A Pilot Study of Whole-Brain Low-Intensity Pulsed Ultrasound Therapy for Early Stage of Alzheimer's Disease (LIPUS-AD): A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial.

The prevalence of Alzheimer's disease (AD) has been rapidly increasing worldwide. We have developed a novel angiogenic therapy with low-intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS), which is effective and safe in animal models of AD and vascular dementia. We performed two trials of LIPUS therapy for AD (mild cognitive impairment due to AD and mild AD); a roll-in open trial for safety, and a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled (RCT) trial for efficacy and safety. The LIPUS therapy was performed for whole brain through the bilateral temporal bones for one hour 3 times a week as one session under the special conditions (1.3 MPa, 32 cycles, 5% duty cycle) we identified. The LIPUS therapy was performed for one session in the roll-in trial, and 6 sessions in the RCT trial with 3-month intervals for 1.5 years. The primary endpoint was ADAS-J cog scores. The RCT trial was terminated prematurely due to the COVID-19 pandemic. In the roll-in trial (N = 5), no adverse effects were noted. In the RCT trial (N = 22), the worsening of ADAS-J cog scores tended to be suppressed in the LIPUS group compared with the placebo group at week 72 (P = 0.257). When responders were defined as those with no worsening of ADAS-J cog scores at week 72, the prevalence was 50% (5/10) and 0% (0/5) in the LIPUS and placebo groups, respectively (P = 0.053). No adverse effects were noted. These results suggest that the LIPUS therapy is safe and tends to suppress cognitive impairment although a next pivotal trial with a large number of subjects is warranted.

Coronary physiological assessment combining fractional flow reserve and index of microcirculatory resistance in patients undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention with grey zone fractional flow reserve.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to investigate the association between fractional flow reserve (FFR) values and change in coronary physiological indices after elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). BACKGROUND: Decision making for revascularization when FFR is 0.75-0.80 is controversial. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed of 296 patients with stable angina pectoris who underwent physiological examinations before and after PCI. To investigate the differences of coronary flow improvement between territories with low-FFR (<0.75) and grey-zone FFR (0.75-0.80), serial changes in physiological indices including mean transit time (Tmn), coronary flow reserve (CFR), and index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR) were compared between these two groups. RESULTS: Compared to low-FFR territories, grey-zone FFR territories showed significantly lower prevalence of Tmn shortening, CFR improvement, and decrease in IMR (Tmn shorting, 63.9% vs. 87.0%, P < .001; CFR improvement, 63.0% vs. 75.7%, P = .019; IMR decrease, 51.3% vs. 63.3%, P = .040) and lower extent of their absolute changes (Tmn shorting, 0.06 (-0.03 to 0.16) vs. 0.22 (0.07-0.45), P < .001; CFR improvement, 0.45 (-0.32 to 1.87) vs. 1.08 (0.02-2.44), P < .01; IMR decrease, 0.2 (-44.0 to 31.3) vs. 2.9 (-2.9 to 11.8), P = .022). Multivariate analysis showed that pre-PCI IMR predicted improved coronary flow profile in both groups, whereas pre-PCI FFR predicted increased coronary flow indices in low-FFR territories. CONCLUSIONS: Worsening of physiological indices after PCI was not uncommon in territories showing grey-zone FFR. Physiological assessment combining FFR and IMR may help identify patients who may benefit by PCI, particularly those in the grey zone.

Prevalence of Thin-Cap Fibroatheroma in Relation to the Severity of Anatomical and Physiological Stenosis.

BACKGROUND: The relationship between the features of morphologically unstable plaque and physiological lesion severity remains elusive. We aimed to investigate this relationship using optical coherence tomography (OCT)-derived high-risk plaque characteristics and fractional flow reserve (FFR) as the degree of anatomical and physiological stenosis severity.Methods and Results:We investigated 286 de novo intermediate and severe coronary lesions in 248 patients who underwent OCT and FFR examinations. Lesions were divided into tertiles based on either FFR or quantitative coronary angiographic diameter stenosis (QCA-%DS). The OCT findings were compared among the tertiles of FFR and QCA-%DS. FFR and QCA tertiles were defined as follows: FFR-T1 (FFR <0.74), FFR-T2 (0.74≤FFR≤0.81), and FFR-T3 (FFR >0.81); and QCA-T1 (%DS ≥61%), QCA-T2 (51%≤%DS<61%), and QCA-T3 (%DS <51%). The prevalence of thin-cap fibroatheroma (TCFA) was significantly greater in FFR-T1 (20.0%) than in FFR-T2 and FFR-T3 (7.0%, P=0.03 and 7.7%, P=0.04, respectively), although no significant differences were observed among the QCA tertiles. CONCLUSIONS: Physiological severity of coronary stenosis evaluated by FFR correlated with plaque instability in terms of TCFA. Preferable clinical outcomes for lesions with negative FFR based on the existing clinical evidence might be attributable to less likelihood of TCFA.

The influence of elective percutaneous coronary intervention on microvascular resistance: a serial assessment using the index of microcirculatory resistance.

This study investigates whether hyperemic microvascular resistance (MR) is influenced by elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) by using the index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR). Seventy-one consecutive patients with stable angina pectoris undergoing elective PCI were prospectively studied. The IMR was measured before and after PCI and at the 10-mo follow-up. The IMR significantly decreased until follow-up; the pre-PCI, post-PCI, and follow-up IMRs had a median of 19.8 (interquartile range, 14.6-28.9), 16.2 (11.8-22.1), and 14.8 (11.8-18.7), respectively (P < 0.001). The pre-PCI IMR was significantly correlated with the change in IMR between pre- and post-PCI (r = 0.84, P < 0.001) and between pre-PCI and follow-up (r = 0.93, P < 0.001). Pre-PCI IMR values were significantly higher in territories with decreases in IMR than in those with increases in IMR [pre-PCI IMR: 25.4 (18.4-35.5) vs. 12.5 (9.4-16.8), P < 0.001]. At follow-up, IMR values in territories showing decreases in IMR were significantly lower than those with increases in IMR [IMR at follow-up: 13.9 (10.9-17.6) vs. 16.6 (14.0-21.4), P = 0.013]. The IMR decrease was significantly associated with a greater shortening of mean transit time, indicating increases in coronary flow (P < 0.001). The optimal cut-off values of pre-PCI IMR to predict a decrease in IMR after PCI and at follow-up were 16.8 and 17.0, respectively. In conclusion, elective PCI affected hyperemic MR and its change was associated with pre-PCI MR, resulting in showing a wide distribution. Overall hyperemic MR significantly decreased until follow-up. The modified hyperemic MR introduced by PCI may affect post-PCI coronary flow.

Effect of Elective Percutaneous Coronary Intervention on Hyperemic Absolute Coronary Blood Flow Volume and Microvascular Resistance.

BACKGROUND: The hemodynamics involved in the relationship between absolute coronary blood flow (ABF) volume and myocardial resistance (MR) are complex, and the effect of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) on their changes remains unclear. The aim of this study was to investigate the differences in hyperemic ABF and MR before and after elective PCI using a thermodilution method. METHODS AND RESULTS: We investigated 28 vessels (right coronary artery, 9; left anterior descending coronary artery, 18; left circumflex coronary artery, 1) from 28 patients with stable angina pectoris undergoing elective PCI. ABF was measured pre- and post-PCI using a pressure-temperature sensor-equipped wire, based on a thermodilution method with a continuous saline infusion of 20 mL/min through a proximally located microcatheter with an end-hole in the target vessel. MR equals distal coronary perfusion pressure divided by ABF at maximal hyperemia. Conventional fractional flow reserve was also measured pre- and post-PCI. Fractional flow reserve increased significantly after PCI (from 0.70 [0.65-0.75] to 0.88 [0.85-0.95]) in all examined territories. ABF also increased significantly (from 137.8 mL/min [86.3-180.8 mL/min] to 173.3 mL/min [137.9-234.3 mL/min] ; increase: 52.8 mL/min [9.7-80.8 mL/min]) while MR decreased in 11 vessels and increased in 17. No significant relationship was detected between these increases in fractional flow reserve and ABF. Both pre- and post-PCI MR distributed in a wide range, and there was a significant relationship between pre-PCI MR and the increase in ABF (r=0.44; P=0.02) although no significant change in MR was observed between pre- and post-PCI (P=0.37). CONCLUSIONS: Direct measurement of ABF and MR using thermodilution method offers a feasible approach that could shed a light on previously unclear aspects of coronary hemodynamics.

Efficacy of pressure parameters obtained during contrast medium-induced submaximal hyperemia in the functional assessment of intermediate coronary stenosis in comparison with instantaneous wave-free ratio.

BACKGROUND: Despite evidence demonstrating the benefits of percutaneous coronary intervention guided by fractional flow reserve (FFR), FFR evaluation has not been widely adopted. We sought to compare the diagnostic performances of instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) to a novel contrast medium-induced index in FFR prediction, hypothesizing that the latter parameter would offer superior diagnostic agreement with FFR. METHODS & RESULTS: We studied 132 intermediate stenoses in 97 patients prospectively. iFR was measured first, followed by intracoronary injection of 6 mL contrast medium at 3 mL/s to obtain end-diastolic instantaneous distal coronary pressure/aortic pressure ratio (Pd/Pa) 60 ms before the electrocardiographic R-wave (C-ED-Pd/Pa). Subsequently, conventional hyperemic FFR was measured as a reference standard. Of the 132 lesions, 120 were available for final analysis. The FFR values of 95/120 lesions (79.2%) were between 0.60 and 0.90. C-ED-Pd/Pa values (median 0.79 [interquartile range 0.69-0.87]) were significantly lower than FFR values (0.81 [0.75-0.88], P<0.01), whereas iFR values (0.91 [0.86-0.94], P<0.01) were significantly higher. Correlation coefficients with FFR were 0.78 (standard error of the estimate [SEE] 0.067, P<0.0001) and 0.93 (SEE 0.052, P<0.0001) for iFR and C-ED-Pd/Pa, respectively (P<0.001). The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves were 0.88 and 0.96 for iFR and C-ED-Pd/Pa, respectively (P<0.01). Diagnostic accuracy was 85.0% and 92.5% for iFR and C-ED-Pd/Pa, respectively (P=0.06). CONCLUSIONS: C-ED-Pd/Pa is a novel, practical, and accurate measure for the physiological assessment of intermediate coronary stenosis compared to iFR.

Prevalence and Clinical Significance of Discordant Changes in Fractional and Coronary Flow Reserve After Elective Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

BACKGROUND: Fractional flow reserve (FFR) and coronary flow reserve (CFR) are well-validated physiological indices; however, changes in FFR and CFR after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remain elusive. We sought to evaluate these changes and to investigate whether physiological indices predict cardiac event-free survival after PCI. METHODS AND RESULTS: Physiological assessment of 220 stenoses from 220 patients was performed before and after PCI. The changes in FFR and CFR were studied, and factors associated with CFR change were investigated. Follow-up data were collected to determine the predictor of cardiac events. CFR increase was found in 158 (71.8%) territories, and 62 (28.2%) presented a decrease, whereas FFR increased in all 220 (100%) territories. Pre- and post-PCI percentage diameter stenoses were 57.7±11.2% and 7.48±4.79%, respectively. Post-PCI CFR increase was associated with pre-PCI indices including low FFR, low CFR and high microvascular resistance, and post-PCI hyperemic coronary flow increase. Post-PCI CFR decrease was not associated with significant post-PCI hyperemic coronary flow increase. At a median follow-up of 24.3 months, adverse event-free survival was significantly worse in patients with lower pre-PCI CFR (log-rank test λ2=7.26; P=0.007). Cox proportional hazards analysis showed that lower pre-PCI CFR (hazard ratio 0.73; 95% CI 0.55-0.97; P=0.028) was an independent predictor of adverse cardiovascular events after PCI. CONCLUSIONS: CFR decrease after PCI was not uncommon, and discordant change in FFR and CFR was associated with high pre-PCI CFR, low pre-PCI microvascular resistance, and no significant post-PCI hyperemic coronary flow increase. Pre-PCI CFR, not post-PCI physiological indices, may help identify patients who require adjunctive management strategy after successful PCI.