Anatomical accuracy of the KODEX-EPD novel 3D mapping system of the left atrium during pulmonary vein isolation: A correlation with computer tomography imaging.

BACKGROUND: A novel 3D mapping system (KODEX-EPD, EPD Solutions) enables catheter localization and real-time 3D cardiac mapping. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate left atrium (LA) anatomical mapping accuracy created by the KODEX-EPD system during pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) compared with gold standard computed tomography (CT) images acquired from the same patients before the procedure. METHODS: In 15 consecutive patients who underwent PVI, 3D mapping of the LA was created on the KODEX-EPD system using the Achieve catheter. Pulmonary vein (PV), posterior wall, and appendage anatomy and diameters, were compared to the CT 3D reconstruction measured on the CARTO 3 system. Measurements were done independently by two physicians in each method. Linear correlation and agreement between CT and EPD measurements were assessed by Spearman correlation and Bland-Altman plot. RESULTS: Mean LA mapping time was 7.7 ± 3.6 min. Very high interobserver correlation was found for both EPD and CT measurements (Spearman r = .9). High correlation (r = .75) was found between CT and EPD measurements. Bland-Altman plot method revealed that measurements assessed by EPD were slightly higher than those assessed by CT. Mean difference was 3.5 mm, p < .01. In 2 (13.5%) patients each, disagreement regarding the presence of a left common PV and a right middle accessory vein anatomy was seen. CONCLUSION: The new KODEX-EPD mapping system allows quick and accurate mapping of the LA with high correlation to CT imaging. Some differences in left common and accessory right middle vein anatomy were seen.

Lead fixation mechanism impacts outcome of transvenous lead extraction: data from the European Lead Extraction ConTRolled Registry.

AIMS: The aims of this study is to characterize the transvenous lead extraction (TLE) population with active (A) compared with passive fixation (PFix) leads and to compare the safety, efficacy, and ease of extracting active fixation (AFix) compared with PFix right atrial (RA) and right ventricular (RV) leads. METHODS AND RESULTS: The European Lead Extraction ConTRolled Registry (ELECTRa) was analysed. Patients were divided into three groups; those with only AFix, only PFix, and combined Fix leads. Three outcomes were defined. Difficult extraction, complete radiological, and clinical success. Multivariate model was used to analyse the independent effect of Fix mechanism on these outcomes. The study included 2815 patients, 1456 (51.7%) with only AFix leads, 982 (34.9%) with only PFix leads, and 377 (13.4%) with combined Fix leads. Patients with AFix leads were younger with shorter lead dwelling time. Infection was the leading cause for TLE among the combined Fix group with lowest rates among AFix group. No difference in complications rates was noted between patients with only AFix vs. PFix leads. Overall, there were 1689 RA (1046 AFix and 643 PFix) and 2617 RV leads (1441 AFix and 1176 PFix). Multivariate model demonstrated that PFix is independently associated with more difficult extraction for both RA and RV leads, lower radiological success in the RA but has no effect on clinical success. CONCLUSION: Mechanism of Fix impact the ease of TLE of RA and RV leads and rates of complete radiological success in the RA but not clinical success. These findings should be considered during implantation and TLE procedures.

Impact of lockdown during COVID-19 pandemic on physical activity and arrhythmia burden in heart failure patients.

BACKGROUND: Restricted outdoor activity during COVID-19 related lockdown may accelerate heart failure (HF) progression and thereby increase cardiac arrhythmias. We analyzed the impact of March/April 2020 lockdown on physical activity and arrhythmia burden in HF patients treated with cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) devices with daily, automatic remote monitoring (RM) function. METHODS: The study cohort included 405 HF patients enrolled in Observation of Clinical Routine Care for Heart Failure Patients Implanted with BIOTRONIK CRT Devices (BIO|STREAM.HF) registry in 16 countries, who had left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤40% (mean 28.2 ± 6.6%) and NYHA class II/III/IV (47.9%/49.6%/2.5%) before CRT pacemaker/defibrillator implantation. The analyzed RM data comprised physical activity detected by accelerometer, mean heart rate and nocturnal rate, PP variability, percentage of biventricular pacing, atrial high rate episode (AHRE) burden, ventricular extrasystoles and tachyarrhythmias, defibrillator shocks, and number of implant interrogations (i.e., follow-ups). Intraindividual differences in RM parameters before (4-week period) versus during (4-week period) lockdown were tested for statistical significance and independent predictors were identified. RESULTS: There was a significant relative change in activity (mean -6.5%, p < .001), AHRE burden (+17%, p = .013), and follow-up rate (-75%, p < .001) during lockdown, with no significant changes in other RM parameters. Activity decreased by ≥8 min/day in 46.5% of patients; predictors were higher LVEF, lower NYHA class, no defibrillator indication, and more activity before lockdown. AHRE burden increased by ≥17 min/day in 4.7% of patients; predictors were history of atrial fibrillation, higher LVEF, higher body mass index, and activity decrease during lockdown. CONCLUSION: Unfavorable changes in physical activity, AHRE burden, and follow-up rate were observed during lockdown, but not in ventricular arrhythmia.

"Preventive" pacing in patients with tachy-brady syndrome (TBS): Confirming a common practice.

AIMS: Many tachy-brady syndrome (TBS) patients, are implanted a permanent pacemaker (PPM) to allow continuation of anti-arrhythmic drug (AAD) therapy to maintain sinus rhythm. Many of these PPM's are implanted as a preventive measure, in absence of symptomatic bradycardia. Our primary aim was to evaluate pacing use among these patients and find predictors for PPM use. Our secondary aim was to appreciate the portion of these patients who progress to permanent atrial fibrillation (AF). METHODS: Retrospective study of TBS patients implanted a PPM as preventive measure, dividing cases into defined categories regarding highest percent atrial and ventricular pacing documented in PPM clinic visits during 3 year follow-up (F/U) period. Patients' baseline characteristics and AAD therapy were compared between cases with a major (>90%) pacing use and cases with <90% pacing use to find predictors for pacing use. Multivariable logistic regression was applied to identify independent variables associated with major pacing use. RESULTS: Our study included 119 TBS patients. Most (86.5%) TBS patients had a moderate (>50%) pacing use and 58% had a major pacing use. Significant association was found between pre-implant severe sinus bradycardia (<40 bpm), first degree atrioventricular block and amiodarone treatment to major pacing use on univariate analysis and severe sinus bradycardia was significantly associated with major pacing on multivariate analysis as well. Only minority (16.8%) of TBS patients progressed to permanent AF during the study F/U period. CONCLUSION: Our study reveals most TBS patients succeed to maintain sinus rhythm using an AAD with a significant pacing use, suggesting preventive PPM implantation might be advantageous in these cases. Pre-implant severe sinus bradycardia (<40 bpm) is a possible predictor for major pacing use in this population.

The management of cardiac implantable electronic device lead perforations: a multicentre study.

AIMS: Lead perforation is a rare, well-known complication of cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) implants, whose management is mostly not evidence-based. Main management strategies include conservative approach based on clinical and lead function follow-up vs. routine invasive lead revision approach. This study compared the complications of both strategies by composite endpoint, including recurrent perforation-related symptoms, recurrent pericardial effusion (PEf), lead dysfunction, and device infection during 12 month follow-up. METHODS AND RESULTS: Multicentre retrospective analysis, inquiring data from imaging studies, device interrogation, pericardiocentesis, and clinical charts of patients with suspected perforating leads between 2007 and 2014 in five hospitals. All cases were reviewed by electrophysiologist and defined as definite perforations by suggestive symptoms along with lead perforation on imaging, bloody PEf on pericardiocentesis shortly after implant, or right ventricular (RV) lead non-capture along with diaphragmatic stimulation upon bipolar pacing. Clinical outcomes associated with both management approaches were compared, with respect to the composite endpoint. The study included 48 definitive perforation cases: 22 managed conservatively and 26 via lead revision. Conservative management was associated with an increased composite endpoint compared with lead revision (8/22 vs. 1/26; P = 0.007). The dominant complication among the conservative cohort was appearance of cardiac tamponade during follow-up; 5/6 occurring in cases which presented with no or only mild PEf and were treated by antiplatelets/coagulants during or shortly after CIED implantation. CONCLUSION: A conservative management of CIED lead perforation is associated with increased complications compared with early lead revision. Lead revision may be the preferred management particularly in patients receiving antiplatelets/coagulants.

Arrhythmic Events in Brugada Syndrome: A Nationwide Israeli Survey of the Clinical Characteristics, Treatment; and Long-Term Follow-up (ISRABRU-VF).

BACKGROUND: Limited information exists about detailed clinical characteristics and management of the small subset of Brugada syndrome (BrS) patients who had an arrhythmic event (AE). OBJECTIVES: To conduct the first nationwide survey focused on BrS patients with documented AE. METHODS: Israeli electrophysiology units participated if they had treated BrS patients who had cardiac arrest (CA) (lethal/aborted; group 1) or experienced appropriate therapy for tachyarrhythmias after prophylactic implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) implantation (group 2). RESULTS: The cohort comprised 31 patients: 25 in group 1, 6 in group 2. Group 1: 96% male, mean CA age 38 years (range 13-84). Nine patients (36%) presented with arrhythmic storm and three had a lethal outcome; 17 (68%) had spontaneous type 1 Brugada electrocardiography (ECG). An electrophysiology study (EPS) was performed on 11 patients with inducible ventricular fibrillation (VF) in 10, which was prevented by quinidine in 9/10 patients. During follow-up (143 ± 119 months) eight patients experienced appropriate shocks, none while on quinidine. Group 2: all male, age 30-53 years; 4/6 patients had familial history of sudden death age < 50 years. Five patients had spontaneous type 1 Brugada ECG and four were asymptomatic at ICD implantation. EPS was performed in four patients with inducible VF in three. During long-term follow-up, five patients received ≥ 1 appropriate shocks, one had ATP for sustained VT (none taking quinidine). No AE recurred in patients subsequently treated with quinidine. CONCLUSIONS: CA from BrS is apparently a rare occurrence on a national scale and no AE occurred in any patient treated with quinidine.

Evaluation of MADIT-II Risk Stratification Score Among Nationwide Registry of Heart Failure Patients With Primary Prevention Implantable Cardiac Defibrillators or Resynchronization Therapy Devices.

The current guidelines advocate prophylactic implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) for all patients with symptomatic heart failure (HF) with low left ventricular ejection fraction. Because many patients will never use their device, a score delineating subgroups with differential ICD benefit is crucial. We aimed to evaluate the MADIT-II-based Risk Stratification Score (MRSS) feasibility to delineate the ICD survival benefit in a nationwide registry of patients with HF with prophylactic ICDs. Accordingly, all Israeli patients with HF with prophylactic ICD/cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators were categorized into MRSS-based risk subgroups. The study end points included overall mortality, sustained ventricular arrhythmia (VA), and a competing risk of VA (potential preventable arrhythmic death, where ICD could benefit survival) versus nonarrhythmic death. Potential ICD survival benefit was estimated by the area between these cumulative incidence curves. In 2,177 patients with HF implanted prophylactic device, 189 patients (8.7%) had VA and 316 (14.5%) died during a median follow-up of 2.9 years. The MRSS risk subgroups were significantly associated with overall mortality (p <0.001) and weakly with VA (p = 0.3). The competing risk analysis of VA versus nonarrhythmic death revealed a significantly shorter duration (p <0.001) and smaller magnitude of ICD survival benefit with increased risk subgroups, yielding an estimated 76, 60, 38, and 0 life days gained from prophylactic ICD implant during a 5-year follow-up for the MRSS low-, intermediate-, high-, and very high-risk subgroups, respectively (p for trend <0.05). In conclusion, MRSS use in a nationwide registry of patients with ischemic and nonischemic cardiomyopathy, revealed subgroups with differing ICD survival benefit, suggesting it could help evaluate prophylactic ICD survival benefit.

Permanent pacemaker implantation following cardiac surgery: indications and long-term follow-up.

BACKGROUND: Conduction disturbances requiring permanent pacemaker implantation after heart surgery occur in about 1.5% of patients. Early pacemaker implantation may reduce morbidity and postoperative hospital stay. We reviewed our experience with patients undergoing surgery to try and identify predictors for pacemaker requirements and patients who will remain pacemaker dependent. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of 4,999 patients undergoing surgery between the years 1993 and 2005. Patient age was 64 +/- 12 years, and 71% were males. Coronary bypass was performed in 4,071 (81%), aortic valve replacement in 675 (14%), and mitral valve replacement in 968 (18%) patients. RESULTS: Seventy-two patients (1.4%) required implantation of a permanent pacemaker after surgery. Indications for pacemaker implantation included complete atrioventricular block in 59, symptomatic bradycardia/slow atrial fibrillation in nine, second-degree atrioventricular block in two, and other conduction disturbances in two patients. Predictors for pacemaker requirement by multivariate analysis were left bundle branch block and aortic valve replacement (P < 0.001). Late follow-up was available in 58 patients, at 72 +/- 32 months. Thirty-seven (63%) were pacemaker dependent. Predictors for late pacemaker dependency were third-degree atrioventricular block after surgery and preoperative left bundle branch block (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients at high risk for pacemaker implantation after heart surgery include those with preexisting conduction disturbances, and those undergoing aortic valve replacement. Of those receiving a pacemaker, about one-third will recover at late follow-up. For patients in the high-risk group who are pacemaker dependent after surgery, we recommend implanting a permanent pacemaker at 5 days after surgery, thus enabling early mobilization and early discharge.

Tricuspid incompetence following permanent pacemaker implantation.

AIM: Severe tricuspid insufficiency (TI) after permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) has been described in small series of patients, though its incidence is not known. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the data of 545 patients who underwent PPI and had Doppler echocardiograms performed before and after the procedure. We excluded 135 patients who had > or =moderate TI on the 1st Doppler echocardiogram. RESULTS: Group 1 included 75 patients (18.3%) who had a >2 grades worsening of TI, and group 2 included 335 patients (82%) with <2 grade increase in TI after PPI. Patients in group 1 were 77 +/- 7 years of age, versus 72 +/- 10 years in group 2 (P < 0.001). There was no difference in left ventricular size and function. The TI gradient before PPI was higher in group 2 (25 +/- 13 mmHg versus 19 +/- 12 mmHg [P < 0.001]), though within the normal range in both groups. The mitral E/A ratio was 0.98 in group 1 versus 1.42 in group 2 (P < 0.001). The systolic TI gradient after implantation was 42 +/- 12 mmHg in group 1, versus 33 +/- 8 mmHg in group 2 (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Worsening of TI after PPI was not rare and was observed more often in older patients, with abnormal LV relaxation and who developed pulmonary hypertension after the procedure.

Delayed prolongation of the QRS interval in patients with left ventricular dysfunction.

AIMS: Patients with left ventricular dysfunction (LVD) and prolonged QRS on surface electrocardiogram are at increased risk for heart failure and death and may benefit from resynchronization therapy. Patients with initial narrow QRS may prolong their QRS during the disease course. The occurrence of delayed QRS prolongation, its predictors and associated risk of heart failure hospitalizations (HFH) or death are currently unknown and the subject of this investigation. METHODS & RESULTS: Patients with LVD, QRS < 120 ms and available follow-up ECGs were retrospectively evaluated for persistent unprovoked QRS prolongation >130 ms. Impact on mortality or HFH was assessed using Cox regression with QRS > 130 ms as a time dependent covariate. Following 178 patients for 30 (10;59) median (IQR) months, 28 (16%) patients prolonged their QRS to >130 ms, reaching a QRS duration of 154 ±â€¯29 ms; LBBB pattern was diagnosed among 14 (50%) patients. Patients with delayed QRS prolongation were older (71.9 ±â€¯11.8 vs 64.4 ±â€¯15.1 years p = 0.014), had larger left ventricle and left atrial diameters (6.3 ±â€¯0.9 vs 5.7 ±â€¯0.9 cm p = 0.010; 4.9 ±â€¯0.6 vs 4.5 ±â€¯0.7 cm p = 0.006, respectively) and wider baseline QRS (104.8 ±â€¯12.6 vs 91.4 ±â€¯14.5 ms p < 0.001) which was linearly associated with late QRS prolongation (p for trend<0.0001). In a multivariable model, age, baseline QRS width and left atrial diameter were significantly associated with delayed QRS prolongation. QRS prolongation at follow-up was independently associated with risk of death or HFH (HR 7.426, 95% CI3.017-18.280, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: QRS prolongation occurs in a significant proportion of patients with LVD and portends adverse outcome. Advanced age, prolonged QRS and larger left atria are potential predictors. Routine monitoring is justified and physicians may choose to plan ahead for resynchronization therapy in patients at risk for QRS prolongation.

Outcome after implantation of cardioverter defibrillator [corrected] in patients with Brugada syndrome: a multicenter Israeli study (ISRABRU).

BACKGROUND: Many electrophysiologists recommend implantable cardioverter defibrillators for patients with Brugada syndrome who are cardiac arrest survivors or presumed at high risk of sudden death (patients with syncope or a familial history of sudden death or those with inducible ventricular fibrillation at electrophysiologic study). OBJECTIVES: To assess the efficacy and complications of ICD therapy in patients with Brugada syndrome. METHODS: The indications, efficacy and complications of ICD therapy in all patients with Brugada syndrome who underwent ICD implantation in 12 Israeli centers between 1994 and 2007 were analyzed. RESULTS: There were 59 patients (53 males, 89.8%) with a mean age of 44.1 years. At diagnosis 42 patients (71.2%) were symptomatic while 17 (28.8%) were asymptomatic. The indications for ICD implantation were: a history of cardiac arrest (n = 11, 18.6%), syncope (n = 31, 52.5%), inducible VF in asymptomatic patients (n = 14, 23.7%), and a family history of sudden death (n = 3, 0.5%). The overall inducibility rates of VF were 89.2% and 93.3% among the symptomatic and asymptomatic patients, respectively (P = NS). During a follow-up of 4-160 (45 +/- 35) months, all patients (except one who died from cancer) are alive. Five patients (8.4%), all with a history of cardiac arrest, had appropriate ICD discharge. Conversely, none of the patients without prior cardiac arrest had appropriate device therapy during a 39 +/- 30 month follow-up. Complications were encountered in 19 patients (32%). Inappropriate shocks occurred in 16 (27.1%) due to lead failure/dislodgment (n = 5), T wave oversensing (n = 2), device failure (n = 1), sinus tachycardia (n = 4), and supraventricular tachycardia (n = 4). One patient suffered a pneumothorax and another a brachial plexus injury during the implant procedure. One patient suffered a late (2 months) perforation of the right ventricle by the implanted lead. Eleven patients (18.6%) required a reintervention either for infection (n = 1) or lead problems (n = 10). Eight patients (13.5%) required psychiatric assistance due to complications related to the ICD (mostly inappropriate shocks in 7 patients). CONCLUSIONS: In this Israeli population with Brugada syndrome treated with ICD, appropriate device therapy was limited to cardiac arrest survivors while none of the other patients including those with syncope and/or inducible VF suffered an arrhythmic event. The overall complication rate was high.

Radiofrequency ablation of accessory pathways: a 14 year experience at the Tel Aviv Medical Center in 508 patients.

BACKGROUND: Radiofrequency ablation has been suggested as first-line therapy in the management of accessory pathways. There are limited data on the results of ablation over years of experience. OBJECTIVES: To assess the results and complications following RFA of APs performed in our institution over a 14 year period. METHODS: RFA was performed using deflectable electrode catheters positioned at the mitral or tricuspid annulus. The site of the AP was localized by electrophysiological study and radiofrequency energy was applied via the tip of the catheter. RESULTS: The study cohort comprised 508 consecutive patients (64.2% males, mean age 33.6 +/- 15.1 years) who underwent 572 RFA procedures for ablating 534 APs. A single AP was found in 485 (95.5%) patients while multiple APs were noted in 23 patients (4.5%). The APs were manifest, concealed or intermittent in 46.8%, 44.4% and 8.8% of cases, respectively. AP distribution was as follows: left free wall (56.6%), posteroseptal (23%), right anteroseptal (7.9%), right free wall (6.2%), midseptal (3.4%) and right atriofascicular (3.0%). Acute successful rates for a first or multiple ablation attempts were 93.1% and 95.3%, respectively. At a first ablation attempt, acute success and failure rates were the highest for midseptal (100%) and right atriofascicular (12.5%) APs respectively. Right anteroseptal APs were associated with the highest rate (23.9%) of discontinued or non-attempted procedures. Recurrent conduction in an AP after an initial successful ablation was observed in 9.9% of cases; it was the highest (24.2%) for right free wall APs and the lowest (5.0%) for left free wall APs. During follow-up (85 +/- 43 months), definite cure of the AP was achieved in 94.9% of cases following a single or multiple procedures: midseptal (100%), left free wall (98%), right free wall (97%), posteroseptal (92.7%), right atriofascicular (87.5%) and right anteroseptal (78.5%). A non-fatal complication occurred in 18 patients (3.5%), more frequently in females (6.6%) than in males (1.8%) (P < 0.01). The two major complications (pericardial effusion and myocardial ischemic events) mainly occurred during RFA of a left free wall AP using a retrograde aortic approach. Catheter-induced mechanical trauma to APs was observed in 56 cases (10.5%). Mechanical trauma mainly involved right atriofascicular (43.8%) and right anteroseptal (38.1%) APs and contributed to the low success rate of RFA at these AP locations. During the 14 year period, our learning curve was achieved quickly in terms of success rate, although the most significant complications were observed at the beginning of our experience. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study confirm the efficacy and safety of RFA and suggest that it is a reasonable first-line therapy for the management of APs at any location.

[Permanent pacemaker implantation after heart surgery: incidence and indications].

BACKGROUND: New conduction disturbances requiring pacemaker implantation occur in about 1-3% of patients undergoing heart surgery. We reviewed our experience with patients undergoing heart surgery between the years 1993-2005 in order to identify predictors for pacemaker requirement. METHODS: There were 4999 patients aged 64 +/- 12 years. Coronary bypass was performed in 3448 (69%), valve surgery in 831 (17%), combined procedures in 623 (12%), and other procedures in 97 (2%). RESULTS: Overall, 72 (1.4%) patients required pacemaker implantation for the following indications: complete atrioventricular block (AVB) in 59, second degree AVB in 2, severe bradycardia (< 40 beats/min) in 9, first degree AVB with left bundle branch block (LBBB) in 1, and bifascicular block in 1. For patients undergoing aortic valve replacement, the incidence of pacemaker implantation was 5%. Multivariate analysis identified the following predictors for pacemaker implantation: LBBB, aortic valve replacement, and elevated CPK-MB levels after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing heart surgery will require a permanent pacemaker in about 1.4% of cases. Based upon the recognition of predictors for pacemaker requirement, we recommend early implantation in order to enable early mobilization and shorter hospital stay.

Clinical characteristics and outcomes of elderly patients treated with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator or cardiac resynchronization therapy in a real-world setting: data from the Israeli ICD Registry.

BACKGROUND: Elderly patients are underrepresented in clinical trials of device therapy. OBJECTIVE: To provide real-world data regarding outcomes associated with device-based therapy in a large cohort of elderly patients enrolled in the Israeli ICD Registry. METHODS: Between July 2010 and June 2012, a total of 2807 consecutive patients undergoing implanted cardioverter-defibrillator/cardiac resynchronization therapy-defibrillator (ICD/CRT-D) implantation were prospectively enrolled in the Israeli ICD Registry. For the present analysis, patients were categorized into 3 age groups: ≤60 years (n = 1378 [49%]), 61-75 years (n = 863 [31%]), and >75 years (n = 566 [20%]). RESULTS: Elderly patients (>75 years of age) had more comorbid conditions and were more likely to undergo CRT-D implantation (all P < .01). However, the rate of device-related complications associated with surgical reinterventions at 1 year was <3% regardless of age (P = .70 for the comparison among the 3 age groups). Multivariate analysis showed that the risk of heart failure or death and of appropriate ICD therapy for ventricular arrhythmias was significantly increased with increasing age among patients who received an ICD. In contrast, the age-related increase in the risk of all end points was attenuated among patients who received CRT-D devices (all P values for age-by-device-type interactions are <.05). CONCLUSIONS: In a real-world scenario, elderly patients (>75 years of age) comprise approximately 20% of the ICD/CRT-D recipients and experience a device reintervention rate similar to that of their younger counterparts. Our data suggest that the association between advanced age and adverse clinical outcomes is attenuated in elderly patients implanted with CRT-D devices.