Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
Asunto de la revista
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
JAMA Netw Open ; 6(3): e231723, 2023 03 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36877518

RESUMEN

Background: Patients with cancer seen in rural and underserved areas disproportionately face barriers to access genetic services. Genetic testing is critical to inform treatment decisions, for early detection of another cancer, and to identify at-risk family members who may benefit from screening and prevention. Objective: To examine medical oncologists' genetic testing ordering trends for patients with cancer. Design, Setting, and Participants: This prospective quality improvement study was performed in 2 phases over 6 months between August 1, 2020, and January 31, 2021, at a community network hospital. Phase 1 focused on observation of clinic processes. Phase 2 incorporated peer coaching from cancer genetics experts for medical oncologists at the community network hospital. The follow-up period lasted 9 months. Main Outcomes and Measures: The number of genetic tests ordered was compared between phases. Results: The study included 634 patients (mean [SD] age, 71.0 [10.8] years [range, 39-90 years]; 409 women [64.5%]; 585 White [92.3%]); 353 (55.7%) had breast cancer, 184 (29.0%) had prostate cancer, and 218 (34.4%) had a family history of cancer. Of the 634 patients with cancer, 29 of 415 (7.0%) received genetic testing in phase 1, and 25 of 219 (11.4%) received genetic testing in phase 2. Of the 29 patients who received testing in phase 1, 20 (69.0%) had germline genetic testing; 23 of 25 patients (92.0%) had germline genetic testing in phase 2. Uptake of germline genetic testing increased by 23.0% between phases, but the difference was not statistically significant (P = .06). Uptake of germline genetic testing was highest among patients with pancreatic cancer (4 of 19 [21.1%]) and ovarian cancer (6 of 35 [17.1%]); the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) recommends offering genetic testing to all patients with pancreatic cancer and ovarian cancer. Conclusions and Relevance: This study suggests that peer coaching from cancer genetics experts was associated with an increase in ordering of genetic testing by medical oncologists. Efforts made to (1) standardize gathering of personal and family history of cancer, (2) review biomarker data suggestive of a hereditary cancer syndrome, (3) facilitate ordering tumor and/or germline genetic testing every time NCCN criteria are met, (4) encourage data sharing between institutions, and (5) advocate for universal coverage for genetic testing may help realize the benefits associated with precision oncology for patients and their families seeking care at community cancer centers.


Asunto(s)
Tutoría , Neoplasias Ováricas , Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Médicos , Masculino , Humanos , Femenino , Anciano , Redes Comunitarias , Estudios Prospectivos , Medicina de Precisión , Servicios Genéticos , Hospitales Comunitarios
2.
Head Neck ; 35(10): E292-8, 2013 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22965917

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Fanconi anemia (FA) is a rare autosomal recessive genetic disorder characterized by bone marrow failure and increased risk of cancers including acute myelogenous leukemia and various solid tumors, especially head and neck cancer. Management of head and neck cancer in the setting of FA is complicated by pancytopenia, poor tolerance of chemotherapy, and potentially increased radiosensitivity. There are limited reports on tolerance of radiotherapy (RT) in patients with FA. METHODS: We report a case of a patient with FA who presented with a small oral tongue cancer that was excised. He rapidly developed extensive locoregional recurrence and underwent surgical resection followed by postoperative RT with concurrent cetuximab. RESULTS: Both RT and cetuximab were well tolerated with manageable toxicities. Unfortunately, the patient died of early locoregional disease progression. CONCLUSIONS: RT with concurrent cetuximab was well tolerated and may be an appropriate option in patients with FA. However, many patients have a poor prognosis due to aggressive disease.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/administración & dosificación , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/patología , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/terapia , Anemia de Fanconi/complicaciones , Anemia de Fanconi/terapia , Neoplasias de la Lengua/patología , Neoplasias de la Lengua/terapia , Biopsia con Aguja , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/complicaciones , Cetuximab , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Terapia Combinada , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Anemia de Fanconi/diagnóstico , Resultado Fatal , Humanos , Inmunohistoquímica , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Masculino , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/patología , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/terapia , Cuidados Preoperatorios/métodos , Radioterapia Adyuvante , Cirugía Bucal/métodos , Neoplasias de la Lengua/complicaciones , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA