HR 2.11; ECSIPOT-2: HR 4.93; p < 0.0001). In the first validation cohort, mOS was 11.5, 7.3, and 3.3 months for ECSIPOT-0, ECSIPOT-1, and ECSIPOT-2, respectively (ECSIPOT-0: HR 1; ECSIPOT-1: HR 1.74; ECSIPOT-2: HR 3.41; p < 0.0001). In the second validation cohort, mOS was 25.2, 12.5, and 3.0 months for ECSIPOT-0, ECSIPOT-1, and ECSIPOT-2, respectively (ECSIPOT-0: HR = 1; ECSIPOT-1: HR 2.33; ECSIPOT-2: HR 8.46; p < 0.0001). In the third validation cohort, mOS was 11.8, 8.1, and 4.6 months for ECSIPOT-0, ECSIPOT-1, and ECSIPOT-2, respectively (ECSIPOT-0: HR = 1; ECSIPOT-1: HR 1.47; ECSIPOT-2: HR 3.17; p < 0.0001). Multivariate analysis in all cohorts confirmed the ECSIPOT index as an independent prognostic factor for OS. CONCLUSION: The easy assessment and good risk-stratification performance make the ECSIPOT index a promising tool to comprehensively estimate the prognosis of aBTC patients.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias del Sistema Biliar , Estudios de Cohortes , Humanos , Evaluación Nutricional , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos
8.
Pigment Cell Melanoma Res ; 34(3): 550-563, 2021 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32745351

RESUMEN

Approximately 40% of malignant melanomas are diagnosed in patients older than 65 years. Elderly patients with melanoma present clinicopathological features related to a more aggressive biology, and they are often diagnosed with advanced stage of disease. Interestingly, in older patients the immune system can be altered with changes both in the innate system and in the adaptive immune system with the acquisition of a pro-inflammatory and immune suppressive phenotype. Immunotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors has reshaped the treatment strategies and prognosis of patients with melanoma, and particularly, older age should not be considered a contraindication for immunotherapy. However, data regarding efficacy and safety of immunotherapy in elderly population are still limited because frail older patients are generally excluded from clinical trials. Recently, real-world data have shed light on similar efficacy and safety of immunotherapy in older population compared with younger counterpart. The aim of the present review was to summarize the available knowledge on the underlying immune system in older patients with a diagnosis of melanoma and the immunotherapeutic approaches in this population.


Asunto(s)
Sistema Inmunológico/efectos de los fármacos , Inmunoterapia/métodos , Melanoma/terapia , Anciano , Humanos , Melanoma/inmunología , Melanoma/patología , Pronóstico
9.
Cancers (Basel) ; 13(14)2021 Jul 13.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34298718

RESUMEN

Different de-escalation strategies have been proposed to limit the risk of cumulative toxicity and guarantee quality of life during the treatment trajectory of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Programmed treatment interruptions, defined as drug holidays (DHs), have been implemented in clinical practice. We evaluated the association between DHs and overall survival (OS). This was a retrospective study, conducted at the University Hospital of Udine and the IRCCS CRO of Aviano. We retrieved records of 608 consecutive patients treated for mCRC from 1 January 2005 to 15 March 2017 and evaluated the impact of different de-escalation strategies (maintenance, DHs, or both) on OS through uni- and multivariate Cox regression analyses. We also looked at attrition rates across treatment lines according to the chosen strategy. In our study, 19.24% of patients received maintenance therapy, 16.12% DHs, and 9.87% both, while 32.07% continued full-intensity first-line treatment up to progression or death. In uni- and multivariate analyses first-line continuous treatment and early discontinuation (treatment for less than 3 months) were associated to worse OS compared to non-continuous strategies (HR, 1.68; 95% CI, 1.22-2.32; p = 0.002 and HR,4.89; 95% CI, 3.33-7.19; p < 0.001, respectively). Attrition rates were 22.8%, 20.61%, and 19.64% for maintenance, DHs, or both, respectively. For continuous therapy and for treatment of less than 3 months it was 21.57% and 49%. De-escalation strategies are safe and effective options. DHs after initial induction chemotherapy may be considered in clinically selected patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

10.
J Neurol ; 267(1): 26-35, 2020 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31552550

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The epidemiology of paraneoplastic neurological syndromes (PNS) remains to be defined. We present here the first population-based incidence study and report the clinical spectrum and antibody profile of PNS in a large area in Northeastern Italy. METHODS: We performed a 9-year (2009-2017) population-based epidemiological study of PNS in the provinces of Udine, Pordenone and Gorizia, in the Friuli-Venezia Giulia region (983,190 people as of January 1, 2017). PNS diagnosis and subgroups were defined by the 2004 diagnostic criteria. Age- and sex-adjusted incidence rates were calculated. RESULTS: We identified 89 patients with a diagnosis of definite PNS. Median age was 68 years (range 26-90), 52% were female. The incidence of PNS was 0.89/100,000 person-years. PNS incidence rates increased over time from 0.62/100,000 person-years (2009-2011), 0.81/100,000 person-years (2012-2014) to 1.22/100,000 person-years (2015-2017). The prevalence of PNS was 4.37 per 100,000. Most common PNS were limbic encephalitis (31%), cerebellar degeneration (28%) and encephalomyelitis (20%). Among antibody (Ab)-positive cases, most frequent specificities included: Yo (30%), Hu (26%), and Ma2 (22%), while the most frequent associated tumors were lung (17%) and breast cancer (16%), followed by lymphoma (12%). PNS developed in 1 in every 334 cancers in our region. Statistically significant associations were observed between cancer type and Ab-specificity (P < 0.001), and between neurological syndrome and Ab-specificity (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This first population-based study found an incidence of PNS that approximates 1/100,000 person-years and a prevalence of 4/100,000. Moreover, the incidence of PNS is increasing over time, probably due to increased awareness and improved detection techniques.


Asunto(s)
Encefalomielitis/epidemiología , Neoplasias/epidemiología , Síndromes Paraneoplásicos del Sistema Nervioso/epidemiología , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Encefalomielitis/inmunología , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Italia/epidemiología , Encefalitis Límbica/epidemiología , Encefalitis Límbica/inmunología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Degeneración Cerebelosa Paraneoplásica/epidemiología , Degeneración Cerebelosa Paraneoplásica/inmunología , Síndromes Paraneoplásicos del Sistema Nervioso/inmunología , Prevalencia
11.
Melanoma Res ; 29(5): 510-515, 2019 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30702508

RESUMEN

Advanced melanoma (AM) represents the leading cause of death from skin cancer. To date, the crucial role of the immune system in AM pathogenesis and progression is well known, but the prognostic value of clinicopathological characteristics remains unclear. Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) is an ascertained prognostic indicator and previous data showed that AM patients treated with BRAF and MEK inhibitors with normal LDH values and fewer than three metastatic sites achieved a better outcome. Moreover, the neutrophil-to-lymphocytes ratio and the lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR) have been suggested as other potential prognostic factors. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic value of LMR together with other clinical biomarkers in patients with AM. We retrospectively analyzed 162 consecutive patients with AM treated between January 2010 and March 2016. Outcome was measured in terms of overall survival (OS). In our cohort, the BRAF mutation was present in 74 (46%) patients. Overall, 42 and 26% of the patients received targeted therapy and immunotherapy, respectively. After 48 months of follow-up, 129 (78%) patients died; the median OS was 12.8 months. High LMR was associated with the following clinicopathological characteristics: absence of central nervous system localization (P = 0.011), fewer than three metastatic sites (P = 0.014), and normal LDH (P = 0.006). In multivariate analysis, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status >1 [hazard ratio (HR) 7.87, P = 0.001], high LDH (HR 2.76, P = 0.006), and high LMR (HR 0.76, P = 0.033) were associated significantly with OS. In conclusion, LMR seems to be associated with OS. Further prospective investigations are needed to confirm these data and introduce peripheral blood cell count in daily clinical use.


Asunto(s)
Linfocitos/citología , Melanoma/mortalidad , Monocitos/citología , Neoplasias Cutáneas/mortalidad , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Inmunoterapia , L-Lactato Deshidrogenasa/metabolismo , Recuento de Linfocitos , Masculino , Melanoma/diagnóstico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mutación , Metástasis de la Neoplasia , Pronóstico , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas B-raf/genética , Estudios Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Cutáneas/diagnóstico , Resultado del Tratamiento
12.
J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle ; 10(2): 368-377, 2019 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30719874

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Pancreatic cancer (PC) patients have multiple risk factors for sarcopenia and loss of skeletal muscle mass (LSMM), which may cause greater treatment toxicities, reduced response to cancer therapy, prolonged hospitalization, impaired quality of life, and worse prognosis. METHODS: This is a retrospective study on advanced PC patients treated at the Department of Oncology of Udine, Italy, from January 2012 to November 2017. Among 162 patients who received chemotherapy, 94 consecutive patients with an available computed tomography (CT) scan were retrospectively analyzed. The primary objective of our study was to explore if an early LSMM ≥ 10% (measured at first radiological evaluation and compared with baseline) and/or baseline sarcopenia may impact prognosis. Baseline sarcopenia was defined according to Prado's criteria. Skeletal muscle area was measured as cross-sectional areas (cm2 ) using CT scan data through the Picture archiving and communication system (PACS) image system. RESULTS: In the whole cohort, 48% of patients were ≤70 years old, and 50% had metastatic disease. At baseline, 73% of patients had sarcopenia, and 16% presented a visceral fat area ≥ 44 cm2 /m2 . Overall, 21% experienced an early LSMM ≥ 10%. Approximately 33% of sarcopenic patients at baseline and ~35% of patients with early LSMM ≥ 10% had a body mass index > 25 kg/m2 . Of note, 71% of patients were evaluated by a nutritionist, and 56% received a dietary supplementation (oral and/or parenteral). After a median follow-up of 30.44 months, median overall survival (OS) was 11.28 months, whereas median progression-free survival (PFS) was 5.72 months. By multivariate analysis, early LSMM ≥ 10% was significantly associated with worse OS [hazard ratio (HR): 2.16; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.23-3.78; P = 0.007] and PFS (HR: 2.31; 95% CI 1.30-4.09; P = 0.004). Moreover, an exploratory analysis showed that inflammatory indexes, such as neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio variation, impact early LSMM ≥ 10% (odds ratio 1.31, 95% CI 1.06-1.61, P = 0.010). CONCLUSIONS: Early LSMM ≥ 10% has a negative prognostic role in advanced PC patients. Further prospective investigations are needed to confirm these preliminary data.


Asunto(s)
Músculo Esquelético/patología , Atrofia Muscular/epidemiología , Atrofia Muscular/etiología , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/complicaciones , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/epidemiología , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Biomarcadores , Índice de Masa Corporal , Terapia Combinada , Comorbilidad , Femenino , Hospitalización , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Metástasis de la Neoplasia , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/terapia , Pronóstico , Calidad de Vida , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X
13.
Clin Breast Cancer ; 19(2): 137-145.e4, 2019 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30584056

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Approximately 50% of locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients treated with first-line exemestane do not show objective response and currently there are no reliable biomarkers to predict the outcome of patients using this therapy. The constitutive genetic background might be responsible for differences in the outcome of exemestane-treated patients. We designed a prospective study to investigate the role of germ line polymorphisms as biomarkers of survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Three hundred two locally advanced or MBC patients treated with first-line exemestane were genotyped for 74 germ line polymorphisms in 39 candidate genes involved in drug activity, hormone balance, DNA replication and repair, and cell signaling pathways. Associations with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were tested with multivariate Cox regression. Bootstrap resampling was used as an internal assessment of results reproducibility. RESULTS: Cytochrome P450 19A1-rs10046TC/CC, solute carrier organic anion transporter 1B1-rs4149056TT, adenosine triphosphate binding cassette subfamily G member 2-rs2046134GG, fibroblast growth factor receptor-4-rs351855TT, and X-ray repair cross complementing 3-rs861539TT were significantly associated with PFS and then combined into a risk score (0-1, 2, 3, or 4-6 risk points). Patients with the highest risk score (4-6 risk points) compared with ones with the lowest score (0-1 risk points) had a median PFS of 10 months versus 26.3 months (adjusted hazard ratio [AdjHR], 3.12 [95% confidence interval (CI), 2.18-4.48]; P < .001) and a median OS of 38.9 months versus 63.0 months (AdjHR, 2.41 [95% CI, 1.22-4.79], P = .012), respectively. CONCLUSION: In this study we defined a score including 5 polymorphisms to stratify patients for PFS and OS. This score, if validated, might be translated to personalize locally advanced or MBC patient treatment and management.


Asunto(s)
Androstadienos/uso terapéutico , Antineoplásicos Hormonales/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de la Aromatasa/uso terapéutico , Biomarcadores de Tumor/genética , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Inhibidores de la Aromatasa/metabolismo , Neoplasias de la Mama/genética , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Reparación del ADN/genética , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Polimorfismo Genético , Estudios Prospectivos , Receptores de Estrógenos/metabolismo , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Riesgo , Transducción de Señal/genética , Análisis de Supervivencia
14.
Expert Opin Biol Ther ; 18(5): 595-603, 2018 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29690797

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Breast cancer (BC) is the most common cancer diagnosed among women. The development of new personalized therapeutic strategies has reshaped the landscape in this field. However, BC is still the first cause of death among women. Interestingly, several preclinical studies and some clinical evidences are focused their attention on the role of immune system and immunotherapy on cancer control, also in BC. Areas covered: Usually, BC has been considered a not immunogenic tumor for its low mutational load. However, recent studies have evidenced that some subtypes, triple negative and HER-2 positive BC, are 'hot' tumors, thus more immunogenic. Moreover, the presence of immune infiltrate is positively associated with favorable prognosis. Therefore, the use of immune-checkpoint inhibitors seems to be an encouraging treatment option also in BC. Among these drugs, atezolizumab is an anti-PD-L1 monoclonal antibody with a particular structure that reduce antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity against T cells, increasing quantitatively and qualitatively the effective response. Expert opinion: The use of immunotherapy is a promising option for BC. However, at the same time it still raises many doubts. Surely, the research and the validation of immune biomarkers can permit to identify patients who more benefit from these drugs.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados , Antígeno B7-H1/metabolismo , Ensayos de Selección de Medicamentos Antitumorales/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Inmunoterapia/métodos , Linfocitos T/efectos de los fármacos , Linfocitos T/inmunología
15.
Clin Breast Cancer ; 18(3): 205-213, 2018 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28781022

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients, the identification of factors helping clinicians in the choice between active therapy versus best supportive care is needed clinically. The aim of the present study was to identify the clinicopathologic factors that could improve the prognostic valuation of MBC patients and clinical decision-making at the end of life. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The present study analyzed data from a retrospective series of 522 MBC patients treated at the oncology department (University Hospital of Udine) from January 2004 to June 2014. The association between clinicopathologic features and death within 30 or 90 days since last-line treatment prescription was explored. Differences between lightly (≤ 3 lines) and heavily (> 3 lines) pretreated patients and the factors affecting treatment choice were investigated. RESULTS: The event "death" occurred in 410 patients. The median last-line survival was 100 days. The median number of therapeutic lines was 3. On multivariate analysis, worse Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status was significantly associated with death within 90 and 30 days since last-line treatment prescription. Among the heavily pretreated patients, liver function impairment and evaluation by a breast cancer specialist were significantly associated with a greater and lower risk of death within 30 days, respectively. Among the lightly pretreated patients with luminal disease, age < 70 years, luminal B-like disease, and number of previous lines were associated with a greater chance of receiving chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: In the present study, the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status was the most robust independent factor driving the last-line therapeutic choice for MBC patients. In addition, the molecular subtype and oncologist subspecialization also influenced the decision-making process.


Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias de la Mama/terapia , Toma de Decisiones Clínicas , Cuidados Paliativos/métodos , Cuidado Terminal/métodos , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Mama/patología , Neoplasias de la Mama/mortalidad , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Cuidados Paliativos/normas , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Análisis de Supervivencia , Factores de Tiempo
16.
Melanoma Res ; 28(6): 547-554, 2018 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29794562

RESUMEN

Age is an important prognostic factor in melanoma; notably, elderly patients tend to present with advanced stage skin melanoma (SM) and worse outcome. Moreover, SM is an immunogenic cancer, and its interaction with the aging immune system could have an effect on biologic behaviour of this disease. Tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) could represent the host response in SM; it has been shown that higher grade of TILs is associated with better survival. Moreover, programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) and cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) are potential markers of host immune response and inflammation. We retrospectively reviewed 113 consecutive cases of early-stage SM that occurred in patients aged greater than or equal to 65 years at the time of diagnosis, followed between January 2010 and March 2014 at the University and General Hospital of Udine, Italy. The aim of this study was to evaluate TILs grade, PD-L1 expression on TILs and tumour expression of PD-L1 and COX-2 and their prognostic value in elderly patients with early SM. A better disease-free survival as well as melanoma-specific survival (MSS) was significantly associated with TILs [hazard ratios (HR): 0.41, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.20-0.84, P=0.02 and HR: 0.37, 95% CI: 0.17-0.82, P=0.01, respectively]. PD-L1 positivity on TILs was associated with a better MSS (HR: 0.41, 95% CI: 0.17-0.97, P=0.04). Moreover, among patients with TILs, those showing COX-2 positivity on tumour cells and no PD-L1 expression on TILs had a worse disease-free survival and MSS (HR: 5.18, 95% CI: 1.33-20.23, P=0.018; HR: 6.21, 95% CI: 1.20-32.24, P=0.03; respectively). Immune and inflammatory markers deserve further investigation in aging patients with melanoma.


Asunto(s)
Ciclooxigenasa 2/metabolismo , Linfocitos Infiltrantes de Tumor/metabolismo , Melanoma/genética , Receptor de Muerte Celular Programada 1/metabolismo , Neoplasias Cutáneas/genética , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Melanoma/metabolismo , Melanoma/patología , Pronóstico , Neoplasias Cutáneas/metabolismo , Neoplasias Cutáneas/patología
17.
Cancer Treat Rev ; 61: 15-22, 2017 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29078133

RESUMEN

In recent years, new therapeutic approaches have reshaped the overall strategy of breast cancer (BC) treatment and have markedly improved patient survival. This is, in part, due to novel therapies for estrogen receptor (ER)-positive BC. Unfortunately, many patients present de novo resistance to these therapies or develop an acquired resistance over time. Therefore, research is now focused on discovering new molecular targets to overcome these resistances. Interestingly, preclinical and clinical studies have shown a critical role for the cross-talk between androgen receptor (AR) and ER in luminal-like BC. AR is expressed in >60% of BC and in up to 90% of ERα-positive tumors. Multiple studies suggest that AR is associated with a favorable prognosis. However, AR overexpression and, in particular, the high AR:ER ratio, seem to be involved in resistance to hormonal treatment. In this setting, a group of BCs could benefit from AR-inhibitors; nevertheless, some ER-positive BC patients do not seem to benefit from this strategy. Therefore, it is crucial to identify biomarkers that would enable the selection of patients who might benefit from combination treatment with ER and AR inhibitors.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/metabolismo , Receptores Androgénicos/metabolismo , Receptores de Estrógenos/metabolismo , Animales , Neoplasias de la Mama/terapia , Femenino , Humanos , Receptores Androgénicos/biosíntesis , Receptores de Estrógenos/biosíntesis
18.
Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol ; 10(6): 609-619, 2017 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28349740

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The broad use of immunotherapy is revolutionizing the treatment paradigms of many solid tumors. Although chemotherapy remains the treatment backbone for advanced gastric cancer, improvements in its molecular characterization and progresses in understanding its underpinning biology have supported clinical development of novel immunotherapies. However, the results of recent trials testing these new agents raise the question on how to identify the patients that could greatly benefit. Areas covered: This article summarizes the current understanding on the biology and the mechanisms underlying different clinical features of gastric cancers. Particularly, after a comprehensive literature search, we speculate whether specific molecular subsets of patients could derive more benefit from immunotherapy. Expert commentary: Most cancers may evade the immune response, which is normally regulated by a delicate balance between activating and inhibitory signals. For example, both CTLA-4 and PD-1, once linked to PD-L1/2, may inhibit T-cell signaling. The use of agent to harness the power of the immune system appears to be the ultimate frontier in gastric cancer treatment. While anti-CTLA-4 antibodies are minimally active, there is growing evidence for the efficacy of PD1/-L1 inhibitors. The search of predictive factors for immunotherapy will provide key hints towards the optimal use of these agents.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Inmunoterapia/métodos , Neoplasias Gástricas/terapia , Animales , Anticuerpos/inmunología , Antineoplásicos/inmunología , Antineoplásicos/farmacología , Antígeno B7-H1/inmunología , Antígeno CTLA-4/inmunología , Humanos , Receptor de Muerte Celular Programada 1/inmunología , Transducción de Señal/efectos de los fármacos , Neoplasias Gástricas/inmunología , Neoplasias Gástricas/patología
19.
Oncotarget ; 8(68): 112816-112824, 2017 12 22.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29348868

RESUMEN

The benefit of adding chemotherapy (CT) to adjuvant hormone therapy (HT) in stage IA luminal-like HER2-negative breast cancer (BC) is unclear. We retrospectively evaluated predictive factors and clinical outcome of 1,222 patients from 4 oncologic centers. Three hundred and eighty patients received CT and HT (CT-cohort) and 842 received HT alone (HT-cohort). Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated with univariate and multivariate analyses. We also applied the propensity score methodology. Compared with the HT-cohort, patients in the CT-cohort were more likely to be younger, have larger tumors of a higher histological grade that were Ki67-positive, and lower estrogen and progesterone receptor expression. At univariate analysis, a higher histological grade and Ki67 were significantly associated to a lower DFS. At multivariable analysis, only histological grade was predictive of DFS. The CT-cohort had a worse outcome than the HT-cohort in terms of DFS and OS, but differences disappeared when matched according to propensity score. In summary, patients with stage IA luminal-like BC had an excellent prognosis, however relapse and mortality were higher in the CT-cohort than in the HT-cohort. Longer use of adjuvant HT or other therapeutic strategies may be needed to improve outcome.

20.
Breast ; 31: 114-120, 2017 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27837704

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: According to current guidelines, endocrine therapy (ET) is recommended as first-line treatment of luminal-like metastatic breast cancer (MBC), whereas chemotherapy (CT) should be considered in presence of life-threatening disease. In daily practice, CT is often used outside of this clinical circumstance. Factors influencing first-line choice and the relative impact on outcome are unknown. METHODS: A consecutive series of luminal-like HER2-negative MBC patients treated from 2004 to 2014 was analyzed to test the association of disease- and patient-related factors with the choice of first-line treatment (ET vs. CT). A propensity score method was used to estimate impact of first-line strategy on outcome. RESULTS: Of 604 consecutive luminal-like MBC patients identified, 158 cases were excluded due to unknown or positive HER2-status. Among 446 HER2-negative cases, 171 (38%) received first-line CT. On multivariate analysis, the only factors significantly associated with lower CT use were old age (OR 0.25, 95%C.I. 0.13-0.49) or presence of bone metastases only (OR 0.26, 95%C.I. 0.13-0.53). In propensity score matched population, no differences were observed between CT and ET as first-line treatment either in terms of overall survival (37.5 months and 33.4 months respectively, log-rank test, P = 0.62) or progression-free survival (13.3 months and 9.9 months respectively, log-rank test, P = 0.92). CONCLUSIONS: High percentage of patients with luminal-like MBC received CT as first-line therapy in real-life. The choice was mainly driven by age and site of metastases. With the limitations of a non-randomized comparison, no differences on patients' outcome were observed depending on the first-line strategy.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Antagonistas de Hormonas/uso terapéutico , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Neoplasias de la Mama/química , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Metástasis de la Neoplasia , Puntaje de Propensión , Receptor ErbB-2/análisis , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA