RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Abdominal adhesions are the most common surgical complication and without reliable prophylactics. This study presents a novel rat model for abdominal adhesions and reports pilot results of human placental stem cell (hPSC)-based therapies. METHODS: Forty-four (n = 44) male Sprague-Dawley rats (250-350 g) were used in the experiment. Of these, thirty-eight (n = 38) were included in a preliminary data set to determine a minimum treatment effect. Adhesions were created in a reproducible model to the abdominal wall and between organs. Experimental groups included the control group (Model No Treatment, MNT), Plasmalyte A (Media Alone, MA, 10 mL), hPSC (5 × 106 cells/10 mL Plasmalyte A), hPSC-CM (hPSC secretome, conditioned media) in 10 mL Plasmalyte A, Seprafilm™ (Baxter, Deerfield, IL), and sham animals (laparotomy only). Treatments were inserted intraperitoneally (IP) and the study period was 14 days post-operation. Results are reported as the difference between means of an index statistic (AIS, Animal Index Score) and compared by ANOVA with pairwise comparison. RESULTS: The overall mean AIS was 23 (SD 6.16) for the MNT group with an average of 75% of ischemic buttons involved in abdominal adhesions. Treatment groups MA (mean overall AIS 17.33 SD 6.4), hPSC (mean overall AIS 13.86 SD 5.01), hPSC-CM (mean overall AIS 13.13 SD 6.15), and Seprafilm (mean overall AIS 13.43 SD 9.11) generated effect sizes of 5.67, 9.14, 9.87, and 9.57 decrease in mean overall AIS, respectively, versus the MNT. DISCUSSION: The presented rat model and scoring system represent the clinical adhesion disease process. hPSC-based interventions significantly reduce abdominal adhesions in this pilot dataset.
Asunto(s)
Ratas Sprague-Dawley , Adherencias Tisulares/prevención & control , Animales , Humanos , Ratas , Femenino , Proyectos Piloto , Masculino , Embarazo , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Placenta/citología , Trasplante de Células Madre/métodos , Células Madre/citologíaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Abdominal adhesions represent a chronic postsurgical disease without reliable prophylaxis. Animal modeling has been a cornerstone of novel therapeutic development but has not produced reliable clinical therapies for prevention of adhesive small bowel obstruction. The purpose of this scoping review is to analyze animal models for abdominal adhesion generation by key considerations of external validity (i.e., fidelity, homology, and discrimination). METHODS: A literature review was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews Extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines. Peer-reviewed publications were included that described the development or quality assessment of experimental animal models for abdominal adhesions with inclusion of a scoring system. Studies that focused on treatment evaluation, implantation of surgical devices, models of nonsurgical etiologies for abdominal adhesions, non-in vivo modeling, and investigations involving human subjects were excluded. RESULTS: Four hundred and fifteen (n = 415) articles were identified by prespecified search criteria. Of these, 13 studies were included for review. CONCLUSIONS: Translation of investigational therapeutics for abdominal adhesion prevention is dependent upon high-quality experimental animal models that reproduce the clinical adhesions seen in the operating room as a disease of the entire abdomen.
Asunto(s)
Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Adherencias Tisulares/prevención & control , Adherencias Tisulares/etiología , Animales , Humanos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Abdomen/cirugíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Physician burnout is rising, especially among academic physicians facing pressures to increase their clinical workload, lead administrative tasks and committees, and be active in research. There is a concern this could have downstream effects on learners' experiences and academic physician's ability to teach learners on the team. METHODS: A 29-question RedCap survey was electronically distributed to 54 attending physicians within an academic learning health system who oversaw the General Medicine inpatient teaching services during the 2022-2023 academic year. The aims were to assess this cohort of attending physicians' experiences, attitudes, and perceptions on their ability to effectively teach learners on the team, feeling valued, contributors to work-life balance and symptoms of burnout, Fisher's Exact Tests were used for data analysis. RESULTS: Response rate was 56%. Attendings splitting time 50% inpatient / 50% outpatient felt that team size and type of admissions model affected their ability to effectively teach learners (p = 0.022 and p = 0.049). Attendings with protected administrative time felt that non-patient care obligations affected their ability to effectively teach the learners (p = 0.019). Male attendings and attendings with ≤ 5 years of General Medicine inpatient teaching experience felt less valued by residency leadership (p = 0.019 and p = 0.026). 80% of attendings experienced emotional exhaustion, and those with > 10 weeks on a General Medicine inpatient teaching service were more likely to experience emotional exhaustion (p = 0.041). Attendings with > 10 weeks on a General Medicine inpatient teaching service and those who were a primary caregiver were more likely to experience depersonalization (p = 0.012 and p = 0.031). 57% of attendings had reduced personal achievement. CONCLUSIONS: Institutions should seek an individual and organizational approach to professional fulfillment. Special attention to these certain groups is warranted to understand how they can be better supported. Further research, such as with focus groups, is needed to address these challenges.
Asunto(s)
Agotamiento Profesional , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Internado y Residencia , Adulto , Cuerpo Médico de Hospitales/psicología , Cuerpo Médico de Hospitales/educación , Pacientes Internos/psicología , Enseñanza , Equilibrio entre Vida Personal y LaboralRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Household food insecurity (HFI) is associated with poor general and mental health. Prior studies assessed parent and child mental health separately and did not assess other social risks. OBJECTIVE: To assess the relationship between HFI and both parental and child mental health. METHODS: Parents of 3-5-year-old children completed validated measures of food insecurity and mental health. Separate linear regression models were used for unadjusted analysis for each mental health outcome (parent depression, anxiety, and stress, and child mental health). Multivariable analysis was performed using hierarchical regression to adjust for relevant covariates. RESULTS: Children (n = 335) were racially and socioeconomically diverse. HFI was reported in 10% of participants. HFI was associated with worse parent depression and stress in unadjusted analyses; however, after adjusting for covariates, the associations became insignificant. HFI was significantly associated with worse child mental health in unadjusted and multivariable analysis (aß 2.24, 95% CI 0.59-3.88) compared to those without HFI. CONCLUSION: HFI was not associated with parental mental health outcomes when other social risks were included in the analyses; however, HFI was significantly associated with worse childhood mental health in all analyses. Pediatric providers should screen for and develop interventions to target both HFI and mental health. IMPACT: Household food insecurity was associated with worse parent depression and stress in unadjusted analyses; however, after adjusting for other social risks, the associations became insignificant. Household food insecurity was significantly associated with worse child mental health, even after adjusting for demographics, other social risks, and parent mental health. Social risks are differentially associated with parent and child mental health. Understanding the complexities of family stressors can help better support parents and children struggling with mental health problems and social risks.
Asunto(s)
Abastecimiento de Alimentos , Salud Mental , Humanos , Niño , Preescolar , Ansiedad , Estudios Transversales , Inseguridad AlimentariaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Developmental disruption contributes to poor psychosocial outcomes among adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with cancer, though indicators of AYAs' developmental status are not well understood. In this study, we describe perceived adult status as a novel developmental indicator and examine its associations with social milestones achievements and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). METHODS: For this secondary analysis, AYAs with cancer were recruited using a 2 (on/off treatment) × 2 [emerging adults (EAs) 18-25 years-old, young adults (YAs) 26-39 years-old] stratified sampling design through an online research panel. Surveys assessed perceived adult status (i.e., self-perception of the extent to which one has reached adulthood), social milestones (marital, child-rearing, employment, educational status), demographic and treatment characteristics, and HRQoL. Generalized linear models tested associations between perceived adult status, social milestones, and HRQoL. RESULTS: AYAs (N = 383; Mage = 27.2, SD = 6.0) were majority male (56%) and treated with radiation without chemotherapy (37%). Most EAs (60%) perceived they had reached adulthood in some ways; most YAs (65%) perceived they had reached adulthood. EAs who perceived they had reached adulthood were more likely to be married, raising a child, and working than EAs who did not perceive they had reached adulthood. Among EAs, lower perceived adult status was associated with lower HRQoL when accounting for social milestones. Among YAs, perceived adult status was not associated with social milestones and neither perceived adult status nor social milestones were associated with HRQoL. CONCLUSIONS: Perceived adult status may be a useful developmental indicator for EAs with cancer. Findings highlight unique developmental needs of EAs and utility of patient perspectives for understanding developmental outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias , Calidad de Vida , Humanos , Masculino , Adulto Joven , Adolescente , Adulto , Calidad de Vida/psicología , Neoplasias/terapia , Neoplasias/psicología , AutoimagenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The Lee-Jones model posits that antecedent individual and interpersonal factors predicate the development of fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) through cognitive and emotional processing, which further to behavioral, emotional, and/or physiological responses. We analyzed data from FoRtitude, a FCR intervention grounded in the Lee-Jones FCR model, to evaluate associations between FCR antecedents, resources (e.g., breast cancer self-efficacy, BCSE) and psychological and behavioral consequences. METHODS: Women with breast cancer who completed treatment and reported clinically elevated levels of FCR were randomized into a 4-week online psychosocial intervention or contact control group. We assessed BCSE, FCR, and physical activity, anxiety and depression, or symptoms at baseline, 4 and 8 weeks. Separate structural equation models were constructed with both baseline data and change scores (baseline-8 weeks) to examine the pathways linking BCSE, FCR and: (1) physical activity; (2) anxiety and depression; and (3) symptoms (fatigue, sleep disturbance, cognitive concerns). RESULTS: At baseline, higher levels of BCSE were associated with lower levels of FCR. Higher FCR was associated with worse psychological effects and symptoms but not behavioral response. Change models revealed that an increase in BCSE was associated with a decrease in FCR at 8-week assessment, which was associated with reductions in psychological effects. A change in BCSE was also directly associated with reductions in psychological effects. CONCLUSIONS: Results support the Lee-Jones model as a foundation for FCR interventions among breast cancer survivors. Replicability among varied populations is needed to examine effects on behavioral outcomes of FCR such as health care utilization. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT03384992.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Supervivientes de Cáncer , Femenino , Humanos , Supervivientes de Cáncer/psicología , Neoplasias de la Mama/terapia , Neoplasias de la Mama/psicología , Análisis de Clases Latentes , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/psicología , Miedo/psicología , Modelos TeóricosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: The Shift and Persist model provides an informative framework to understand how adolescent and young adult (AYA) cancer patients and survivors (ages 15-39) may withstand stress and thrive despite adversity. The goal of the present study was to examine the psychometric properties of the Shift and Persist Questionnaire (SPQ) in this population and provide guidelines for interpretation. METHODS: AYA cancer patients and survivors were recruited via an online research panel. Participants reported demographics and health history and completed the SPQ and Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System 29-item profile (PROMIS®-29). We evaluated the structural validity, internal consistency, and construct validity of the SPQ. Minimally important differences (MIDs) were estimated to inform SPQ score interpretation. RESULTS: 572 eligible individuals completed the survey. On average, participants were aged 24 (SD = 7) at evaluation. Of the participants, 43.5% were female, 77.1% were white, and 17.5% were Hispanic (across races). The two-factor structure of the SPQ demonstrated very good structural validity (CFI > 0.95, SRMR < 0.08), and construct validity with PROMIS-29® domains (convergent Rs = 0.17 to 0.43, divergent Rs = - 0.11 to - 0.51). Internal consistency was adequate (ω = 0.76-0.83). Recommended MIDs were 1 point for the Shift subscale, 1-2 point(s) for the Persist subscale, and 2-3 points for the total SPQ score. CONCLUSION: The SPQ is a psychometrically sound measure of skills that contribute to resilience in AYA cancer patients and survivors. MID recommendations enhance the interpretability of the SPQ in this population. Future studies examining shifting and persisting in this population may benefit from administering the SPQ.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias , Calidad de Vida , Humanos , Femenino , Adulto Joven , Adolescente , Masculino , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Calidad de Vida/psicología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Psicometría , SobrevivientesRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevention is practiced concurrently by providers from several specialties. Our goal was to understand providers' preference of specialties in CVD prevention practice and the role of preventive cardiologists. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 11 October 2021 and 1 March 2022, we surveyed providers from internal medicine, family medicine, endocrinology, and cardiology specialties to examine their preference of specialties in managing various domains of CVD prevention. We examined categorical variables using Chi square test and continuous variables using t or analysis of variance test. RESULTS: Of 956 invitees, 263 from 21 health systems and 9 states responded. Majority of respondents were women (54.5%), practicing physicians (72.5%), specializing in cardiology (43.6%), and working at academic centers (51.3%). Respondents favored all specialties to prescribe statins (43.2%), ezetimibe (37.8%), sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors (30.5%), and aspirin in primary prevention (36.3%). Only 7.9% and 9.5% selected cardiologists and preventive cardiologists, respectively, to prescribe SGLT2 inhibitors. Most preferred specialists (i.e. cardiology and endocrinology) to manage advanced lipid disorders, refractory hypertension, and premature coronary heart disease. The most common conditions selected for preventive cardiologists to manage were genetic lipid disorders (17%), cardiovascular risk assessment (15%), dyslipidemia (13%), and refractory/resistant hypertension (12%). CONCLUSIONS: For CVD prevention practice, providers favored all specialties to manage common conditions, specialists to manage complex conditions, and preventive cardiologists to manage advanced lipid disorders. Cardiologists were least preferred to prescribe SGLT2 inhibitor. Future research should explore reasons for selected CVD prevention practice preferences to optimize care coordination and for effective use of limited expertise.
Asunto(s)
Cardiólogos , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares , Hipertensión , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Medicina Interna , Sudeste de Estados Unidos , Lípidos , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/prevención & controlRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: A comprehensive cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevention approach should address patients' medical, behavioral, and psychological issues. The aim of this study was to understand the clinician-reported availability of a pertinent CVD preventive workforce across various specialties using a survey study in the southeastern United States, an area with a disproportionate burden of CVD and commonly known as the Stroke Belt. METHODS: We surveyed physicians, advanced practice providers (APPs), and pharmacists in internal medicine, family medicine, endocrinology, and cardiology regarding available specialists in CVD preventive practice. We examined categorical variables using the χ2 test and continuous variables using the t test/analysis of variance. RESULTS: A total of 263 clinicians from 21 health systems participated (27.6% response rate, 91.5% from North Carolina). Most were women (54.5%) and physicians (72.5%) specializing in cardiology (43.6%) and working at academic centers (51.3%). Overall, most clinicians stated having adequate specialist services to manage hypertension (86.6%), diabetes mellitus (90.1%), and dyslipidemia (84%), with >50% stating having adequate specialist services for obesity, smoking cessation, diet/nutrition, and exercise counseling. Many reported working with an APP (69%) or a pharmacist (56.5%). Specialist services for exercise therapy, psychology, behavioral counseling, and preventive cardiology were less available. When examined across the four specialties, the majority reported having adequate specialist services for hypertension, diabetes mellitus, obesity, dyslipidemia, and diet/nutrition counseling. Providers from all four specialties were less likely to work with exercise therapists, psychologists, behavioral counselors, and preventive cardiologists. CONCLUSIONS: A majority of providers expressed having adequate specialists for hypertension, diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia, obesity, smoking cessation, diet/nutrition, and exercise counseling. Most worked together with APPs and pharmacists but less frequently with exercise therapists, psychologists, behavioral counselors, and preventive cardiologists. Further research should explore approaches to use and expand less commonly available specialists for optimal CVD preventive care.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Cardiovasculares , Diabetes Mellitus , Dislipidemias , Hipertensión , Humanos , Femenino , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Masculino , Hipertensión/epidemiología , Hipertensión/prevención & control , Obesidad , Medicina Familiar y Comunitaria , North Carolina , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/prevención & controlRESUMEN
Background: Access to neurology services is important for children's well-being. We sought to evaluate the effects of telehealth on pedi-atric neurology appointment outcomes for children. Methods: Using electronic health record (EHR) data, information about children with pediatric neurology appointments in a tertiary care children's hospital in North Carolina was collected. Appointment outcomes (completion, cancellation, and no-show rates) were calculated for children who had a neurology appointment scheduled both in the pre-pandemic (March 10, 2019, to March 9, 2020) and pandemic (March 10, 2020, to March 9, 2021) periods. "Telehealth user" was a child who had at least one telehealth appointment scheduled between March 10, 2020, and March 9, 2021. In bivariate and multivariate analyses, we compared appointment outcomes for telehealth users and non-users. Limitations: EHR data were limited to a single institution and could have missed children's clinical encounters elsewhere. Since this study used secondary data that were not collected for research purposes, it is possible that there were unmeasured confounders. Because of the observational nature of the study, the association between telehealth use and appointment outcomes does not indicate causation. Results: A total of 2110 children had 11,194 pediatric neurology appointments scheduled. Telehealth users compared with non-users were more likely to be White, non-Hispanic, have private insurance, and live farther from the children's hospital. There was a statistically sig-nificant decrease in completion (66% versus 57%) and increase in cancellation (27% versus 33%) and no-show (7% versus 10%) rates in the pandemic when compared to the pre-pandemic period. In the pre-pandemic period, telehealth user and non-user groups had similar cancellation and no-show rates. In the pandemic period, there was a statistically significant decrease in cancellation and no-show rates in the telehealth user group when compared to the non-user group. Conclusions: Pediatric neurology outpatient clinic visits decreased substantially during the pandemic. Telehealth mitigated these problems. Children belonging to a minority race/ethnicity are less likely to use telehealth, increasing their risk of poor access to neurology services.
Asunto(s)
Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Neurología , Telemedicina , Humanos , Telemedicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Niño , North Carolina , Femenino , Masculino , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Preescolar , Adolescente , Citas y Horarios , Atención Ambulatoria/estadística & datos numéricos , COVID-19/epidemiología , Estudios de Cohortes , LactanteRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Clinical guidelines recommend shared decision-making for treatment of peripheral artery disease (PAD), which requires understanding of patient perspectives and preferences. We conducted a focus group study of patients with symptomatic PAD to identify factors important and relevant to treatment choices, and to characterize aspects of the health care process that contribute to positive vs negative experiences apart from the specific treatment(s) received. METHODS: Participants were recruited from an academic medical center over 2 years using a purposeful sampling approach based on a clinical diagnosis of symptomatic PAD (either claudication or chronic limb-threatening ischemia [CLTI]) confirmed by the abnormal ankle or toe brachial index. Focus groups were led by a nonphysician moderator, consisted of 5 to 12 participants, and were conducted separately for patients with CLTI and claudication. Audio recordings converted to verbatim transcripts were used for qualitative analysis. RESULTS: A total of 51 patients (26 with CLTI and 25 with claudication) were enrolled and participated in focus groups. Major themes identified related to treatment preferences and decisions included specific interventions under consideration, the chance of technical success versus failure, anticipated degree of symptom improvement, outcome durability, and risk. Major themes related to the process of care included decision-making input, provider communication and trust, the timeline from diagnosis to definitive treatment, and compartmentalized care (including different venues of care). CONCLUSIONS: The results provide insights into patient preferences, perspectives, and experiences related to PAD treatment. These observations can be used to inform patient-centered approaches to shared decision-making, communication, and assessment of PAD treatment outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Isquemia , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica , Humanos , Grupos Focales , Isquemia/diagnóstico , Isquemia/terapia , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/diagnóstico , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/terapia , Claudicación Intermitente/diagnóstico , Claudicación Intermitente/terapia , Extremidad Inferior/irrigación sanguíneaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: There is increasing interest in patient-reported measures of cancer treatment tolerability. A global measure of bother, the FACT GP5 item ("I am bothered by side effects of treatment") is potentially useful for regulatory, research, and clinical use. To understand this item's appropriateness for capturing treatment tolerability, we conducted cognitive interviews on this item with 3 samples of cancer patients. METHODS: Patients with ovarian cancer (Study 1: N = 21; on treatment), lymphoma (Study 2: N = 14; on treatment), and colorectal or lung cancer (Study 3: N = 16; treatment naïve) were interviewed about GP5's understandability and relevance to their treatment side effects. What patients think about when answering GP5 was also assessed. In all studies, the interview included both structured and open-ended questions. Qualitative data were coded to extract themes and responses to structured questions were tallied. RESULTS: Most patients on treatment (Studies 1 and 2) reported that the GP5 item wording is appropriate (88%) and its meaning is clear (97%). They were very confident or confident in their response (97%) and stated that GP5 was relevant to their cancer experience (97%). When answering GP5, patients considered their treatment and specific side effects. A large proportion (40%) of the treatment-naïve (Study 3) patients reported that GP5 was not relevant to their cancer treatment, and the largest proportion responded to GP5 thinking of negative side effect expectancies. CONCLUSION: This study provides assurance that GP5 is a useful indicator of treatment tolerability, and is meaningful to people with cancer, especially once they have started treatment.
Asunto(s)
Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos , Neoplasias Ováricas , Femenino , Humanos , PacientesRESUMEN
An understanding of genetics is becoming increasingly relevant to receiving medical care. It is important for health care providers and educators, including genetic counselors, to understand patients' perceptions about trait transmission and their interpretation of terms used in biomedicine. Knowledge about the patient perspective about trait transmission is important when health care providers are not fluent in the patient's language. Sixty Latinx immigrant adults (30 men and 30 women) who were born in Mexico or Central America (MCA) and living in North Carolina were interviewed about their heredity beliefs. By design, most participants had limited education. Eight percent had a least a high school education; 45% had less than a seventh grade education. Semi-structured, in-depth interviews were conducted to examine how participants think and discuss trait transmission. The translated transcripts were systematically analyzed using a case-based approach, supplemented by theme-based coding. Five lay mental models of heredity were identified that varied in terms of involvement of genes. Four of the five heredity mental models encompass genes; four out of five mental models do not link DNA to heredity. The centrality of blood, whether used metaphorically or literally, varies widely across the models. One model references God and depicts that heredity involves blood and/or genes, but not DNA. The mental models of heredity for most adult immigrants with limited education do not include DNA. Trait transmission by blood appears to have a more prominent role in lay mental models held by Mexicans than Central Americans. Increased patient knowledge about genetics can facilitate shared decision-making as genetics becomes increasingly relevant to medical care. Efforts to educate people can be most effective when we first understand the layperson's conceptions or mental models. Health care providers and educators should be aware that MCA adults with limited formal education hold diverse mental models about heredity.
Asunto(s)
Emigrantes e Inmigrantes , Herencia , Adulto , Femenino , Hispánicos o Latinos , Humanos , Masculino , México , Modelos PsicológicosRESUMEN
A residency-based Family Medicine outpatient clinic chose to implement an integrated behavioral health care program in a large primary care clinic in the Southeast to improve patient access to behavioral health care. We hypothesized that embedding a BHP in a primary care setting would be a cost neutral intervention. We implemented a prospective cohort design and included expenses from both inpatient and outpatient visits. We implemented a mixed effects linear regression model to evaluate pre- and post-BHP exposure costs. A total of 1256 patients were identified in the post-BHP exposure period that had more than one-year post-exposure. After applying exclusion criteria, there were 926 patients included in analysis. These patient had an average total cost during the one-year pre-BHP exposure period of $5113 (SD = 7712) and one-year post-BHP exposure period of $5462 (SD = 7813). Our analysis shows a relatively cost neutral impact following the introduction of BHPs in a primary care setting. The results of this study provide a gauge for future planning of services.
Asunto(s)
Pacientes Internos , Atención Primaria de Salud , Estudios de Cohortes , Costos y Análisis de Costo , Humanos , Atención Primaria de Salud/métodos , Estudios ProspectivosRESUMEN
The cost of cancer care is rising and represents a stressor that has significant and lasting effects on quality of life for many patients and caregivers. Adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with cancer are particularly vulnerable. Financial burden measures exist but have varying evidence for their validity and reliability. The goal of this systematic review is to summarize and evaluate measures of financial burden in cancer and describe their potential utility among AYAs and their caregivers. To this end, the authors searched PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, CINAHL, and PsycINFO for concepts involving financial burden, cancer, and self-reported questionnaires and limited the results to the English language. They discarded meeting abstracts, editorials, letters, and case reports. The authors used standard screening and evaluation procedures for selecting and coding studies, including consensus-based standards for documenting measurement properties and study quality. In all, they screened 7250 abstracts and 720 full-text articles to identify relevant articles on financial burden. Eighty-six articles met the inclusion criteria. Data extraction revealed 64 unique measures for assessing financial burden across material, psychosocial, or behavioral domains. One measure was developed specifically for AYAs, and none were developed for their caregivers. The psychometric evidence and study qualities revealed mixed evidence of methodological rigor. In conclusion, several measures assess the financial burden of cancer. Measures were primarily designed and evaluated in adult patient populations with little focus on AYAs or caregivers despite their increased risk of financial burden. These findings highlight opportunities to adapt and test existing measures of financial burden for AYAs and their caregivers.
Asunto(s)
Estrés Financiero , Neoplasias , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adolescente , Cuidadores/psicología , Humanos , Neoplasias/economía , Neoplasias/terapia , Psicometría , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: E5103 was a study designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab. It was a negative trial for the end points of invasive disease-free survival and overall survival. The current work examines the tolerability of bevacizumab and other medication exposures with respect to clinical outcomes and patient-reported outcomes (PROs). METHODS: Adverse events (AEs) collected from the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events were summarized to form an AE profile at each treatment cycle. All-grade and high-grade events were separately analyzed. The change in the AE profile over the treatment cycle was delineated as distinct AE trajectory clusters. AE-related and any-reason early treatment discontinuations were treated as clinical outcome measures. PROs were measured with the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast + Lymphedema. The relationships between the AE trajectory and early treatment discontinuation as well as PROs were analyzed. RESULTS: More than half of all AEs (57.5%) were low-grade. A cluster of patients with broad and mixed AE (all-grade) trajectory grades was significantly associated with any-reason early treatment discontinuation (odds ratio [OR], 2.87; P = .01) as well as AE-related discontinuation (OR, 4.14; P = .001). This cluster had the highest count of all-grade AEs per cycle in comparison with other clusters. Another cluster of patients with primary neuropathic AEs in their trajectories had poorer physical well-being in comparison with a trajectory of no or few AEs (P < .01). A high-grade AE trajectory did not predict discontinuations. CONCLUSIONS: A sustained and cumulative burden of across-the-board toxicities, which were not necessarily all recognized as high-grade AEs, contributed to early treatment discontinuation. Patients with neuropathic all-grade AEs may require additional attention for preventing deterioration in their physical well-being.
Asunto(s)
Bevacizumab , Neoplasias de la Mama Triple Negativas , Bevacizumab/efectos adversos , Ensayos Clínicos Fase III como Asunto , Humanos , Receptor ErbB-2 , Neoplasias de la Mama Triple Negativas/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
CONTEXT: Among adolescents and young adults (AYAs), cancer and its treatment can disturb body image in distinct ways compared to younger or older individuals. OBJECTIVE: Since AYA body image is not well understood, this study was designed to develop a conceptual framework for body image in AYAs with cancer. METHODS: Concept elicitation interviews were conducted with 36 AYA patients [10 adolescents (15-17 years), 12 emerging adults (18-25 years), 14 young adults (26-39 years)] and health care providers (n = 36). The constant comparative method was used to analyze for themes and properties, with themes considered saturated if they were present and salient across participant sets. RESULTS: Twenty themes emerged from participant data. Three themes illustrate a shared understanding of patients' experience of body image: (1) physical changes produce shifts in identity and experience of self; (2) precancer body image shapes how the AYA experiences cancer-related physical changes, and (3) changes to the body are upsetting. Nine themes were unique to patients while eight themes were unique to providers. Patient body image experiences were found to evolve over time, largely affected by concerns about how others view them. Providers appeared attuned to AYA patient body image but recognized that it is not systematically addressed with patients. CONCLUSION: More striking than differences between patient groups is the consistency of themes that emerged. The conceptual framework of body image developed from these data offers an important step toward addressing body image concerns for AYA patients.
Asunto(s)
Imagen Corporal , Neoplasias , Adolescente , Emociones , Personal de Salud , Humanos , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is a multidimensional concept comprising multiple domains such as physical, emotional, and social well-being. Many analyses use a sum score to represent the construct. However, this approach implies that gain in one domain can compensate for a deficit in another, and thus such analyses may not capture HRQoL profiles. Additionally, within-individual change over time, such as improvement in one domain but deterioration in another, may not be detected. The objectives of this research are to demonstrate the utility of a non-compensatory approach by (1) evaluating this approach applied to HRQoL data, and (2) comparing the approach to a compensatory method. METHODS: Data from a sample of 653 breast cancer survivors (BCS) provided five measurement time points over 18 months. We analyzed the scores from five domains on the FACT-B questionnaire (physical, functional, social, and emotional well-being and breast cancer-related concerns) using the multivariate hidden Markov model (MHMM), a non-compensatory approach that identifies different HRQoL states and associated BCS subgroups and their trajectories. RESULTS: The MHMM delineated six states. States 1 and 2 had low well-being scores across all domains, with state 2 slightly better than state 1. States 3 and 4 had similar overall HRQoL scores, but different profiles with compensation occurring across the domains of both physical and social well-being. States 5 and 6 had almost identical overall scores with compensation occurring between the domains of both social and emotional well-being. Over time, states 3-6 mostly "communicated" with each other (with moderate probabilities of transitioning between states). Compensation across domains could mask subtle changes occurring in BCS. We found that a trend analysis using both compensatory and non-compensatory approaches showed improvement in the HRQoL in BCS over time. CONCLUSION: The non-compensatory analysis of FACT-B shows differential profiles and trajectories in the HRQoL of BCS not captured by the sum score or one-domain-at-a-time approach.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/psicología , Supervivientes de Cáncer/psicología , Calidad de Vida/psicología , Neoplasias de la Mama/mortalidad , Femenino , Humanos , Cadenas de Markov , Salud Mental , Persona de Mediana Edad , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
In any given survey, individuals are likely to differ in attitudes toward the subject matter. They also may differ in terms of the duration and persistence of attitudes, with some persons' beliefs being much more stable than others. For the purpose of jointly assessing attitude and temporal attitudinal stability, we propose a latent bivariate item response model. Attitudinal stability is operationalized as a construct called response consistency, which is indicated by the concordance of observed responses between two-time points. A simulation experiment assesses the parameter recovery of the proposed model. A real data analysis example uses data collected from a study on folklore beliefs about diabetes (563 individuals from multiple rural communities in North Carolina). On two different occasions, the individuals in the sample completed a 31-item common-sense model of diabetes inventory, which measures the congruence of their beliefs with a biomedical model. Results from the simulation study showed that the model parameters and factor correlation in the latent bivariate IRT model overall recovered well. Results from the real data analysis demonstrated the saliency of the construct. A weak association between having beliefs congruent with the biomedical model and response consistency across the two administrations was found.
Asunto(s)
Actitud , Simulación por Computador , Humanos , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
CONTEXT: While 55 million Americans incorporate running into their exercise routines, up to 65% of runners sustain an overuse injury annually. It has been consistently shown that regular physical activity positively impacts quality of life (QOL), an essential public health indicator; however, the impact of running-related injuries on QOL is unknown. This study seeks to determine whether overuse injury severity impacts QOL in recreational runners, and if self-efficacy mediates this relationship. DESIGN: Community-based prospective cohort study of 300 runners who had been running injury free for at least 5 miles/wk in the past 6 months. METHODS: Self-efficacy for running and QOL measures (Short Form-12 Physical Component and Mental Component, Satisfaction with Life, Positive Affect and Negative Affect) were assessed at baseline, time of injury, and follow-up visits. Over 2 years of observation, overuse injuries were diagnosed by an orthopedic surgeon and injured runners were referred to a physical therapist. RESULTS: Injury severity was significantly (P < .01) related with 2 indices of QOL, such that the effect of injury severity was -2.28 units on the Short Form-12 physical component and -0.73 units on positive affect. Self-efficacy accounted for 19% and 48% of the indirect effects on Short Form-12 physical component and positive affect, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Since self-efficacy is a modifiable factor related to decreased QOL, these findings have important clinical implications for rehabilitation interventions.