Safety of skipping the tract dilation step for EUS-guided biliary drainage in patients with unresectable malignant biliary obstruction (with video).

BACKGROUND: Thin delivery system stents can be inserted directly without the need for a tract dilation step and are expected to reduce bile leakage during endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD). The present study retrospectively compared the safety and efficacy of EUS-BD using a thin metal stent (< 7.5 Fr) with those of EUS-BD using a conventional stent (≥ 7.5 Fr). METHODS: The present study enrolled 112 patients who underwent EUS-BD using metal stents for unresectable malignant biliary obstruction between April 2016 and July 2022. The primary endpoint was the rate of adverse events (AEs). The secondary endpoints were clinical success rate, procedure time, procedure success rate in the absence of the tract dilation step, recurrent biliary obstruction rate, time to biliary obstruction, and overall survival. Risk factors associated with early AEs were also evaluated. RESULTS: The rate of early AEs was significantly lower (12% vs. 35%, P = 0.013) and the procedure success without the tract dilation step was significantly higher (82% vs. 33%, P < 0.001) in the thin than in the conventional delivery system stent group. None of the other secondary endpoints differed significantly between the two groups. Multivariate analysis showed that employing the tract dilation step during EUS-BD was a significant independent risk factor for early AEs (skipping vs. employing; HR, 9.66; 95% CI, 1.13-83.0, P = 0.028). CONCLUSION: Employing the tract dilation step during EUS-BD was a significant risk factor for early AEs. Metal stents with a delivery diameter < 7.5 Fr can be inserted directly without the tract dilation step, resulting in lower early AE rates.

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy vs. antegrade metal stent placement keeping an access route in patients with malignant biliary obstruction.

BACKGROUND: Few studies have compared endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided hepaticogastrostomy (HGS) with EUS-guided antegrade metal stent placement (AGMS). The purpose of this study was to compare times to recurrent biliary obstruction (TRBO) in patients who underwent HGS using metal stents (MS) and those who underwent AGMS keeping access routes with plastic stents (AGMS-AR). METHODS: This study retrospectively evaluated consecutive patients who underwent HGS or AGMS between September 2016 and December 2022. TRBO, overall survival (OS), and adverse event (AE) rates were compared in the two groups. The risk factors for RBO were determined using a multivariable Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: This study included 32 patients in the HGS group and 30 in the AGMS-AR group. Technical success rate was significantly higher in the HGS than in the AGMS-AR group (100 vs. 80%; P = 0.009). The technical success rate without tract dilation was significantly higher in the AGMS-AR than in the HGS group (83 vs. 38%; P < 0.001). RBO rates were significantly higher in the HGS than in the AGMS-AR group (53 vs. 17%; P = 0.024), whereas AE rates did not differ significantly. TRBO differed significantly in the HGS and AGMS-AR groups (159 days vs. not reached, P = 0.011), whereas OS did not differ significantly. Multivariable analysis revealed that HGS was an independent risk factor for RBO (hazard ratio, 6.48, P = 0.014). CONCLUSION: TRBO was significantly longer in patients who underwent AGMS with PS than HGS. AGMS with PS may be effective after the failure of ERCP in patients with malignant biliary obstruction.

Impact of sarcopenia on recurrent biliary obstruction after EUS-guided biliary drainage in patients with malignant biliary obstruction.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Sarcopenia is an important prognostic factor for cancer patients. The aim of this study was to assess the ability of sarcopenia to predict recurrent biliary obstruction (RBO) in patients with unresectable cancer after EUS-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD). METHODS: The study enrolled 113 patients who underwent EUS-BD using the self-expandable metal stent (SEMS) for unresectable malignant biliary obstruction (MBO) between April 2016 and December 2021 at Wakayama Medical University Hospital. The skeletal muscle index at the third lumbar spine level (L3) was calculated from computed tomography images. We analyzed the cumulative incidence of RBO at 180 days after stent insertion. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify variables significantly associated with RBO. RESULTS: Seventy-six patients were assigned to the sarcopenia group, and 37 were assigned to the non-sarcopenia group. The 180-day cumulative incidence of RBO was 11% in the non-sarcopenia group and 29% in the sarcopenia group (p = 0.034). The time to RBO was significantly shorter for the sarcopenia group (p = 0.028; Gray's test). Multivariate analyses identified sarcopenia as an independent prognostic factor for RBO (present vs absent; HR 4.61; 95% CI 1.76-12.10, p = 0.001). The rates of biliary sludge/food impaction were significantly higher in the sarcopenia group for the causes of RBO (p = 0.048). There were no significant differences between the sarcopenia and the non-sarcopenia groups with respect to related EUS-BD adverse events. CONCLUSION: Sarcopenia is an independent indicator of RBO in patients with MBO who receive EUS-BD with SEMS.

Shear-wave versus strain elastography in endoscopic ultrasound for the diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis.

BACKGROUND: /Objectives: Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) elastography is a non-invasive diagnostic method for evaluating tissue elasticity. The aims of this study were to compare shear-wave elastography (SWE) and conventional strain elastography (SE) in determination of the diagnosis and degree of chronic pancreatitis (CP). METHODS: Forty-nine patients who underwent computed tomography (CT), EUS-SWE, EUS-SE, and pancreatic exocrine function testing between January 2019 and January 2022 were prospectively evaluated. CP was diagnosed according to Japan Pancreatic Society criteria (JPSC) 2019, Rosemont criteria (RC), CT findings, and pancreatic exocrine dysfunction. The cut-off values, sensitivity, and specificity for CP diagnosed according to the four criteria were calculated for EUS-SWE and EUS-SE. Relationships between values measured by either of the EUS elastography methods and the number of EUS features were also assessed. RESULTS: EUS-SWE values were positively correlated with the severity grades of RC and JPSC, but EUS-SE values were not. EUS-SWE was significantly better than EUS-SE for diagnosing CP defined according to CT findings (area under the receiver operating characteristics curve [AUROC]: 0.77 vs. 0.61, P < 0.001), RC (AUROC: 0.85 vs. 0.56, P < 0.001), JPSC 2019 (AUROC: 0.83 vs. 0.53, P < 0.001), and exocrine dysfunction (AUROC: 0.78 vs. 0.61, P < 0.001). EUS-SWE values were positively correlated with the number of EUS features, but EUS-SE values were not. CONCLUSIONS: EUS-SWE provides objective assessment for diagnosing and assessing the degree of CP defined according to the criteria of CT findings, RC, JPSC, or exocrine dysfunction, and it can be considered a non-invasive diagnostic tool for CP and exocrine dysfunction.

Utility of contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasonography for prediction of pathological response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with pancreatic cancer.

OBJECTIVES: Contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasonography (CH-EUS) plays an important role in the diagnosis of pancreatic lesions. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether CH-EUS is useful for predicting the treatment efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) determined by pathological response. METHODS: Patients who underwent CH-EUS before chemotherapy and surgical resection were divided into two groups according to poor (group-P) or rich tumor vascularity (group-R) determined by enhancement pattern on early- and late-phase CH-EUS. The pathological response to chemotherapy was categorized according to Evans' classification. Pathological analysis showing tumor cell destruction (>50 %) defined a good response. RESULTS: Early-phase CH-EUS classified 44 patients into group-R and 50 into group-P, whereas late-phase CH-EUS classified 10 into group-R and 84 into group-P. Early-phase CH-EUS classification resulted in significantly higher numbers of patients with a good response in the rich group (n = 19) than in the poor group (n = 4; P = 0.0015). Multivariate analysis showed that assignment to the rich group was the strongest independent factor associated with chemosensitivity (P = 0.006, hazard ratio = 5.66, 95 % confidence interval: 1.17-19.27). In resectable patients, the enhancement pattern was the only independent factor associated with chemosensitivity (group-P vs. group-R, P = 0.003; HR [95 % CI], 14.59 [1.38-154.38]). Late-phase CH-EUS did not reveal a significant difference between group-P and group-R. CONCLUSIONS: Evaluation of vascular pattern on CH-EUS could be useful for predicting the efficacy of NAC in patients with pancreatic cancer. The enhancement pattern on CH-EUS could be a one of the useful features for determining NAC indications in resectable pancreatic cancer patients.

Development of devices for interventional endoscopic ultrasound for the management of pancreatobiliary diseases.

A variety of devices have been developed for interventional endoscopic ultrasound (EUS). EUS-guided drainage of the bile duct and pancreatic duct, as well as fluid collection adjacent to the gastrointestinal tract, is performed by a procedure involving puncture, guidewire manipulation, tract dilation, and stent placement. Devices specialized for interventional EUS are being developed for each step of the procedure. Mechanical dilators such as bougie, balloon, and electrocautery dilators are used for tract dilation. Various types of plastic stents, self-expandable metal stents, and lumen-apposing metal stents specifically designed for interventional EUS are now available, including one-step devices developed to improve the efficacy and safety of interventional EUS. In addition, radiofrequency ablation and the placement of fiducial markers and radioactive seeds under EUS guidance are now becoming established for pancreatic neoplasms. Such development of specialized devices has expanded the indications for interventional EUS, increased the success rate, and lowered the adverse event rate.

Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Fine-needle Biopsy With or Without Rapid On-site Evaluation for Diagnosis of Solid Pancreatic Lesions: A Randomized Controlled Non-Inferiority Trial.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The benefit of rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) on the diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) has never been evaluated in a randomized study. This trial aimed to test the hypothesis that in solid pancreatic lesions (SPLs), diagnostic accuracy of EUS-FNB without ROSE was not inferior to that of EUS-FNB with ROSE. METHODS: A noninferiority study (noninferiority margin, 5%) was conducted at 14 centers in 8 countries. Patients with SPLs requiring tissue sampling were randomly assigned (1:1) to undergo EUS-FNB with or without ROSE using new-generation FNB needles. The touch-imprint cytology technique was used to perform ROSE. The primary endpoint was diagnostic accuracy, and secondary endpoints were safety, tissue core procurement, specimen quality, and sampling procedural time. RESULTS: Eight hundred patients were randomized over an 18-month period, and 771 were analyzed (385 with ROSE and 386 without). Comparable diagnostic accuracies were obtained in both arms (96.4% with ROSE and 97.4% without ROSE, P = .396). Noninferiority of EUS-FNB without ROSE was confirmed with an absolute risk difference of 1.0% (1-sided 90% confidence interval, -1.1% to 3.1%; noninferiority P < .001). Safety and sample quality of histologic specimens were similar in both groups. A significantly higher tissue core rate was obtained by EUS-FNB without ROSE (70.7% vs. 78.0%, P = .021), with a significantly shorter mean sampling procedural time (17.9 ± 8.8 vs 11.7 ± 6.0 minutes, P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: EUS-FNB demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy in evaluating SPLs independently on execution of ROSE. When new-generation FNB needles are used, ROSE should not be routinely recommended. (ClinicalTrial.gov number NCT03322592.).

Impact of sarcopenia on prediction of progression-free survival and overall survival of patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma receiving first-line gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Sarcopenia is an important prognostic factor for cancer patients. Here, we assessed the effects of sarcopenia on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) who underwent treatment with first-line gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel (GEM and nab-PTX). METHODS: The study enrolled patients with unresectable PDAC who underwent chemotherapy between April 2016 and May 2020. The skeletal muscle index (SMI) at the third lumbar spine level (L3) was calculated from computed tomography (CT) images. Propensity score analysis was used to compare PFS and OS in the sarcopenia and non-sarcopenia groups. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine variables significantly associated with prognosis. RESULTS: Of the 176 patients who received first-line GEM and nab-PTX, 84 were selected and divided into two groups of 42 (the sarcopenia and the non-sarcopenia groups) by propensity score matching. The median PFS of the sarcopenia and the non-sarcopenia groups was 5.0 and 8.0 months, respectively (p = 0.004). The median OS was 10.3 and 18.1 months, respectively (p = 0.001). Multivariate analyses revealed that sarcopenia was an independent prognostic factor for PFS and OS (p = 0.004, p = 0.001, respectively). The rates of major grade 3 or 4 AEs were significantly higher in the sarcopenia group (p = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: Sarcopenia is an independent indicator of a poor prognosis in patients with PDAC treated with first-line GEM and nab-PTX.

Contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasonography for predicting the efficacy of first-line gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel chemotherapy in pancreatic cancer.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The purpose of this study was to assess prognosis with different intratumoral vascularity on contrast-enhanced endoscopic harmonic ultrasonography (CH-EUS) in pancreatic cancer patients receiving chemotherapy. METHODS: Patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer who underwent CH-EUS before first-line gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel (GEM and nab-PTX) therapy were classified into four groups according to vascularity on the early and late phases of contrast enhancement: "Group A″, poor on both phases; "Group B″, rich and poor on the early and late phases, respectively; "Group C″, poor and rich on the early and late phases; "Group D″, rich on both phases. Subgroups were compared in terms of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). We also assessed whether the results with CH-EUS correlate with those of contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CE-CT). RESULTS: On CH-EUS, 57, 64, 0, and 24 patients were classified into Groups A, B, C, and D, respectively. The median PFS of patients in groups A, B, and D was 3.9, 7.6, and 10.8 months, respectively, and the median OS were 9.5, 13.1, and 18.6 months, respectively. Both PFS and OS were longest in Group D (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively). The results of CE-CT were consistent with those of CH-EUS, and there was a correlation between CE-CT and CH-EUS. CONCLUSIONS: Evaluation of intratumoral vascularity by CH-EUS may be useful for predicting the efficacy of chemotherapy in patients with pancreatic cancer. A better response to GEM and nab-PTX can be expected in patients showing rich vascularity at both the early and late phases.

Comparison of 22-gauge standard and Franseen needles in EUS-guided tissue acquisition for diagnosing solid pancreatic lesions: a multicenter randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: This large multicenter randomized controlled trial compared the diagnostic yields of 22-gauge standard and 22-gauge Franseen needles for EUS-guided tissue acquisition (EUS-TA) of solid pancreatic lesions. METHODS: Consecutive patients with solid pancreatic lesions were prospectively randomized to EUS-TA using standard or Franseen needles. Samples obtained with the first needle pass and with second and subsequent passes were evaluated separately. The primary endpoint was the rate of accuracy for diagnosis of malignancy. Other endpoints were technical success rate, sample cellularity, adverse events, diagnostic accuracy in patient subgroups, and the diagnostic accuracy and numbers of second and subsequent needle passes. RESULTS: Of 523 patients undergoing EUS-TA, 260 were randomized to using standard 22-gauge needles and 263 to 22-gauge Franseen needles. The technical success rate in each group was 99.6%, with similar adverse event rates in the standard (1.5%) and Franseen (.8%) needle groups. First-pass EUS-TA using the Franseen needle resulted in significantly greater diagnostic accuracy (84.0% vs 71.2%, P < .001) and sensitivity (82.4% vs 66.7%, P < .001) than first-pass EUS-TA using a standard needle and also resulted in superior diagnostic accuracy in patients requiring immunostaining. Second and subsequent EUS-TA using Franseen needles showed significantly greater accuracy (94.7% vs 90.0%, P = .049) and sensitivity (94.0% vs 88.6%, P = .047) and required fewer needle passes (1.81 vs 2.03, P = .008) than using standard needles. CONCLUSIONS: EUS-TA with the Franseen needle is superior to EUS-TA with a standard needle with respect to diagnostic accuracy per pass, particularly in patients who require immunostaining, and number of passes when using macroscopic on-site evaluation. (Clinical trial registration numbers: UMIN000030634 and jRCTs052180062.).

Covered versus uncovered metal stent for endoscopic drainage of a malignant distal biliary obstruction: Meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: The role of a covered vs. an uncovered self-expandable metal stent (SEMS) for malignant distal biliary obstruction (MDBO) is not clear. This meta-analysis compared the efficacy of covered vs. uncovered SEMS for patients with MDBO after endoscopic insertion. METHODS: A systematic meta-analysis of all relevant articles listed in PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar databases was performed. Fixed effects or random effects models were used to investigate pooled effects with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: The meta-analysis included 2358 patients from 12 eligible studies. Time to recurrent biliary obstruction (RBO) was significantly longer for covered SEMS (mean difference, 45.51 days; 95% CI 11.79-79.24). Although there was no significant difference in the RBO rate, subgroup analysis in pancreatic cancer occupying more than 90% (PC) revealed that the RBO rates were significantly lower for covered SEMS (odds ratio [OR] 0.43, 95% CI 0.25-0.74). Stent migration, sludge formation, and overgrowth were significantly more common with a covered SEMS (OR 7.92, 95% CI 4.01-15.64; OR 3.25, 95% CI 1.89-5.59; OR 2.03, 95% CI 1.20-3.43, respectively). The rate of ingrowth was significantly lower for covered SEMS. There was no significant difference in total procedure-related adverse events between the two types of SEMS. CONCLUSIONS: A covered SEMS is superior to an uncovered SEMS with respect to prevention of RBO in patients with MDBO, particularly those caused by PC.

Usefulness of a newly designed laser-cut metal stent with an anchoring hook and thin delivery system for EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy in experimental settings (with video).

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy (EUS-HGS) is associated with high rates of adverse events. The present study evaluated the feasibility of a newly designed stent equipped with a dilatation and antimigration system for EUS-HGS in phantom and animal models. METHODS: The newly designed stent was a partially covered laser-cut stent with antimigration anchoring hooks and a thin tapered tip (7.2F). The feasibility of these stents for biliary obstruction was compared with that of conventional stents. Evaluated outcomes were resistance force to migration in phantom and ex vivo models, rates of technical success and adverse events, and histology in an in vivo model. RESULTS: The resistance forces on the distal (3.59 vs 1.73 N and 6.21 vs 1.74 N) and proximal (3.58 vs 1.5 N and 5.97 vs 1.67 N) sides in phantom and ex vivo models were significantly higher for hook stents than for conventional stents. Although EUS-HGS was successfully performed in all cases with both stents (100% [10/10] vs 100% [8/8]), the success rate of EUS-HGS without using a fistulous tract dilation device was significantly higher with hook stents (100% [10/10]) than with conventional stents (13% [1/8]). No adverse events occurred with either stent. Pathologic examination showed adhesion between the stomach and liver. CONCLUSIONS: The strong resistance to migration and the absence of the dilation step are important advantages of newly designed hook stents. These stents may therefore be feasible and safe for EUS-HGS.

Endoscopic ultrasonography shear wave as a predictive factor of endocrine/exocrine dysfunction in chronic pancreatitis.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Chronic pancreatitis (CP) leads to permanent impairment of exocrine and endocrine functions. The endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS)-based Rosemont classification plays an important role in diagnosing CP. However, it is based on subjective judgment. In contrast, EUS shear wave measurement (EUS-SWM) has been established to be a precise method for evaluating tissue hardness. This study aimed to evaluate the utility of EUS-SWM in diagnosing CP and determining exocrine and endocrine dysfunctions. METHODS: We evaluated 40 patients who underwent EUS-SWM between January 2019 and January 2020. They were classified into the normal pancreas and early, probable, and definite CP groups following the Japan Pancreatic Society criteria. EUS-SWM value was compared between the normal pancreas group and the early, probable, and definite CP groups. The relationship between EUS-SWM value and exocrine/endocrine dysfunctions was also assessed. The cut-off value of EUS-SWM for diagnosing CP and exocrine/endocrine dysfunctions was investigated. RESULTS: The EUS-SWM value was positively correlated with the Japan Pancreatic Society criteria stages. The probable and definite CP groups had significantly higher EUS-SWM values than the normal group. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the diagnostic accuracy of EUS-SWM for CP, exocrine dysfunction, and endocrine dysfunction were 0.92, 0.78, and 0.63, respectively. The cut-off values of 1.96, 1.96, and 2.34 for diagnosing CP, exocrine dysfunction, and endocrine dysfunctions had 83%, 90%, and 75% sensitivity, respectively, and 100%, 65%, and 64% specificity, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic ultrasonography shear wave measurement provides objective assessment and can thus be an alternative diagnostic tool for diagnosing CP and exocrine/endocrine dysfunctions.

Value of contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasound for diagnosing hepatic metastases of pancreatic cancer: A prospective study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: This study aimed to compare contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasound (CH-EUS) with fundamental B-mode endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) and contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CE-CT) for the diagnosis of left hepatic lobe metastases of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. METHODS: In this single-center prospective study, CE-CT, EUS, and CH-EUS were performed to detect left hepatic lobe metastases in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma, and the detection rates were compared between EUS plus CH-EUS and the other two modalities. Subgroup comparisons of between-modality detection rate were performed in patients with only metastases of <10 mm. The number of pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients whose clinical stage and treatment strategy were changed because of EUS plus CH-EUS findings was also assessed. RESULTS: Thirty-one patients were diagnosed with left hepatic lobe metastases. For overall detection of left hepatic lobe metastases, EUS plus CH-EUS had significantly higher accuracy (94.3%) than CE-CT (86.7%) and EUS alone (87.6%) (P = 0.021 and P = 0.020, respectively). For detection of left hepatic lobe metastases < 10 mm, EUS plus CH-EUS (93.3%) was significantly superior to CE-CT (84.4%) and EUS alone (85.6%) (P = 0.021 and P = 0.020, respectively). In five of the 11 patients in whom only CH-EUS allowed detection of hepatic metastases, the stage and/or treatment strategy of the pancreatic adenocarcinoma was changed after CH-EUS. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that EUS plus CH-EUS has advantages over CE-CT and EUS alone with regard to the accuracy of detecting left hepatic lobe metastases, particularly small hepatic metastases and accurate staging.

Computed tomography findings for predicting the future occurrence of pancreatic cancer: value of pancreatic volumetry.

BACKGROUND: The features of pancreatic parenchyma that tend to progress towards pancreatic cancer (PC) are unknown. We performed volumetry of the pancreas in PC patients using computed tomography (CT) scans acquired before detection of PC, and investigated whether CT findings of pancreatic parenchyma could predict the future occurrence of PC. METHODS: Between April 2009 and March 2017, a total of 3769 patients underwent abdominal contrast-enhanced CT, the scans of which were archived as digital images. Among them, 15 PC patients underwent abdominal CT 6-120 months before diagnosis of PC. This retrospective study compared the 15 PC patients (PC group) with 15 propensity score-matched subjects without PC (non-PC group). Pancreatic volumetry and radiological findings were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: There were significant differences between the PC and non-PC groups in the volume of the main pancreatic duct (MPD) plus any cystic lesion (P = 0.007), volume of the MPD plus any cystic lesion/body surface area (BSA; P = 0.009), MPD diameter (P = 0.011), and MPD diameter/BSA (P = 0.013). Univariate analysis revealed volume of MPD plus any cystic lesion/BSA ≥ 0.53 mL/m2 (odds ratio [OR] 38.50, P = 0.002), volume of pancreatic parenchyma/BSA < 27.0 mL/m2 (OR 12.25, P = 0.030), and MPD diameter/BSA ≥ 1.0 mm/m2 (OR 13.00, P = 0.006) as significant risk factors for PC. CONCLUSIONS: Quantification of the volume of MPD plus any cystic lesion/BSA, volume of pancreatic parenchyma/BSA, and MPD diameter/BSA on pre-diagnosis CT were useful for predicting the future occurrence of PC.

Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided hepaticogastrostomy using a novel laser-cut type partially covered self-expandable metal stent (with video).

Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS)-guided hepaticogastrostomy (HGS) is of clinical benefit in patients with failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). However, some endoscopists are concerned about the potential risk of adverse events. Bile peritonitis due to bile leakage through the fistula is one of the possible adverse events following EUS-HGS. Recently, a novel laser-cut type partially covered self-expandable metal stent (PCSEMS), which is a dedicated stent for EUS-HGS, has become available. This stent has an uncovered part, despite it being a laser-cut type stent, along with a flared end. In addition, it uses a 7-Fr stent delivery. Therefore, tract dilation might not be needed to deploy the stent, which might reduce the incidence of stent migration. In this study, the safety of EUS-HGS using this novel laser-cut type PCSEMS was evaluated by assessing technical success, which was defined as successful stent deployment, and clinical success, which was defined as reduction in serum total bilirubin levels by 50% and resolution of symptoms related to biliary tract obstruction within 2 weeks. Five patients with unresectable malignant biliary obstruction underwent EUS-HGS using the novel stent. Stent deployment was successfully performed without tract dilation in four patients, although tract dilation using a balloon catheter was needed in one patient. Clinical success was obtained in all patients, and adverse events including abdominal pain and bile peritonitis were not observed in any of the patients. EUS-HGS without tract dilation can be safely performed using a novel laser-cut type PCSEMS. A prospective comparative study evaluating this stent versus conventional stents is needed to corroborate our results.

Novel endoscopic ultrasonography imaging technique for visualizing microcirculation without contrast enhancement in subepithelial lesions: Prospective study.

OBJECTIVES: Detective flow imaging for endoscopic ultrasonography (DFI?EUS) is a new imaging modality developed for detecting fine vessels without using ultrasound contrast agents. This study aimed to evaluate its utility by comparing it with a type of directional power Doppler (eFLOW) for subepithelial lesions (SELs). METHODS: Between January 2019 and January 2020, 28 patients with SELs undergoing DFI?EUS and eFLOW?EUS were enrolled. DFI?EUS and eFLOW?EUS assessing the vascularity in SELs were compared in terms of the rates of identification of intratumoral vessels. We also investigated how large vessels were depicted in both modalities based on surgical specimens as well as the detection rates of intratumoral vessels in gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) and non?GISTs using either DFI?EUS or eFLOW?EUS. RESULTS: Among 28 patients, 23 with pathological confirmation by EUS?guided fine?needle aspiration biopsy (EUS?FNAB) specimens were included. Of those 23 patients, the 10 who underwent surgical resection were selected for analysis. The rate of detection of intratumoral vessels in SELs was significantly higher on DFI?EUS (80%) than on eFLOW?EUS (30%) (P\xA0=\xA00.03). Comparison with surgical specimens revealed that detection rate for vessels with maximum size of less 1000\xA0µm was higher in DFI?EUS (66%) than that in eFLOW?EUS (0%). GIST patients had significantly higher positive rates (90%) of intratumoral vessels than non?GIST patients (31%) on DFI in 23 cases including EUS?FNAB specimens (P\xA0=\xA00.045). CONCLUSIONS: Detective flow imaging?EUS is more sensitive for depicting intratumoral vessels than eFLOW?EUS. Evaluation of intratumoral vessels on DFI?EUS is useful for identifying GISTs without contrast agents.

Covered self-expandable metal stents versus plastic stents for preoperative biliary drainage in patient receiving neo-adjuvant chemotherapy for borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: Prospective randomized study.

OBJECTIVES: This single-center comparative randomized superiority study compared biliary stenting using fully covered self-expandable metal stents (FCSEMS) and biliary stenting using plastic stents (PS) in preoperative biliary drainage of patients with borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC) who are planned to undergo a single regimen of neo-adjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). METHODS: Twenty-two patients with BRPC who required preoperative biliary drainage before NAC (Gemcitabine plus Nab-paclitaxel) were randomly assigned 1:1 to the FCSEMS or PS group. The primary endpoint was the rate of stent dysfunction until surgery or tumor progression. Secondary endpoints were stent patency, number of re-interventions, adverse events of endoscopic retrograde biliary drainage (EBD), operation time, volume of intraoperative bleeding, postoperative hospitalization, postoperative adverse events and medical costs. RESULTS: Eleven patients in each of the groups reached the primary endpoint. The FCSEMS group showed a significantly lower rate of stent dysfunction (18.2% vs. 72.8%, P = 0.015), longer stent patency (P = 0.02), and lower number of re-interventions for stent dysfunction (0.27 ± 0.65 vs. 1.27 ± 1.1, P = 0.001) than the PS group. The adverse events of EBD, operation time, volume of intraoperative bleeding, postoperative hospitalization, postoperative adverse events and medical costs did not significantly differ between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with BRPC for preoperative biliary drainage, stent dysfunction occurred less frequently with FCSEMSs than with PSs. In addition, FCSEMS and PS provided similar preoperative management of BRPC in terms of the safety of surgery and medical costs. (UMIN ID000030473).

Comparison of a 22-gauge Franseen-tip needle with a 20-gauge forward-bevel needle for the diagnosis of type 1 autoimmune pancreatitis: a prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter study (COMPAS study).

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Histologic diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) using EUS-guided FNA (EUS-FNA) is difficult. To address this issue, new fine-needle biopsy (FNB) needles were recently developed. Here, we prospectively evaluated 2 newly designed EUS-FNB needles for histologic evaluation in patients with type 1 AIP. METHODS: This was a prospective, randomized, multicenter trial comparing biopsy specimens obtained with a 22-gauge Franseen needle or a 20-gauge forward-bevel needle in patients with suspected type 1 AIP. AIP was diagnosed according to international consensus diagnostic criteria. The primary endpoint was the sensitivity of EUS-FNB needles, and secondary endpoints were the amount of specimen obtained, histology of the pancreas based on evaluation of lymphoplasmacytic sclerosing pancreatitis (LPSP), and contribution of histologic findings to the diagnosis of AIP. RESULTS: One hundred ten patients were randomly assigned to the Franseen group (22-gauge Franseen needle) or the forward-bevel group (20-gauge forward-bevel needle). EUS-FNB sampling was successful in all patients. Nine patients were excluded because of diagnoses other than AIP. Compared with the forward-bevel needle, the Franseen needle obtained a significantly greater number of high-power fields. Of 101 patients, 39 patients (78%) in the Franseen group and 23 patients (45%) in the Forward-bevel group were diagnosed with level 1 or 2 LPSP (P = .001). Thirty-six patients could not be diagnosed with type 1 AIP without EUS-FNB specimen results. CONCLUSIONS: The 22-gauge Franseen needle should be routinely used for histologic diagnosis of type 1 AIP. (Clinical trial registration number: UMIN 000027668.).

The usefulness of EUS-FNA with contrast-enhanced harmonic imaging of solid pancreatic lesions: A prospective study.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Few studies have investigated endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration with contrast-enhanced harmonic imaging (EUS-FNA-CHI) for diagnosing and adequately sampling pancreatic lesions. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of EUS-FNA-CHI compared with that of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration with fundamental B mode imaging (EUS-FNA-FBI) for diagnosing solid pancreatic lesions. METHODS: Consecutive patients with solid pancreatic lesions were enrolled prospectively (UMIN 000024467). Only samples obtained during the first needle pass (EUS-FNA-FBI) and second needle pass (EUS-FNA-CHI) were used to compare the accuracy rate for diagnosing pancreatic lesions and rate of adequate sampling for histological evaluation. In patients with hypo-enhancing lesions on contrast-enhanced harmonic EUS (CH-EUS), subgroup analyses were performed. Patients were classified into those with a heterogeneous area in the whole lesion (whole group), those with a heterogeneous area with a non-enhancing area (non-enhancing group), and those with a heterogeneous area with a homogeneous area (homogeneous group). RESULTS: Ninety-three patients were enrolled. Overall, the rates of adequate sampling and sensitivity were significantly higher with EUS-FNA-CHI than with EUS-FNA-FBI (84.9% vs 68.8%, P = 0.003 and 76.5% vs 58.8%, P = 0.011, respectively). The adequate sampling rate and sensitivity were significantly higher with EUS-FNA-CHI than with EUS-FNA-FBI when the mass was > 15 mm. In the non-enhancing and homogeneous groups, the adequate sampling rate and sensitivity were significantly higher with EUS-FNA-CHI than with EUS-FNA-FBI. CONCLUSIONS: CH-EUS enables improved observation of pancreatic lesions and helps identify the target of EUS-FNA among different pathological areas of the lesions particularly of > 15 mm.