Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Emerg Infect Dis ; 30(8): 1672-1676, 2024 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39043445

RESUMEN

Influenza D virus was isolated from pigs on a mixed pig and beef farm in France. Investigation suggested bull-to-pig transmission and spread among pigs. The swine influenza D virus recovered was a reassortant of D/660 and D/OK lineages. Reported mutations in the receptor binding site might be related to swine host adaptation.


Asunto(s)
Granjas , Infecciones por Orthomyxoviridae , Filogenia , Virus Reordenados , Enfermedades de los Porcinos , Thogotovirus , Animales , Porcinos , Virus Reordenados/genética , Francia/epidemiología , Infecciones por Orthomyxoviridae/virología , Infecciones por Orthomyxoviridae/veterinaria , Enfermedades de los Porcinos/virología , Bovinos , Thogotovirus/genética , Thogotovirus/clasificación , Thogotovirus/aislamiento & purificación , Deltainfluenzavirus
2.
Vet Sci ; 9(7)2022 Jul 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35878355

RESUMEN

Swine influenza A virus (swIAV), which plays a major role in the porcine respiratory disease complex (PRDC), is eliminated from the respiratory tract within 7-9 days after infection. Therefore, diagnosis is complicated in endemically infected swine herds presenting no obvious clinical signs. This study aimed to investigate the right time point for sampling to detect swIAV. A cross-sectional study was performed in 131 farms from 12 European countries. The sampling protocol included suckling piglets, weaners, and nursery pigs. In each age group, 10 nasal swabs were collected and further examined in pools of 5 for swIAV by Matrix rRT-PCR, followed by a multiplex RT-PCR to determine the influenza subtype. SwIAV was detected in 284 (37.9%) of the samples and on 103 (78.6%) farms. Despite the highest number of animals with clinical signs being found in the nursery, the weaners were significantly more often virus-positive compared to nursery pigs (p = 0.048). Overall, the swIAV detection rate did not significantly differ between diseased or non-diseased suckling and nursery piglets, respectively; however, diseased weaners had significantly more positive pools than the non-diseased animals. Interestingly, in 9 farms, different subtypes were detected in different age groups. Our findings indicate that to detect all circulating swIAV subtypes on a farm, different age groups should be sampled. Additionally, the sampling strategy should also aim to include non-diseased animals, especially in the suckling period.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA