The utility of physical examination in ovarian cancer recurrence detection: a retrospective analysis informing virtual surveillance care.

OBJECTIVES: Given the recent rapid increase in telemedicine in the setting of the COVID-19 pandemic, we sought to investigate the utility of symptom review, CA125, and physical examination in the detection of ovarian cancer recurrence to determine the role of virtual surveillance care in the COVID-19 era. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included patients diagnosed with ovarian cancer between 2013 and 2020 who achieved remission after primary treatment and then had recurrence while in a routine surveillance program. Modalities that detected recurrence including symptoms, CA125, physical examination, or 'other,' which was denoted if imaging was obtained for reasons other than suspected recurrence and recurrence was incidentally identified, were recorded. Descriptive statistics were performed to summarize the cohort. RESULTS: One hundred and nine patients met inclusion criteria. At time of recurrence, elevated CA125 was present in 97 (89.0%) patients, symptoms in 41 (37.6%), and abnormal physical exam findings in 27 (24.8%). Recurrence was incidentally found with imaging obtained for reasons other than suspicion of recurrence in six (5.5%) patients. Recurrence was suspected based on multiple modalities in 46 (42.2%) patients. Elevated CA125, symptoms, or both were present in 102 (93.6%) patients. Of patients with abnormal physical exam findings, 26 (96.3%) also had elevated CA125 or symptoms present. Recurrence was suspected based on physical exam findings alone in one (0.9%) patient. CONCLUSIONS: Over 90% of ovarian cancer recurrences were detected by rising CA125, symptoms, or both. Only one patient had recurrence detected by physical examination alone. Given that review of symptoms and CA125 can be conducted virtually, virtual visits may offer a reasonable alternative to in-person visits for ovarian cancer surveillance for patients who have pre-treatment elevated CA125.

When blood is not an option: Optimal bloodless management of severe anemia in pregnancy.

Standard treatment for severe anemia in pregnancy is allogeneic blood transfusion, but this is not acceptable to all patients. Options for alternative anemia treatment are available. In this case report, a 32-year-old G2P1 woman who was a Jehovah's Witness presented at 27 weeks gestation with dyspnea, palpitations, and severe anemia (hemoglobin 2.8 g/dL) related to chronic rectal bleeding. She declined blood transfusion. An anemia management protocol (high-dose erythropoietin-stimulating agent, iron, vitamin D, vitamin C, folate, vitamin B12) rapidly increased endogenous erythropoiesis. After 12 days, hemoglobin increased to 8 g/dL. A bovine hemoglobin-based oxygen carrier was available for acute bleeding but was not used. This case highlights that early initiation of multimodal therapy can adequately increase endogenous erythropoiesis to treat life-threatening anemia in antepartum patients who do not accept blood transfusion.

Comorbid Vulvar Lichen Sclerosus and High-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions: A Management Conundrum.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine if treating lichen sclerosus (LS) with high-potency topical corticosteroids (TCS) increases the risk of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) recurrence in patients with comorbid vulvar LS and HSIL. METHODS: This is a retrospective study of patients with comorbid vulvar LS and HSIL treated with TCS between 2015 and 2020. Patients with clinically diagnosed or biopsy-proven LS and biopsy-proven HSIL of the vulva were included. Clinical data included demographics, tobacco use, immune-modifying conditions, specimen pathology, treatment types, and HSIL recurrence. Bivariate analysis was performed to compare demographic and clinical characteristics between patients with and without HSIL recurrence. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients with comorbid LS and HSIL were identified. The median age was 66.0 years and median time in treatment for LS was 5.5 years. Thirteen (50%) had recurrence of HSIL and 13 (50%) did not have recurrence. Exposure to high-potency TCS was present in 20 (77%) patients, with 17 (65%) having use of more than 1-year duration and 9 (35%) having use at the time of HSIL diagnosis. When comparing the groups with and without HSIL recurrence, there was no significant difference in high-potency TCS exposure, duration of use, or use at time of HSIL diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: High-potency TCS use for the treatment of LS did not seem to increase the risk of HSIL recurrence in patients with comorbid vulvar LS and HSIL. This suggests that high-potency TCS can be appropriately used for the treatment of LS even when HPV-associated disease is present.

Validation of the surprise question in gynecologic oncology: A one-question screen to promote palliative care integration and advance care planning.

OBJECTIVE: The "surprise question" ("Would you be surprised if this patient died in the next year?") has been shown to be predictive of 12-month mortality in multiple populations, but has not been studied in gynecologic oncology (GO) patients. We sought to evaluate the prognostic performance of the surprise question in GO patients among physician and non-physician providers. METHODS: GO providers at two tertiary care centers were asked the surprise question about a cohort of their patients undergoing chemotherapy or radiation. Demographic and clinical information was chart abstracted. Mortality data were collected at one year; relative risk of death at one year based on response to the surprise question was then calculated. RESULTS: 32 providers (12 MDs, 7 APPs, 13 RNs) provided 942 surprise question assessments for 358 patients. Fifty-seven % had ovarian cancer and 54% had recurrent disease. Eighty-three (24%) patients died within a year. Patients whose physician answered "No" to the surprise question had a 43% one-year mortality (compared to 10% for "Yes"). Overall RR of 12-month mortality for "No" was 3.76 (95% CI 2.75-5.48); this association remained significant in all provider types. Among statistically significant predictors of 12-month mortality (including recurrent disease and >2 prior lines of chemotherapy), the surprise question had the highest RR. CONCLUSIONS: The surprise question is a simple, one question tool that effectively identifies GO patients increased risk of 12-month mortality. The surprise question could be used to identify patients for early referral to palliative care and initiation advance care planning.

Patient perspective on virtual prechemotherapy visits in gynecologic oncology.

Objective: To assess gynecologic oncology patients' experiences with virtual prechemotherapy evaluation and determine preference for incorporating virtual visits into a chemotherapy schedule. Methods: From June-August 2023, a survey was distributed to patients with gynecologic malignancies who had both an in-person and virtual prechemotherapy visit at a tertiary comprehensive cancer center. Patient satisfaction and preference for incorporating virtual visits was elicited. Patients who preferred ≥ 50 % of prechemotherapy visits to be virtual were classified as "virtual-leaning" and those who preferred < 50 % virtual as "in-person-leaning." Results: Of 110 eligible patients, 93 agreed to participate and 73 completed the survey, yielding an overall 66.4% response rate and 78.5% (73/93) survey completion rate. Overall satisfaction with in-person and virtual visits were rated positively at similar rates (in-person 87.7%, virtual 87.2%). Sixty-four (88.4%) patients preferred some proportion of their visits to be virtual, 5 (7.0%) preferred no virtual care, and 4 (5.0%) had no preference. In a 6-cycle schedule of chemotherapy, the median number of preferred virtual visits was 3 (IQR 1.8-4.2). Forty-six (63.0%) patients were "virtual-leaning" and 23 (32.0%) were "in-person-leaning." When comparing groups, there was no difference in age, race, category of residence, commute, experience with technical difficulty, primary disease site, disease stage, number of prior chemotherapy cycles, or number of prior virtual visits. Conclusions: Most patients are highly satisfied with virtual visits and prefer virtual care to be included when undergoing chemotherapy. A hybrid model should be offered to gynecological cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy, with patient preference dictating the cadence of virtual visits.