Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Prostate ; 79(14): 1604-1610, 2019 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31376184

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Docetaxel (DOC) has been widely accepted as a therapeutic option for castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). Evidence-based clinical guidelines have stipulated its use up to 10 cycles in most health care systems. There has been a paucity of information regarding potential benefits of its use over 10 cycles. The purpose of this study is to re-examine the rationale for the clinical guidelines concerning cycles of DOC in CRPC. METHODS: Between July 2007 and July 2016, a total of 122 CRPC patients received at least five cycles of DOC at Jikei University and its affiliate hospitals. Doses of DOC (75 mg/m 2 ) were administered every 3 to 4 weeks. Clinical outcomes between patients receiving extended cycles of DOC (≥11 cycles, extended [ex]-DOC group) were compared to those receiving fewer (≤10 cycles, short-DOC group). A subgroup of patients who had discontinued DOC owing to adverse events, but whose disease did not progress, were also considered for comparison (adverse events [AE] group). Overall survival from the induction of DOC was the primary outcome measure. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to analyze variables associated with overall survival. RESULTS: The ex- and short-DOC groups included 80 and 42 patients, respectively. Most baseline demographics did not differ between groups. However, in the short-DOC group more patients had received abiraterone acetate and/or enzalutamide before chemotherapy, age at DOC induction was younger, and lactate dehydrogenase at DOC induction was higher. Overall survival was significantly longer in the ex-DOC group compared to the short-DOC group (median, 53 and 27 months, respectively; P = .04). A subgroup of 22 patients in AE group was compared to compensate for potential bias. Overall survival from the induction of DOC was comparable between AE group and ex-DOC groups (median, 53 vs 53 months, respectively; P = 0.87). Univariate and multivariate analyses did not show any advantage of extended use of DOC on patient survival. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study failed to show the survival benefit of extended use of DOC over 10 cycles in CRPC patients in the era of innovative drugs such as abiraterone acetate, enzalutamide, and cabazitaxel. Further prospective studies are required to confirm our findings.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Docetaxel/administración & dosificación , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/mortalidad , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangre , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/sangre , Tasa de Supervivencia
2.
Prostate ; 78(10): 766-772, 2018 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29635810

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the role of androgen receptor-axis-targeted drugs (ARAT) in non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) versus mCRPC. METHODS: Chemotherapy-naive patients (n = 114) with CRPC who had no metastasis at the time of diagnosis were included in this retrospective study. All patients were treated with ARAT at Jikei University and its affiliated hospitals from July 2014 to March 2017. The patients were stratified into nmCRPC (n = 81) and mCRPC (n = 33) groups according to their metastatic status at ARAT induction. The primary outcome measure was difference in overall survival (OS) between groups from the time of CRPC diagnosis. The patients were compared for progression-free survival (PFS) and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response. The predictors of OS were explored by a multivariate Cox model. RESULTS: The baseline demographics did not differ significantly between the groups. The median observation period from the diagnosis of CRPC was 24.5 months (range: 3-135) and 20 months (range: 1-66) in nmCRPC and mCRPC groups, respectively. The nmCRPC group demonstrated better OS from the time of diagnosis of CRPC in Kaplan-Meier analysis than mCRPC group (86 months vs 40 months; P = 0.004), with similar results obtained for PFS (P = 0.048) and PSA response (P = 0.0014). Multivariate analysis demonstrated non-metastatic status, low PSA, and long PSA doubling time (PSADT) at ARAT induction as the significant predictors of longer OS (P = 0.044, 0.0001, and 0.026, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Early use of ARAT may improve OS, PFS, and PSA response in CRPC. Larger, prospective studies will be required to confirm our findings.


Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Adenocarcinoma/terapia , Antagonistas de Receptores Androgénicos/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/tratamiento farmacológico , Receptores Androgénicos/efectos de los fármacos , Adenocarcinoma/sangre , Adenocarcinoma/secundario , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antagonistas de Receptores Androgénicos/farmacología , Humanos , Calicreínas/sangre , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangre , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/sangre , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/secundario , Estudios Retrospectivos , Análisis de Supervivencia
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA