Calculation of delivered composite dose from Calypso tracking data for prostate cancer: And subsequent evaluation of reasonable treatment interruption tolerance limits.

PURPOSE: In this study we calculate composite dose delivered to the prostate by using the Calypso tracking -data- stream acquired during patient treatment in our clinic. We evaluate the composite distributions under multiple simulated Calypso tolerance level schemes and then recommend a tolerance level. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seven Calypso-localized prostate cancer patients treated in our clinic were selected for retrospective analysis. Two different IMRT treatment plans, with prostate PTV margins of 5 and 3 mm respectively, were computed for each patient. A delivered composite dose distribution was computed from Calypso tracking data for each plan. Additionally, we explored the dosimetric implications for "worst case" scenarios by assuming that the prostate position was located at one of the eight extreme corners of a 3 or 5 mm "box." To characterize plan quality under each of the studied scenarios, we recorded the maximum, mean, and minimum doses and volumetric coverage for prostate, PTV, bladder, and rectum. RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS: Calculated composite dose distributions were very similar to the original plan for all patients. The difference in maximum, mean, and minimum doses as well as volumetric coverage for the prostate, PTV, bladder, and rectum were all < 4.0% of prescription dose. Even for worst scenario cases, the results show acceptable isodose distribution, with the exception for the combination of a 3 mm PTV margin with a 5 mm position tolerance scheme. CONCLUSIONS: Calculated composite dose distributions show that the vast majority of dosimetric metrics agreed well with the planned dose (within 2%). With significant/detrimental deviations from the planned dose only occurring with the combination of a 3 mm PTV margin and 5 mm position tolerance, the 3 mm position tolerance strategy appears reasonable, confirming that further reducing prostate PTV margins to 3 mm is possible when using Calypso with a position tolerance of 3 mm.

Initial clinical evaluation of a novel combined biometric, radio-frequency identification, and surface imaging system.

PURPOSE: To evaluate and characterize the overall clinical functionality and workflow of the newly released Varian Identify system (version 2.3). METHODS: Three technologies included in the Varian Identify system were evaluated: patient biometric authentication, treatment accessory device identification, and surface-guided radiation therapy (SGRT) function. Biometric authentication employs a palm vein reader. Treatment accessory device verification utilizes two technologies: device presence via Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) and position via optical markers. Surface-guidance was evaluated on both patient orthopedic setup at loading position and surface matching and tracking at treatment isocenter. A phantom evaluation of the consistency and accuracy for Identify SGRT function was performed, including a system consistency test, a translational shift and rotational accuracy test, a pitch and roll accuracy test, a continuous recording test, and an SGRT vs Cone-Beam CT (CBCT) agreement test. RESULTS: 201 patient authentications were verified successfully with palm reader. All patient treatment devices were successfully verified for their presences and positions (indexable devices). The patient real-time orthopedic pose was successfully adjusted to match the reference surface captured at simulation. SGRT-reported shift consistency against couch readout was within (0.1 mm, 0.030). The shift accuracy was within (0.3 mm, 0.10). In continuous recording mode, the maximum variation was 0.2 ± 0.12 mm, 0.030 ± 0.020. The difference between Identify SGRT offset and CBCT was within (1 mm, 10). CONCLUSIONS: This clinical evaluation confirms that Identify accurately functions for patient palm identification and patient treatment device presence and position verification. Overall SGRT consistency and accuracy was within (1 mm, 10), within the 2 mm criteria of AAPM TG302.

Impact of detector selection on commissioning of Leipzig surface applicators with improving immobilization in high-dose-rate brachytherapy.

PURPOSE: Commission and treatment setup of Leipzig surface applicators, because of the steep dose gradient and lack of robust immobilization, is challenging. We aim to improve commissioning reliability by investigating the impact of detector choice on percentage depth dose (PDD) verifications, and to enhance accuracy and reproducibility in calibration/treatment setup through a simple and novel immobilization device. METHODS AND MATERIALS: PDD distributions were measured with radiochromic films, optically stimulated luminescent dosimeters (OSLDs), a diode detector, and both cylindrical and parallel plate ionization chambers. The films were aligned to the applicators in parallel and transverse orientations. PDD data from a benchmarking Monte Carlo (MC) study were compared with the measured results, where surface doses were acquired from extrapolation. To improve setup accuracy and reproducibility, a custom-designed immobilization prototype device was made with cost-effective materials using a 3D printer. RESULTS: The measured PDD data with different detectors had an overall good agreement (<±10%). The parallel plate ionization chamber reported unreliable doses for the smallest applicator. There was no remarkable dose difference between the two film setups. The two-in-one prototype device provided a rigid immobilization and a flexible positioning of the applicator. It enhanced accuracy and reproducibility in calibration and treatment setup. CONCLUSION: We recommend using radiochromic films in the transverse orientation for a reliable and efficient PDD verification. The applicator's clinical applicability has been limited by a lack of robust immobilization. We expect this economical, easy-to-use prototype device can promote the use of Leipzig applicators in surface brachytherapy.