Anticoagulation Status and Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion Indications in Hospitalized Cardiology Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: A Hellenic Cardiorenal Morbidity Snapshot (HECMOS) Sub-Study.

Background and Objectives: The proper use of oral anticoagulants is crucial in the management of non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) patients. Left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) may be considered for stroke prevention in patients with AF and contraindications for long-term anticoagulant treatment. We aimed to assess anticoagulation status and LAAC indications in patients with AF from the HECMOS (Hellenic Cardiorenal Morbidity Snapshot) survey. Materials and Methods: The HECMOS was a nationwide snapshot survey of cardiorenal morbidity in hospitalized cardiology patients. HECMOS used an electronic platform to collect demographic and clinically relevant information from all patients hospitalized on 3 March 2022 in 55 different cardiology departments. In this substudy, we included patients with known AF without mechanical prosthetic valves or moderate-to-severe mitral valve stenosis. Patients with prior stroke, previous major bleeding, poor adherence to anticoagulants, and end-stage renal disease were considered candidates for LAAC. Results: Two hundred fifty-six patients (mean age 76.6 ± 11.7, 148 males) were included in our analysis. Most of them (n = 159; 62%) suffered from persistent AF. The mean CHA2DS2-VASc score was 4.28 ± 1.7, while the mean HAS-BLED score was 1.47 ± 0.9. Three out of three patients with a a CHA2DS2-VASc score of 0 or 1 (female) were inappropriately anticoagulated. Sixteen out of eighteen patients with a CHA2DS2-VASc score 1 or 2 (if female) received anticoagulants. Thirty-one out of two hundred thirty-five patients with a CHA2DS2-VASc score > 1 or 2 (if female) were inappropriately not anticoagulated. Relative indications for LAAC were present in 68 patients with NVAF (63 had only one risk factor and 5 had two concurrent risk factors). In detail, 36 had a prior stroke, 17 patients had a history of major bleeding, 15 patients reported poor or no adherence to the anticoagulant therapy and 5 had an eGFR value < 15 mL/min/1.73 m2 for a total of 73 risk factors. Moreover, 33 had a HAS-BLED score ≥ 3. No LAAC treatment was recorded. Conclusions: Anticoagulation status was nearly optimal in a high-thromboembolic-risk population of cardiology patients who were mainly treated using NOACs. One out of four AF patients should be screened for LAAC.

Long-term efficacy and safety of renal denervation: an update from registries and randomised trials.

Hypertension remains the leading treatable global cause of mortality due to high incidence and poor control rates despite of safe and effective drug therapy.Animal studies do not support functional nerve regrowth after RF-RDN and accordingly clinical evidence verify that RDN leads to durable BP reduction.Renal denervation is safe, as up to 36 months after the procedure, there are no statistically significant difference in procedure-related adverse events, deterioration of renal function and adverse cardiovascular outcomeRenal denervation is efficient in reducing BP in patients with no drug therapy, independently of the number of antihypertensive drugs and phenotype of patient. This sustained and safe reduction in BP observed up to 36 months after RDN could be associated with lower rates of renal and cardiovascular events.

Transcatheter Structural Heart Interventions in the Acute Setting: An Emerging Indication.

Structural heart disease is increasingly prevalent in the general population, especially in patients of increased age. Recent advances in transcatheter structural heart interventions have gained a significant following and are now considered a mainstay option for managing stable valvular disease. However, the concept of transcatheter interventions has also been tested in acute settings by several investigators, especially in cases where valvular disease comes as a result of acute ischemia or in the context of acute decompensated heart failure. Tested interventions include both the mitral and aortic valve, mostly evaluating mitral transcatheter edge-to-edge repair and transcatheter aortic valve implantation, respectively. This review is going to focus on the use of acute structural heart interventions in the emergent setting, and it will delineate the available data and provide a meaningful discussion on the optimal patient phenotype and future directions of the field.

Management of dyslipidemia in coronary artery disease: the present and the future.

Coronary artery disease (CAD) remains a leading cause of global morbidity and mortality, necessitating continuous refinement in the management of dyslipidemia, one of its major risk factors, to mitigate cardiovascular risks. Previous studies have proven the critical role of immediate and robust low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) reduction in the aftermath of acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Emphasizing the evidence supporting this approach, we delve into the impact of early intervention on cardiovascular outcomes and propose optimal strategies for achieving rapid LDL-C lowering, while also providing the rationale for early proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin 9 inhibitor use after an ACS. Given the importance of the residual lipidemic risk, we present an overview of emerging therapeutic avenues poised to reshape dyslipidemia management, such as bempedoic acid, lipoprotein(a) inhibition, ApoC3 modulation, and angiopoietin-like protein 3 targeting. This comprehensive review amalgamates current evidence with future prospects, offering a holistic perspective on the management of dyslipidemia in CAD. By exploring both the urgency for immediate post-ACS LDL-C reduction and the exciting advancements on the horizon, this article provides a roadmap for clinicians navigating the intricate landscape of lipid-lowering therapies in CAD.

LOX-1 Receptor: A Diagnostic Tool and Therapeutic Target in Atherogenesis.

Low-density lipoprotein (LDL) and oxidized LDL (oxLDL) are major contributors to atherogenesis, as endogenous antigens, via several receptors such as LOX 1. A PubMed search was conducted in order to identify relevant articles regarding LOX-1's role in the atherosclerosis, diagnosis, prognostic use and molecules that could be used for therapy. The references of the manuscripts obtained were also reviewed, in order to find additional relevant bibliography. LOX-1 is a lectin-like pattern recognition receptor, mostly expressed in endothelial cells (ECs) which can bind a variety of molecules, including oxLDL and C-reactive protein (CRP). LOX-1 plays a key role in oxLDL's role as a causative agent of atherosclerosis through several pathologic mechanisms, such as oxLDL deposition in the subintima, foam cell formation and endothelial dysfunction. Additionally, LOX-1 acts a scavenger receptor for oxLDL in macrophages and can be responsible for oxLDL uptake, when stimulated. Serum LOX-1 (sLOX-1) has emerged as a new, potential biomarker for diagnosis of acute coronary syndromes, and it seems promising for use along with other common biomarkers in everyday clinical practice. In a therapeutic perspective, natural as well as synthetic molecules exert anti-LOX-1 properties and attain the receptor's pathophysiological effects, thus extensive research is ongoing to further evaluate molecules with therapeutic potential. However, most of these molecules need further trials in order to properly assess their safety and efficacy for clinical use. The aim of this review is to investigate LOX-1 role in atherogenesis and explore its potential as diagnostic tool and therapeutic target.

Unravelling the effect of renal denervation on glucose homeostasis: more questions than answers?

Renal Denervation (RDN) is an interventional, endovascular procedure used for the management of hypertension. The procedure itself aims to ablate the renal sympathetic nerves and to interrupt the renal sympathetic nervous system overactivation, thus decreasing blood pressure (BP) levels and total sympathetic drive in the body. Recent favorable evidence for RDN resulted in the procedure being included in the recent European Guidelines for the management of Hypertension, while RDN is considered the third pillar, along with pharmacotherapy, for managing hypertension. Sympathetic overactivation, however, is associated with numerous other pathologies, including diabetes, metabolic syndrome and glycemic control, which are linked to adverse cardiovascular health and outcomes. Therefore, RDN, via ameliorating sympathetic response, could be also proven beneficial for maintaining an euglycemic status in patients with cardiovascular disease, alongside its BP-lowering effects. Several studies have aimed, over the years, to provide evidence regarding the pathophysiological effects of RDN in glucose homeostasis as well as investigate the potential clinical benefits of the procedure in glucose and insulin homeostasis. The purpose of this review is, thus, to analyze the pathophysiological links between the autonomous nervous system and glycemic control, as well as provide an overview of the available preclinical and clinical data regarding the effect of RDN in glycemic control.

Coronary sinus narrowing therapy: A "Reducer" for angina and beyond.

Refractory Angina (RA) is an increasingly common clinical diagnosis, in which patients unsuitable for further percutaneous or surgical procedures experience anginal symptoms, despite receiving optimal medical therapy. This clinical condition challenges the everyday activities and diminishes the quality of life of these patients. A wide variety of novel therapies for this type of angina are being investigated for clinical use. One of them is coronary sinus narrowing, which is performed as a percutaneous interventional procedure using catheter-delivered device, the Reducer. The device is implanted in the coronary sinus creating a physical narrowing and a pressure gradient in the sinus. This intervention improves the impaired blood flow in the ischemic regions of the heart leading to the relief of the anginal symptoms and, therefore, the overall clinical improvement of these patients. Several clinical trials have established both the safety and efficacy of the coronary sinus Reducer, while ongoing trials are aiming to further establish the procedure's safety and efficiency in both RA and other cardiovascular diseases, such as coronary microvascular dysfunction. This review aims to discuss the pathophysiology and the role of the coronary sinus Reducer in RA, the clinical trials documenting its safety and efficacy, as well as the future perspectives of this procedure among cardiovascular diseases.

A network meta-analysis of the antithrombotic strategies in patients with atrial fibrillation and percutaneous coronary interventions: Focus on bleeding.

BACKGROUND: We performed a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant (NOAC)-based versus vitamin K antagonists (VKA)-based regimens in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and acute coronary syndromes or PCI, aiming to examine the precise impact of recently established antithrombotic strategies on major bleeding as primary end-point and other safety and efficacy as secondary end-points. METHODS: A literature search was conducted for randomized controlled trials. Our search took place in three major databases. The primary endpoint of our study was bleeding. To combine direct and indirect evidence across trials, a frequentist network meta-analysis with a random-effects model was used. RESULTS: Five studies were found eligible for the meta-analysis enrolling a total of 11,542 patients. Five studies (N = 4903 patients) contributed to the network. Compared to the triple antithrombotic therapy (TAT)-based VKA, only the dual antithrombotic therapy (DAT) based NOAC reduced the bleeding (RR 0.57, 95%CI 0.40-0.82). There was no statistically significant difference between DAT-based VKA (RR = 0.66, 95%CI = 0.40-1.09) or TAT-based NOAC (RR = 0.80, 95%CI = 0.43-1.49). DAT-based NOAC ranked best (P-score = 0.91), followed by DAT-based VKA (P-score = 0.67), TAT-based NOAC (P-score = 0.40), and TAT-based VKA (P-score = 0.03). CONCLUSION: The network meta-analysis of four antithrombotic strategies, demonstrated that in patients with AF undergoing PCI the combination of DAT-based NOAC is associated with a significantly lower risk of major bleeding events. This strategy does not seem to be less effective in terms of prevention of ischemic events compared to the other regimens.

Transcatheter Tricuspid Valve Interventions: A Triumph for Transcatheter Procedures?

Tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is a common valvular pathology, estimated to affect 1.6 million people in the United States alone. Even though guidelines recommend either medical therapy or surgical treatment for TR, the misconception of TR as a benign disease along with the high mortality rates of surgical intervention led to undertreating this disease and commonly describing it as a "forgotten" valve. Recently, the development of transcatheter interventions for TR show promising potential for use in the clinical setting. There are currently few approved and numerous tested percutaneously delivered devices, which can be categorized, based on their mechanism of action, to either valve repair or valve replacement procedures. Both procedures were tested in clinical trials and show an echocardiographic reduction in TR sustained for at least 1 year after the procedure, as well as symptom relief and functional improvement of the patients. Device selection should be personalized, taking into consideration the anatomy of each valve and the available options at each heart center. Moreover, appropriate patient selection and timing of the procedure are also crucial for the success of the procedure. In this review, we analyze the clinical trials available for all devices currently approved or tested, aiming to provide a comprehensive summary of the most recent evidence in the field of transcatheter TR interventions.

Left ventricular mass versus pulse wave velocity as predictors of coronary artery disease in hypertensive patients: data from a 6-year-follow-up study.

In treated hypertensive patients, there is a substantial residual cardiovascular (CV) risk that cannot be assessed by the available prediction models. This risk can be associated with subclinical organ damage, such as increased left ventricular mass (LVM) and arterial stiffness. However, it remains unknown which of these two CV markers better predicts coronary artery disease (CAD). A prospective cohort study was used to answer the above question. The study sample consisted of 1033 patients with hypertension (mean age 55.6 years, 538 males) free of CAD at baseline, who were followed for a mean period of 6 years. At baseline, all subjects underwent a complete echocardiographic study and pulse wave velocity (PWV) measurement. Hypertensive individuals who developed CAD (2.8%) compared to those without CAD at follow-up, had a higher baseline LVM index (by 16.7 g/m2, p < 0.001), higher prevalence of left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) (21% greater, p = 0.027) and greater prevalence of high PWV levels at baseline (21% greater, p = 0.019). Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that baseline age >65 years (HR = 2.067, p = 0.001), male gender (HR = 3.664, p = 0.001), baseline chronic kidney disease (HR = 2.020, p = 0.026), baseline diabetes mellitus (HR = 1.952, p = 0.015) and baseline LVH (HR = 2.124 p = 0.001) turned out to be independent predictors of CAD, whereas high PWV levels were not. LVH proved to be an independent prognosticator of CAD in contrast to arterial stiffness that was not related to CAD after accounting for established confounders. Therefore, LVM can reliably help physicians to identify high-risk hypertensives in whom an intensified therapeutic management is warranted.

Profile and management of hypertensive urgencies and emergencies in the emergency cardiology department of a tertiary hospital: a 12-month registry.

AIMS: Currently there are scarce epidemiological data regarding prevalence, clinical phenotype, and therapy of hypertensive urgencies (HU) and emergencies (HE). The aim of this article was to record the prevalence, clinical characteristics, and management of patients with HU and HE assessed in an emergency department (ED) of a tertiary hospital. METHODS AND RESULTS: The population consisted of patients presenting with HE and HU in the ED (acute increase in systolic blood pressure (BP) ≥ 180 mmHg and/or diastolic BP ≥120 mmHg with and without acute target organ damage, respectively). Of the 38 589 patients assessed in the ED during a 12-month period, 353 (0.91%) had HU and HE. There were 256 (72.5%) cases presented as HU and 97 (27.5%) as HE. Primary causes for both HU and HE were stress/anxiety (44.9%), increased salt intake (33.9%), and non-adherence to medication (16.2%). Patients with HU reported mainly dizziness/headache (46.8%) and chest pain (27.4%), whereas those with HE presented dyspnoea (67%), chest pain (30.2%), dizziness/headache (10.3%), and neurological disorders (8.2%). In HE, the underlying associated conditions were pulmonary oedema (58%), acute coronary syndrome (22.6%), and neurological disorders/stroke (7.2%). All HE cases were hospitalized and received intensive healthcare, including dialysis. CONCLUSION: This 1-year single-centre registry demonstrates a reasonable prevalence of HU and HE contributing to the high volume of visits to the ED. Stress, increased salt intake and non-adherence were main triggers of HE and HU. Dizziness and headache were the prevalent symptoms of HU patients while heart failure was the most common underlying disease in patients with HE.

Fatty liver index and hypertension-mediated organ damage in never-treated hypertensive patients without diabetes mellitus.

BACKGROUND: We investigated whether fatty liver index (FLI), a surrogate marker of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), is associated with hypertension-mediated organ damage (HMOD) in never-treated hypertensive patients without diabetes mellitus. METHODS: We performed both clinic and ambulatory blood pressure (BP) measurements, and calculated the FLI for all participants. A FLI of no less than 60 indicates a high-risk of underlying NAFLD, whereas a FLI of less than 60 indicates lower risk. We evaluated left ventricular mass (LVM) by echocardiography, arterial stiffness by carotid--femoral pulse wave velocity (PWV), capillary rarefaction by nailfold capillaroscopy, as well as urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio (ACR). HMOD was defined according to the categorical thresholds for each domain, except for capillary rarefaction in which case the categorization of patients was made by the median. RESULTS: We included 146 hypertensive patients (men, 43.8%; mean age, 56.6 ±â€Š10.8 years; BMI, 30.3 ±â€Š4.9 kg/m2; FLI, 57.2 ±â€Š27.7; office, systolic/diastolic, and 24-h BP, 153.5 ±â€Š15.8/94.7 ±â€Š9.8 mmHg, and 140.5 ±â€Š9.9/83.8 ±â€Š9 mmHg, respectively). Patients with FLI at least 60 (n = 76) were younger, with higher BMI and 24-h SBP, compared with patients with FLI less than 60 (n = 70). FLI was associated with HMOD after adjustment (LVM indexed to height, P = 0.004; PWV, P = 0.047; reduced capillary density, P = 0.001; and logACR, P = 0.003). High-risk FLI phenotype and FLI z scores increased the likelihood of any HMOD by 3.8 (95% confidence interval, 1.6-7.1) and 5.4 (95% confidence interval, 2.3-15.0) times, respectively. However, the increased number of HMOD domains has progressively stopped being determined by the FLI z scores (P = 0.65). CONCLUSION: High-risk FLI pattern was associated with various HMOD, and may re-classify never-treated hypertensive patients without diabetes mellitus into a higher cardiovascular risk level.

Isolated diastolic vs. systolic hypertension phenotypes and outcomes: prospective cohort of newly diagnosed individuals with hypertension.

AIMS: To evaluate whether different hypertension phenotypes, namely, isolated systolic hypertension (ISH), isolated diastolic hypertension (IDH) and systolic/diastolic hypertension (SDH) have a differential outcome effect by clinic and ambulatory blood pressure (BP) measurements. METHODS: We prospectively evaluated in 569 never-treated patients with sustained hypertension (age 52.6 ±â€Š11.6 years; men 55%; clinic BP 150 ±â€Š15/95.5 ±â€Š10 mmHg, systolic/diastolic; 24-h ambulatory BP 128.9 ±â€Š12.6/80.6 ±â€Š9.7) the incidence of major cardiovascular (CV) events within 5 years, after adjustment for confounders, including the rate of BP control and the weighted follow-up BP. RESULTS: All participants received antihypertensive drug treatment (mean number of drugs 1.9 ±â€Š1.1; follow-up visits 4.6/patient). Average clinic BP achieved during follow-up was 136 ±â€Š12.6/83.9 ±â€Š9.4 mmHg, with 39% of participants having clinic BP less than 140/90 mmHg in at least 75% of their visits, and 24% in 25-75% of visits. Prevalence of hypertension phenotypes defined using BP differed from that using ambulatory BP, whereas integration of both BP measurements reclassified the initial phenotype to another in 18% of participants. Although, no differential outcome effect was observed between clinic IDH and SDH assessed using clinic or ambulatory BP measurements, clinic BP-based ISH was associated with a higher outcome incidence than the IDH and SDH phenotypes (hazard ratio 4.8, 95% confidence interval 1.4-17.0, P = 0.015). ISH diagnosed by integration of clinic and ambulatory BP, also increased the outcome (hazard ratio 4.0, 95% confidence interval 1.0-15.6, P = 0.046). CONCLUSION: In hypertensive patients at low/moderate CV risk, IDH and SDH phenotypes defined by clinic BP measurements, equally determined CV events but to a lower extent compared with ISH.

Joint ESH excellence centers' national meeting on renal sympathetic denervation: A Greek experts' survey.

OBJECTIVE: The efficacy of renal sympathetic denervation (RDN) has been affirmed by a number of recent clinical studies, despite controversies in this field over the last five years. Therefore, it is of paramount importance that hypertension experts debate the merits of RDN by revealing and expressing their personal beliefs and perspectives regarding this procedure. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among Greek leaders of the Hypertension Excellence Centers with the use of a closed-type questionnaire specifically designed to elicit information and evaluate the respondent's views and perspectives about RDN efficacy, safety and ideal target patient population. RESULTS: A total of 36 participants completed the survey. Based on the results, RDN was considered efficient (91.7%) and safe (94.5%), while the overwhelming majority of the participants felt confident in the long-term efficacy (88.9%) of the intervention and that it lacks reliable predictors of blood pressure response (94.5%). Patients with resistant (91.7%), ultra-resistant (94.4%), and uncontrolled hypertension (80.6%) were suggested as ideal candidates for RDN. Establishing a close co-operation between interventionalists and hypertension experts was considered essential to ensure the efficacy (97.2%) as well as the safety (97.3%) of the procedure. CONCLUSION: The vast majority of Greek hypertension experts surveyed were convinced of the efficacy and safety of RDN based on the preponderance of available scientific and clinical data. Identification of the ideal patient group remains controversial. Respondents generally agreed on the necessity of building close collaborative relationships between interventionalists and hypertension experts in order to improve RDN clinical outcome.

Anticoagulation in Deep Venous Thrombosis: Current Trends in the Era of Non- Vitamin K Antagonists Oral Anticoagulants.

Anticoagulation therapy is the cornerstone of treatment in acute vein thrombosis (DVT) and it aims to reduce symptoms, thrombus extension, DVT recurrences, and mortality. The treatment for DVT depends on its anatomical extent, among other factors. Anticoagulation therapy for proximal DVT is clearly recommended (at least for 3 months), while AT for isolated distal DVT should be considered, especially in the presence of high thromboembolic risk factors. The optimal anticoagulant and duration of therapy are determined by the clinical assessment, taking into account the thromboembolic and bleeding risk in each patient in a case-by-case decision making. Non-Vitamin K antagonists oral anticoagulants (NOACs) were a revolution in the anticoagulation management of DVT. Nowadays, NOACs are considered as first-line therapy in the anticoagulation therapy for DVT and are recommended as the preferred anticoagulant agents by most scientific societies. NOACs offer a simple route of administration (oral agents), a rapid onset-offset of their action along with a good efficacy and safety profile in comparison with Vitamin K Antagonists (VKAs). However, there are issues about their efficacy and safety profile in specific populations with high thromboembolic and bleeding risks, such as renal failure patients, active-cancer patients, and pregnant women, in which VKAs and heparins were the standard care of treatment. Since the available data are promising for the use of NOACs in end-stage chronic kidney disease and cancer patients, several ongoing randomized trials are currently trying to solve that issues and give evidence about the safety and efficacy of NOACs in these populations.