Effect of upfront intensive therapy on oncological outcomes in older patients with high tumor burden metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer: A multicenter retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: The effect of upfront intensive therapy on the prognosis of older patients with metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC) remains unclear. Thus, we assessed the impact of older age (≥75 years) on oncological outcomes in mCSPC patients with a high tumor burden. METHODS: This multicenter retrospective study included 252 patients aged ≥75 years treated with either upfront or conventional therapy between 2014 and 2021. We compared castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC)-free survival (FS) and overall survival (OS) between patients with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) plus upfront intensive therapy (docetaxel [DTX] or abiraterone acetate [ABI] plus prednisolone) and conventional therapy (ADT monotherapy or ADT combined with bicalutamide). We evaluated the effect of upfront intensive therapy on prognosis by multivariable Cox regression analysis. RESULTS: The 231 patients enrolled in our study were classified in the conventional group (n = 148) or the upfront group (n = 104; DTX = 27 and ABI = 77). The upfront group had significantly prolonged CRPC-FS and OS compared with the conventional group, and this was also the case in the background-adjusted multivariable Cox regression analysis. CONCLUSION: Patients aged ≥75 years who received upfront intensive therapy had significantly longer CRPC-FS and OS compared with similar age patients treated with conventional therapy in real-world practice. The oncological benefit may not diminish in this older population.

Trends of incidence and age in adults with testicular germ cell tumors: a two-decade multicenter retrospective study.

Background: Testicular germ cell tumors (GCTs) are the most common type of cancer in adolescent boys and young adult men, but the age at onset has been increasing. However, little is known regarding the incidence and age of patients with testicular GCTs in Japan because the incidence there is low. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients with GCTs in seven hospitals between 2001 and 2021. We compared the incidences of testicular GCTs, ages at onset, pathological types (seminoma or nonseminoma), and clinical stages in patients with GCTs between the periods 2001-2010 and 2011-2021. Results: We identified 193 adults (≥20 years of age) with testicular GCTs; their median age was 37 years [interquartile range (IQR), 29-47 years]. Of these patients, 87 (45.1%) were ≥40 years of age at diagnosis. The proportion of patients aged ≥40 years was significantly higher in the period 2011-2021 (54.8%) than in 2001-2010 (30.8%; P=0.001). The incidence of seminoma was significantly higher in the period 2011-2021, but clinical stage did not differ significantly between the two periods. The population-adjusted incidence among patients in their 40s was 3.4-fold higher in 2011-2021 than in 2001-2010. Conclusions: The number of patients with GCTs aged ≥40 years was significantly higher in 2011-2021, even in a population-adjusted analysis. Treatment strategies need to be adapted to older testicular germ cell tumor patients.