Prenatal vs postnatal diagnosis of 22q11.2 deletion syndrome: cardiac and noncardiac outcomes through 1 year of age.

BACKGROUND: The 22q11.2 deletion syndrome is the most common microdeletion syndrome and is frequently associated with congenital heart disease. Prenatal diagnosis of 22q11.2 deletion syndrome is increasingly offered. It is unknown whether there is a clinical benefit to prenatal detection as compared with postnatal diagnosis. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine differences in perinatal and infant outcomes between patients with prenatal and postnatal diagnosis of 22q11.2 deletion syndrome. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study across multiple international centers (30 sites, 4 continents) from 2006 to 2019. Participants were fetuses, neonates, or infants with a genetic diagnosis of 22q11.2 deletion syndrome by 1 year of age with or without congenital heart disease; those with prenatal diagnosis or suspicion (suggestive ultrasound findings and/or high-risk cell-free fetal DNA screen for 22q11.2 deletion syndrome with postnatal confirmation) were compared with those with postnatal diagnosis. Perinatal management, cardiac and noncardiac morbidity, and mortality by 1 year were assessed. Outcomes were adjusted for presence of critical congenital heart disease, gestational age at birth, and site. RESULTS: A total of 625 fetuses, neonates, or infants with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome (53.4% male) were included: 259 fetuses were prenatally diagnosed (156 [60.2%] were live-born) and 122 neonates were prenatally suspected with postnatal confirmation, whereas 244 infants were postnatally diagnosed. In the live-born cohort (n=522), 1-year mortality was 5.9%, which did not differ between groups but differed by the presence of critical congenital heart disease (hazard ratio, 4.18; 95% confidence interval, 1.56-11.18; P<.001) and gestational age at birth (hazard ratio, 0.78 per week; 95% confidence interval, 0.69-0.89; P<.001). Adjusting for critical congenital heart disease and gestational age at birth, the prenatal cohort was less likely to deliver at a local community hospital (5.1% vs 38.2%; odds ratio, 0.11; 95% confidence interval, 0.06-0.23; P<.001), experience neonatal cardiac decompensation (1.3% vs 5.0%; odds ratio, 0.11; 95% confidence interval, 0.03-0.49; P=.004), or have failure to thrive by 1 year (43.4% vs 50.3%; odds ratio, 0.58; 95% confidence interval, 0.36-0.91; P=.019). CONCLUSION: Prenatal detection of 22q11.2 deletion syndrome was associated with improved delivery management and less cardiac and noncardiac morbidity, but not mortality, compared with postnatal detection.

Epidermal nevi and epidermolytic hyperkeratosis: A review of cases, highlighting indications for biopsy and genetics referral.

Epidermal nevi are common benign cutaneous hamartomas that may rarely demonstrate histopathologic evidence of epidermolytic hyperkeratosis (EHK), representing cutaneous mosaicism for pathogenic keratin variants. Rarely, individuals with linear epidermal nevi transmit to their children the inherited form of EHK, also known as epidermolytic ichthyosis, characterized by generalized erythema, blistering, and scaling at birth evolving to widespread hyperkeratosis. We present an updated review of reported cases of linear epidermal nevi with EHK exhibiting transmission of epidermolytic ichthyosis to guide important considerations in the care of individuals with epidermal nevi. Clinical characteristics of linear epidermal nevi do not reliably predict the presence of EHK. All reported cases of transmission to offspring have occurred in individuals with linear epidermal nevi involving more than one anatomic area suggesting increased reproductive risk with involvement of two or more anatomic sites. Therefore, genetics consultation is recommended for these individuals with biopsy-confirmed EHK. For individuals with smaller areas of epidermal nevus involvement, the implications are less well known, though genetics consultation may still be considered for those interested in further discussion of general reproductive risk.