A retrospective cohort study to assess PET-CT findings and clinical outcomes in Takayasu arteritis: does 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in arteries predict relapses?

The objective of this study is to investigate the use of PET-CT scan with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) as a method to predict outcomes in patients with Takayasu arteritis (TAK), as well as to analyze associations between 18F-FDG PET-CT findings with disease relapses, sustained remission, new angiographic lesions, ischemic events, and changes in therapy for TAK. At baseline assessment, 36 TAK patients underwent 18F-FDG PET-CT scan and maximal standardized uptake value (SUVmax) in arteries ≥ 1.3 was predictive for clinical disease activity. Thirty-two TAK patients were then followed-up for a median 83.5 months. Twenty-three (71.9%) patients developed clinical relapses and new arterial lesions were observed in 14 (43.8%) cases. Disease relapses [85.0% vs. 50.0%, p = 0.049; odds ratio (OR): 5.667; 95% confidence interval (95 CI): 1.067-30.085] and the need for changing immunosuppressive therapy (85.0% vs. 41.7%, p = 0.018; OR: 7.933; 95CI: 1.478-42.581) were more frequently found in patients with SUVmax ≥ 1.3 at baseline compared with those presenting SUVmax < 1.3. No associations were found between SUVmax ≥ or < 1.3 in large arteries at baseline and the development of ischemic events, sustained remission or new angiographic lesions. In multivariate analysis, associations between baseline SUVmax ≥ 1.3 and disease relapses were not independent (hazard ratio: 1.07; 95 CI 0.39-2.92; p = 0.892). In conclusion, arterial SUVmax is marginally associated with disease relapses and with the need to change therapy in TAK. 18F-FDG uptake in large arteries is not associated with the development of new arterial lesions in TAK.

Effectiveness and safety of adalimumab compared with leflunomide in patients with Takayasu arteritis: a retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of adalimumab (ADA) compared with leflunomide (LEF) in patients with Takayasu arteritis (TAK). METHOD: A retrospective cohort study was performed with the following inclusion criteria: the fulfilment of the 2022 American College Classification/European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology criteria for TAK, age ≥18 years, and written informed consent. Forty-four patients were treated with LEF (n=28) or ADA (n=16) therapy due to relapsing/refractory disease or toxicity from previous therapy. Patients were evaluated at baseline (T0), at a median of 7.0 months (T1) and at 15.0 months of follow-up (T2). Data regarding disease activity, daily dose of prednisone, side effects and angiographic progression were analysed. RESULTS: LEF and ADA groups had similar features on the baseline visit. However, intravenous methylprednisolone was more frequently prescribed for the ADA group (p=0.019). On T1 and T2 visits, complete response rates were similar for ADA and LEF groups (75.0% and 88.5%; p=0.397 and 62.5% vs 78.3%; p=0.307), respectively. The differences remained non-significant after adjusting for baseline variables by propensity score matching. Although the ADA group had a higher median daily prednisone on visit T1 (p=0.004), it was similar on visit T2 (p=0.595). Similar rates of angiographic progression were observed in ADA and LEF groups (40% vs 25%; p=0.467). Mild-to-moderate adverse events were observed only in the LEF group (17.9%). CONCLUSION: LEF and ADA had comparable outcomes after a median of 15.0 months of follow-up. However, withdrawal from therapy and mild-to-moderate adverse events were only observed in the LEF group.