Population pharmacokinetic/target engagement modelling of tozorakimab in healthy volunteers and patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

AIMS: This study describes the pharmacokinetic (PK)/target engagement (TE) relationship of tozorakimab, an anti-interleukin (IL)-33 antibody, by building a mechanistic population PK/TE model using phase 1 biomarker data. METHODS: The analysis included tozorakimab PK and TE in serum assessed in 60 tozorakimab-treated participants, including healthy adults and patients with mild chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Scenarios evaluated three dose frequencies (once every 2, 4 or 6 weeks) administered subcutaneously at seven doses of tozorakimab (30, 60, 90, 120, 150, 300 or 600 mg). For each dose, simulations were performed with 5000 virtual individuals to predict systemic TE. Inhibition of IL-33/soluble ST2 (sST2) complex levels at trough PK at steady state was assessed in each dosing scenario. The PK/TE modelling analyses were performed using a nonlinear mixed-effect modelling approach. RESULTS: The final two-compartment PK model with tozorakimab binding IL-33 in the central compartment adequately described the systemic PK and TE of tozorakimab at population and individual levels. The mean PK parameter estimates of absorption rate, central volume of distribution and clearance were 0.48 (90% confidence interval [CI]: 0.40-0.59, 1/day), 12.64 (90% CI: 8.60-18.62, L) and 0.87 (90% CI: 0.65-1.16, L/day), respectively. Consistent with the observed value, tozorakimab bioavailability was 45%. For all three dose frequencies, predicted inhibition of systemic IL-33/sST2 levels was more than 95% at doses greater than 90 mg. CONCLUSIONS: The PK/TE model reliably quantified the relationship between PK and systemic TE of tozorakimab, with potential utility for predicting clinical dose-response relationships and supporting clinical dose selection.

The novel bronchodilator navafenterol: a phase 2a, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial in COPD.

BACKGROUND: Navafenterol (AZD8871) belongs to a new class of bronchodilator, the single-molecule muscarinic antagonist and ß-agonist, developed for the treatment of COPD. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy, pharmacokinetics and safety of navafenterol versus placebo and an active comparator treatment for moderate-to-severe COPD. METHODS: This phase 2a, randomised, multicentre (Germany and UK), double-blind, double-dummy, three-way complete crossover study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03645434) compared 2 weeks' treatment of once-daily navafenterol 600 µg via inhalation with placebo and a fixed-dose combination bronchodilator (umeclidinium/vilanterol (UMEC/VI); 62.5 µg/25 µg) in participants with moderate-to-severe COPD. The primary outcome was change from baseline in trough forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) on day 15. Secondary end-points included change from baseline in peak FEV1; change from baseline in Breathlessness, Cough and Sputum Scale (BCSS); change from baseline in COPD Assessment Tool (CAT); adverse events; and pharmacokinetics. RESULTS: 73 participants were randomised. After 14 days, trough FEV1 was significantly improved with navafenterol compared with placebo (least-squares (LS) mean difference 0.202 L; p<0.0001). There was no significant difference in FEV1 between navafenterol and UMEC/VI (LS mean difference -0.046 L; p=0.075). COPD symptoms (CAT and BCSS) showed significantly greater improvements with both active treatments versus placebo (all p<0.005). Novel objective monitoring (VitaloJAK) showed that cough was reduced with both active treatments compared with placebo. Safety profiles were similar across the treatment groups and no serious adverse events were reported in the navafenterol treatment period. CONCLUSION: Once-daily navafenterol was well tolerated, improved lung function and reduced COPD-related symptoms, similar to an established once-daily fixed-dose combination bronchodilator.

Navafenterol (AZD8871) in patients with COPD: a randomized, double-blind, phase I study evaluating safety and pharmacodynamics of single doses of this novel, inhaled, long-acting, dual-pharmacology bronchodilator.

BACKGROUND: Navafenterol (AZD8871) is a dual-pharmacology muscarinic antagonist ß2-agonist (MABA) molecule in development for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The pharmacodynamics, safety and tolerability of single doses of navafenterol were investigated in patients with moderate to severe COPD. METHODS: This was a randomized, five-way complete cross-over study. Patients received single doses of navafenterol 400 µg, navafenterol 1800 µg and placebo (all double-blind) and indacaterol 150 µg and tiotropium 18 µg (both open-label active comparators). The primary pharmacodynamic endpoint was change from baseline in trough forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) on day 2. Safety and tolerability were monitored throughout. RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients were randomized and 28 (73.7%) completed the study. Navafenterol 400 µg and 1800 µg demonstrated statistically significant improvements vs placebo in change from baseline in trough FEV1 (least squares mean [95% confidence interval]: 0.111 [0.059, 0.163] L and 0.210 [0.156, 0.264] L, respectively, both P < .0001). The changes were significantly greater with navafenterol 1800 µg vs the active comparators (least squares mean treatment difference: 0.065-0.069 L, both P < .05). The frequency of treatment-emergent adverse events was similar for placebo and the active comparators (range 34.4-37.5%), slightly higher for navafenterol 400 µg (52.9%), and lowest for navafenterol 1800 µg (22.6%). CONCLUSIONS: Both doses of navafenterol demonstrated sustained bronchodilation over 24 h. Navafenterol was well tolerated and no safety concerns were raised. TRIAL REGISTRY: ClinicalTrials.gov ; No.: NCT02573155 ; URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov . Registered 9th October, 2015.

Navafenterol (AZD8871) in healthy volunteers: safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of multiple ascending doses of this novel inhaled, long-acting, dual-pharmacology bronchodilator, in two phase I, randomised, single-blind, placebo-controlled studies.

BACKGROUND: Navafenterol (AZD8871) is a novel, long-acting, dual-pharmacology (muscarinic receptor antagonist and ß2-adrenoceptor agonist) molecule in development for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and asthma. METHODS: These two phase I, randomised, single-blind, multiple-ascending-dose studies evaluated inhaled navafenterol and placebo (3:1 ratio) in healthy, male, non-Japanese (study A; NCT02814656) and Japanese (study B; NCT03159442) volunteers. In each study, volunteers were dosed in three cohorts, allowing gradual dose escalation from 300 µg to 600 µg to 900 µg. The primary objective was to investigate the safety and tolerability of navafenterol at steady state. Pharmacokinetics were also assessed. RESULTS: Twenty-four volunteers completed each study (navafenterol, n = 6; placebo, n = 2 in each cohort). There were no deaths, serious adverse events (AEs) or treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) leading to discontinuation of navafenterol. The most frequent TEAEs were vessel puncture-site bruise (placebo, n = 2; navafenterol 900 µg; n = 3) in study A and diarrhoea (placebo, n = 1; navafenterol 300 µg, n = 2; navafenterol 900 µg, n = 3) in study B. No dose-response relationship was observed for TEAEs. There was a dose-dependent increase in mean heart rate on day 16 in both studies. The pharmacokinetics of navafenterol were similar between non-Japanese and Japanese volunteers. CONCLUSIONS: Multiple ascending doses of navafenterol were well-tolerated and the safety and pharmacokinetics of navafenterol were similar in non-Japanese and Japanese volunteers. The findings support navafenterol clinical development. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov ; Nos.: NCT02814656 and NCT03159442; URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov .

Navafenterol (AZD8871) in patients with mild asthma: a randomised placebo-controlled phase I study evaluating the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of single ascending doses of this novel inhaled long-acting dual-pharmacology bronchodilator.

BACKGROUND: Navafenterol (AZD8871) is an inhaled long-acting dual-pharmacology muscarinic antagonist/ß2-adrenoceptor agonist (MABA) in development for the treatment of obstructive airways diseases. The safety, tolerability, pharmacodynamics, and pharmacokinetics of navafenterol were investigated in patients with mild asthma. METHODS: This was a randomised, single-blind, placebo-controlled, single-ascending-dose study. Patients were randomly assigned to one of two cohorts which evaluated escalating doses of navafenterol (50-2100 µg) in an alternating manner over three treatment periods. The primary pharmacodynamic endpoint was the change from pre-dose baseline in trough forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) for each treatment period. RESULTS: Sixteen patients were randomised; 15 completed treatment. Data from all 16 patients were analysed. The maximum tolerated dose was not identified, and all doses of navafenterol were well tolerated. The most frequently reported treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were headache (n = 10, 62.5%) and nasopharyngitis (n = 7, 43.8%). No TEAEs were serious, fatal, or led to discontinuation, and no dose dependency was identified. Navafenterol demonstrated a dose-ordered bronchodilatory response with a rapid onset of action (within 5 min post-dose). Doses ≥200 µg resulted in improvements in trough FEV1 (mean change from baseline range 0.186-0.463 L) with sustained bronchodilation for 24-36 h. Plasma concentrations increased in a dose-proportional manner, peaking ~ 1 h post-dose, with a derived terminal elimination half-life of 15.96-23.10 h. CONCLUSIONS: In this study navafenterol was generally well tolerated with a rapid onset of action which was sustained over 36 h. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT02573155.

Abediterol, a novel long-acting ß2-agonist: bronchodilation, safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetic results from a single-dose, dose-ranging, active-comparator study in patients with COPD.

BACKGROUND: Abediterol is a novel, once-daily long-acting ß2-agonist in development for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and asthma in combination with an anti-inflammatory agent. This Phase IIa, randomised, double-blind, crossover study investigated the bronchodilation, safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of abediterol in patients with moderate to severe COPD. METHODS: Seventy patients (aged ≥40 years, Global initiative for chronic Obstructive Lung Disease Stage II/III) were randomised (1:1:1:1:1:1) to single doses of abediterol 0.625, 2.5, 5 or 10 µg, indacaterol 150 µg or placebo. Spirometry was performed up to 36 h post-dose. Pharmacokinetics were assessed in a subset of patients (N = 20). Safety and tolerability were evaluated throughout the study. RESULTS: Abediterol (all doses) significantly improved change from baseline in trough forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) compared with placebo (0.102, 0.203, 0.233 and 0.259 L for abediterol 0.625, 2.5, 5 and 10 µg, respectively; all p < 0.0001; primary endpoint). Abediterol 2.5, 5 and 10 µg significantly improved trough FEV1 compared with indacaterol 150 µg (0.092, 0.122 and 0.148 L, respectively; all p < 0.0001). Improvements in bronchodilation were maintained at all time points post-dose versus placebo (all abediterol doses) and from 15 or 30 min post-dose versus indacaterol 150 µg with abediterol 2.5, 5 and 10 µg (all p < 0.05). Abediterol had low systemic exposure; incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events was similar between treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: All doses of abediterol (0.625-10 µg) provided clinically and statistically significant, dose-dependent improvements in bronchodilation versus placebo, and abediterol 2.5, 5 and 10 µg gave significant improvements versus indacaterol. All doses of abediterol were safe and well tolerated in patients with COPD. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT01425814 . Registered 29 August 2011.

A Phase 1, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Single Ascending Dose Study to Evaluate the Pharmacokinetics, Immunogenicity, Safety, and Tolerability After Subcutaneous Administration of Tozorakimab in Healthy Chinese Participants.

Tozorakimab is a high-affinity human immunoglobulin G1 monoclonal antibody that neutralizes interleukin (IL)-33, an IL-1 family cytokine. This phase 1, single-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single ascending dose study (NCT05070312) evaluated tozorakimab in a healthy Chinese population. Outcomes included the characterization of the pharmacokinetic (PK) profile and immunogenicity of tozorakimab. Safety outcomes included treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and clinical laboratory, electrocardiogram, and vital sign parameters. Healthy, non-smoking, male, and female Chinese participants aged 18-45 years with a body mass index 19-24 kg/m2 were enrolled. In total, 36 participants across 2 cohorts of 18 participants were randomized 2:1 to receive a single subcutaneous dose of tozorakimab (300 mg [2 mL] or 600 mg [4 mL]) or matching placebo (2 or 4 mL). Tozorakimab showed dose-dependent serum PK concentrations with an approximate monophasic distribution in serum over time and a maximum observed peak concentration of 20.1 and 33.7 µg/mL in the 300- and 600-mg cohorts, respectively. No treatment-emergent anti-drug antibodies for tozorakimab were observed in any of the participants. There were no clinically relevant trends in the occurrence of TEAEs across the treatment groups. There were no clinically relevant trends over time in clinical laboratory (hematology, clinical chemistry, and urinalysis), electrocardiogram, or vital sign parameters in any treatment group. Overall, tozorakimab demonstrated dose-dependent systemic exposure in healthy Chinese participants and was well tolerated, with no safety concerns identified in this study.

A Randomized Phase I Study of the Anti-Interleukin-33 Antibody Tozorakimab in Healthy Adults and Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.

Tozorakimab is a human monoclonal antibody that neutralizes interleukin (IL)-33. IL-33 is a broad-acting epithelial "alarmin" cytokine upregulated in lung tissue of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). This first-in-human, phase I, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study (NCT03096795) evaluated the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PKs), immunogenicity, target engagement, and pharmacodynamics (PDs) of tozorakimab. This was a 3-part study. In part 1, 56 healthy participants with a history of mild atopy received single escalating doses of either intravenous or subcutaneous tozorakimab or placebo. In part 2, 24 patients with mild COPD received multiple ascending doses of subcutaneous tozorakimab or placebo. In part 3, 8 healthy Japanese participants received a single intravenous dose of tozorakimab or placebo. The safety data collected included treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), vital signs, and clinical laboratory parameters. Biological samples for PKs, immunogenicity, target engagement, and PD biomarker analyses were collected. No meaningful differences in the frequencies of TEAEs were observed between the tozorakimab and placebo arms. Three tozorakimab-treated participants with COPD experienced treatment-emergent serious adverse events. Subcutaneous or intravenous tozorakimab demonstrated linear, time-independent PKs with a mean half-life of 11.7-17.3 days. Treatment-emergent anti-drug antibody frequency was low. Engagement of tozorakimab with endogenous IL-33 in serum and nasal airways was demonstrated. Tozorakimab significantly reduced serum IL-5 and IL-13 levels in patients with COPD compared with placebo. Overall, tozorakimab was well tolerated, with a linear, time-independent serum PK profile. Additionally, biomarker studies demonstrated proof of mechanism. Overall, these data support the further clinical development of tozorakimab in COPD and other inflammatory diseases.

The Pharmacokinetics, Safety and Tolerability of Aclidinium Bromide 400 µg Administered by Inhalation as Single and Multiple (Twice Daily) Doses in Healthy Chinese Participants.

Purpose: To date, aclidinium pharmacokinetic (PK) studies have focused on Caucasian populations, and no data are available for Chinese populations. We aimed to characterize the PK and safety profile of aclidinium and its metabolites (LAS34823 and LAS34850) following single and multiple (twice-daily; BID) dosing in healthy Chinese participants, and to compare PK data between Chinese and Caucasian populations. Materials and methods: In this Phase I, open-label study (NCT03276052), healthy participants from a single site in China received aclidinium bromide 400 µg via a dry powder inhaler. The Day 1 single dose was followed by a washout period of 96 hours. On Days 5 through 8, participants received BID doses. Results: Twenty healthy Chinese participants, aged 18-45 years, were enrolled. Aclidinium absorption was rapid (median time to maximum concentration [tmax] 0.08 hours post-dose following single/multiple doses). LAS34823 had a similar median tmax of 0.08 hours, whereas LAS34850 tmax occurred later (median 2.50-3.00 hours). Aclidinium, LAS34823, and LAS34850 concentrations declined in a bi-phasic manner; geometric mean half-life was 13.5 hours (single dosing) and 21.4 hours (multiple dosing), while steady state was generally achieved after 5 days' continuous dosing. Area under the concentration-time curve during a dosage interval (AUCτ) metabolite to parent ratios for LAS34823 were 2.6 (Day 1) and 2.9 (Day 9), while LAS34850 had ratios of 136.0 and 94.8, respectively. Aclidinium accumulation occurred after 5 days of BID dosing (LS mean accumulation ratio for AUCτ Day 9/Day 1: 214.1% [90% CI, 176.5, 259.6]); LAS34823 accumulation was similar, while LAS34850 accumulation was lower. Between-participant exposure variability was moderate to high for aclidinium and LAS34823, and low for LAS34850. Conclusion: Single and multiple doses of aclidinium were well tolerated in healthy Chinese participants. The safety profile of and exposure to aclidinium was consistent with previous studies conducted in Caucasian populations.

Factores de estrés y su asociación con los biomarcadores del síndrome metabólico

Introducción: el síndrome metabólico es considerado como un conjunto de factores de riesgo para desarrollar enfermedades cardiovasculares y diabéticas, en adición a esto, los biomarcadores determinan un diagnóstico del síndrome metabólico. Existen diversos factores que pueden causar el síndrome metabólico, uno de ellos, el estrés, que se concibe como la reacción de un individuo ante eventos o situaciones que exceden los mecanismos de adaptación. Objetivos: explorar la literatura científica existente para identificar y sintetizar los diferentes factores de estrés fisiológico que se han investigado en relación con el síndrome metabólico, y evaluar críticamente la evidencia disponible sobre la asociación entre los factores de estrés identificados y los biomarcadores específicos del síndrome metabólico. Además, realizar un análisis de la calidad metodológica de los estudios incluidos en la revisión para evaluar la validez y la fiabilidad de los resultados obtenidos. Materiales y Métodos: se realizó una revisión sistemática usando bases de datos como PubMed, Redalyc, SciELO y Google Scholar, en donde se incluyeron investigaciones que busquen establecer una relación entre el estrés y los biomarcadores del síndrome metabólico en publicaciones desde enero del 2017 a noviembre del 2022. Se tomaron en cuenta criterios de la Declaración PRISMA. Resultados: se incluyeron un total de 32 artículos, en donde se pudo observar que los biomarcadores del estrés oxidativo que influyen en el padecimiento del síndrome metabólico son diversos y pueden afectar de múltiples formas al ser humano, generando enfermedades como la diabetes, enfermedades cardiovasculares, pulmonares y hasta neuropsicológicas. Conclusiones: los biomarcadores del estrés oxidativo influyen de manera directa en el padecimiento de síndrome metabólico y son identificados como un factor determinante para diagnosticar enfermedades desencadenantes de este síndrome.

Introduction: Metabolic syndrome is considered as a set of risks factors for developing cardiovascular and diabetic diseases. Additionally, biomarkers determine a diagnosis of metabolic syndrome. Several of them can cause metabolic syndrome, and one of them, stress, is conceived as an individual's reaction to events or situations that exceed adaptation mechanisms. Materials and methods: A systematic review was carried out using database such as PubMed, Redalyc, Scielo and Google Scholar, which included research that relates oxidative stress to biomarkers of metabolic syndrome in publications from January 2017 to November 2022. The criteria considered were those of the PRISMA Declaration. Results: A total of 32 articles were included, and it was possible to observe that the biomarkers of oxidative stress that influence the condition of metabolic syndrome are diverse and can affect humans in multiple ways, generating diseases such as diabetes, cardiovascular, pulmonary, and even neuropsychological. Conclusions: Oxidative stress biomarkers have a direct influence on suffering from metabolic syndrome and are identified as a determining factor in diagnosing diseases that trigger this syndrome.

Parto humanizado y la función de enfermería en os establecimientos de salud pública / Humanized delivery and nursing role in public health facilities

Introducción: la humanización del parto asegura el respeto de los derechos fundamentales, reproductivos y sexuales de la gestante y la familia, reduciendo complicaciones perinatales y morbi-mortalidad materno-infantil. Objetivo: Caracterizar el parto humanizado y las funciones de enfermería en los establecimientos de salud pública. Métodos: diseño documental con revisión bibliográfica sobre humanización del parto para lo cual se realizó una búsqueda en bases de datos como: PubMed, Taylor y Francis, LILACS, MEDLINE, BVS, SCIELO, LATINDEX, GOOGLE ACADÉMICO, en idioma español e inglés. Resultados: En base a revisión y análisis de 40 artículos se pudo conocer que el parto humanizado es reconocido mundialmente como una estrategia eficiente para reducir complicaciones perinatales y lograr una maternidad satisfactoria y que a nivel latinoamericano; Brasil, Perú, Argentina, Ecuador, Venezuela y México ya cuentan con iniciativas del sector público, privado y de organizaciones civiles para promocionar parto humanizado, y con ello reducir las tasas de cesáreas, parto instrumentado, morbi-mortalidad materno infantil y lograr una maternidad satisfactoria, segura basada en prácticas no invasivas ni farmacológicas para el alivio del dolor, educación y autorización sobre procedimientos, autonomía, buen trato y respeto por sentimientos y creencias. Conclusiones: En el pato humanizado, el rol de enfermería es esencial sobre todo en los establecimientos públicos en donde se asume maltrato, negligencia o falta de respeto por el parto, por lo que la enfermera está llamada a educar a la parturienta sobre el trabajo de parto y parto. (AU)

Introduction: the humanization of childbirth ensures respect for the fundamental, reproductive and sexual rights of the pregnant woman and the family, reducing perinatal complications and maternal and infant morbidity and mortality. Objective: To characterize humanized delivery and nursing functions in public health establishments. Methods: documentary design with bibliographic review on the humanization of childbirth for which a search was carried out in databases such as: PubMed, Taylor and Francis, LILACS, MEDLINE, BVS, SCIELO, LATINDEX, GOOGLE ACADEMICO, in Spanish and English. Results: Based on a review and analysis of 40 articles, it was possible to know that humanized delivery is recognized worldwide as an efficient strategy to reduce perinatal complications and achieve a satisfactory maternity and that at the Latin American level; Brazil, Peru, Argentina, Ecuador, Venezuela and Mexico already have initiatives from the public and private sectors and civil organizations to promote humanized delivery, and thereby reduce the rates of cesarean sections, instrumented delivery, maternal and infant morbidity and mortality and achieve motherhood, satisfactory, safe based on non-invasive or pharmacological practices for pain relief, education and authorization on procedures, autonomy, good treatment and respect for feelings and beliefs. Conclusions: In the humanized duck, the role of nursing is essential especially in public establishments where abuse, neglect or lack of respect for childbirth is assumed, so the nurse is called to educate the woman in labor about the labor of labor and delivery.

[Analysis of differences in flow-mediated dilation in relation to the treatment of coronary patients]. / Anális de las diferencias encontradas en la dilatación mediada por flugo según la terapia seguida en pacientes con enfermedad coronaria.

INTRODUCTION: Flow-mediated dilation (FMD) is thought to be related to the development of coronary disease. We were interested in knowing the degree of FMD in a large sample of coronary patients in relation to the therapy they were given in clinical practice. PATIENTS AND METHOD: We studied 1,081 coronary patients (age 68 +/- 12 years, 73% male) in which FMD was evaluated in the brachial artery. The patients were classified into 5 treatment groups (416 who receive 2 or more treatments were excluded): group A: 81 controls treated with aspirin, group B: 198 treated with ACE inhibitors, group C: 106 with calcium antagonists, group D: 145 with beta-blockers, and group E: 135 with lipid lowering medication (93% statins). RESULTS: ANOVA was used to analyze the differences between groups. With regard to the number of risk factors present in each group, the patients treated with ACE inhibitors (2.44 +/- 0.79 vs 2.14 +/- 0.89; p < 0.05) and statins (3.45 +/- 0.70 vs 2.14 +/- 0.89; p < 0.05) had more risk factors than GrA and higher levels of LDL-cholesterol (ACE inhibitors 145.0 +/- 33.5 vs 128.5 +/- 32.2 and statins 157.8 +/- 45.3 vs 128.5 +/- 32.2; p < 0.05). GrB had a higher glycemia than controls (123.4 +/- 32.2 vs 114.7 +/- 33.7; p < 0.05). The control group was younger than the therapeutic groups (p < 0.05). Compared with the control group, FMD was significantly higher only in the group treated with ACE inhibitors (3.42 +/- 6.01 vs 0.82 +/- 6.04; p < 0.05). Multivariate logistical regression showed that treatment with ACE inhibitors and statins (p < 0.05) were independent predictors of FMD > 4%. CONCLUSION: Treatment with ACE inhibitors or statins was predictive of the normalization of FMD in coronary patients in clinical practice.

First-in-human study of the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of abediterol (LAS100977), a novel long-acting Β2 -agonist.

Here we report the results of a first-in-human study to evaluate the safety, tolerability pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of abediterol, a new ß2 -adrenergic agonist. Forty-eight healthy males aged 18-45 years received abediterol doses of 5, 10, 25, or 50 µg, or placebo. Safety and tolerability assessments included adverse event reporting, pulse and blood pressure monitoring, 12-lead electrocardiograms, laboratory tests, and physical examination. Pharmacodynamic assessments included whole body plethysmography to determine the bronchodilatory effect by means of airway conductance and resistance. Blood and urine samples were obtained for pharmacokinetic analyses. Abediterol showed an overall good safety and tolerability profile in the dose range tested, consistent with the expected characteristics of a ß2 -adrenergic agonist. A dose-dependent increase of systemic treatment-emergent adverse events was observed, the most frequent being palpitations, tremor, nausea, and asthenia; most were mild in intensity and resolved without the need for intervention. Improvements in airway conductance (increase) and resistance (decrease) were greater for all doses of abediterol tested compared with placebo at all time-points up to 36 hours. This first-in-human study suggests a potent, rapid, and sustained bronchodilatory effect of abediterol in healthy male subjects. Lower doses are currently under investigation in patients with asthma and in patients with COPD.

Análisis de las diferencias encontradas en la dilatación mediada por flujo según la terapia seguida en pacientes con enfermedad coronaria / Analysis of differences in flow-mediated dilation in relation to the treatment of coronary patients

Introducción. La dilatación mediada por flujo (DMF) ha sido propuesta como un marcador de enfermedad coronaria. Nuestro objetivo ha sido conocer el grado de DMF en una muestra amplia de enfermos coronarios según la terapia seguida en la práctica clínica. Pacientes y método. Estudiamos a 1.081 pacientes coronarios (edad 68 ñ 12; 73 por ciento varones) en los que se evaluó la DMF braquial. Según el tratamiento, los pacientes fueron clasificados en 5 grupos (fueron excluidos 416 pacientes con 2 terapias): grupo A, 81 controles tratados con aspirina; grupo B, 198 con IECA; grupo C, 106 con antagonistas del calcio; grupo D, 145 con bloqueadores beta, y grupo E, 135 tratados con fármacos hipolipemiantes (93 por ciento estatinas).Resultados. Mediante ANOVA se analizaron las diferencias entre grupos. Respecto al número de factores de riesgo, los pacientes en tratamiento con IECA (2,44 ñ 0,79 frente a 2,14 ñ 0,89; p 4 por ciento. Conclusión. El tratamiento con IECA o estatinas es predictor de una mejor dilatación mediada por flujo en pacientes coronarios en la práctica clínica (AU)