Pursuing Clinical Predictors and Biomarkers for Progression in ILD: Analysis of the Pulmonary Fibrosis Foundation (PFF) Registry.

INTRODUCTION: Pulmonary fibrosis is a characteristic of various interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) with differing etiologies. Clinical trials in progressive pulmonary fibrosis (PPF) enroll patients based on previously described clinical criteria for past progression, which include a clinical practice guideline for PPF classification and inclusion criteria from the INBUILD trial. In this study, we compared the ability of past FVC (forced vital capacity) progression and baseline biomarker levels to predict future progression in a cohort of patients from the PFF Patient Registry. METHODS: Biomarkers previously associated with pathobiology and/or progression in pulmonary fibrosis were selected to reflect cellular senescence (telomere length), pulmonary epithelium (SP-D, RAGE), myeloid activation (CXCL13, YKL40, CCL18, OPN) and fibroblast activation (POSTN, COMP, PROC3). RESULTS: PFF or INBUILD-like clinical criteria was used to separate patients into past progressor and non-past progressor groups, and neither clinical criterion appeared to enrich for patients with greater future lung function decline. All baseline biomarkers measured were differentially expressed in patient groups compared to healthy controls. Baseline levels of SP-D and POSTN showed the highest correlations with FVC slope over one year, though correlations were low. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings provide further evidence that prior decline in lung function may not predict future disease progression for ILD patients, and elevate the need for molecular definitions of a progressive phenotype. Across ILD subtypes, certain shared pathobiologies may be present based on the molecular profile of certain biomarker groups observed. In particular, SP-D may be a common marker of pulmonary injury and future lung function decline across ILDs.

Isoform-selective TGF-ß3 inhibition for systemic sclerosis.

BACKGROUND: Transforming growth factor ß (TGF-ß) is implicated as a key mediator of pathological fibrosis, but its pleiotropic activity in a range of homeostatic functions presents challenges to its safe and effective therapeutic targeting. There are three isoforms of TGF-ß, TGF-ß1, TGF-ß2, and TGF-ß3, which bind to a common receptor complex composed of TGF-ßR1 and TGF-ßR2 to induce similar intracellular signals in vitro. We have recently shown that the cellular expression patterns and activation thresholds of TGF-ß2 and TGF-ß3 are distinct from those of TGF-ß1 and that selective short-term TGF-ß2 and TGF-ß3 inhibition can attenuate fibrosis in vivo without promoting excessive inflammation. Isoform-selective inhibition of TGF-ß may therefore provide a therapeutic opportunity for patients with chronic fibrotic disorders. METHODS: Transcriptomic profiling of skin biopsies from patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc) from multiple clinical trials was performed to evaluate the role of TGF-ß3 in this disease. Antibody humanization, biochemical characterization, crystallization, and pre-clinical experiments were performed to further characterize an anti-TGF-ß3 antibody. FINDINGS: In the skin of patients with SSc, TGF-ß3 expression is uniquely correlated with biomarkers of TGF-ß signaling and disease severity. Crystallographic studies establish a structural basis for selective TGF-ß3 inhibition with a potent and selective monoclonal antibody that attenuates fibrosis effectively in vivo at clinically translatable exposures. Toxicology studies suggest that, as opposed to pan-TGF-ß inhibitors, this anti-TGF-ß3 antibody has a favorable safety profile for chronic administration. CONCLUSION: We establish a rationale for targeting TGF-ß3 in SSc with a favorable therapeutic index. FUNDING: This study was funded by Genentech, Inc.