[Effective usage of nutrition assessment proteins in patients with diabetic nephropathy].

We investigated the relationship between the levels of serum albumin (ALB), serum transthyretin (TTR) or retinol binding protein (RBP) and those of serum cystatin C or clinical gradings in patients with diabetic nephropathy. Serum samples were obtained from 85 patients with type 2 diabetic nephropathy in our hospital. The levels of serum ALB, TTR, RBP and cystatin C were measured by the Dade Behring assay system using the automated Dade Behring Nephelometer II (BN II). The grades of diabetic nephropathy were classified into five groups according to Report of the Ministry of Health and Welfare, Japan. The serum levels of RBP showed a significant correlation between the serum levels of cystatin C and the grades of diabetic nephropathy. However, the serum levels of TTR were not significantly correlated with those of serum cystatin C or the grades of diabetic nephropathy. In this study, the serum levels of TTR were not influenced by renal function although those of RBP and ALB were influenced by renal function. In spite of clinical usefulness in the nutritional assessment of healthy controls and hemodialysis patients, RBP and ALB are not suitable nutrition marker in patients with chronic renal failure. However, TTR is suitable marker in patients with chronic renal failure.

Effects of calcium antagonists in hypertensive patients with renal dysfunction: a prospective, randomized, parallel trial comparing benidipine and nifedipine.

BACKGROUND: Although calcium antagonists, derived from dihydropyridine (DHP), are important agents in achieving control in a majority of patients with high blood pressure and renal disease, there are no comparative data regarding their inhibitory effects on the progression of renal dysfunction in Japan. METHODS: Benidipine and nifedipine retard both calcium antagonists derived from DHP and were compared in terms of their inhibitory effect on the progression of renal dysfunction in hypertensive patients. The primary end-points were defined as 1.5 times the serum creatinine value at baseline, progression to end-stage renal failure (ESRF) necessitating dialysis or renal transplantation, and death. RESULTS: During the study period, a significant decline in blood pressure was observed in the two groups, with no significant difference between them. The worsening of nephropathy was significantly inhibited in the benidipine group as compared with the nifedipine retard group (log-rank test: P = 0.014, Wilcoxon's test: P = 0.022). Among the subjects who reached a primary end-point, one (33%) in the benidipine group and five (50%) in the nifedipine retard group were placed on haemodialysis within 1 year. CONCLUSION: It appears that benidipine inhibits the progression of hypertensive renal diseases more effectively than nifedipine retard.